Cavitation phenomenon in penetration of rigid projectiles into elastic-plastic targets

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103837Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cavitation during penetration of rigid projectiles into elastic-plastic targets is studied.

  • An analytical criterion for projectile-target separation is developed.

  • Formulae for the cavitation critical velocity VCR and contact zone size x* are obtained.

  • Penetration of ogive and Rankine ovoid nose projectiles into aluminum targets are investigated.

  • The effect of projectile and medium properties on VCR and on x* are studied.

Abstract

This paper presents an analytical study on the cavitation phenomenon during penetration of a rigid projectile into an elastic-plastic target. The developed analytical approach is based on the general solution of the quasi-static and non-stationary dynamic cylindrical/spherical cavity expansion problem with assigned kinematic boundary condition at the cavity boundary (variable, time dependent radial velocity). An analytical projectile-target separation criterion is developed for a projectile having an arbitrary shape and for a target described by a simplified material model with a locked equation of state and a linear shear failure relationship. This relatively simple model may represent the behavior of different materials reasonably well yet allow an analytical solution of the problem. The paper derives the analytical expression of the contact zone size using both the cylindrical and spherical cavity expansion approaches and presents the related normal contact stresses acting on the projectile nose surface that maintains contact with the target. Examples of the developed formulation is presented for ogive nose and Rankine ovoid projectiles hitting aluminum targets, with a constant shear failure envelope, at different velocities and comparisons with known analytical and numerical solutions are shown. The effect of projectile and medium properties on the size of the contact zone are studied.

Introduction

The term "cavitation" may have several meanings in the scientific literature:

  • 1)

    In fluid mechanics, cavitation describes a phenomenon where rapid pressure changes in a liquid lead to formation of small vapor-filled cavities in places where the pressure is relatively low [1].

  • 2)

    In studies on the dynamic or quasi-static expansion of a spherical and cylindrical cavity in an elastic-plastic media, the term "cavitation" is frequently used in relation to the pressure acting at the cavity wall denoted as the “cavitation stress/pressure” [2], [3], [4], the “cavitation fields” [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] that are the stress/pressure/velocity distributions along the radial coordinate and “cavitation instability” that is defined as a critical state in the material response at which constant applied load induces spontaneous expansion of a cavity [10].

  • 3)

    When an underwater vehicle is moving at a sufficiently high speed, its surface pressure is lower than the saturated vapor pressure of local water, thus forming a cavity that can surround a major part of its body. This phenomenon is called “natural super cavitation” [11]. When super cavitation occurs, only a small part of the body front is in contact with the water, while the rest of the body is in contact with the vapor in the formed cavity.

Hill [12] borrowed the term “cavitation” from hydrodynamics and applied it to problems of penetration into solid media to describe the case of partial contact between the projectile and the target. Hill's analysis for the penetration of ogive-nosed projectiles resulted in determination of the threshold velocity (VCR) beyond which cavitation occurs, and some energy is invested in expanding the projectile channel's diameter. The present analysis follows the definition given by Hill and aims at contributing to enhance our understanding on this important, complex and not fully understood topic.

Since Hill's pioneering study, a very small number of articles have been published on the cavitation phenomenon in problems of projectile penetration into elastic-plastic targets [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27].

Evaluation of the rather small number of papers on this topic shows that the topic deserves more elaboration to clarify several fundamental aspects and to compare the different approaches. Unfortunately, there is hardly any supporting experimental data on cavitation. This is apparently due the difficulties involved, such as the relatively high velocity at which cavitation occurs and the corresponding high stresses in the projectile body, that may exceed the projectile elastic stress level cause deformation and even failure, thus affecting the cavitation development.

Other difficulties arise from the very short duration of cavitation occurrence, the fact that cavitation cannot be inspected directly and the high resolution required to determine the cavitation region. Therefore, cavitation is mostly studied theoretically. Such studies indicate that the importance of cavitation for common engineering practice is rather limited. Nevertheless, this is one of the more complex issues in penetration mechanics, that may become more important and influential when extremely high strength projectiles are considered or when applications with other specific target materials are implemented. There is no doubt that regardless of its practical importance, its academic importance is high and deserves attention. Such analysis requires an advanced and delicate formulation of the dynamic projectile-target interaction problem.

When penetration into a thick target is discussed, the mechanical interaction between the projectile and the target should be carefully simulated to allow calculation of the contact stresses (pressures). This analysis capability is especially important for cavitation analysis. Cavitation occurs at a certain distance along the projectile nose when the conditions are such that the "projectile - target" contact pressure drops to zero and separation occurs between the target and the projectile nose surface. It may be noted that in fact, on the transition of numerical calculations from a certain time step to the following, different algorithms for contact stress calculation may calculate a negative contact pressure (i.e. tensile stresses). This is of course non-physical and the contact pressure must be set then to zero. In the spherical/cylindrical cavity expansion models analyses, this instant of zero stress activates a new boundary condition at the cavity boundary replacing the kinematic boundary condition (when the contact is always maintained, and the contact stresses are always positive). Beyond the point of separation there is a part of the projectile nose surface which is disconnected from the target. Obviously, the total resistance force on the projectile nose is only due to the contact stresses and the cavitation zone is not affecting the overall resistance. Therefore, contact stresses should always be checked, to control the zero contact stresses in the cavitation zone. The above contact stresses check is performed in [[13], [14], [15], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], 28, 29].

