Abstract
The ability to win fights is expected to be influenced by the rearing and nutritional conditions experienced by individuals. We hypothesized that crowded rearing conditions would foreshadow intense competition for resources in adult male Gryllus firmus (Scudder) field crickets and thus favour greater investment in mandibular weaponry. In line with prediction, males developed relatively larger weapons in crowded rearing conditions but this investment did not translate into greater success in contests against size-matched males that were reared singly. Rather, we found that low-density males were more likely to defeat high-density males under some experimental conditions, possibly because low-density males are more aggressive. Overall, our strongest observed effect was that males with larger weaponry were more likely to win contests, independent of rearing density. We also manipulated the adult diet of males to test the hypothesis that greater fat loads, and thus potentially greater stamina, would improve success in contests. Contrary to prediction, increased fat load did not increase a male’s probability of winning a contest possibly because fights in field crickets are too short to invoke stamina. Broadly speaking, animals decide whether to give up in a fight by assessing either their own (self-assessment) resource-holding potential (RHP) or by assessing a combination of their own and their opponent’s RHP (mutual assessment). Our study lends some support to the hypothesis that male G. firmus crickets decide to persist in a fight by assessing their own RHP rather than via mutual assessment.
Significance statement
Animals fight each other for access to, and control of, resources that they require for survival and reproduction (e.g. food, shelter, and mates). Although considerable empirical research has shown that individuals having a larger body size or weapons generally possess greater fighting ability—resource-holding potential (RHP)—and are thus typically more successful in combat, the factors contributing to the development of an individual’s RHP have received less attention. One potential environmental factor dictating RHP is population density; however, the effect of density on RHP is difficult to predict. Developing under high density could cause individuals to invest more in RHP-related traits because these conditions might signal intense competition for mates in the near future. However, individuals reared under high density are often less aggressive than their low-density counterparts. The food available to an adult could also be important because the consumption of fat could improve an individual’s stamina, an RHP-related trait important in combat. Our study testing the impact of these two factors on male fighting ability in the sand field cricket (Gryllus firmus) found limited support for the hypothesis that rearing density and diet significantly influence a male’s ability to win a fight against another male. Instead we found stronger support for the notion that, all else being equal, males with larger mandibles, or weapons, than their opponent were more likely to win a fight.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data and R code used in this study are available at the Open Science Framework: DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3JMVA.
References
Adamo SA, Hoy RR (1995) Agonistic behaviour in male and female field crickets, gryllus bimaculatus, and how behavioural context influences its expression. Anim Behav 49:1491–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)90070-5
Alexander RD (1961) Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behavior in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behaviour 17:130–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/4532972
Andersson MB (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Applebaum S, Heifetz Y (1999) Density-dependent physiological phase in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 44:317–341
Arnott G, Elwood RW (2009) Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.20
Briffa M (2015) Agonistic signals: Integrating analysis of functions and mechanisms. In: Irschick DJ, Briffa M (eds) Animal signaling and function: an integrative approach, pp 141–173
Briffa M (2008) Decisions during fights in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus mutual or self assessment of energy, weapons and size. Anim Behav 75:1053–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.08.016
Briffa M, Elwood R (2004) Use of energy reserves in fighting hermit crabs. Proc Biol Sci 271:373–379. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2633
Briffa M, Elwood RW (2009) Difficulties remain in distinguishing between mutual and self-assessment in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:759–762
Briffa M, Sneddon L (2010) Contest behavior. Evolut Behav Ecol:246e265
Briffa M, Sneddon LU (2007) Physiological constraints on contest behaviour. Funct Ecol 21:627–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01188.x
Brown WD, Smith AT, Moskalik B, Gabriel J (2006) Aggressive contests in house crickets: Size, motivation and the information content of aggressive songs. Anim Behav 72:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.012
Droney D (1998) The influence of the nutritional content of the adult male diet on testis mass, body condition and courtship vigour in a Hawaiian Drosophila. Funct Ecol 12:920–928
Elwood RW, Arnott G (2012) Understanding how animals fight with Lloyd Morgan’s canon. Anim Behav 84:1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.035
Elwood RW, Arnott G (2013) Assessments in contests are frequently assumed to be complex when simple explanations will suffice. Anim Behav 86:e8–e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.006
Enquist M, Leimar O (1983) Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. J Theor Biol 102:387–410
Fawcett TW, Mowles SL (2013) Assessments of fighting ability need not be cognitively complex. Anim Behav 86:e1–e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.033
Gammell MP, Hardy IC (2003) Contest duration: sizing up the opposition. Trends Ecol Evol 18:491–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00222-2
Hack MA (1997) Assessment strategies in the contests of male crickets, Acheta domesticus (l.). Anim Behav 53:733–747. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0310
Hardy ICW, Briffa M (2013) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press
Hofmann HA, Schildberger K (2001) Assessment of strength and willingness to fight during aggressive encounters in crickets. Anim Behav 62:337–348. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1746
Houslay TM, Hunt J, Tinsley MC, Bussière LF (2015) Sex differences in the effects of juvenile and adult diet on age-dependent reproductive effort. J Evol Biol 28:1067–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12630
Hsu Y, Earley RL, Wolf LL (2006) Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev 81:33. https://doi.org/10.1017/s146479310500686x
Huntingford FA, Turner AK (1987) Animal conflict. Springer Science & Business Media
Iba M, Nagao T, Urano A (1995) Effects of population density on growth, behavior and levels of biogenic amines in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool Sci 12:695–702. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.12.695
Judge K, Bonanno V (2008) Male weaponry in a fighting cricket. PLoS One 3:e3980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003980
Judge K, Ting J, Gwynne D (2008) Condition dependence of male life span and calling effort in a field cricket. Evolution 62:868–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00318.x
Kasumovic MM, Brooks RC (2011) It’s all who you know: the evolution of socially cued anticipatory plasticity as a mating strategy. Q Rev Biol 86:181–197. https://doi.org/10.1086/661119
Kelly CD (2006) Fighting for harems: Assessment strategies during male–male contests in the sexually dimorphic Wellington tree weta. Anim Behav 72:727–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.007
Kelly CD (2008) The interrelationships between resource-holding potential, resource-value and reproductive success in territorial males: how much variation can we explain? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:855–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0518-8
Kelly CD (2018) The causes and evolutionary consequences of variation in female mate choice in insects: the effects of individual state, genotypes and environments. Curr Opin Insect Sci 27:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2018.01.010
Kelly CD, Tawes BR (2013) Sex-specific effect of juvenile diet on adult disease resistance in a field cricket. PLoS One 8:e61301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061301
Kelly CD, Tawes B, Worthington A (2014) Evaluating indices of body condition in two cricket species. Ecol Evol 4:4476–4487. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1257
Knell RJ (2009) Population density and the evolution of male aggression. J Zool 278:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00566.x
Marden JH, Rollins RA (1994) Assessment of energy reserves by damselflies engaged in aerial contests for mating territories. Anim Behav 48:1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1335
Marden JH, Waage JK (1990) Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim Behav 39:954–959
McFarlane J (1962) A comparison of the growth of the house cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) reared singly and in groups. Can J Zool 40:559–560
Nagamoto J, Aonuma H, Hisada M (2005) Discrimination of conspecific individuals via cuticular pheromones by males of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool Sci 22:1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.22.1079
Niemelä PT, Vainikka A, Lahdenperä S, Kortet R (2012) Nymphal density, behavioral development, and life history in a field cricket. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:645–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1312-1
Noldus LP, Spink AJ, Tegelenbosch RA (2001) EthoVision: a versatile video tracking system for automation of behavioral experiments. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 33:398–414
Nylin S, Gotthard K (1998) Plasticity in life-history traits. Annu Rev Entomol 43:63–83
Palaoro AV, Briffa M (2017) Weaponry and defenses in fighting animals: how allometry can alter predictions from contest theory. Behav Ecol 28:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw163
Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47:223–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(74)90111-8
Payne RJ (1998) Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model. Anim Behav 56:651–662
Payne RJ, Pagel M (1996) Escalation and time costs in displays of endurance. J Theor Biol 183:185–193
Pinto N, Palaoro A, Peixoto P (2019) All by myself? Meta-analysis of animal contests shows stronger support for self than for mutual assessment models. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 94:1430–1442. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12509
Pomfret JC, Knell RJ (2008) Crowding, sex ratio and horn evolution in a South African beetle community. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 275:315–321
Radwan J (1993) The adaptive significance of male polymorphism in the acarid mite Caloglyphus berlesei. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:201–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/4600869
Radwan J, Unrug J, Tomkins J (2002) Status-dependence and morphological trade-offs in the expression of a sexually selected character in the mite, Sancassania berlesei. J Evol Biol 15:744–752
R Development Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing
Reichard M, Smith C, Casalini M (2010) The effect of crowding and density on male mating behaviour in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). Behaviour 147:1035–1050. https://doi.org/10.1163/000579510x504879
Riechert SE (1988) The energetic costs of fighting. Am Zool 28:877–884
Rillich J, Schildberger K, Stevenson PA (2007) Assessment strategy of fighting crickets revealed by manipulating information exchange. Anim Behav 74:823–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.11.022
Scheuber H, Jacot A, Brinkhof MW (2003) Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris. Anim Behav 65:721–727. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2083
Simmons L (1986) Inter-male competition and mating success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer). Anim Behav 34:567–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(86)80126-9
Stevenson P, Rillich J (2013) Isolation associated aggression–a consequence of recovery from defeat in a territorial animal. PLoS One 8:e74965. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074965
Stevenson P, Schildberger K (2013) Mechanisms of experience dependent control of aggression in crickets. Curr Opin Neurobiol 23:318–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.03.002
Tawes BR, Kelly CD (2016) Sex-specific catch-up growth in the Texas field cricket, Gryllus texensis. Biol J Linn Soc 120:90–101
Taylor P, Elwood R (2003) The mismeasure of animal contests. Anim Behav 65:1195–1202. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2169
Uetz GW, Papke R, Kilinc B (2002) Influence of feeding regime on body size, body condition and a male secondary sexual character in Schizocosa ocreata wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae): Condition-dependence in a visual signaling trait. J Arachnol 30:461–469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3706060
Wey TW, Réale D, Kelly CD (2019) Developmental and genetic effects on behavioral and life-history traits in a field cricket. Ecol Evolut 9:3434–3445. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4975
Whattam EM, Bertram SM (2011) Effects of juvenile and adult condition on long-distance call components in the Jamaican field cricket, Gryllus assimilis. Anim Behav 81:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.024
Zajitschek F, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Hall MD, Brooks RC (2009) Effects of juvenile and adult diet on ageing and reproductive effort of male and female black field crickets, Teleogryllus commodus. Funct Ecol 23:602–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01520.x
Acknowledgements
We thank Jules Mc Cabe Leroux and Ozgur Yoruk for help with cricket care. We thank Bob Elwood and two anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions on a previous version of the manuscript. This study was funded by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant to CDK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by D. Kemp
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelly, C.D., L’Heureux, V. Effect of diet and rearing density on contest outcome and settlement in a field cricket. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75, 50 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-02990-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-02990-w