Abstract
The Internet has become an integral part of everyday life, but analytical and systematic investigation of school-aged children’s online activities is lacking. This study aims to describe children’s Internet use according to types of online activities and examine the personal and family sociodemographic correlates of types of online activities within different sociocultural contexts. Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 840 children aged 8–10 years and their parents in Latvia, Lithuania and Taiwan. Children reported the frequency of using the Internet for ten specific activities, which were classified into the three distinct types of online activities, namely, information seeking, social interactions and entertainment, through multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. Overall, school-aged children used the Internet most frequently for entertainment and least frequently for social interactions, and Latvian children engaged the most frequently in all types of online activities. The multiple linear regression results show that in all three countries, children’s device ownership and use of the Internet to cope with negative emotions were the two most salient correlates of engagement in different online activities. Although family socioeconomic (e.g., parent’s education, financial status) differences in Internet usage types were not evident, there were country variations in the association of online activity types with family demographic factors (e.g., living arrangement, child’s number of siblings). This study identifies personal and family sociodemographic correlates of the types of activities children perform online and highlights differences in the comparison countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ataşalar, J., & Michou, A. (2019). Coping and Mindfulness: Mediators between Need Satisfaction and Generalized Problematic Internet Use. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 31(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000230.
Blank, G., & Groselj, D. (2014). Dimensions of Internet Use: Amount, Variety, and Types. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.889189.
Bozoglan, B. (2018). The Role of Family Factors in Internet Addiction among Children and Adolescents: An Overview. In B. Bozoglan (Ed.), Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology (Ahsat) Book Series. Psychological, Social, and Cultural Aspects of Internet Addiction (p. 146–168). Information Science Reference/IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3477-8.ch008.
Brand, M., Young, K. S., Laiera, C., Wölfling, K., & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Integrating Psychological and Neurobiological Considerations Regarding the Development and Maintenance of Specific Internet-Use Disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) Model. NeuroScience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033.
Büchi, M., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2016). Modeling the Second-Level Digital Divide: A Five-Country Study of Social Differences in Internet Use. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2703–2722.
Byrne, J., Kardefelt-Winther, D., Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M. (2016). Global Kids Online Research Synthesis, 2015–2016. UNICEF Office of Research–Innocenti and London School of Economics and Political Science. http://globalkidsonline.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Synthesis-report_07-Nov-2016.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2020.
Chen, W., & Wellman, B. (2005). Minding the Gaps: The Digital Divide and Social Inequality. In M. Romero & E. Margolis (Eds.), Blackwell Companion to Social Inequalities (pp. 523–545). Oxford: Blackwell.
Chi, X., Hong, X., & Chen, X. (2020). Profiles and Sociodemographic Correlates of Internet Addiction in Early Adolescents in Southern China. Addictive Behaviors, 106,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106385.
Ciarrochi, J., Parker, P., Sahdra, B., Marshall, S., Jackson, C., Gloster, A. T., & Heaven, P. (2016). The Development of Compulsive Internet use and Mental Health: A Four-Year Study of Adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 52(2), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000070.
Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental Mediation Theory for the Digital Age. Communication Theory, 21, 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x.
Durkee, T., et al. (2012). Prevalence of Pathological Internet use among Adolescents in Europe: Demographic and Social Factors. Addiction, 107, 2210–2222.
Gamito, P. S., Morais, D. G., Oliveira, J. G., Brito, R., Rosa, P. J., & de Matos, M. G. (2016). Frequency is Not enough: Patterns of use Associated with Risk of Internet Addiction in Portuguese Adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.013.
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.
Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital Inequality Differences in Young Adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621.
Hasebrink, U., Olafsson, K., & Stetka, V. (2010). Commonalities and Differences: How to Learn from International Comparisons of Children’s Online Behavior. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 6(1), 9–24.
Hinostroza, J. E., Matamala, C., Labbé, C., Claro, M., & Cabello, T. (2015). Factors (not) Affecting what Students do with Computers and Internet at Home. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.883407.
Hofstede, G. (2020). Country Comparison. Hofstede Insights. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/. Accessed 23 November 2020.
International Telecommunications Union (2020). ICT Indicators (Edition 2019/2), World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database, http://handle.itu.int/11.1002/pub_series/dataset/da8eb2fb-en. Accessed 03 July 2020.
Kalmus, V., Realo, A., & Siibak, A. (2011). Motives for Internet use and Their Relationships with Personality Traits and Socio-Demographic Factors. Trames, 15, 385–403.
Katus, K., Puur, A., & Sakkeus, L. (2008). Family Formation in the Baltic Countries: A Transformation in the Legacy of State Socialism. Journal of Baltic Studies, 39(2), 123–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770802031218.
Ko, C. H., Yen, J. Y., Yen, C. F., Lin, H. C., & Yang, M. J. (2007). Factors Predictive for Incidence and Remission of Internet Addiction in Young Adolescents: A Prospective Study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 545–551.
Kormas, G., Critselis, E., Janikian, M., Kafetzis, D., & Tsitsika, A. (2011). Risk Factors and Psychosocial Characteristics of Potential Problematic and Problematic Internet use among Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Public Health, 11, 595–602.
Leung, L. (2007). Stressful Life Events, Motives for Internet use, and Social Support among Digital Kids. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(2), 204–214.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in Digital Inclusion: Children, Young People, and the Digital Divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.
Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). EU Kids Online: Final Report. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; EU Kids Online.
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Anke, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and Safety on the Internet: The Perspective of European Children: Full Findings and Policy Implications from the EU Kids Online Survey of 9–16 Year Olds and Their Parents in 25 Countries. EU Kids Online, Deliverable D4. EU Kids Online Network, London, UK.
Luo, R., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Song, L. (2013). Chinese Parents’ Goals and Practices in Early Childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 843–857.
Mak, K. K., Lai, C. M., Watanabe, H., Kim, D. I., Bahar, N., Ramos, M., et al. (2014). Epidemiology of Internet Behaviors and Addiction among Adolescents in Six Asian Countries. Cyberpyschology, Behavior, and Networking, 17(11), 720–728.
Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2016). The Mobile Internet: Access, Opportunities and Divides among European Children. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1657–1679.
Meerkerk, G. J., Van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., Vermulst, A. A., & Garretsen, H. F. L. (2009). The Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS): Some Psychometric Properties. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 1–6.
Micheli, M. (2015). What is New in the Digital Divide? Understanding Internet use by Teenagers from Different Social Backgrounds. Communication and Information Technologies Annual (Studies in Media and Communications, Vol. 10) (pp.55–87), Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010003
Milani, L., Osualdella, D., & Di Blasio, P. (2009). Quality of Interpersonal Relationships and Problematic Internet use in Adolescence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 681–684. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0071.
Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education. Taipei: Ministry of Education, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2019). 2018 National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being. Taipei: Ministry of Health and Welfare.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
National Statistics Taiwan (2020). Statistical Abstract of National Accounts. https://eng.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=5. Accessed 03 July 2020
OECD (2020a). Income Inequality (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/459aa7f1-en. (Accessed 06 July 2020)
OECD (2020b). OECD Family Database. http://www.oecd.org/social/family/database.htm. Accessed 03 July 2020.
Orchard, L. J., & Fullwood, C. (2011). Current Perspectives on Personality and Internet use. Social Science Computer Review, 28(2), 155–169.
Panova, R., & Buber-Ennser, I. (2016). Attitudes Towards Parental Employment: A Ranking Across Europe, Australia, and Japan. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 6(2), 11–37.
Park, S., & Lee, H. (2019). Patterns of Online Activities and Related Psychosocial Factorsin Adolescence: A Latent Class Analysis. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 1147–1161.
Samli, R. (2018). A Review of Internet Addiction on the Basis of Different Countries (2007–2017). In B. Bozoglan (Ed.), Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology (AHSAT) Book Series. Psychological, Social, and Cultural Aspects of Internet Addiction (p. 200–220). Information Science Reference/IGI Global.
Sebre, B. S., Jusiene, R., Dapkevice, E., Skreitule-Pikse, I., & Bieliauskaite, R. (2015). Parenting Dimensions in Relation to Pre-Schoolers’ Behaviour Problems in Latvia and Lithuania. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(5), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414548774.
Shek, D. T. L., Zhu, X., & Dou, D. (2019). Influence of Family Processes on Internet Addiction among Late Adolescents in Hong Kong. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 113. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00113.
Taiwan Network Information Center (2019). 2019 Taiwan Internet Report. https://www.twnic.net.tw/doc/twrp/201912e.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2020.
Talaee, E., & Noroozi, O. (2019). Re-Conceptualization of “Digital Divide” among Primary School Children in an Era of Saturated Access to Technology. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(1), 27–35.
Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in Usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526.
Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015). Toward a Multifaceted Model of Internet Access for Understanding Digital Divide: An Empirical Investigation. The Information Society, 31, 379–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770.
Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Ten Klooster, P. M. (2015). Increasing Inequalities in What We Do Online: A Longitudinal Cross-Sectional Analysis of Internet Activities among the Dutch Population (2010 To 2013) Over Gender, Age, Education, and Income. Informatics and Telematics, 32(2), 259–272.
Van Rooij, A. J., Schoenmakers, T. M., Van de Eijnden, R. J. J. M., & Van de Mheen, D. (2010). Compulsive Internet use: The Role of Online Gaming and other Internet Applications. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.12.021.
Wang, C. W., Ho, R. T. H., Chan, C. L. W., & Tse, S. (2015). Exploring Personality Characteristics of Chinese Adolescents with Internet-Related Addictive Behaviors: Trait Differences for Gaming Addiction and Social Networking Addiction. Additive Behaviors, 42, 32–35.
Wang, B. Q., Yao, N. Q., Zhou, X., Liu, J., & Lv, Z. T. (2017). The Association between Attention Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder and Internet Addiction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 17, 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1408-x.
Yeh, K. H., Huang, T. C., & Chiu, Y. Y. (2006). The Characteristics of Modern Chinese Family Culture: A Study of 24 Families in Northern Taiwan. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 25, 141–196.
Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the schools, students and parents who participated in this international collaborative study. The authors are also grateful to Professor Tung-liang Chiang, Associate Professor Baiba Martinsone and Dr. Ming-Yu Wang for their contributions to the development of research protocol and data collection.
Funding
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 107–2923-H-152–001-MY3) as part of the mutual funds of Taiwan-Latvia-Lithuania cooperation project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 42 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, J.CL., Sebre, S.B., Jusienė, R. et al. Personal and Family Sociodemographic Correlates of Types of Online Activities in School-Aged Children: a Multicountry Study. Child Ind Res 14, 1415–1434 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09805-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09805-4