Abstract
Objective
In humans and other species, winning or losing a competition elicits changes in testosterone that may influence engagement or performance in subsequent competitive events. Furthermore, anticipating or observing competition can change mood and testosterone, suggesting that cognitions surrounding competitive events may at least partially drive specific physiological and emotional responses. In the present study, we investigated the effect of imagined competition on mood and testosterone in women.
Methods
Participants (62 women) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions (high-investment win, high-investment loss, low-investment win, low-investment loss) and were asked to imagine and write about experiencing both the competition and its outcome. Salivary testosterone levels and self-reported mood were assessed before and after the competitive cognition task.
Results
Although imagining a competitive scenario was not salient enough to elicit significant changes in testosterone, imagining a high-investment competition and imagining a win each significantly increased feelings of self-assurance. Participants were more likely to write about their motivation to compete again when imagining a loss than when imagining a win, but testosterone did not predict including content about competing again.
Conclusions
Visualizing oneself winning a contest of personal importance increased feelings of self-assurance in the absence of a testosterone response in women. Future research is needed to determine how the combination of positive mental imagery and physical competition could influence mood and testosterone, and whether self-assurance induced by mental imagery can increase the chance of future victories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarado, L. C., Muller, M. N., Eaton, M. A., & Thompson, M. E. (2018). Steroid hormone reactivity in fathers watching their children compete. Human Nature, 29(3), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-018-9318-2.
Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.007.
Bernhardt, P. C., Dabbs Jr., J. M., Fielden, J. A., & Lutter, C. D. (1998). Testosterone changes during vicarious experiences of winning and losing among fans at sporting events. Physiology & Behavior, 65(1), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00147-4.
Carré, J. M., & Olmstead, N. A. (2015). Social neuroendocrinology of human aggression: Examining the role of competition-induced testosterone dynamics. Neuroscience, 286, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.11.029.
Carre, J. M., & Putnam, S. K. (2010). Watching a previous victory produces an increase in testosterone among elite hockey players. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(3), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.09.011.
Casanova, N., Palmeira-de-Oliveira, A., Pereira, A., Crisóstomo, L., Travassos, B., & Costa, A. M. (2016). Cortisol, testosterone and mood state variation during an official female football competition. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 56(6), 775–781.
Casto, K. V., & Edwards, D. A. (2016). Testosterone, cortisol, and human competition. Hormones and Behavior, 82, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.04.004.
Casto, K. V., & Mehta, P. H. (2019). Competition, dominance, and social hierarchy. In Lisa L. M. Welling & Todd K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology and behavioral endocrinology (pp. 295–315). Oxford University Press.
Casto, K. V., & Prasad, S. (2017). Recommendations for the study of women in hormones and competition research. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.05.009.
Casto, K. V., Rivell, A., & Edwards, D. A. (2017). Competition-related testosterone, cortisol, and perceived personal success in recreational women athletes. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.05.006.
Casto, K. V., Edwards, D. A., Akinola, M., Davis, C., & Mehta, P. H. (2020). Testosterone reactivity to competition and competitive endurance in men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 123, 104665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104665.
Cook, C. J., & Crewther, B. T. (2012). The effects of different pre-game motivational interventions on athlete free hormonal state and subsequent performance in professional rugby union matches. Physiology & Behavior, 106(5), 683–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.05.009.
Costa, R., & Salvador, A. (2012). Associations between success and failure in a face-to-face competition and psychobiological parameters in young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(11), 1780–1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.03.012.
Crewther, B. T., & Cook, C. J. (2018). A longitudinal analysis of salivary testosterone concentrations and competitiveness in elite and non-elite women athletes. Physiology & Behavior, 188, 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.012.
Dekkers, T. J., van Rentergem, J. A. A., Meijer, B., Popma, A., Wagemaker, E., & Huizenga, H. M. (2019). A meta-analytical evaluation of the dual-hormone hypothesis: Does cortisol moderate the relationship between testosterone and status, dominance, risk taking, aggression, and psychopathy? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 96, 250–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.004.
Edwards, D. A., & Casto, K. V. (2013). Women’s intercollegiate athletic competition: Cortisol, testosterone, and the dual-hormone hypothesis as it relates to status among teammates. Hormones and Behavior, 64(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.03.003.
Edwards, D. A., & Casto, K. V. (2015). Baseline cortisol moderates testosterone reactivity to women’s intercollegiate athletic competition. Physiology & Behavior, 142, 48–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.01.037.
Edwards, D. A., & O’Neal, J. L. (2009). Oral contraceptives decrease saliva testosterone but do not affect the rise in testosterone associated with athletic competition. Hormones and Behavior, 56(2), 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.01.008.
Fuxjager, M. J., Oyegbile, T. O., & Marler, C. A. (2011). Independent and additive contributions of postvictory testosterone and social experience to the development of the winner effect. Endocrinology, 152(9), 3422–3429. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2011-1099.
Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond power calculations: Assessing type S (sign) and type M (magnitude) errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642.
Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Department of Statistics, Columbia University.
