Abstract
This study assesses a trade-off between mechanized treatment systems and natural treatment systems for wastewater treatment (WWT) and recycling approaches. Investigation on this trade-off is carried out using field data on operation and maintenance (O and M) costs and land requirements. It is then shown that none of them in solo are techno-economically viable and environmentally sustainable for WWT in urban areas in India. Hence, a paradigm shift in WWT in India is proposed to adopt hybrid treatment systems (HTSs) approach. HTSs involve treatment considering a combination of natural and mechanized treatment approaches. Adoption of HTSs will result in energy savings and environmental benefits and hence will help India to achieve various national and international commitments of WWT and recycling.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
1 US Dollar = 71.2 Indian Rupees in December, 2019.
References
Ahluwalia JI, Munjee N, Mor N, et al (2011) Report on Indian urban infrastructure and services, ministry of urban development, New Delhi, India
Arceivala SJ, Asolekar SR (2006) Wastewater treatment for pollution control and reuse, 3rd edn. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New Delhi
Asolekar SR, Kalbar PP, Chaturvedi MKM, Maillacheruvu KY (2013) Rejuvenation of rivers and lakes in india: balancing societal priorities with technological possibilities. Comprehensive water quality and purification. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 181–229
Avellan CT, Ardakanian R, Gremillion P (2017) The role of constructed wetlands for biomass production within the water-soil-waste nexus. Water Sci Technol 75:2237–2245. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.106
Ávila C, Pedescoll A, Matamoros V et al (2010) Capacity of a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland system for the removal of emerging pollutants: an injection experiment. Chemosphere 81:1137–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.006
Batstone DJ, Hülsen T, Mehta CM, Keller J (2015) Platforms for energy and nutrient recovery from domestic wastewater: a review. Chemosphere 140:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.021
Brunner N, Starkl M, Kazmi AA et al (2018) Affordability of decentralized wastewater systems: a case study in integrated planning from INDIA. Water (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111644
Census of India (2011) Provisional population totals urban agglomerations and cities. http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/paper2/data_files/India2/1.%20Data%20Highlight.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2020
Chauhan J. (2017) Sewage treatment technologies: techno-economic viability. J Indian Water Work Assoc January-Ma: 70–78
CPHEEO (2013) Manual on sewerage and sewage treatment systems, central public health and environmental engineering organisation
Crites RW, Middlebrooks EJ, Bastian RK, Reed SC (2014) Natural wastewater treatment systems, 2nd edn. CRC Press, the Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton
El-Sayed Mohamed Mahgoub M, Van Der Steen NP, Abu-Zeid K, Vairavamoorthy K (2010) Towards sustainability in urban water: a life cycle analysis of the urban water system of Alexandria City. Egypt J Clean Prod 18:1100–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.009
ENVIS (2019) ENVIS - centre on hygiene, sanitation, sewage treatment systems and technology http://www.sulabhenvis.nic.in/database/stst_wastewater_2090.aspx. Accessed 5 January 2020
EPA (1986) Scheduel VI of environmental protection act, 1986 https://cpcb.nic.in/general-standards/. Accessed on 31st Jan, 2020
Gani KM, Kazmi AA (2017) Contamination of emerging contaminants in Indian aquatic sources: first overview of the situation. J Hazardous, Toxic, Radioact Waste 21:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000348
Goffi AS, Trojan F, de Lima JD, Lizot M, Thesari SS (2018) Economic feasibility for selecting wastewater treatment systems. Water Sci Technol 78(12):2518–2531
GRBMP (2010) Sewage treatment in class i towns: recommendations and guidelines report code: 003_GBP_IIT_EQP_SandR_02_Ver 1_Dec 2010 https://nmcg.nic.in/writereaddata/fileupload/16_31_003_EQP_SandR_02.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2020
Gupta I, Vachasiddha L, Kumar R (2017) Evaluation of the costs and benefits of mumbai sewage disposal project, India. Indian J Geo-Marine Sci 46:1539–1545
Hai FI, Yamamoto K, Fukushi K (2007) Hybrid treatment systems for dye wastewater. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 37:315–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380601174723
Harder R, Wielemaker R, Molander S, Öberg G (2020) Reframing human excreta management as part of food and farming systems. Water Res 175:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115601
Kakwani NS, Kalbar PP (2020) Review of Circular Economy in urban water sector: challenges and opportunities in India. J of Env Manag 271:111010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111010
Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR (2012a) Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach. J Environ Manag 113:158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.025
Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR (2012b) Technology assessment for wastewater treatment using multiple-attribute decision-making. Technol Soc 34:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.10.001
Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR (2013) Assessment of wastewater treatment technologies: life cycle approach. Water Environ J 27:261–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12006
Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR (2016) Life cycle-based decision support tool for selection of wastewater treatment alternatives. J Clean Prod 117:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.036
Kalbar PP, Muñoz I, Birkved M (2018) WW LCI v2: a second-generation life cycle inventory model for chemicals discharged to wastewater systems. Sci Total Environ 622–623:1649–1657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.051
Kunz NC, Fischer M, Ingold K, Hering JG (2016) Drivers for and against municipal wastewater recycling: a review. Water Sci Technol 73:251–259. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.496
Langergraber G, Dotro G, Nivala J et al (eds) (2019) Wetland technology: practical information on the design and application of treatment wetlands. Scientific and technical report no. 27, IWA Publishing
Larsen TA, Alder AC, Eggen RIL et al (2009) Source separation: will we see a paradigm shift in wastewater handling? Environ Sci Technol 43:6121–6125. https://doi.org/10.1021/es803001r
Lee CG, Fletcher TD, Sun G (2009) Nitrogen removal in constructed wetland systems. Eng Life Sci 9:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200800049
Lekshmi B, Sharma S, Sutar RS et al (2020) Circular Economy Approach to Women Empowerment Through Reusing Treated Rural Wastewater Using Constructed Wetlands. In: Ghosh S (ed) Waste Management as Economic Industry Towards Circular Economy. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–10
Matamoros V, García J, Bayona JM (2008) Organic micropollutant removal in a full-scale surface flow constructed wetland fed with secondary effluent. Water Res 42:653–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.016
McCarty PL, Bae J, Kim J (2011) Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer-can this be achieved? Environ Sci Technol 45:7100–7106. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2014264
Metcalf E (2003) Metcalf, Eddy wastewater engineering treatment and reuse, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
NGT (2019) National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, India Order dated 30 April 2019, Original Application No. 1069/2018. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/revised-standards-STPs-NGT-Order.pdf. Accessed 02 Feb 2020
NITI (2018) SDG India index 2018 https://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/SDX_Index_India_21.12.2018.pdf. Accessed 02 Feb 2020
Parkinson J, Tayler K (2003) Decentralized wastewater management in peri-urban areas in low-income countries. Environ Urban 15:75–90. https://doi.org/10.1630/095624703101286556
Paul R, Kenway S, Mukheibir P (2019) How scale and technology influence the energy intensity of water recycling systems-an analytical review. J Clean Prod 215:1457–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.148
Philip JM, Aravind UK, Aravindakumar CT (2018) Emerging contaminants in Indian environmental matrices–a review. Chemosphere 190:307–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.120
Sato N, Okubo T, Onodera T et al (2007) Economic evaluation of sewage treatment processes in India. J Environ Manage 84:447–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.019
Sethi S (2019) Financing water infrastructure, water digest 26–32. http://www.spml.co.in/download/media/2018-2019/water-digest-02401.pdf. Accessed 10th Feb. 2020
Sgroi M, Vagliasindi FGA, Roccaro P (2018) Feasibility, sustainability and circular economy concepts in water reuse. Curr Opin Environ Sci Heal 2:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.01.004
Sharma A, Burn S, Gardner T, Gregory A (2010) Role of decentralised systems in the transition of urban water systems. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 10:577–583. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2010.187
Shilton AN, Powell N, Guieysse B (2012) Plant based phosphorus recovery from wastewater via algae and macrophytes. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:884–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2012.07.002
Singh S, Gupta AB (2018) life cycle cost assessment of different sewage treatment technologies a case study. J Indian Water Work Assoc July-Septe: 169–174
Singh NK, Kazmi AA (2016) Techno-economic assessment of MBBRs treating municipal wastewater followed by different supplemental treatment strategies. J Indian Water Work Assoc. Apr-Jun. 89–93
Singh NK, Kazmi AA (2018) Performance and cost analysis of decentralized wastewater treatment plants in Northern India: case study. J Water Resour Plan Manag 144:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000886
Singh NK, Kazmi AA, Starkl M (2015) A review on full-scale decentralized wastewater treatment systems: techno-economical approach. Water Sci Technol 71:468–478. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.413
Singh P, Kansal A, Carliell-marquet C (2016) Energy and carbon footprints of sewage treatment methods. J Environ Manage 165:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.017
Sørup HJD, Brudler S, Godskesen B et al (2020) Urban water management: can UN SDG 6 be met within the planetary boundaries? Environ Sci Policy 106:36–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.01.015
Tare V, Bose P (2009) Compendium of Sewage Treatment Technologies National River Conservation Directorate
Thibodeau C, Monette F, Glaus M, Laflamme CB (2011) Economic viability and critical influencing factors assessment of black water and grey water source-separation sanitation system. Water Sci Technol 64:2417–2424. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.796
Thibodeau C, Monette F, Bulle C, Glaus M (2014) Comparison of black water source-separation and conventional sanitation systems using life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 67:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.012
Tsagarakis KP (2013) Does size matter? operating cost coverage for water utilities. Water Resour Manag 27:1551–1562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0256-1
Ullah A, Hussain S, Wasim A, Jahanzaib M (2020) Development of a decision support system for the selection of wastewater treatment technologies. Sci Total Environ 731:139158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139158
USEPA (2000) Wastewater technology fact sheet wetlands: subsurface flow-EPA 832-F-00–023
Villarín MC, Merel S (2020) Paradigm shifts and current challenges in wastewater management. J Hazard Mater 390:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122139
Vymazal J (2005) Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 25:478–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.010
Vymazal J (2010) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water 2:530–549. https://doi.org/10.3390/w2030530
Williams M, Kookana RS, Mehta A et al (2019) Emerging contaminants in a river receiving untreated wastewater from an Indian urban centre. Sci Total Environ 647:1256–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.084
Yerri S, Piratla KR (2019) Decentralized water reuse planning: evaluation of life cycle costs and benefits. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.016
Zhang DQ, Jinadasa KBSN, Gersberg RM et al (2014) Application of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in developing countries-a review of recent developments (2000–2013). J Environ Manag 141:116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.015
Acknowledgement
Author is thankful to the Editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. Author also thank Ms. Nikita Kakwani for proof reading the manuscript.
Funding
The work received funding to the author by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India through the projects “Innovation Centre for Eco-prudent Wastewater Solutions (IC-EcoWS)” project number DST/TM/ WTI/WIC/2K17/83(G) and “Fast Forward to SDG6: Acceptable and Affordable Water in Secondary Indian Cities (4WARD)” project number DST/TM/EWO/WTI/2K19/UWS-03(C4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalbar, P.P. Hybrid treatment systems: a paradigm shift to achieve sustainable wastewater treatment and recycling in India. Clean Techn Environ Policy 23, 1365–1373 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02034-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02034-x