Just opt in: How choosing to engage with technology impacts business students’ academic performance
Introduction
There is an increasing focus on retention and success in higher education that has prompted educators to consider the integration of technology into university teaching environments in a bid to enhance student engagement (Bharucha, 2017, Luthans et al., 2016, Olelewe et al., 2019). Aptly, much of this emphasis on retention translates to academic and non-academic interventions in first year classrooms and other introductory learning environments. Indeed, student engagement1 has long been recognized as a challenge facing first-year students, as the transition to university life can be difficult (Berger and Milem, 1999, Pascarella et al., 1986, Tinto, 1987, Upcraft et al., 2004). Often, it is non-academic interventions that influence a student’s chances of success and retention beyond their first year of study (Chemers, Hu, & Garcia, 2001). Therefore, faced with this challenge, higher education professionals are using technology increasingly in a bid to increase student engagement (Chen et al., 2010, Kearsley and Shneiderman, 1998).
With the growing confluence of technology and higher education practice, gamification is becoming increasingly popular in higher education learning environments (Clark and Barbour, 2015, Kapp, 2012, Overland, 2017), but also within business studies more specifically (Jakubowski, 2014, Poole et al., 2014, Reiners and Wood, 2015). Indeed, there is growing evidence that the effective use of technology in blended learning initiatives, such as gamification, can influence student retention (Olelewe et al., 2019) and combat low levels of student engagement (Arbaugh, 2000, Bharucha, 2017, Luthans et al., 2016). Specifically, students respond well to gamification designs (that is, using game-based principles when designing non-game activities), enjoyed being able to earn badges, and reported a strong desire to use the technology (Denny, 2013).
However, the nature of the technology is changing, and while researchers have undertaken considerable exploration of the efficacy of computer-aided learning tools more generally, the corpus has suffered from a dearth of research that focuses on mobile apps specifically (used, for example, on smartphones). In addition, and anecdotally, our own observations of students in the introductory level compulsory courses in Accounting, as well as in Management, at a New Zealand university suggested that student engagement levels were low. Therefore, to empirically diagnose and solve this issue, we undertook this study with the aim to compare the efficacy of gamification, delivered via a mobile app, Quitch,2 as a tool to enhance student engagement and academic performance (grades) in two first-year, compulsory,3 business higher education courses.4 We used a range of learning activities, and a mobile gamification app, to send out quizzes and short surveys to students in both courses – in Accounting, and in Management – throughout the semester. To interpret our results, we combine flow theory (Shernoff, Csikszentmihalyi, Schneider, & Shernoff, 2014) as conceptual underpinning with technology as an engagement tool, using a model of engagement (van der Meer, Scott, & Pratt, 2018). Thus, this paper answers the call for further research on the influence of mobile app and gamification technologies on student retention (Pechenkina, Laurence, Oates, Eldridge, & Hunter, 2017) and examines this important phenomenon within a business school setting.
This research is important to capture and understand what is happening in universities where educators are increasingly turning to technology to enhance engagement. The business school where this study takes place is part of a sizable and reputable New Zealand university. The university is regionally unique as there is a large proportion of domestic students with a high proportion of first-year students living on campus in residential colleges5 (Quick Stats, nd). In 2017, there were approximately 18,200 equivalent full-time students (EFTS) enrolled at the university, and 91.2% of those students were domestic. Of the students enrolled, 2900 (approximately) were business students. Only 14% of students across the university come from the local area; most of the student population are New Zealanders from outside of the local area (Quick Stats, nd). Given the large number of students who live away from home, the university is an interesting context in which to study student engagement and academic success away from strong influencing factors such as parents and other familial motivators.
We structure the remainder of this paper as follows. Section 2 presents an overview of the relevant literature. We outline our methods in Section 3, and present our results in Section 4. We discuss the results, implications for both theory and practice, limitations and ideas for future research within Section 5.
Section snippets
Theoretical development
The theoretical underpinning of this research combines three key concepts: student engagement, flow theory and gamification. The overall framework is grounded in engagement theory, using a conceptual diagram (van der Meer et al., 2018) to demonstrate the complexity of the phenomenon. We use flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 2014) to show that concentration, interest and engagement are integral parts of the student learning process. Finally, gamification is discussed as a tool in which to spark
Method
This project aimed to understand how student behavioral engagement influences performance in two compulsory first-year business courses, hereafter referred to simply as “Accounting” (n = 500) and “Management” (n = 469). Accounting is an introduction to financial and management accounting concepts, which includes reading and interpreting accounting statements and making internal business decisions. This course uses information systems and communication technology to manage data and discusses the
Results
Table 2 provides an overview of the main student behaviors that are reported on in this paper. For both courses, we present descriptive data for students in the sample: how many were or were not first-year students, those that were repeating the course, and the percentage of domestic and international students. Also presented in Table 2 is information about where the student lives, either in a residential college or not, the engagement with the mobile app Quitch and how many courses the student
Engagement and attendance
Our findings suggest that ‘behavioral engagement’, when measured broadly as activities that are undertaken voluntarily, leads to improved scholastic performance. The data indicates that attendance at a tutorial (which is not a mandatory part of the course) and using Quitch helps to explain more than half of the variation in performance explained by the full stepwise regression models that include prior knowledge. The results presented here provide support for the conceptual framework in Fig. 1 (
Conclusions
This study was designed to examine how student engagement contributes to academic achievement. Using data from two compulsory, first-year classes at the university business school, we used several measures of student engagement while controlling for a range of factors, including previous academic success. Our findings show that a range of voluntary activities are associated with improved academic performance. The points (or achievement) in the use of the gamified mobile app, Quitch has some
Funding
This research was supported by the University of Otago 2017 CALT grants.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the reviewers and delegates at the RMIT Accounting Educators Conference 2018 for their valuable comments. We would also like to thank the University of Otago 2017 CALT grants who financially supported this research.
References (61)
- et al.
The impact of mastery feedback on undergraduate students’ self-efficacy beliefs
Studies in Educational Evaluation
(2018) - et al.
Using student response systems in the accounting classroom: Strengths, strategies and limitations
Journal of Accounting Education
(2011) - et al.
Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement
Computers & Education
(2010) Do badges increase user activity? A field experiment on the effects of gamification
Computers in Human Behavior
(2017)- et al.
Using Pinterest to stimulate student engagement, interest, and learning in managerial accounting courses
Journal of Accounting Education
(2018) An instructional assignment for student engagement in auditing class: Student movies and the AICPA Core Competency Framework
Journal of Accounting Education
(2012)- et al.
Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education
Journal of Accounting Education
(2016) Effective methods of teaching business education
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research
(2016)- et al.
Quantifying the advantage of secondary mathematics study for accounting and finance undergraduates
Accounting & Finance
(2008) How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in Internet-based MBA courses
Business Communication Quarterly
(2000)