Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:42:34.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender and Age in Funerary Practices in the Ceramic Periods in Central Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2020

Lorena Sanhueza Open the ORCID record for Lorena Sanhueza [Opens in a new window]
Lorena Sanhueza*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Antropología, Universidad de Chile, Ignacio Carrera Pinto 1045, Ñuñoa, SantiagoChile Email: loresan@uchile.cl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Ceramic Periods in central Chile are a scenario of major changes in mobility and subsistence systems, associated with the incorporation of cultigens as the basis of subsistence. In this paper, we present a study of the funerary contexts of the Ceramic Periods in central Chile in order to assess whether in this scenario, generally considered very significant in the low-scale societies studied here, gender categories were constructed or signified, and how this changed over time. The results of the analysis suggest that gender categorization was not always important in this scenario. Among Llolleo groups, the offerings associated with females and children suggest their relation with production spheres; in Bato groups, on the other hand, age categories seem to be more important. In the Late Intermediate Period, it is the collective aspect that appears to be stressed in the funerary contexts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , August 2020 , pp. 367 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Århem, K., 1981. Makuna Social Organization. A Study in descent, alliance and the formation of corporate groups in the north-western Amazon. (Uppsala Studies in Cultural Anthropology 4.) Uppsala: Academiae Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Bellelli, C., Berón, M. & Scheinsohn, V., 1993. Una arqueología de distinto género [An archaeology of different gender]. Publicar en Antropología y Ciencias Sociales 2(3), 47–61.Google Scholar
Berdichewsky, B., 1964. Informe preliminar de las excavaciones arqueológicas de Con Con [Preliminary report of archaeological excavations in Con Con]. Revista Antropología Año II, Vol. II, 65–86. Centro de Estudios Antropológicos, Universidad de Chile.Google Scholar
Boccara, G., 2007. Los vencedores. Historia del Pueblo Mapuche en la Época Colonial (trans. from Milos, French D.) [The victors. History of the Mapuche in colonial times]. Santiago: Línea Editorial IIAM.Google Scholar
Bowser, B., 2000. From pottery to politics: an ethnoarchaeologicla study of political factionalism, ethnicity, and domestic pottery style in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7(3), 219–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfiel, E., 1991. Weaving and cooking: women's production in Aztec Mexico, in Engendering Archaeology: Women and prehistory, eds Gero, J.M. & Conkey, M.W.. Oxford: Blackwell, 224–51.Google Scholar
Cartajena, I., Trejo, V. & Sanhueza, L., 2010. Camélidos en contextos funerarios: entierro de un individuo contenido en una carcasa de camélido (Agroalfarero Temprano, Chile central) [Camelids in funerary contexts: burial of an individual in a camelid carcass], in Zooarqueología a Principios del Siglo XXI: Aportes Teóricos, Metodológicos y Casos de Estudio [Zooarchaeology at the beginning of the 21st century: theoretical and methodological aspects, and case studies], eds Gutiérrez, M.A., De Nigris, M., Fernández, P.M., et al. . Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Espinillo, 7–16.Google Scholar
Claassen, C. & Joyce, R.A. (eds), 1997. Women in Prehistory. North America and Mesoamerica. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Conkey, M.W. & Spector, J.D., 1984. Archaeology and the study of gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 7, 1–38.Google Scholar
Costin, C.L., 1996. Exploring the relationship between gender and craft in complex societies: methodological and theoretical issues of gender attribution, in Gender and Archaeology, ed. Wright, R.. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press, 111–40.Google Scholar
Crown, P.L. (ed.), 2000. Women & Men in the Prehispanic Southwest. Labor, power & prestige. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Descola, P., 1996. La Selva Culta. Simbolismo y praxis en la ecología de los Achuar (3rd edn) (trans. from Carrera Colin, French J. & Catta Quelen, X.) [In the society of nature. A native ecology in Amazonia]. (Colección Pueblos del Ecuador 3.) Quito: Ediciones Abya Yala.Google Scholar
Durán, E. & Planella, M.T., 1989. Consolidación agroalfarera: zona central (900 a 1470 d.C.) [Agricultural and ceramic consolidation: the central area (900–1470 AD)], in Prehistoria. Desde sus orígenes hasta los albores de la conquista [Prehistory. From its origin to the dawn of the conquest], eds Hidalgo, J., Schiappacasse, V., Niemeyer, H., Aldunate, C. & Solimano, I.. Santiago: Editorial Andrés Bello, 313–28.Google Scholar
Durán, E., Rodríguez, A. & González, C., 1999. El Paso del Buey: cementerio de túmulos Aconcagua en la cuesta de Chacabuco (Chile Central) [Paso del Buey: a mound cemetery in the Chacabuco slope (Central Chile)]. Chungara 31, 29–48.Google Scholar
Esched, V., Gopher, A., Galili, E. & Hershkovitz, I., 2004. Musculoskeletal stress markers in Natufian hunter-gatherers and Neolithic farmers in the Levant: the upper limb. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 123, 303–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falabella, F. 2003. Las identidades en el mundo prehispano de Chile central [Identities in the pre-Hispanic world of central Chile], in Revisitando Chile: identidades, mitos e historias [Revisiting Chile: identities, myths and histories], ed. Montecinos, S.. Santiago: Publicaciones del Bicentenario, 297–303.Google Scholar
Falabella, F., Planella, M.T., Aspillaga, E., Sanhueza, L. & Tykot, R.H., 2007. Dieta en sociedades alfareras de Chile central: aporte de análisis de isótopos estables [Diet in pottery-making societies from central Chile: the contribution of stable isotope analyses]. Chungara Revista de Antropología Chilena 39(1), 5–27.Google Scholar
Falabella, F., Planella, M.T. & Tykot, R.H., 2008. El maíz (Zea mays) en el mundo prehispánico de Chile central [Maize (Zea mays) in the pre-Hispanic world of central Chile]. Latin American Antiquity 19(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falabella, F., Pavlovic, D., Planella, M.T. & Sanhueza, L., 2016. Diversidad y heterogeneidad cultural y social en Chile central durante los períodos Alfarero Temprano e Intermedio tardío [Social and cultural diversity and heterogenity in the Early Ceramic periods and Late Intermediate period in central Chile], in Prehistoria en Chile. Desde sus primeros habitantes hasta los Incas [Prehistory in Chile. From its first inhabitants to the Incas], eds. Falabella, F., Uribe, M., Sanhueza, L., Aldunate, C. & Hidalgo, J.. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria, 365–99.Google Scholar
Gero, J.M. & Conkey, M.W., 1991. Engendering Archaeology: Women and prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gero, J. & Scattolin, C., 2002. Beyond complementary and hierarchy: new definitions for archaeological gender relations, in In Pursuit of Gender. Worldwide archaeological approaches, eds. Nelson, S.M. & Rosen-Ayalon, M.. Walnut Creek (CA): Altamira Press, 155–71.Google Scholar
Ghisleni, L., Jordan, A.M. & Fioccoprile, E., 2016. Introduction to ‘binary binds’: deconstructing sex and gender dichotomies in archaeological practice. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23, 765–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godelier, M., 1979. The appropriation of nature. Critique of Anthropology 4, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, B., 2009. Funerals as feasts: why are they so important? Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernando, A., 2002. Arqueología de la Identidad [The archaeology of identity]. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.Google Scholar
Hernando, A., 2010. Gender, individualization, and affine/consanguineal relationships in ‘egalitarian societies’: the Awá-Guajá case, in Situating Gender in European Archaeologies, eds Dommasnes, L.H., Hjørungdal, T., Montón-Subías, S., Sánchez Romero, M. & Wicker, N.L.. Budapest: Archaeolingua Alapítvány, 283–306.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1984. Burials, houses, women and men in the European Neolithic, in Ideology, Power and Prehistory, eds Miller, D. & Tilley, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 51–68.Google Scholar
Jordan, A.M., 2016. Her mirror, his sword: unbinding binary gender and sex assumptions in Iron Age British mortuary traditions. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23, 870–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R.A., 2009. Ancient Bodies, Ancient Lives. Sex, gender and archaeology. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Leacock, E., 1978. Women's status in egalitarian society: implications for social evolution. Current Anthropology 19(2), 247–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meillassoux, C., 1977. Mujeres, Graneros y Capitales. Economía Doméstica y Capitalismo (7th edn) [Women, barns, and capital. Domestic economy and capitalism]. México: Editorial Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Navarrete, R., 2010. Excavando mujeres en y desde el sur: aproximaciones a la arqueología feminista en Latinoamerica [Excavating women in and from the south: approaches to a feminist archaeology in Latin America]. Revista Venezolana de Estudios de la Mujer 15(34), 75–104.Google Scholar
Nuñez de Pineda y Bascuñan, F., 2001. Cautiverio Feliz (crit. edn Fereccio P, M.. & Kordic, R.) [A happy captivity]. Santiago: RIL Editores.Google Scholar
Ortner, S., 1974. Is female to male as nature is to culture?, in Woman, Culture, and Society, eds Rosaldo, M.Z. & Lamphere, L.. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press, 68–87.Google Scholar
Ortner, S., 1989–1990. Gender hegemonies. Cultural Critique 14 (Winter), 35–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., 1982. Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnoarchaeological study, in Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., 2000. The Archaeology of Death and Burial. College Station (TX): Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Piqué, R., Vila, A., Berihuete, M., et al. , 2008. El mito de la ‘Edad de Piedra’: los recursos olvidados [The ‘Stone Age’ myth: the forgotten resources], in Mujeres y arqueología. Nuevas Aportaciones Desde el Materialismo Histórico [Women and archaeology: New contributions from historical materialism], eds Escoriza, T., López, M.J. & Navarro, A.. Granada: Junta de Andalucía, 59–103.Google Scholar