It should be noted that there are many penetration models which cannot consider the cavitation and projectile-target separation phenomenon. For example, in the simplest versions of the different spherical and cylindrical cavity expansion models (denoted as SCE and CCE correspondingly) full contact along the nose is pre-assumed and the contact stresses are always positive (i.e. compression). These contact stresses are expressed, for example, in [30, 31] as:σn=σST+ρ0Vn2where σSTis the radial quasi-static constant stress at the cavity boundary and the normal projectile velocity Vn is the radial velocity at the cavity boundary.

The vast majority of publications on the cavitation phenomenon deals with the penetration of ogive and spherical-nosed projectiles [19, 20] as well as ovoid shaped projectiles [21], [22], [23], [24], [25] and concentrate on their penetration into metallic targets. Rubin's publications [21], [22], [23], [24], [25] conclude that for a steady-state projectile motion at a constant penetration velocity, the drag force acting on the projectile in the tunneling penetration stage in a metallic elastic-perfectly-plastic target is related to the velocity as follows: when the velocity is below a certain critical velocity, the projectile axial resistant force is constant, whereas when the velocity is higher, the projectile axial resistant force is not constant and it increases at increasing velocity.

Except for single studies on cavitation in penetration into soils [14] and concrete [27], cavitation has not been studied with regard to penetration into geological materials or concrete despite their importance as common barriers against projectiles penetration.

This paper presents an analytical study on the cavitation phenomenon using a general solution of the problem of the quasi-static [32] and non-stationary dynamic [33] cylindrical/spherical cavity expansion with assigned kinematic boundary condition at the boundary (variable, time dependent radial velocity). An analytical projectile-target separation criterion is developed for a projectile having an arbitrary shape and for a target described by a simplified material model with a locked equation of state and a linear shear failure relationship. This material model of the target material may reasonably well represent the behavior of different materials yet allow an analytical solution of the problem.

This paper derives the analytical expression of the contact zone size between the projectile nose and the target, using both the cylindrical and the spherical cavity expansion approaches and presents the related normal contact stresses acting on the projectile nose surface.

The developed solution may be applied to different materials such as metal, concrete, soil and rock as well as to materials with simpler behavior (e.g. constant shear failure envelope) like aluminum.

As examples of the application of the developed formulae, penetration of ogive and Rankine ovoid nose projectiles with different velocities into aluminum targets described by a constant shear failure envelope is investigated.

The obtained solution is based on the CCE and SCE approaches and is compared with the hybrid DISC method [28], with numerical 2D analysis in metallic targets that were reported in [19] and with other analytical and numerical solutions [23, 24].

The effect of projectile and medium properties on the size of the contact zone are studied.

Section snippets

The projectile-target interaction problem

Consider a rigid projectile penetrating perpendicularly into a semi-infinite target (Fig. 1a). The general geometry of the projectile is defined by its diameter D=2R0 (R0 is the shank radius), its nose shape and nose length L. In the global axisymmetric cylindrical coordinate system r and z (Fig. 1a), the penetration axis z is perpendicular to the target top surface. The projectile nose shape is described by the general monotonic shape function y=f(x), using a local coordinate system f(x)-x

Cavity expansion models implemented in penetration mechanics

The main idea of cavity expansion-based penetration models is to implement the solution of the pressure acting at the boundary of an expanding cavity in an elastic-plastic infinite medium as an approximation of the projectile-target contact pressure.

The spherical cavity expansion (SCE) [22, 30, 31, [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]] and cylindrical cavity-expansion (CCE) [[13], [14], [15], 28, 29, [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46]] approximations simplify the target analyses thus

Solution of the problem of the non-stationary dynamic cylindrical/spherical cavity expansion (brief description)

Feldgun and Yankelevsky [33] developed a general solution of the problem of the non-stationary dynamic cylindrical/spherical cavity expansion (Fig. 5) with assigned kinematic boundary condition at the boundary (variable, time dependent radial velocity).

The plastic region is bounded by r = a(t) and r = c(t), as shown in Fig. 5, where a(t) is the cavity radius and c(t) is the elastic-plastic interface.

