Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial Structures of the North–South Asymmetry in the Green Coronal Line and Magnetic Fields

  • Published:
Astronomy Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spatial distribution of the north–south (N–S) asymmetry over 1977–2001 is studied. A comparison of the distributions and time variations of the asymmetry index \(A\) in the green coronal Fe XIV 530.3 nm line, in the total coronal magnetic field, and in small- and large-scale fields has shown that at low latitudes the distribution of \(A\) for small-scale fields bears the greatest similarity to its distribution in the green line brightness. An anticorrelation between the behaviors of \(A\) in the green line and large-scale magnetic fields is observed at latitudes above \(40^{\circ}\). Previously, it has been shown that the latitude–longitude regions with a predominance of the green line brightness in one of the hemispheres are replaced by regions similar in shape with its predominance in the other hemisphere after 14–18 rotations, i.e., the map, as it were, changes to a ‘‘negative’’ one. In the current paper this conclusion is confirmed by a consideration of the behavior of the N–S asymmetry in the magnetic field strength. The change of the map to a negative one is most pronounced for large-scale fields. The N–S asymmetry is evidence and a measure of the fact that there exist differences (desynchronization) in the operation of the two solar hemispheres. This fact should be taken into account in the construction of up-to-date dynamo theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Unfortunately, an error was introduced in Figs. 1 and 2 in Badalyan (2010) and Figs. 1, 3, and 4 in Badalyan (2012a): the latitude specified along the vertical axis increases not from bottom to top, but from top to bottom. It should be emphasized that the error introduced in the figures did not affect the results and conclusions in Badalyan (2010, 2012a). Here in Figs. 1 and 4 the maps are arranged correctly. Some difference from Fig. 1 in Badalyan (2012a) is related to a slightly different map smoothing.

REFERENCES

  1. M. J. Aschwanden, http:// www.lmsal.com/\(\sim\)aschwand/ppt/2011_JENAM.ppt. Accessed 2011.

  2. O. G. Badalyan, Astron. Lett. 33, 51 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O. G. Badalyan, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Activity Cycles on the Sun and Stars, December 18–19, 2009, Moscow, Ed. by V. N. Obridko and Yu. A. Nagovitsyn (BBM, St. Petersburg, 2009), p. 205.

  4. O. G. Badalyan, in Solar and Solar-Earth Physics - 2010, Proceedings of the All-Russia Annual Conference, Ed. by A. V. Stepanov and Yu. A. Nagovitsyn (GAO RAN, St. Petersburg, 2010), p. 27.

  5. O. G. Badalyan, Astron. Rep. 55, 928 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. O. G. Badalyan, in Solar and Solar–Terrestrial Physics–2012, Proceedings of the All-Russia Annual Conference, Ed. by A. V. Stepanov and Yu. A. Nagovitsyn (GAO RAN, St. Petersburg, 2012), p. 5.

  7. O. G. Badalyan, Astron. Rep. 57, 222 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. O. G. Badalyan and V. N. Obridko, Solar Phys. 238, 271 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. O. G. Badalyan and V. N. Obridko, Astron. Lett. 33, 182 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. O. G. Badalyan and V. N. Obridko, New Astron. 16, 357 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. O. G. Badalyan and V. N. Obridko, Solar and Solar–Terrestrial Physics–2015, Proceedings of the All-Russia Annual Conference, Ed. by A. V. Stepanov and Yu. A. Nagovitsyn (GAO RAN, St. Petersburg, 2015), p. 19.

  12. O. G. Badalyan and V. N. Obridko, Astron. Astrophys. 603, A109 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. O. G. Badalyan, V. N. Obridko, and Ya. Rybak, and Yu. Sýkora, Astron. Rep. 49, 659 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. O. G. Badalyan, V. N. Obridko, and J. Sýkora, Solar Phys. 247, 379 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. L. Ballester, R. Oliver, and M. Carbonell. Astron. Astrophys. 431, L5 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Carbonell, R. Oliver, and J. L. Ballester, Astron. Astrophys. 274, 497 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Carbonell, J. Terradas, R. Oliver, and J. L. Ballester, Astron. Astrophys. 476, 951 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. A. Guseva and Yu. A. Nagovitsyn, Geomagn. Aeron. 52, 431 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. T. Hoeksema, Report CSSA-ASTRO-91-01 (Center Space Sci. Astrophys., Stanford, 1991).

  20. J. T. Hoeksema and P. H. Scherrer, WDCA Report UAG-94 (Natl. Geophys. Data Center, Boulder, 1986).

  21. A. P. Kharshiladze, K. G. Ivanov, Geomagn. Aeron. 34 (4), 22 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Knaack, J. O. Stenflo, and S. V. Berdyugina, Astron. Astrophys. 418, L17 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. K. J. Li, J. X. Wang, S. Y. Xiong, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 383, 648 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Mariş, M. D. Popescu, and M. Mierla, Rom. Astron. J. 12(2), 131 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. A. Mitchell, Handb. Aph. 4, 231 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Müller, Z. Astrophys. 35, 61 (1954).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu. A. Nagovitsyn, Izv. Glavn. Astron. Observ. 212, 145 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. W. Newton and A. S. Milsom, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 115, 398 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. V. N. Obridko and B. D. Shelting, Solar Phys. 184, 187 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. V. Rušin, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechosl. 31, 9 (1980).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Storini and J. Sýkora, Nuovo Cim. 20C, 923 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Sýkora, in Solar and Interplanetary Dynamics, Ed. by M. Dryer and E. Tandberg-Hanssends (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1980), p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Sýkora, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechosl. 22, 12 (1971).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. J. Sýkora and J. Rybák, Adv. Space Res. 35, 393 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. J. Sýkora and J. Rybák, Solar Phys. 261, 321 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. G. Vizoso and J. L. Ballester, Astron. Astrophys. 229, 540 (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Waldmeier, Zs. Astrophys. 38, 37 (1955).

  38. M. Waldmeier, Solar Phys. 29, 332 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. G. Badalyan.

Additional information

Translated by V. Astakhov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Badalyan, O.G. Spatial Structures of the North–South Asymmetry in the Green Coronal Line and Magnetic Fields. Astron. Lett. 46, 705–714 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773720100023

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773720100023

Keywords:

Navigation