Plants with an ammonium preference affect soil N transformations to optimize their N acquisition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108158Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Significant interactions between plants and soil N transformations were observed.

  • NH4+-preferring plants outcompeted microbes for NH4+.

  • Soil microorganisms switched to assimilate NO3 in the presence of NH4+-preferring plants.

  • Plants preferring NH4+ can induce heterotrophic nitrification.

Abstract

Our understanding of how plants influence the gross rates of specific soil N transformations in plant-soil systems is still rudimentary, providing the incentive for our current study. A 15N tracing study was carried out with plants known for their NH4+-preference to quantify the gross soil N transformation and gross plant N uptake rates. Significant interactions between plants and gross rates of soil N transformations were observed. The rates of NH4+ uptake by sugarcane (3.74 mg N kg−1 d−1) and tea (3.34 mg N kg−1 d−1) were much higher than microbial NH4+ immobilization rates (0.01, and 0.27 mg N kg−1 d−1, respectively), suggesting that NH4+-preferring plants outcompeted microbial NH4+ acquisition. The gross rates of NO3 immobilization increased with decreasing gross NH4+ immobilization rates, indicating a switch towards microbial NO3 uptake under high plant NH4+ demand. Moreover, the gross rates of autotrophic nitrification, the classical NO3 production pathway, was generally low in the studied acidic soil (average 0.40 mg N kg−1 d−1 in plant treatments), and was insufficient to meet the total NO3 demand (average 2.37 mg N kg−1 d−1). Gross rates of heterotrophic nitrification, ranging from 0.31 to 0.57 mg N kg−1 d−1, were stimulated by the presence of plants and were generally responsible for 49–69% of total NO3 production in the plant treatments, while this rate was negligible in the absence of plant. Heterotrophic nitrification might provide additional NO3 to meet N requirements of plants and microorganisms. This is supported by the positive correlation of gross heterotrophic nitrification coupled with gross NO3 immobilization and plant N uptake rates. Interactions between plant N acquisition and soil N transformations exist and plant-soil studies are key to identify feedbacks between plants and soil microbes.

Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is an essential element for maintaining life in the biosphere and is often the limiting element for ecosystem productivity. Thus, strong N retention strategies, such as low NH4+ oxidation rates, efficient NO3 immobilization into organic N, and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA), are critical for the fertility for instance of humid forest soils (Stark and Hart, 1997; Huygens et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2013). Besides the available N retention capacities, the interactions between plants and soil microbes can also affect plant N acquisition (Song et al., 2007; Inselsbacher et al., 2010; Blagodatskaya et al., 2014). Generally, there is a strong competition for N between microbes and plants (Harrison et al., 2008; Inselsbacher et al., 2010) and plants have evolved different N nutritional strategies to optimize N acquisition under various growing conditions (Ehrenfeld et al., 2005; Hu et al., 2018). Previous studies have focused on the competition between microbial N immobilization and plant N acquisition, the chemical N forms and plant N uptake, plant-mediated effects on net N mineralization and nitrification rates (Ehrenfeld et al., 2005; Jackson and Cavagnaro, 2008; Nacry et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2016c). However, most of these studies did not quantify the interactions between plants and soil microbes but focused only on the net transformation dynamics. Thus, a quantitative understanding based on plant N acquisition and soil gross N transformations in the plant-soil systems is largely lacking.

With the rapid development of 15N-tracing technology, new approaches are now available to simultaneously quantify the gross rates of soil N transformation and plant N uptake in plant-soil systems (Inselsbacher et al., 2013; He et al., 2020). A recent study using the 15N tracing tool Ntraceplant found that gross rates of heterotrophic nitrification and NO3 immobilization were significantly higher in subtropical acidic soil planted with sugarcane (an NH4+-preferring plant) than in the control soil (without plant) while NH4+ immobilization rates were significantly lower compared to the control (He et al., 2020). Thus, it seems that at least plants with a preference for NH4+ are able to outcompete soil microorganisms for NH4+ and provide a pressure for microorganisms to utilize NO3 to meet their N requirements. The generally low autotrophic nitrification rates in acidic soils also explain the dominance of NH4+ in soil mineral N for plant N uptake (Zhang et al., 2018). Thus, the stimulation of heterotrophic nitrification by plants is likely to be a strategy to meet NO3 requirement of both plants and microorganisms. An increasing number of studies have found that heterotrophic nitrification occurs more widely than previously thought, and may even be the dominant pathway of NO3 production in acidic, humid forest soils (Huygens et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2015, 2018). The large amount of NO3 generated via heterotrophic nitrification in acidic, humid forest soils, appears to contrast with the N retention strategy, especially for humid ecosystems. Plants growing in acidic soils, such as Dicranopteris linearis (Xu et al., 2014), Pinus massoniana Lamb (Zhang et al., 2019b), Camellia sinensis (Ruan et al., 2007), and Saccharum officinarum (Nastaro et al., 2018) prefer NH4+ uptake. Moreover, it has also been reported that NO3 immobilization is a widespread process in acidic, humid subtropical forest soils, despite the fact that microbes generally prefer NH4+ as N source (Cresswell and Syrett, 1979; Rice and Tiedje, 1989; Zhang et al., 2011, 2013). These interactions between plant N acquisition, microbes N immobilization and soil N transformations are likely to provide N nutritional strategies for plants and soil microbes to alleviate the N competition in the plant-soil systems (Ehrenfeld et al., 2005). However, very few investigations have focused on simultaneously quantifying the gross rates of soil N transformation and plant N uptake in the plant-soil systems to identify relationships between plants and microbes with respect to their N demand.

