Numerical investigation of spray self-pulsation characteristics of liquid-centered swirl coaxial injector with different recess lengths
Introduction
Various applications, such as rocket, diesel, and gas turbine engines, are functioning with swirl coaxial injectors because of their efficient mixing and atomization performances (Im et al., 2015; Yang and Anderson, 1995). Typically, the gas-liquid swirl coaxial injectors can be divided into two categories, namely gas-centered swirl coaxial injector (GCSC) (Lightfoot et al., 2006; Villasmil et al., 2016) and liquid-centered swirl coaxial (LCSC) injector (Bazarov and Yang, 1998). The atomization process of an LCSC injector is shown in Fig. 1. The liquid is injected into the swirl chamber through tangential entries. As a result, a swirling liquid film is formed. Due to centrifugal force, an empty gas-core is generated around the centerline of the injector, and the liquid sheet will expend after ejecting from the inner injector. An annular gas stream is injected through the annular gap, as indicate in Fig. 1. Breakup of the liquid sheet depends highly on the gas-liquid interaction (Chu et al., 2020). Under certain operating conditions and injectors with certain geometrical parameters, the LCSC injector is known to experience spray self-pulsation (Bazarov and Lul'ka, 1978). Because spray self-pulsation may introduce harmful disturbance to the combustion chamber and induce combustion instability, this phenomenon must be controlled (Bai et al., 2020).
Self-pulsation is defined as the pressure and mass flow rate oscillations resulting from a time-delayed feedback between liquid and gas (Im et al., 2005). Significant efforts have been made to explore the mechanism of self-pulsation, in order to control it. Bazarov et al. (Bazarov, 1995; Bazarov and Lul'ka, 1978) conducted a pioneering theoretical and experimental investigation on self-pulsation. They found that self-pulsation arises from a time-delayed feedback caused by transient hydro-resistance between liquid and gas (Bazarov, 1995). Im et al. (Im et al., 2009, 2005) suggested that self-pulsation might result from the dominant wave of the liquid sheet. Hung et al. (Yuhui et al., 1998) developed a simplified acoustic model to compare the self-pulsation frequency and resonance frequency. They concluded that self-pulsation was caused by the resonance between the annular gas and the gas-core of the swirling liquid sheet. Applying a two-dimensional swirling symmetrical model, Bai et al. (Xiao et al., 2018) studied self-pulsation both experimentally and numerically. They attributed the self-pulsation mechanism of the recessed LCSC injector to the periodic blocking action of the liquid sheet. Nevertheless, violent self-pulsation was also discovered for non-recessed LCSC injectors by Eberhart and Frederick, (2017b). Besides, they concluded that self-pulsation was caused by the K-H instability (Eberhart and Frederick, 2017a). Recently, Chu et al. (Chu et al., 2020) performed a three-dimensional numerical investigation into the spray characteristics of a non-recessed LCSC injector and proposed that the vortex shedding of the spray induced self-pulsation. The mechanisms of recessed and non-recessed LCSC injectors seem different. Despite considerable efforts, the mechanism of self-pulsation is not yet fully understood.
During self-pulsation, the spray patterns oscillate periodically like a “Christmas tree” (Bai et al., 2019) or “string” (Im and Yoon, 2008). According to Kang et al. (Kang et al., 2014), the spray pattern is determined by the gas-core of the injector. Generally, self-pulsation is accompanied by painful screams (Yuhui et al., 1998). The acoustic frequency is almost the same as the spray oscillation frequency; therefore, the self-pulsation frequency can be characterized not only by the spray oscillation frequency but also by the acoustic frequency (Im et al., 2005). Im et al. (Im et al., 2009) suggested that the self-pulsation frequency was almost constant as the recess length increased, whereas according to Kang's experiments (Kang et al., 2016a), the self-pulsation frequency increased first, before decreasing.