Planella, M.T., 1988. La propiedad territorial indígena en la Cuenca de Rancagua a fines del siglo XVI y comienzos del XVII [Indigenous Territorial Property in the Rancagua Basin at the End of the 16th Century and the Beginning of the 17th]. Masters thesis, Universidad de Chile.Google Scholar
Planella, M.T. & Falabella, F., 2008. Chile prehispano: un acercamiento a la mujer desde los estudios arqueológicos de Chile central [Prehispanic Chile: an approach to women from the archaeological studies in central Chile], in Mujeres Chilenas. Fragmentos de una Historia [Chilean women. Fragments of a history], ed. Montecinos, S.. Santiago: Editorial Catalonia/Cátedra Unesco/CIEG Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Chile, 23–30.Google Scholar
Planella, M.T., Falabella, F., Belmar, C. & Quiroz, L., 2014. Huertos, chacras y sementeras. Plantas cultivadas y su participación en los desarrollos culturales de Chile central [Gardens, farms and seedlings. Cultivated plants and their participation in the cultural developments of central Chile]. Revista Española de Antropología Americana 44(2), 495–522.Google Scholar
Robb, J. & Harris, O.J.T., 2018. Becoming gendered in European prehistory: was Neolithic gender fundamentally different? American Antiquity 83(1), 128–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, M., 1974. Woman, culture and society: a theoretical overview, in Woman, Culture and Society, eds Rosaldo, M. & Lamphere, L.. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press, 17–42.Google Scholar
Rosengren, D., 1987. In the Eyes of the Beholder. Leadership and the social construction of power and dominance among the Matsigenka of the Peruvian Amazon. (Etnologiska Studier 39.) Gothenburg: Göteborgs Etnografiska Museum.Google Scholar
Sanahuja, M.E., 2002. Cuerpos sexuados, objetos y prehistoria [Sexed bodies, objects and prehistory]. Valencia: Ediciones Cátedra, Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Sánchez, R., 1993. Prácticas mortuorias como producto de sistemas simbólicos [Burial practices as outcomes of symbolic systems]. Boletín Museo Regional de la Araucanía 4, 263–78.Google Scholar
Sánchez, R., 1995. Cultura material, arte, monumentos y cuerpos en el espacio. Prácticas mortuorias del complejo cultural Aconcagua [Material culture, art, monuments and bodies in space. Funerary practices of the Aconcagua cultural complex]. Hombre y Desierto 9, 281–90.Google Scholar
Sanhueza, L., 2016. Comunidades prehispanas de Chile central. Organización e Ideología (0–1200 d.C.) [Prehispanic communities of central Chile. Organization and ideology (0–1200 AD)]. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C., 1982. Ideology, symbolic power and ritual communication: a reinterpretation of Neolithic mortuary practices, in Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 129–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, J., 1964. Investigaciones arqueológicas en la costa de la zona central de Chile, una síntesis cronológica [Archaeological research in the coast of Central Chile, a chronological synthesis]. Arqueología de Chile central y áreas vecinas. III Congreso Internacional de Arqueología Chilena. Santiago, 263–73.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J., 1997a. Age and gender at the site of Tiszapolgar-Basatanya, Hungary. Antiquity 71, 875–89.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J., 1997b. Linking age and gender as social variables. Ethnographisch-Archäologische Zeitschrift 38 (3&4), 485–93.Google Scholar
Sofaer, J., 1998. Engendering children, engendering archaeology, in Invisible People and Processes, eds Moore, J. & Scott, E.. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 192–202.Google Scholar
Soto, M., 2018. Explotación de camélidos durante el Período Intermedio tardío en la Cuenca del Maipo-Mapocho [Camelid exploitation in the late Intermediate period in the Maipo-Mapocho basin]. Undergraduate thesis, Universidad de Chile.Google Scholar
Stratton, S., 2016. ‘Seek and you shall find.’ How the analysis of gendered patterns in archaeology can create false binaries: a case study from Durankulak. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23, 854–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Rouff, C., 2011. Piercing the body. Labret use, identity and masculinity in prehistoric Chile, in Breathing New Life into the Evidence of Death: New approaches to bioarchaeology, eds Baadsgaard, A., Boutin, A. & Buikstra, J.E.. Santa Fe (NM): SAR Press, 153–78.Google Scholar
Williams, V. & Alberti, B. (eds), 2005. Género y etnicidad en la Arqueología Sudamericana [Gender and ethnicity in South American archaeology]. (Serie Teórica 4.) Olavarría: INCUAPA/UNICEN.Google Scholar
Wolf, E., 1987. Europa y la Gente sin Historia [Europe and the people without history]. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Wylie, A., 1991. Gender theory and the archaeological record: why is there no archaeology of gender?, in Engendering Archaeology. Women and prehistory, eds Gero, J.M. & Conkey, M.W.. Oxford: Blackwell, 31–54.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sanhueza supplementary material

Sanhueza supplementary material

Download Sanhueza supplementary material(File)
File 18.3 KB