Abstract
It is well-known that if the physical system is located in the restricted area, additional “surface terms” emerge in the traditional form of hypervirial and/or Erenfest theorems. In the current literature mainly one-dimensional Schrodinger equation was considered in this respect. Our observation consists in that this situation emerges automatically in spherical coordinates, as well as one of the coordinates, namely radial distance, is restricted by a half-line. In particular, these considerations are clearly manifested, when one consider spherically symmetric potentials and operators, depended only on distance. Evidently, these additional terms give rise owing the boundary conditions for wave functions and the behavior of the considered operators at the origin of coordinates. We have analyzed the role of these additional terms for various model- potentials in the Schrodinger equation. We consider regular, as well as soft-singular potentials and show that the inclusion of these terms is very important for obtaining correct physical results. Some complicated integrals for hypergeometric functions are also derived. The modified virial relations, derived below, is converted into the usual relations, when the additional terms are absent and when present, they give reasonable corrections in correct direction. This fact also provides its legitimacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
J. G. Esteve, “Anomalies in conservation laws in the Hamiltonian,” Phys. Rev. D: Part. Fields 34, 674–677 (1986).
S. De Vincenzo, “Confinement average forces and the Ehrenfest theorem for a one-dimensional particle,” Pramana 80, 797–810 (2013).
S. De Vincenzo, “On average forces and the Ehrenfest theorem for a one-dimensional particle in a semi-infinite interval,” Rev. Mex. Fis. E 59, 84–90 (2013).
V. Alonso, S. De Vincenzo, and L. A. Gonznalez-Diaz, “On the Ehrenfest theorem in a one-dimensional box,” Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. B 115, 155–164 (2000).
V. Alonso, S. De Vincenzo, and L. A. Gonzalez-Diaz, “Ehrenfest’s theorem and Bohm’s quantum potential in a one-dimensional box,” Phys. Lett. A 287, 23–30 (2001).
V. Alonso and S. De Vincenzo, “Ehrenfest-type theorems for a one-dimensional Dirac particle,” Phys. Scr. 61, 396–402 (2000).
S. De Vincenzo, “On time derivatives or \(\left\langle {\hat {x}} \right\rangle \) and \(\left\langle {\hat {p}} \right\rangle \): formal1D calculations,” Rev. Bras. Ens. Fis. 35, 2308-1–2308-9 (2013).
S. De Vincenzo, “Operators and bilinear densities in the Dirac formal 1D Eherenfest theorem,” J. Phys. Stud. 19, 1003-1–1003-10 (2015).
J. G. Esteve, F. Falceto, and P. Giri, “Boundary contributions to the hypervirial theorem,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 022104-1–022104-5 (2012); arXiv:1201.4281; J. G. Esteve, “Origin of the anomalies: The modified Heisenberg equation, “ Phys. Rev. D: Part. Fields 66, 125013-1–125013-4 (2002); arXiv:0207164 [hep-th] .
G. Friesecke and M. Koppen, “On the Ehrenfest theorem of quantum mechanics,” J. Math. Phys. 50, 082102-1–082102-6 (2009); arXiv:0907.1877v1[math-ph]; G. Friesecke and B. Schmidt, “A sharp version of Ehrenfest’s theorem for general self-adjoint operators,” Proc. R. Soc. A 466, 2137–2143 (2010); arXiv: 1003.3372v1[math.FA].
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1977).
D. Fitts, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, as Applied to Chemistry and Chemical Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999).
A. Khelashvili and T. Nadareishvili, “Hypervirial and Ehrenfest theorems in spherical coordinates: Systematic approach”, Phys. Part. Nucl. 51, 107–121 (2020); arXiv:1806.01268 [quant-ph].
A. Khelashvili and T. Nadareishvili, “What is the boundary condition for the radial wave function of the Schrodinger equation?,” Am. J. Phys. 79, 668–671 (2011); arXiv:1009.2694 [quant-ph].
A. Khelashvili and T. Nadareishvili, “On some consequences of the Laplacian’s singularity at the origin in spherical coordinates,” Eur. J. Phys. 35, 065026-1–065026-6 (2014).
A. Khelashvili and T. Nadareishvili, “Singular behavior of the Laplace operator in polar spherical coordinates and some of its consequences for the radial wave function at the origin of coordinates,” Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 12, 11–25 (2015); arXiv:1502.04008 [hep-th].
A. Khelashvili and T. Nadareishvili, “Dirac’s reduced radial equations and the problem of additional solutions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 26, 1750043-1–1750043-15 (2017).
R. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles, 2nd ed. (Dover Publ., New York, 2002).