Geniole, S. N., & Carré, J. M. (2018). Human social neuroendocrinology: Review of the rapid effects of testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 104, 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.06.001.
Geniole, S. N., Busseri, M. A., & McCormick, C. M. (2013). Testosterone dynamics and psychopathic personality traits independently predict antagonistic behavior towards the perceived loser of a competitive interaction. Hormones and Behavior, 64(5), 790–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.09.005.
Geniole, S. N., Bird, B. M., Ruddick, E. L., & Carré, J. M. (2016). Effects of competition outcome on testosterone concentrations in humans: An updated meta-analysis. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.10.002.
Geniole, S. N., Bird, B. M., McVittie, J. S., Purcell, R. B., Archer, J., & Carré, J. M. (2020). Is testosterone linked to human aggression? A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between baseline, dynamic, and manipulated testosterone on human aggression. Hormones and Behavior, 123, 104644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104644.
Gleason, E. D., Fuxjager, M. J., Oyegbile, T. O., & Marler, C. A. (2009). Testosterone release and social context: When it occurs and why. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 30(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.04.009.
Goldey, K. L., & van Anders, S. M. (2011). Sexy thoughts: Effects of sexual cognitions on testosterone, cortisol, and arousal in women. Hormones and Behavior, 59(5), 754–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.12.005.
Goldey, K. L., & van Anders, S. M. (2012). Sexual thoughts: Links to testosterone and cortisol in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(6), 1461–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9858-6.
Goldey, K. L., Avery, L. R., & van Anders, S. M. (2014). Sexual fantasies and gender/sex: A multimethod approach with quantitative content analysis and hormonal responses. Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 917–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.798611.
Hamilton, L. D., van Anders, S. M., Cox, D. N., & Watson, N. V. (2009). The effect of competition on salivary testosterone in elite female athletes. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 4(4), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.4.4.538.
Hanek, K. J., Garcia, S. M., & Tor, A. (2016). Gender and competitive preferences: The role of competition size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1122–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000112.
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664.
Hsu, Y., & Wolf, L. L. (1999). The winner and loser effect: Integrating multiple experiences. Animal Behaviour, 57(4), 903–910. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.1049.
Jiménez, M., Aguilar, R., & Alvero-Cruz, J. R. (2012). Effects of victory and defeat on testosterone and cortisol response to competition: Evidence for same response patterns in men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(9), 1577–1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.02.011.
Losecaat Vermeer, A. B., Krol, I., Gausterer, C., Wagner, B., Eisenegger, C., & Lamm, C. (2020). Exogenous testosterone increases status-seeking motivation in men with unstable low social status. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 113, 104552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104552.
Mazur, A. (1985). A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Social Forces, 64(2), 377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578647.
Mehta, P. H., & Josephs, R. A. (2006). Testosterone change after losing predicts the decision to compete again. Hormones and Behavior, 50(5), 684–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.001.
Mehta, P. H., & Prasad, S. (2015). The dual-hormone hypothesis: A brief review and future research agenda. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.008.
Mehta, P. H., Jones, A. C., & Josephs, R. A. (2008). The social endocrinology of dominance: Basal testosterone predicts cortisol changes and behavior following victory and defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 1078–1093. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1078.
Mehta, P. H., van Son, V., Welker, K. M., Prasad, S., Sanfey, A. G., Smidts, A., & Roelofs, K. (2015). Exogenous testosterone in women enhances and inhibits competitive decision-making depending on victory/defeat experience and trait dominance. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 60, 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.07.004.
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2011). Gender and competition. Annual Review of Economics, 3(1), 601–630. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125122.
Oliveira, R. F. (2009). Social behavior in context: Hormonal modulation of behavioral plasticity and social competence. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 49(4), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icp055.
Oliveira, T., Gouveia, M. J., & Oliveira, R. F. (2009). Testosterone responsiveness to winning and losing experiences in female soccer players. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(7), 1056–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.02.006.
Salvador, A. (2005). Coping with competitive situations in humans. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29(1), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.07.004.
Salvador, A., Costa, R., Hidalgo, V., & González-Bono, E. (2017). Causal attribution and psychobiological response to competition in young men. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.04.004.
Schultheiss, O. C., Campbell, K. L., & McClelland, D. C. (1999). Implicit power motivation moderates men’s testosterone responses to imagined and real dominance success. Hormones and Behavior, 36(3), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.1999.1542.
Stanton, S. J., Beehner, J. C., Saini, E. K., Kuhn, C. M., & LaBar, K. S. (2009). Dominance, politics, and physiology: Voters’ testosterone changes on the night of the 2008 United States presidential election. PLoS One, 4(10), e7543. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007543.
Taylor, S. E. (2011). Envisioning the future and self-regulation. In M. Bar (Ed.), Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future (pp. 134–143). New York: Oxford University Press.
