Abstract
Excess phosphorus in water supplies causes eutrophication, which degrades water quality. Hence, the efficient removal of phosphorus from wastewater represents a highly desirable process. Here, we evaluated the effect of sulfate concentration on enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR), in which phosphorus is typically removed under anaerobic-oxic cycles, with sulfate reduction the predominant process in the anaerobic phase. Two sequencing batch EBPR reactors operated under high- (SBR-H) vs. low-sulfate (SBR-L) concentrations for 189 days and under three periods, i.e., start-up, sufficient acetate, and limited acetate. Under acetate-rich conditions, phosphorus removal efficiency was > 90% for both reactors; however, under acetate-limited conditions, only 34% and 91.3% of the phosphorus were removed for the SBR-L and the SBR-H, respectively. Metagenomic sequencing of the reactors showed that the relative abundance of the polyphosphate-accumulating and sulfur-reducing bacteria (SRB) was higher in the SBR-H, consistent with its higher phosphorus removal activity. Ten high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes, including one closely related to the genus Thiothrix disciformis (99.81% average amino acid identity), were recovered and predicted to simultaneously metabolize phosphorus and sulfur by the presence of phosphorus (ppk, ppx, pst, and pit) and sulfur (sul, sox, dsr, sqr, apr, cys, and sat) metabolism marker genes. The omics-based analysis provided a holistic view of the microbial ecosystem in the EBPR process and revealed that SRB and Thiothrix play key roles in the presence of high sulfate.
Key points
• We observed high phosphorus-removal efficiency in high-sulfate EBPR.
• Metagenome-based analysis revealed sulfate-related metabolic mechanisms in EBPR.
• SRB and PAOs showed interrelationships in the EBPR–sulfur systems.
Graphical abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Raw metagenome sequences and the 16S rRNA gene sequences were deposited in the DNA Data Bank of Japan under accession numbers DRA010069 and DRA010150, respectively.
References
Albertsen M, Hansen LBS, Saunders AM, Nielsen PH, Nielsen KL (2012) Metagenome of a full-scale microbial community carrying out enhanced biological phosphorus removal. ISME J 6:1094–1106. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.176
Albertsen M, Hugenholtz P, Skarshewski A, Nielsen KL, Tyson GW, Nielsen PH (2013) Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes. Nat Biotechnol 31:533–538. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2579
Andrews S (2010) FastQC A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham bioinformatics. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. Accessed 8 June 2019
Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O (2008) The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-75
Baetens D, Weemaes M, Hosten L, de Vos P, Vanrolleghem P (2001) Enhanced biological phosphorus removal: competition and symbiosis between SRBs and PAOs on lactate/acetate feed, Proceedings 3rd IWA International Specialised Conference on Microorganisms in Activated Sludge and Biofilm Processes (Rome): 1994–1997.
Blackall LL, Jenkins D, Keller J, Schuler A, Crocetti GR, Hugenholtz P, Bond PL (2002) Identification of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms and design of 16S rRNA-directed probes for their detection and quantitation. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.66.3.1175-1182.2000
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Overbeek R, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Thomason JA, Stevens R, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Xia F (2015) RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 5:8365. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08365
Buffalo V (2014) Scythe—a Bayesian adapter trimmer. https://github.com/vsbuffalo/scythe. Accessed 8 June 2019
Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL (2009) BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7:335–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303
Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, Owens SM, Betley J, Fraser L, Bauer M, Gormley N, Gilbert JA, Smith G, Knight R (2012) Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.8
Carucci A, Lindrea K, Majone M, Ramadori R (1999) Different mechanisms for the anaerobic storage of organic substrates and their effect on enhanced biological phosphate removal (EBPR). Water Sci Technol 39:21–28. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1999.0251
Castro HF, Williams NH, Ogram A (2000) Phylogeny of sulfate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 1:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(99)00071-9
Comeau Y, Hall KJ, Hancock REW, Oldham WK (1986) Biochemical model for enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Water Res 20:1511–1521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(86)90115-6
Cox MP, Peterson DA, Biggs PJ (2010) SolexaQA: at-a-glance quality assessment of illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 11:485. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-485
De-Bashan LE, Bashan Y (2004) Recent advances in removing phosphorus from wastewater and its future use as fertilizer (1997-2003). Water Res 38:4222–4246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.07.014
Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10(10):996–998. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604
Follmi K (1996) The phosphorus cycle, phosphogenesis and marine phosphate-rich deposits. Earth-Science Rev 40:55–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(95)00049-6