Due to the complexity of the non-linear non-stationary problem, an analytical solution of the

The contact stresses and cavitation zone

In the previous section, the expression for the radial stress σa acting on the cylindrical/ spherical cavity wall with radius a(t) is presented (see Eq. (34)):σa=ρ0A1a˙2+ρ0A2(a˙2+aa¨)+σSTwhere the parameters A1, A2 and σST are calculated by Eqs. (35-51).

According to Eq. (15). the contact normal stress σn acting at the nose point y=f(x) of the projectile is:σn={σacos(α)=σa1+(f(x))2,CCEappr.(Fig.4a)σa,SCEappr.(Fig.4b)where the cavity radial stress σa is expressed by Eq. (52) in which the cavity

Examples: Penetration into aluminum targets

Consider the aluminum target used in Forrestal's experiments [36] with the following material properties:τ0=0.4GPa,λ=0,ρ0=2.71g/cm3

Conclusions

The present paper is devoted to an analytical study of the cavitation phenomenon (i.e. the separation of some part of the target material from the projectile envelope) using general solutions of the problem of the quasi-static and non-stationary dynamic cylindrical/spherical cavity expansion with assigned kinematic boundary condition at the boundary. An analytical projectile-target separation criterion has been developed for a projectile having an arbitrary shape and for a target described by a

Credit_Author_Statement

Prof. David Yankelevsky: Methodology, Investigation, Writing- Original draft preparation, Reviewing and Editing.

Dr. Vladimir Feldgun: Methodology, Investigation, Writing- Original draft preparation, Reviewing and Editing.

Dr. Yuri karinski: Methodology, Investigation, Writing- Original draft preparation, Reviewing and Editing.

All authors have equal contribution to the manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a joint grant from the Centre for Absorption in Science of the Ministry of Immigrant Absorption and the Committee for Planning and Budgeting of the Council for Higher Education under the framework of the KAMEA Program.

References (49)

  • MB Rubin et al.

    Essential physics of target inertia in penetration problems missed by cavity expansion models

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2016)
  • L Rapoport et al.

    Separation and velocity dependence of the drag force applied to a rigid ovoid of Rankine nosed projectile penetrating an elastic-perfectly-plastic target

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2009)
  • AL Yarin et al.

    Penetration of a rigid projectile into an elastic-plastic target of finite thickness

    Int J Impact Eng

    (1995)
  • F Rong et al.

    Penetration resistance and the critical cavitation velocity for an ogive-nosed rigid projectile penetrating into a semi-infinite metallic target

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2019)
  • ZC Mu et al.

    Revising the penetration behavior of concrete-like and metal-like materials against the rigid projectile impact

    Mechanics of Materials

    (2020)
  • VR Feldgun et al.

    A coupled DISC -1D variational-difference approach to simulate the rigid projectile penetration into a concrete medium

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2018)
  • TL. Warren

    The effect of target inertia on the penetration of aluminum targets by rigid ogive-nosed long rods

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2016)
  • TL Warren et al.

    Penetration of common ordinary strength water saturated concrete targets by rigid ogive-nosed steel projectiles

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2016)
  • VR Feldgun et al.

    Quasi-static spherical/cylindrical cavity expansion in a medium with an arbitrary equation of state and a shear strength plasticity envelope

    Int J Solids Struct

    (2020)
  • XW Chen et al.

    Deep penetration of a non-deformable projectile with different geometrical characteristics

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2002)
  • XW Chen et al.

    Analysis on the resistive force in penetration of a rigid projectile

    Defence Technology

    (2014)
  • MJ Forrestal et al.

    An empirical equation for penetration depth of ogive-nose projectiles into concrete targets

    Int J Impact Eng

    (1994)
  • MJ Forrestal et al.

    Penetration of concrete targets with deceleration-time measurements

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2003)
  • QM Li et al.

    Dimensionless formulae for penetration depth of concrete targets impacted by rigid projectiles

    Int J Impact Eng

    (2003)
  • Cited by (6)

    • The optimal nose shape of a rigid projectile deeply penetrating into a solid target considering friction

      2022, International Journal of Impact Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      The projectile nose shape is described by the general monotonic shape function f(x), using a local coordinate system f(x)-x that is attached to the nose tip, where x as the local coordinate along the nose, (Fig. 1a). This model is also used and discussed in more detail in [27–29]. With these constitutive models, analytical expressions may be derived for the contact stresses at the “projectile-target” interface and for the corresponding resistance force and penetration depth.

    • A three-dimensional penetration trajectory model for ogive-nosed projectile into metal targets

      2021, International Journal of Impact Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      The inertia effect would play an important role during the process of penetration when striking velocity was above the threshold velocity for the onset of cavitation. Felgum et al. [20] developed an analytical solution on the cavitation phenomenon during the process of a rigid projectile penetrating into an elastic-plastic target based on the quasi-static and the dynamic cylindrical/spherical cavity expansion theory. The oblique penetration of projectile has attracted attention in the field of penetration.

    View full text