As depicted in Fig. 2, there are two independent unstable waves on the gas-liquid interface: sinuous wave and varicose wave (Squire, 1953). Researchers have indicated that the sinuous wave creates a large amplitude on the liquid sheet, whereas the varicose wave is responsible for the primary breakup of the liquid sheet (Mitra et al., 2001). The primary breakup of conical liquid sheets in the axial direction has been widely investigated (Dasgupta et al., 2019; Fu et al., 2010; Lin, 2003). Breakup in the azimuthal direction, however, is usually neglected. Few researchers have addressed the problem of the effect of recess length on the primary breakup of a liquid sheet, especially during self-pulsation. It is difficult to manage experimental access to capture the primary breakup process despite transparent injectors (Matas et al., 2014; Xiao et al., 2018) because the liquid sheet in some cases breakups inside the recess chamber. While numerical studies are easier to perform. Numerical methods have been proved to be a powerful tool in capturing flow dynamics of different injectors (Loureiro et al., 2020; Ridolfi and Folgarait, 2020; Xiao et al., 2016). However, only a section of the injector was simulated in these researches, and several limitations may introduced (Wang et al., 2019). In summary, a three-dimensional simulation to investigate the self-pulsation features of an LCSC injector is necessary.
This study comprehensively investigates the three-dimensional self-pulsation characteristics of LCSC injectors with different recess lengths (Fig. 3). First, self-pulsation features (e.g., spray pattern, primary breakup, characteristic frequency, spray angle) and primary breakup of liquid sheet are analyzed. Then, the flow patterns, pressure oscillations, and flow dynamics are studied. Finally, the self-pulsation mechanism is clarified.
Section snippets
LCSC injector
A schematic of the LCSC injector is depicted in Fig. 3. The injector is composed of an outer injector and an inner pressure-swirl injector (Fig.3b), which has the same construction as the injector of Liu et al. (Liu et al., 2013). Water is selected to simulate the liquid propellant and it enters the inner pressure-swirl injector through four uniformly distributed tangential inlets. Air is used to simulate the gaseous propellant and is injected through the annular gap between the inner pressure
Spray pattern
Figure 6 compares the experimental (Kang et al., 2016b) and calculated spray patterns from the LCSC injector. A good agreement was generally achieved for Case-5, although the gas mass flow rate was slightly larger (0.4 g/s) than that in the experiment. The simulated spray pattern was scaled to the same size as in the experiment. Similar to the measured spray pattern, the “neck” and “shoulder” configurations also appeared alternatively in the present study, and the spray pattern was shaped like
Conclusions
Based on the CLSVOF technique, a comprehensive numerical analysis was conducted to investigate the spray characteristics of LCSC injectors with various recess lengths. A three-level adaptive mesh method was applied to capture the gas-liquid interface. Water liquid was introduced to the inner pressure swirl injector through discrete tangential inlets. Strong spray self-pulsation was observed with increasing recess length. the waves in both the azimuthal and axial directions are captured and
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Yongjie Ren: Methodology, Software, Writing - original draft. Kangkang Guo: Formal analysis, Investigation. Jiafeng Zhao: Data curation, Visualization. Wansheng Nie: Project administration, Funding acquisition, Resources. Yiheng Tong: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Wei Chu: Validation, Investigation.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51876219). The authors gratefully acknowledge the grammar check and revise from Pro. Yangzhu Zhu.
References (56)
- et al.
Effects of self-pulsation on combustion instability in a liquid rocket engine
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
(2020) - et al.
Simulation of primary atomization with an octree adaptive mesh refinement and VOF method
IJMF
(2009) - et al.
Experimental investigation of atomization characteristics of swirling spray by ADN gelled propellant
AcAau
(2018) - et al.
Evaluation of X-ray sources for quantitative two- and three-dimensional imaging of liquid mass distribution in atomizing sprays
IJMF
(2014) - et al.
Analysis of viscous fluid flow in a pressure-swirl atomizer using large-eddy simulation
IJMF
(2019) - et al.
Primary breakup regimes for cryogenic flash atomization
IJMF
(2020) - et al.
Numerical modeling of secondary breakup in molten metals gas-atomization using dimensionless analysis
IJMF
(2020) - et al.
A Coupled level set and volume-of-fluid method for computing 3d and axisymmetric incompressible two-phase flows
JCoPh
(2000) - et al.
Large eddy simulation of liquid jet primary breakup in supersonic air crossflow
IJMF
(2016) - et al.