Gebremariam SY, Beutel MW, Christian D, Hess TF (2012) Effects of glucose on the performance of enhanced biological phosphorus removal activated sludge enriched with acetate. Bioresour Technol 121:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.086
Hao T, Xiang P, Mackey HR, Chi K, Lu H, Chui H, van Loosdrecht MCM, Chen GH (2014) A review of biological sulfate conversions in wastewater treatment. Water Res 65:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2014.06.043
Hausmann B, Knorr KH, Schreck K, Tringe SG, Del Rio TG, Loy A, Pester M (2016) Consortia of low-abundance bacteria drive sulfate reduction-dependent degradation of fermentation products in peat soil microcosms. ISME J 10:2365–2375. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.42
Herlemann DP, Labrenz M, Jürgens K, Bertilsson S, Waniek JJ, Andersson AF (2011) Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J 5:1571–1579. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.41
Hesselmann RPX, Werlen C, Hahn D, Van Der Meer JR, Zehnder AJB (1999) Enrichment, phylogenetic analysis and detection of a bacterium that performs enhanced biological phosphate removal in activated sludge. Syst Appl Microbiol 22:454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(99)80055-1
Hyatt D, LoCascio PF, Hauser LJ, Uberbacher EC (2012) Gene and translation initiation site prediction in metagenomic sequences. Bioinformatics 28:2223–2230. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts429
Islam MS, Zhang Y, Dong S, McPhedran KN, Rashed EM, El-Shafei MM, Noureldin AM, Gamal El-Din M (2017) Dynamics of microbial community structure and nutrient removal from an innovative side-stream enhanced biological phosphorus removal process. J Environ Manage 198:300–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.074
Jing G, Sun Z, Wang H, Gong Y, Huang S, Ning K, Xu J, Su X (2017) Parallel-META 3: comprehensive taxonomical and functional analysis platform for efficient comparison of microbial communities. Sci Rep 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40371
Karst SM, Nielsen PH, Albertsen M, Stokholm-Bjerregaard M, McIlroy SJ, Nierychlo MA (2017) Critical assessment of the microorganisms proposed to be important to enhanced biological phosphorus removal in full-scale wastewater treatment systems. Front Microbiol 8:718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00718
Kavanaugh RG, Randall CW (1994) Bacterial populations in a biological nutrient removal plant. Water Scie Technol 29:25–34. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1994.0297
Kindaichi T, Yamaoka S, Uehara R, Ozaki N, Ohashi A, Albertsen M, Nielsen PH, Nielsen JL (2016) Phylogenetic diversity and ecophysiology of candidate phylum saccharibacteria in activated sludge. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw078
Kong Y, Nielsen JL, Nielsen PH (2005) Identity and ecophysiology of uncultured actinobacterial polyphosphate-accumulating organisms in full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4076–4085. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.7.4076-4085.2005
Kristiansen R, Nguyen HT, Saunders AM, Nielsen JL, Wimmer R, Le VQ, McIlroy SJ, Petrovski S, Seviour RJ, Calteau A, Nielsen KL, Nielsen PH (2013) A metabolic model for members of the genus Tetrasphaera involved in enhanced biological phosphorus removal. The ISME J 7:543–554. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.136
Letunic I, Bork P (2019) Interactive Tree Of Life (ITOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W256–W259. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz239
Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar A, Buchner A, Lai T, Steppi S, Jacob G, Förster W, Brettske I, Gerber S, Ginhart AW, Gross O, Grumann S, Hermann S, Jost R, König A, Liss T, Lüßbmann R, May M, Nonhoff B, Reichel B, Strehlow R, Stamatakis A, Stuckmann N, Vilbig A, Lenke M, Ludwig T, Bode A, Schleifer KH (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1363–1371. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh293
Müller AL, Kjeldsen KU, Rattei T, Pester M, Loy A (2015) Phylogenetic and environmental diversity of DsrAB-type dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductases. ISME J 9:1152–1165. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.208
Muyzer G, Stams AJM (2008) The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature Reviews Microbiology 7:441–454. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1892
Orellana LH, Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT (2016) ROCker: accurate detection and quantification of target genes in short-read metagenomic data sets by modeling sliding-window bitscores. Nucleic Acids Res 45:e14. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw900
Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R (2014) The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1226
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW (2015) CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.186072.114
Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL (2012) IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28:1420–1428. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174
Pester M, Bittner N, Deevong P, Wagner M, Loy A (2010) A ‘rare biosphere’ microorganism contributes to sulfate reduction in a peatland. ISME J 4:1591–1602. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.75
Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219
R Studio Team. 2019. RStudio Cloud: integrated development for R.
Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT (2014) Estimating coverage in metagenomic data sets and why it matters. ISME J 8:2349–2351. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.76
Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT (2016) The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 4:e1900v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1900v1
Rodriguez-R LM, Gunturu S, Harvey WT, Rosselló-Mora R, Tiedje JM, Cole JR, Konstantinidis KT (2018a) The Microbial Genomes Atlas (MiGA) webserver: taxonomic and gene diversity analysis of archaea and bacteria at the whole genome level. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W282–W288. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky467
Rodriguez-R LM, Gunturu S, Tiedje JM, Cole JR, Konstantinidis KT (2018b) Nonpareil 3: fast estimation of metagenomic coverage and sequence diversity. mSystems 3:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00039-18
Rubio-Rincón FJ, Welles L, Lopez-Vazquez CM, Nierychlo M, Abbas B, Geleijnse M, Nielsen PH, van Loosdrecht MCM, Brdjanovic D (2017a) Long-term effects of sulphide on the enhanced biological removal of phosphorus: the symbiotic role of Thiothrix caldifontis. Water Res 116:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.017
Rubio-Rincón FJ, Lopez-Vazquez CM, Welles L, van Loosdrecht MCM, Brdjanovic D (2017b) Sulphide effects on the physiology of Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis type I. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 101(4):1661–1672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7946-1
Rubio-Rincón FJ, Weissbrodt DG, Lopez-Vazquez CM, Welles L, Abbas B, Albertsen M, Nielsen PH, van Loosdrecht MCM, Brdjanovic D (2019) "Candidatus Accumulibacter delftensis": a clade IC novel polyphosphate-accumulating organism without denitrifying activity on nitrate. Water Research 161:136–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.053
Saad SA, Welles L, Lopez-Vazquez CM, van Loosdrecht MCM, Brdjanovic D (2017) Sulfide effects on the anaerobic metabolism of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms. Chem Eng J 326:68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.074
Segata N, Börnigen D, Morgan XC, Huttenhower C (2013) PhyloPhlAn is a new method for improved phylogenetic and taxonomic placement of microbes. Nat Commun 4:2304. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3304
Shu L, Schneider P, Jegatheesan V, Johnson J (2006) An economic evaluation of phosphorus recovery as struvite from digester supernatant. Bioresource Technol 97:2211–2216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.11.005
Takami H, Taniguchi T, Arai W, Takemoto K, Moriya Y, Goto S (2016) An automated system for evaluation of the potential functionome: MAPLE version 2.1.0. DNA Res 23:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsw030
Tatusova T, Ciufo S, Fedorov B, O’Neill K, Tolstoy I (2014) RefSeq microbial genomes database: new representation and annotation strategy. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D553–D559. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1274
The UniProt Consortium (2015) UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D204–D212. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku989
Valverde-Pérez B, Wágner DS, Lóránt B, Gülay A, Smets BF, Plósz BG (2016) Short-sludge age EBPR process – microbial and biochemical process Characterisation during Reactor Start-up and Operation. Water Res 104:320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.026
Weissbrodt DG, Schneiter GS, Fürbringer JM, Holliger C (2013) Identification of trigger factors selecting for polyphosphate- and glycogen-accumulating organisms in aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactors. Water Res 47:7006–7018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.08.043
Wentzel M, Ekama G, Loewenthal R, Dold P, Marais G (1989) Enhanced polyphosphate organism cultures in activated sludge systems-Part II: experimental behaviour. Water SA 15:71–88
Wu D, Ekama GA, Lu H, Chui HK, Liu WT, Brdjanovic D, van Loosdrecht MCM, Chen GH (2013) A new biological phosphorus removal process in association with sulfur cycle. Water Res 47:3057–3069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.009
Wu D, Ekama GA, Wang HG, Wei L, Lu H, Chui HK, Liu WT, Brdjanovic D, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Chen GH (2014a) Simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal in the sulfur cycle-associated enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process. Water Res 49:251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.029
Wu YW, Tang YH, Tringe SG, Simmons BA, Singer SW (2014b) MaxBin: an automated binning method to recover individual genomes from metagenomes using an expectation-maximization algorithm. Microbiome 2:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-26
Xue W, Hao T, Mackey HR, Li X, Chan RC, Chen G (2017) The role of sulfate in aerobic granular sludge process for emerging sulfate-laden wastewater treatment. Water Res 124:513–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.009
Yamamoto RI, Komori T, Matsui S (1991) Filamentous bulking and hindrance of phosphate removal due to sulfate reduction in activated sludge. Water Science & Technology 23:927–935. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1991.0544
Zhang Y, Hua Z, Lu H, Oehmen A, Guo J (2018) Elucidating functional microorganisms and metabolic mechanisms in a novel engineered ecosystem integrating C, N, P and S biotransformation by metagenomics. Water Res 148:219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.061
Zheng X, Sun P, Han J, Song Y, Hu Z, Fan H, Lv S (2014) Inhibitory factors affecting the process of enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) - a mini-review. Process Biochemistry 49:2207–2213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2014.10.008
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Zhu Yuxun (Kanazawa University) for support with reactor operation.
Funding
This study was partly funded by the Leading Initiative for Excellent Young Researchers from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology-Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript. N. M. and Y. M. contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplemental material provides additional information about the reactors and metagenome analysis discussed in the text and is available online on the Springer publications website at https://link.springer.com
ESM 1
(PDF 1405 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsuura, N., Masakke, Y., Karthikeyan, S. et al. Metagenomic insights into the effect of sulfate on enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105, 2181–2193 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11113-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11113-4