Thus, we hypothesize that plant N acquisition capacities affect the specific soil N transformations to meet N demands of plants and soil microorganisms. Specifically, the NH4+ preference plants compete strongly with soil microorganisms for NH4+, providing a pressure for microorganisms to switch to a predominant microbial NO3 assimilation. To meet the NO3 demand in acidic soils, heterotrophic nitrification is stimulated in presence of plants due to the small autotrophic nitrification rate in these soils. To test our hypotheses, a series of 15N-tracing pot experiments were carried out with NH4+-preferring plants with different N acquisition capacities.

Section snippets

Soil samples

The soil samples were collected from Longhushan Nature Reserve, in Jiangxi province, China (28°14′N, 117°13′E). This region is characterized by a typical subtropical monsoon climate with a mean annual temperature and precipitation of 17.5 °C and 1750 mm, respectively. The soil was derived from tertiary red sandstone, classified as Ultisols and Oxisols according to the USDA soil taxonomy system. At the sampling site, four plots (4 m × 4 m) were selected randomly. The surface soil (0–20 cm) was

Soil physicochemical properties

Four weeks after planting, soil pH ranged from 4.20 to 4.23 and was not significantly different among the treatments (Table 1). However, different inorganic N (NH4+-N and NO3-N) concentrations were observed, with significantly higher NH4+ concentrations in CK (average 29.13 mg N kg−1) than in the plant treatments (p < 0.05). Similarly, the NO3 concentrations in CK were also highest (average 9.61 mg N kg−1), followed by TS and SS (average 4.36 mg N kg−1 and 4.10 mg N kg−1, respectively).

Discussion

In the present study, the significant interactions between plants and gross N transformations were observed. We found that NH4+ preferring plants could strongly compete with soil microorganisms for NH4+, resulting in a switch towards predominant microbial NO3 assimilation. In addition, plants also absorbed a considerable quantity of NO3 from soil, despite the tested plants with NH4+-preferring nature in this study. Heterotrophic nitrification as stimulated in presence of plants became an

Conclusions

We evaluated the interactions between plant N acquisition and soil N transformations in plant-acidic soil systems, highlighting that in the presence of plants soil N transformations, especially heterotrophic nitrification, were higher to match the plant N demand. Plants that prefer NH4+ strongly compete with soil microorganisms for NH4+, resulting in a shift towards predominant microbial NO3 assimilation. Due to the low autotrophic nitrification rate in acidic soils, heterotrophic

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 41830642], the CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team project [grant number JCTD-2018-06], and the "Double World-Classes" Development in Geography project. The study was carried out as part of the IAEA funded coordinated research project “Minimizing farming impacts on climate change by enhancing carbon and nitrogen capture and storage in Agro-Ecosystems (D1.50.16)” and was carried out in close collaboration

References (49)

  • X. He et al.

    15N tracing studies including plant N uptake processes provide new insights on gross N transformations in soil-plant systems

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2020)
  • E. Inselsbacher et al.

    Short-term competition between crop plants and soil microbes for inorganic N fertilizer

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2010)
  • E. Inselsbacher et al.

    A novel 15N tracer model reveals: plant nitrate uptake governs nitrogen transformation rates in agricultural soils

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2013)
  • E. Lang et al.

    Fungi of a forest soil nitrifying at low pH values

    FEMS Microbiology Ecology

    (1986)
  • C. Müller et al.

    Effects of repeated fertilizer and cattle slurry applications over 38 years on N dynamics in a temperate grassland soil

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2011)
  • C. Müller et al.

    Estimation of parameters in complex 15N tracing models by Monte Carlo sampling

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2007)
  • C.W. Rice et al.

    Regulation of nitrate assimilation by ammonium in soils and in isolated soil microorganisms

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (1989)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    Ecological and practical significances of crop species preferential N uptake matching with soil N dynamics

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2016)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    Heterotrophic nitrification of organic N and its contribution to nitrous oxide emissions in soils

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2015)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    Ecological and practical significances of crop species preferential N uptake matching with soil N dynamics

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2016)
  • G. Zhu et al.

    Gross N transformation rates and related N2O emissions in Chinese and UK agricultural soils

    The Science of the Total Environment

    (2019)
  • D.T. Britto et al.

    Ecological significance and complexity of N-source preference in plants

    Annals of Botany

    (2013)
  • C.D. Broeckling et al.

    Root exudates regulate soil fungal community composition and diversity

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology

    (2008)
  • J.G. Ehrenfeld et al.

    Feedback in the plant-soil system

    Annual Review of Environment and Resources

    (2005)
  • Cited by (39)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text