Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation on the impact of the supplier, customer, and organization collaboration factors on the performance of new product development

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present worldwide market powers the business associations to build up their item as novel and demanding ones in the market. To guarantee success in consumer satisfaction and higher profit, organizations embrace different methodologies in the new product development. Contribution from the Supply chain partners and customers may enhance the process and development of new product as the external knowledge sources besides internal knowledge sources. The collaboration of suppliers, customers, and organizations (S, C, O) in the new product development process gives innovative products to satisfy the needs of the end-users ultimately. This investigation focuses on developing a research model and the outcome of the study helps any company to plan its strategies for refining the actions on product development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig.1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhuiyan NA (2011) Framework for successful new product development. J Ind Eng Manag 4(4):746–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Boja C (2011) Clusters models, factors, and characteristics. Int J Econ Pract Theories 1(1):34–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Caisucar M, Naik Dessai A, Usgaonkar G (2020) Validation of portfolio allocation in NPD: fuzzy-TOPSIS and COPRAS-grey approach. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-01024-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerbaso C, Silvestri A, Di Bona G et al (2017) Assembly line balancing, proposal of a new methodology: integrated Balancing method. Int J Services Oper Manag 27(3):408–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien SH, Chen JJ (2010) Supplier involvement and customer involvement effect on new product development success in the financial service industry. Serv Ind J 30(2):185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ (1998) Resource allocation and the new product process. J Ind Market Manage 17(3):249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibrell C, Craig J, Hansen E (2011) Natural environment, market orientation, and firm innovativeness: an organizational life cycle perspective. J Small Bus Manage 49(3):467–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar D CO. (2009) Innovations in payments. A Discussion Paper, APCA, Australia. Retrieved as on 15 May 2016 from http://www.ecb.int/events/pdf.

  • Evans MG (1991) The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites: interactions revisited. Am Psychol 46(1):6–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinstein A (2008) The effect of market orientation and its components on innovation consequences: a meta-analysis. J Acad Mark Sci 36(2):166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruner KE, Homburg C (2000) Does customer interaction enhance new product success? J Bus Res 49(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudda P, Bwisa HM, Kihoro JM (2013) Effect of supplier and customer collaboration on product innovativeness: a focus on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Kenya. Int J Learn Dev 3(5):130–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Kota S, Mishra RP (2016) Modeling and evaluation of product quality at conceptual design stage. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7:163–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-015-0357-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadia HAA (2009) Introducing successful financial innovations: rewriting the rules in light of the global financial crisis. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Inte J Soc Behav Edu Econ Bus Ind Eng 3(6):962–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ et al (2014) Multivariate analysis data. Prentice Hall, Bookman

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepperle C, Langer S, Scherer A et al. (2010) Consideration of factors influencing the time of launching new products, design organization and management, proceedings of the 11th international design conference, pp 1099–1108.

  • Isobe T, Makino S, Montgomery DB (2008) Technological capabilities and firm performance. The case of small manufacturing firms in Japan. Asia Pacific J Manag 25(3):413–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W, Filippini R. (2009) Internal vs. external collaboration: What works? Res Technol Manage 52(3):15–17.

  • Laforet S (2008) Size, Strategic, and Market Orientation Effects on Innovation. J Bus Res 61(7):753–764.

  • Lan W, Zhangliu W (2012) Research on interactive learning. Knowledge sharing and collective innovation in SMEs cluster. Int J Innovation Manag Technol 3(1):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Calantone RJ (1998) The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: conceptualization and empirical evidence. J Market 62(4):13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon H, Johnson JL, Mariadoss BJ et al (2018) Supplier and customer involvement in new product development stages: implications for new product innovation outcomes. Int J Innovation Technol Manage 15(1):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhwezi M (2010) Horizontal purchasing collaboration in developing countries: behavioral issues in public units in Uganda. PhD Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.

  • Nassimbeni G, Battain F (2003) Evaluation of supplier contribution to product development: fuzzy and neuro-fuzzy based approaches. Int J Prod Res 41(13):2933–2956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens JD, Davies J (2000) The importance of a new product development (NPD) process: getting started, paper presented at the 1st European Conference on Knowledge Management, Bled School of Management, Bled, pp 26–27, October.

  • PavlovichK AM (2005) Cluster analysis: Mapping the Nelson seafood industry. The University of Auckland. Bus Rev 7(2):55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauniar R, Doll W, Rawski G et al (2008) Shared knowledge and product design glitches in integrated product development. Int J Prod Econ 114(2):723–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renko M, Carsrud A, Brannback M (2009) The effect of a market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation and technological capability on innovativeness: a study of young biotechnology ventures in the United States and in Scandinavia. J Small Bus Manage 47(3):331–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa ME, Mihm J (2008) Organization design for new product development. In: Loch CH (ed) Handbook of new product development management. Elsevier, United States, pp 165–198

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sumrit D, Anuntavoranich P (2013) An analytic network process modeling to assess technological innovation capabilities: case study for Thai automotive parts firms. Am Trans Eng Appl Sci 2(3):189–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Yau HK, Ming G, Suen EK (2010) The simultaneous impact of supplier and customer involvement on new product performance. J Technol Manage Innovation 5(4):70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan C, Tracey M (2007) Collaborative new product development environments: implications for supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manage 43(15):2–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai KH (2009) Collaborative network and product innovation performance. Res Policy 38(5):765–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner SM, Hoegl M (2006) Involving suppliers in product development: Insights from R&D directors and project managers. Ind Mark Manage 35(8):936–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yapa S.R. (2008) Innovate to get ahead in turbulent times, 20thAnniversary Convention on managing financial institutions in turbulent times, Association of Professional Bankers, SriLanka, Retrieved as on 12 March2016 from http://www.apbsrilanka.org/articles/20_ann/20_pdf_articles/20_Shantha_R_Yapa.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sri Sai Ram Institute of Technology, Chennai, India, 600044

    S. Murali

  2. RMK College of Engineering and Technology, Thiruvallur, India, 601206

    M. Balasubramanian & Malepati Vineeth Choudary

Authors
  1. S. Murali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Balasubramanian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Malepati Vineeth Choudary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Balasubramanian.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murali, S., Balasubramanian, M. & Choudary, M.V. Investigation on the impact of the supplier, customer, and organization collaboration factors on the performance of new product development. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 14 (Suppl 4), 918–923 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01064-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01064-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation