Case Notes

The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?

Authors:

Abstract

In this case, the CJEU answers the question whether Article 1(3) of the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant must be interpreted as meaning that when there are strong indications that detention conditions in the issuing Member State infringe Article 4 of the Charter, the executing judicial authority must refuse surrender of the person against whom a European arrest warrant is issued. The CJEU rules that if, after a two-stage assessment, the executing judicial authority finds that there is a real risk of an Article 4 violation for the requested person once surrendered, the execution of the arrest warrant must initially be deferred and, where such a risk cannot be discounted, the executing judicial authority must decide whether or not to terminate the surrender procedure. This conclusion shakes the system of mutual trust upon which the principle of mutual recognition is built.

Keywords:

Framework Decision 2002/584JHAGrounds for non-executionMutual recognitionMutual trustArticle 4 Charter
  • Year: 2016
  • Volume: 32 Issue: 83
  • Page/Article: 112-121
  • DOI: 10.5334/ujiel.337
  • Submitted on 20 Apr 2016
  • Accepted on 15 Sep 2016
  • Published on 29 Sep 2016