Effects of Backpressure on Self-pulsation Characteristics of Liquid-Centered Swirl Coaxial Injectors
(2018)
Effects of annulus width and post thickness on self-pulsation characteristics for Liquid-Centered Swirl Coaxial Injectors
IJMF
Self-pulsations in coaxial injectors with central swirl liquid stage
Self-pulsation of liquid flow in coaxial air stream
Soviet Aeronautics
Design and dynamics of jet and swirl injectors. Liquid Rocket Thrust Chambers: aspects of Modeling
Anal. Des.
Liquid-propellant rocket engine injector dynamics
J. Propul. Power
Numerical Investigation of the Effects of Gas-Liquid Ratio On the Spray Characteristics of Liquid-Centered Swirl Coaxial Injectors
Linear and non-linear analysis of breakup of liquid sheets: a review
J. Indian Inst. Sci.
Atomization performance of petroleum coke and coal water slurries from a twin fluid atomizer
Fuel
Numerical investigation on liquid sheets interaction characteristics of liquid-liquid coaxial swirling jets in bipropellant thruster
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
Details on the mechanism of high-frequency swirl coaxial self-pulsation
J. Propul. Power
Fluid oscillations of a swirl coaxial injector under high-frequency self-pulsation
J. Propul. Power
Mechanistic assessment of swirl coaxial injection by quantitative x-ray radiography
J. Propul. Power
Linear stability analysis of a conical liquid sheet
J. Propul. Power
Quantitative flash x-ray imaging of liquid mass distribution in optically dense sprays
High-speed Radiographic Spray Imaging With a Broadband Tube Source
Gasoline fuel injector spray measurement and characterization - a new SAE J2715 recommended practice
Sae Int. J. Fuels Lubricants
Self-pulsation characteristics of a gas-liquid swirl coaxial injector
At. Sprays.
The effects of the ambient pressure on self-pulsation characteristics of a gas/liquid swirl coaxial injector
Cited by (11)
Effects of recess ratio on combustion characteristics of LOX/methane swirl coaxial injectors
2023, FuelCitation Excerpt :Gas-liquid swirl coaxial (GLSC) injectors have good atomization performance and high combustion efficiency, so they are the most widely used injector types in many advanced bipropellant LRE [5–8]. Recess length (Lr), defined as the distance between the LOX post tip and the injection panel, is the key structural parameter of GLSC injectors [9–12]. It further influences the combustion characteristics of LRE by affecting the atomization and mixing processes.
Effects of injector geometric parameters on the combustion and heat transfer process inside a 7-elements methane combustion chamber
2022, Case Studies in Thermal EngineeringCitation Excerpt :The coaxial injector is wildly used in LRE due to its stable performance in a broad range of operating conditions [8]. Generally, the coaxial injector is investigated in terms of flow parameters, such as velocity ratio, momentum flux ratio [9]; and geometric parameters, such as recess length and post thickness [10,11]. The flow parameters are mainly determined by the operating conditions and are heavily coupled with other systems, while the geometric parameters are relatively independent and more practical to be optimized to improve the injector performance.
Large scale unsteadiness during self-pulsation regime in a swirl coaxial injector and its influence on the downstream spray statistics
2022, International Journal of Multiphase FlowCitation Excerpt :One of the variants of the coaxial configuration, in which an annular swirling liquid sheet is atomized by a high-speed gas jet at the center, is commonly known as a gas-centered swirl coaxial (GCSC) injector (Cohn et al., 2003; Long and Anderson, 2004). It is a well-known fact that the swirl coaxial atomizers exhibit a self-pulsation character under certain flow conditions (Bazarov, 1995; Strasser, 2011; Bai et al., 2019b,a; Ren et al., 2021; Sahoo and Gadgil, 2021). This is caused by the intense interaction between the coflowing streams of gas and liquid.
Theoretical Atomization Model of Liquid Sheet Generated by Coaxial Swirl Injectors
2021, International Journal of Multiphase FlowNumerical Study on the Self-Pulsation Characteristics of LOX/GH<inf>2</inf>Swirl Coaxial Injector
2024, International Journal of Aerospace EngineeringExperimental Study on Macro-Spray Characteristics of Gas-Liquid Double Swirl Coaxial Injectors
2023, Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology