Educational Leadership Doctoral Students’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Instructional Strategies and Course Design in a Fully Online Graduate Statistics Course

Authors

  • Mei Jiang Texas A&M University-Commerce
  • Julia Ballenger Texas A&M University-Commerce
  • William Holt Texas A&M University-Commerce

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.1568

Keywords:

instructional strategy, online course design, statistics

Abstract

In the past several decades, higher education has witnessed exponential growth of online learning, as well as the need for it. New technology has dramatically transformed the way education is delivered compared to what takes place in the traditional classroom. It has enabled online delivery of course materials to students outside of face-to-face classroom in an asynchronous manner and provide students with self-paced flexibility at their convenience. Given the abstract nature of statistics content, effectiveness of the instructional strategies and course design in online statistics instruction has become particularly important to students’ learning success. In this qualitative study, the authors explored perceptions of the Educational Leadership doctoral students towards an online graduate level introductory statistic course in terms of whether the online course instructional strategies and course design helped them learn statistics. The authors assessed effectiveness of the instructional strategies and design of the online statistics course as well as students’ needs, so more effective instructional strategies could be used for online statistics teaching. Students identified the PowerPoint presentations with recorded lectures to be the most useful strategy. This strategy, along with live Q&A sessions, guided practice and activities, helped make the textbook information more real-world and connected the elements of statistics to application.

Author Biographies

Mei Jiang, Texas A&M University-Commerce

Asssistant Professor

Department of Educational Leadership

Julia Ballenger, Texas A&M University-Commerce

Professor
Department of Educational Leadership

William Holt, Texas A&M University-Commerce

Associate Professor
Department of Educational Leadership

References

Anderson, J. F., & Norton, R. W., Nussbaum, J. F. (1981). Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 20, 377-392.

Arasaratnam-Smith, L. A., & Northcote, M. (2017). Community in online higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(2), 188-198.

Baldwin, S. J. (2017). Adaptation and acceptance in online course design from four-year college and university instructors: An analysis using grounded theory (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholarworks boisestate.edu/td/1241

Baloglu, M. (2003). Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 855–865. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00076-4

Bonk, C. J., & Dennen, V. P. (2003). Frameworks for research design, benchmarks, training and pedagogy in web-based distance education. In M. G. Moore, W. G. Anderson (Eds.). Handbook of distance education (pp. 245-260). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown, E. N. & Kass, R. E. (2009). What is Statistics? The American Statistician, 63(2), 105-110.

Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A., & Szücs, D. (2016). The chicken or the egg? The direction of the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance. Frontier in Psychology, 6, 1987. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01987

Cook, C. W., & Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Technology and online education: Models for Change, Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 7(3), 171-188.

Cruise, R., Cash, R., & Bolton, D. (1985). Development and validation of an instrument to measure statistical anxiety. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Statistical Education. Las Vegas, NV.

Cundell, A. & Sheepy, E. (2018). Student perceptions of the most effective and engaging online learning activities in a blended graduate seminar. Online Learning, 22(3), 87-102. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i3.1467

Finzer, W. (2015). The data science education dilemma. Technology Innovations in Statistical Education, 7(2). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7gv0q9dc

Friedman, J. (2018, January 11). Study: More students are enrolling in online courses. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/higher-education/online-education/articles/2018-01-11/study-more-students-are-enrolling-in-online-courses?src=usn_tw

Gbrich C. (2007). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction (1st ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Hamilton, E., & Feenberg, A. (2012). Alternative rationalisations and ambivalent futures: A critical history of online education. In Andrew Feenberg & Norm Friesen (Eds.), (Re)inventing the internet. Rotterdam: Sense.

Hopko, D. R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R. L., & Hunt, M. K. (2003). The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS): construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10, 178–182. doi: 10.1177/1073191103010002008

Horton, N. J. (2015). Challenges and opportunities for statistics and statistical education: Looking back, looking forward. The American Statistician, 69(2), 138-145.

Horton, N. J. (2013). I hear, I forget. I do, I understand: A modified Moore-method mathematical statistics course. The American Statistician, 67(4), 219–228.

Horton, N. J., Baumer, B., & Wickham, H. (2015). Setting the stage for data science: Integration of data management skills in introductory and second courses in statistics, Chance, 28(2), 40–50. Retrieved from: http://chance.amstat.org/2015/04/setting-the-stage/

Kaplan, D. (2012). Statistical Modeling: A Fresh Approach (2nd Ed.). Retrieved from http://www.mosaic-web.org/go/StatisticalModeling

Larwin, K., & Larwin, D. (2011) A Meta-Analysis Examining the Impact of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Postsecondary Statistics Education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 253-278. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2011.10782572

Lu, F., & Lemonde, M. (2013). A comparison of online versus face-to-face teaching delivery in statistics instruction for undergraduate health science students. Advance in Health Sciences Education, 18, 963–973. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9435-3

Macher, D., Paechter, M., Papousek, I., Ruggeri, K., Freudenthaler, H., & Arendasy, M. (2013). Statistics anxiety, state anxiety during an examination, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 535–549. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02081.x

Mayring P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1, 20, Retrieved from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385

Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Nagai, A. (2015). Content analysis: It’s not bean-counting. Academic Quest, 28, 472-479.

Norberg, A., Stockel, B., & Antti, M. (2017). Time shifting and agile time boxes in course design. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 88-103.

Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Academic procrastination and statistics anxiety. Assessment Evaluation Higher Education, 29, 3–19. doi: 10.1080/0260293042000160384

Onwuegbuzie, A., & Daley, C. (1999). Perfectionism and statistics anxiety. Personal Individual Difference, 26, 1089–1102. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00214-1

Onwuegbuzie, A., Da Ros, D., & Ryan, J.M. (1997). The components of statistics anxiety: A phenomenological study. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19, 11–35.

Onwuegbuzie, A., & Wilson, V. (2003). Statistics anxiety: Nature, etiology, antecedents, effects, and treatments–a comprehensive review of the literature. Teaching Higher Education, 8, 195–209. doi: 10.1080/1356251032000052447

Passow, H. (2012). Which ABET competencies do Engineering graduates find most important in their work? Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 95-108.

Pinto, Y. (2012). A strategy, implementation and results of a flexible competency Based Curriculum. ACM Inroads, 1(2), 54-61.

Saadati, F., Ahmad Tarmizi, R., Mohd Ayub, A. F., & Abu Bakar, K. (2015). Effect of internet-based cognitive apprenticeship model (i-CAM) on statistics learning among postgraduate students. PloS One, 10(7), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129938

Seaman, J.E., Allen, E., & Seaman J. (2018). Great increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group, Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradeincrease.pdf

Shankararaman, V., & Elmaleh, J. (2016). Leveraging competency framework to improve teaching and learning: A methodological approach. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1299-1327. Retrieved from: http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2519.

Sosa, G., Berger, D., Saw, A., & Mary, J. (2011). Effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in statistics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 97-128. doi:10.3102/0034654310378174

Stone, P. (2001). Content Analysis. In Encyclopedia of Sociology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 417-422). New York: Macmillan Reference USA. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com.proxy.tamuc.edu/apps/doc/CX3404400067/GVRL?u=txshracd2565&sid=GVRL&xid=b241e461

THECB. (2018, Spring). 2018 Texas Public Higher Education Almanac. Retrieved from http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/reports/PDF/10900.PDF?CFID=86738635&CFTOKEN=96628409

Wickham, H. (2014). Tidy data, Journal of Statistical Software, 59(10). Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v59/i10/

Williams, A. S. (2010). Statistics anxiety and instructor immediacy. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(2), doi: 10.1080/10691898.2010.11889495

Yang, D. (2017). Instructional strategies and course design for teaching statistics online: perspectives from online students. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1). doi:10.1186/s40594-017-0096-x

Downloads

Published

2019-12-01

Issue

Section

Section II