Students as co-inquirers in Australian higher education: Opportunities and challenges

Authors

  • Amani Bell University of Sydney

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.8

Keywords:

Students as Partners, Students as Change Agents, Student Researchers, Innovative Pedagogies

Abstract

While the model of students and staff working in partnership to enhance university education is well-established internationally, it is still an emerging field in Australia where most of such initiatives involve only small numbers of students. This paper examines the opportunities and challenges for students-as-co-inquirers initiatives in Australia. Drawing on a review of the literature, a consideration of theory, and discussions with colleagues, I propose ways in which students as co-inquirers practice and research might move forward, both in Australia and globally.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Amani Bell, University of Sydney

Amani Bell is a Senior Lecturer in the Educational Innovation team at the University of Sydney. Amani’s research focuses on building the teaching capacity of academics and on students as co-inquirers.

References

Allin, L. (2014). Collaboration between staff and students in the scholarship of teaching and learning: The potential and the problems. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 2(1), 95-102.

A to the editors. Honi Soit, Semester 1, Week 4.

Australian Universities (2015). Groupings of Australian Universities.

Bell, A., Carson, L. & Piggott, L. (2013). Deliberative democracy for curriculum renewal. In E. Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education (pp. 499-508). Bingley: Emerald.

Bovill, C. (2014). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 15-25.

Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N (2015). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 1-14.

Brooman, S., Darwent, S., & Pimor, A. (2015). The student voice in higher education curriculum design: Is there value in listening? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(6), 663-674.

Carey, P. (2013). Student as co-producer in a marketised higher education system: A case study of students’ experience of participation in curriculum design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(3), 250-260.

Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. Los Angeles: Sage.

Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Allen & Unwin.

Cook-Sather, A. (2014a). Student-faculty partnership in explorations of pedagogical practice: A threshold concept in academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 186-198.

Cook-Sather, A. (2014b). Multiplying perspectives and improving practice: What can happen when undergraduate students collaborate with college faculty to explore teaching and learning. Instructional Science, 42(1), 31-46.

Cook -Sather, A., & Agu, P. (2013). Students of color and faculty members working together toward culturally sustaining pedagogy. In Laura Cruz (Ed.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, 32 (pp. 271-285). John Wiley & Sons.

Cook-Sather, A., & Luz, A. (2015). Greater engagement in and responsibility for learning: What happens when students cross the threshold of student–faculty partnership. Higher Education Research Development, 34(6), 1097-1109.

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. John Wiley & Sons.

Deane, E. M., & Stanley, K. (2015). The student leadership in curriculum development and reform project. In T. Thomas, E. Levin, P. Dawson, K. Fraser, & R. Hadgraft (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: Learning for life and work in a complex world, 38 (pp. 130-140). Melbourne, Australia, 6-9 July 2015.

Delpish, A., Darby, A., Holmes, A., Knight-McKenna, M., Mihans, R., King, C., & Felten, P. (2010). Student-faculty partnerships in course design. In C. Werder & M. M. Otis (Eds), Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning (pp. 96-114). Virginia: Stylus.

Doherty, J. (2008). Individual and community: Deliberative practices in a first-year seminar. In J. R. Dedrick, L. Grattan, & H. Dienstfrey (Eds.), Deliberation and the work of higher education (pp. 59-87). Ohio: Kettering Foundation.

Dunne, E. & Owen, D. (Eds.) (2013). The Student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education. Bingley: Emerald.

Dunne, E., & Zandstra, R. (2011). Students as change agents—New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in Higher Education. Bristol: A joint University of Exeter ESCalate / Higher Education Academy Publication.

Felten, P., Bagg, J., Bumbry, M., Hill, J., Hornsby, K., Pratt, M., & Weller, S. (2013). A call for expanding inclusive student engagement in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(2), 63-74.

Forsyth, H. (2014). A history of the modern Australian university. New South.

Gale, T. (2012). Towards a southern theory of student equity in Australian higher education: Enlarging the rationale for expansion. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 1(3), 238-262.

Griffin, P., Coates, H., Mcinnis, C., & James, R. (2003). The development of an extended course experience questionnaire. Quality in Higher Education, 9(3), 259-266.

Harriger, K. J., & McMillan, J. J. (2008). Contexts for deliberation: Experimenting with democracy in the classroom, on campus, and in the community. In J. R. Dedrick., L. Grattan, & H. Dienstfrey (Eds.), Deliberation and the work of higher education (pp. 235-265). Ohio: Kettering Foundation.

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.

Higher Education Academy (2014). Framework for partnership in learning and teaching in higher education.

Hoon, C. H., & Looker, P. (2013). On the margins of SoTL discourse: An Asian perspective. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 131-145.

Hutchings, P. (2000). Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, USA: Carnegie Publications, the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Keesing-Styles, L., Nash, S., & Ayres, R. (2014). Managing curriculum change and ‘ontological uncertainty’ in tertiary education. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 496-509.

Kift, S. (2015). A decade of transition pedagogy: A quantum leap in conceptualising the first year experience. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 2, 51-86.

Kleinman, D. L., & Osley-Thomas, R. (2016). Codes of commerce and codes of citizenship: A historical look at students as consumers within US higher education. In Berman, E.P. (Ed), The university under pressure (research in the sociology of organizations, volume 46) (pp. 197-220). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Little, S. (Ed.). (2011). Staff-student partnerships in higher education. London, UK: Continuum.

Martin, K. L. (2008). Please knock before you enter: Aboriginal regulation of outsiders and the implications for researchers. Brisbane: Post Pressed.

National Health and Medical Research Council (2003). Values and ethics: Guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

O’Neill, G., & McMahon, S. (2012). Giving student groups a stronger voice: using participatory research and action (PRA) to initiate change to a curriculum. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49 (2), 161-171.

O’Shea, S. (2012). UStart: A peer designed and led orientation activity. E-Source for College Transitions, 9(2), 4-6.

Peseta, T., Bell, A., Clifford, A. English A., Janarthana, J., Jones, C., Teal, M., & Zhang, J. (2016). Students as ambassadors and researchers of assessment renewal: Puzzling over the practices of university and academic life. The International Journal for Academic Development 21:1, 54-66.

Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. UK: Open University Press.

Quinlan, K. M. (2014). Leadership of teaching for student learning in higher education: What is needed? Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 32-45.

Ramsden, P. (2008). The Future of Higher Education Teaching and the Student Experience.

Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed books.

Taylor, C., & Robinson, C. (2009). Student voice: Theorising power and participation. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 17(2), 167-175.

Universities Australia. (2015). Data snapshot 2014.

Verwoord, R. (2014). ISSoTL and student engagement.

Welikala, T., & Atkin, C. (2014). Student co-inquirers: The challenges and benefits of inclusive research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(4), 390-406.

Werder, C. (2014). Students as co-inquirers: A long history with deep roots.

Werder, C., Thibou, S., & Kaufer, B. (2012). Students as co-inquirers: A requisite threshold concept in educational development? The Journal of Faculty Development, 26(3), 34-38.

Werder, C., Ware, L., Thomas, C., & Skogsberg, E. (2010). Students in parlour talk on teaching and learning. In C.

Werder & M. M. Otis (Eds.), Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. (pp. 16-31). Virginia: Stylus.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-01

How to Cite

Bell, Amani. 2016. “Students As Co-Inquirers in Australian Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges”. Teaching and Learning Inquiry 4 (2):81-90. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.8.

Issue

Section

Articles: Students as Co-Inquirers (Special Section)