A. M. Perelomov and Ya. B. Zeldovich, Quantum Mechanics: Selected Topics (Word Sci., 1998).
O. Hirschfelder and C. Coulson, “Hypervirial theorems applied to molecular quantum mechanics,” J. Chem. Phys. 36, 941–946 (1962).
C. V. Sukumar, “Generalized virial theorems in classical and quantum mechanics” (2014), arXiv:1410.5592 [quant-ph].
T. Nadareishvili and A. Khelashvili, “Generalization of the hypervirial and Feynman–Hellman theorems” (2013), arXiv:1307.7972 [math-ph].
C. Quigg and J. L. Rosner, “Quantum mechanics with applications to quarkonium,” Phys. Rep. 56, 167–235 (1979).
H. A. Kramers, Quantum Mechanics (North Holland Publ. Co., 1951).
J. Epstein and S. Epstein, “Some applications of hypervirial theorems to the calculation of average values,” Am. J. Phys. 30, 266–268 (1962).
U. Roy, S. Ghosh, T. Shreecharan, and K. Bhattacharya, “Reality of linear and angular momentum expectation values in bound states” (2007), arXiv: 0704.0373[quant-ph].
U. Roy, S. Ghosh, and K. Bhattacharya, “Some intricacies of the momentum operator in quantum mechanics” (2007), arXiv:0706.0924 [quant-ph].
H. Grosse and A. Martin, “Exact results on potential models for quarkonium systems,” Phys. Rep. 60, 341–392 (1980).
A. Prudnikov, Y. Brickov, and O. Marichev, Integrals and Sums. Elementary Functions (Nauka, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].
S. Pasternack, “A generalization of the polynomials F n(x),” London, Edinburgh, Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci., Ser. 7 28, 209–226 (1939);
R. Cordero-Soto and S. Suslov, “Expectation values rp for harmonic oscillator in Rn” (2009), arXiv:0908.0032v3 [math-ph].
O. Vallee and M. Soares, Airy Functions and Applications to Physics (Word Sci., Imp. College Press, 2004).
V. Galitski, B. Karnakov, V. Kogan, and V. Galitski, Exploring Quantum Mechanics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).
V. Smirnov, Course of High Mathematics (St. Petersburg, 2010), Vol. 3, Part 2 [in Russian].
A. A. Khare. “The relative magnitudes of the derivatives of 1P(D,F,…) and 2P(D,F,…) wave functions at the origin,” Nucl. Phys. B 181, 347 (1981).
R. Van Royen and V. F. Weisskopf, “Hadron decay processes and the quark model,” Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 50, 617–645 (1967).
S. Flugge, Practical Quantum Mechanics I (Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1971)
M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Natl. Bur. Stand., 1964).
F. Calogero, “Solution of a three-body problem in one dimension,” J. Math. Phys. 10, 2191–2196 (1969);
F. Calogero, “Ground state of a one-dimensional N‑body system,” J. Math. Phys. 10, 2197–2200 (1969).
B. Basu-Mallick, P. K. Ghosh, and K. S. Gupta, “Inequivalent quantizations of the rational Calogero model,” Phys. Lett. A 31, 87–92 (2003); arXiv:hep-th/0208132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
Let consider various examples and find corresponding integrals:
(2) The Hulten potential:
The solution of the Schrodinger equation in this case (\(l = 0\)) is [36]
Here
\(F\)is a Hypergeometric function, \({{C}_{{0{{n}_{r}}}}}\)—normalization constant, and energy levels are obtainable from the condition
For this potential Eq. (4.18) takes the form
Behavior of (A.2) at the origin gives
or
Then Eq. (4.18) gives
or, accounting notations (A.3), we have
But from (A.4) and
and finally, we get
Moreover, again from (A.3)
Therefore
Now we can use the recurrence relation for derivatives of this function [37]
And at the end we have
(3) The Morse potential:
This potential has a wide application in Chemistry for studying two-atomic molecules.
The solution of the s-wave Schrodinger equation looks like [36]
Here \(F\)is a confluent hypergeometric function, and the following notations are used
Eigenvalues equation is
Proceeding in a similar way as above, one finds the following equality
Consider now relation (4.42), which gives
In explicit form this equation means, according to notations (A.18)
(4) Wood–Saxon potential:
It is applied for description of neutron-nucleus interaction. For s-wave Schrodinger equation the solution is [36]
Here \(F\) is a hypergeometric function and
Spectrum is derived by the condition
It is easy to show that
So
Analogous consideration, as above, gives the following relation
We do not find these integrals (A.15), (A.20), (A.22) and (A.29) in accessible to us Tables and Handbooks.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anzor Khelashvili, Teimuraz Nadareishvili Application of Modified Hypervirial and Ehrenfest Theorems and Several Their Consequences. Phys. Part. Nuclei 52, 155–168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779621010020
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779621010020