Tenney, E. R., Logg, J. M., & Moore, D. A. (2015). (too) optimistic about optimism: The belief that optimism improves performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(3), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000018.
van Anders, S. M., Goldey, K. L., & Kuo, P. X. (2011). The steroid/peptide theory of social bonds: Integrating testosterone and peptide responses for classifying social behavioral contexts. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36(9), 1265–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.06.001.
van Anders, S. M., Tolman, R. M., & Volling, B. L. (2012). Baby cries and nurturance affect testosterone in men. Hormones and Behavior, 61(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.09.012.
van Anders, S. M., Goldey, K. L., & Bell, S. N. (2014). Measurement of testosterone in human sexuality research: Methodological considerations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0123-z.
van Anders, S. M., Steiger, J., & Goldey, K. L. (2015). Effects of gendered behavior on testosterone in women and men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(45), 13805–13810. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509591112.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule - expanded form. University of Iowa.
Widmann, M. (2019). The winner effect in female athletes [Unpublished undergraduate honors thesis]. St. Edward's University
Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty, A. M., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”: Theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. The American Naturalist, 136(6), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1086/285134.
Zilioli, S., & Bird, B. M. (2017). Functional significance of men’s testosterone reactivity to social stimuli. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 47, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.06.002.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ana Chavez, Cara Dahlhausen, Nico Mercado, and Jeheli Odidi for assistance with data collection.
Funding
This research was supported in part by a Small Research Grant from the Society for Personality and Social Psychology and by an Emma Lou Linn Faculty-Student Research Grant from St. Edward’s University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This research complied with all laws of the country in which it was performed (United States of America). All human studies were approved by the University’s Institutional Review Board and therefore have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All participants provided informed consent prior to participation in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Prompts for High Investment Conditions
Take a moment to think about an activity in your life that you are invested in. This could be related to art, performance, sports, academia, or your work. Imagine a scenario in which you have entered a competition centered around this activity. You have spent a lot of time and energy preparing for this competition and are emotionally invested in the outcome. Take some time to explore this scenario. Consider the hope of winning the competition as well as gaining the merit and recognition that would come with it.
-
1.
Describe the activity that you imagined (art, performance, sports, academia, work, etc.) and its significance in your life.
-
2.
Describe your process of preparing or practicing for the competition and how you feel during this process.
-
3.
Describe how you feel on the day of the competition as the contest is about to begin.
-
4.
Describe the setting of the competition: What is the location? Who else is present?
-
5.
Describe the events that occur during the competition itself.
-
6.
Describe your feelings as you are awaiting the outcome (e.g. results of a competition or final score of a game, etc.).
High Investment Win
Now imagine that this long-awaited competition has passed and you receive a notification of the results. You have won the competition and are congratulated for your performance.
-
7.
Describe how you feel when you find out you have won the competition and are congratulated.
-
8.
After finding out you have won, what will you do next?
-
9.
Please describe any other details and/or aspects of the situation not included in your responses to the above questions.
High Investment Loss
Now imagine that this long-awaited competition has passed and you receive a notification of the results. Unfortunately, you have not placed in the competition and will not reap any external reward for participating.
-
7.
Describe how you feel when you find out you have not placed in the competition and will not reap any reward.
-
8.
After finding out you have not placed, what will you do next?
-
9.
Please describe any other details and/or aspects of the situation not included in your responses to the above questions.
Prompts for Low Investment Conditions
Take a moment to imagine yourself going about a regular day of errands, with nothing extraordinary happening. After completing your grocery shopping, you are greeted by the clerk at the counter. You spark up a friendly conversation and are informed that today, the store is holding a customer appreciation raffle for fifty dollars cash in which you are automatically entered. The raffle drawing will be held later this evening. Take some time to explore this scenario. Consider how you feel about the prospect of an unexpected fifty dollars.
-
1.
Describe your process of running errands and how you feel during this process.
-
2.
Describe how you feel at the grocery store as you complete your shopping.
-
3.
Describe the setting of the grocery store: What is the store like? Who else is present?
-
4.
Describe the events that occur as you talk to the grocery clerk and find out about the raffle.
-
5.
Describe how you imagined spending the fifty dollars in the event that you won the raffle and what the significance of winning the raffle would be.
-
6.
Describe your feelings as you are awaiting the results.
Low Investment Win
Now imagine that the store has done the raffle drawing and you receive notification of the results. You have won the fifty dollars and are congratulated.
-
7.
Describe how you feel when you find out you have won the raffle and are congratulated.
-
8.
After finding out you have won, what will you do next?
-
9.
Please describe any other details and/or aspects of the situation not included in your responses to the above questions.
Low Investment Loss
Now imagine that the raffle drawing has passed and you receive notification of the results. Unfortunately, you have not won the raffle for fifty dollars or any associated prizes.
-
7.
Describe how you feel when you find out you have not won the raffle and will not reap any reward.
-
8.
After finding out you have not won, what will you do next?
-
9.
Please describe any other details and/or aspects of the situation not included in your responses to the above questions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gray, J.M., Montemayor, E., Drennan, M. et al. A Mental Winner Effect? Competitive Mental Imagery Impacts Self-Assurance but not Testosterone in Women. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 6, 467–489 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-020-00149-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-020-00149-x