Instructor Perceptions of Quality Learning in MOOCs They Teach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2043Keywords:
Massive Open Online Courses, MOOCs, social constructivism, self-regulated learning, online learningAbstract
Discussions regarding the instructional and learning value of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) include the question of whether or not MOOC learners gain much value, if any at all, and has been a continuing debate since MOOCs began. Skeptics argue that MOOCs lack academic rigor and are superficial, while proponents praise them as addressing important global issues of educational access and affordability, providing pathways to more substantial learning opportunities. An important viewpoint in this conversation that warrants consideration is that of the professors/instructors who teach MOOCs and how they perceive the quality of learning that takes place in their MOOCs. In this study, semi-structured qualitative interviews were used with three MOOC instructors and an inductive analysis approach that resulted in the emergence of three main themes. The findings from this study suggest that instructors do believe that quality learning can take place within a MOOC and is often accomplished through social constructivism and self-regulated learning approaches. Discussions, dialogues, negotiations, collaborations as well as learners accomplishing their intended goals in the course were all considered to be manifestations of quality learning in a MOOC. Implications of the findings for additional research and practice are also discussed.
References
Annaraud, K. & Singh, D. (2017). Perceptions of Hospitality Faculty and Students of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 29:2, 82-90, DOI 10.1080/10963758.2017.1297714
Arbaugh, J. B., & Benbunan-Finch, R. (2006). An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 435-447. DOI 10.5465/amle.2006.23473204
Baker, R., Passmore, D. L., & Mulligan, B. M. (2018). Inclusivity instead of exclusivity: The role of MOOCs for college credit. In Enhancing education through open degree programs and prior learning assessment, 109-127. IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5255-0.ch00
Brahimi, T., & Sarirete, A. (2015). Learning outside the classroom through MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 604-609. DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.013
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edX's first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13-25.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21. DOI 10.1007/BF00988593
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Czerniewicz, L., Deacon, A., Glover, M., & Walji, S. (2017). MOOC—making and open educational practices. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 81-97. DOI 10.1007/s12528-016-9128-7
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interactive Media in education, 2012(3). DOI 10.5334/2012-18
DeBoer, Ho, Stump, & Breslow. (2014). "Changing ‘course’: Reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses", Educational Researcher. 43(2), 74-84 DOI 10.3102/0013189X14523038
Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2017, May). Understanding Learning and Teaching in MOOCs from the Perspectives of Students and Instructors: A Review of Literature from 2014 to 2016. In European Conference on Massive Open Online Courses, 176-181. Springer, Cham. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_20
Douglas, K., Zielinski, M., Merzdorf, H., Diefes-Dux, H., & Bermel, P. (2019). Meaningful Learner Information for MOOC Instructors Examined Through a Contextualized Evaluation Framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3717
Emanuel, E., Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., & Woods, D. (2013). Online education: MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature, 503, 346. DOI 10.1038/ 503342a
Evans, S. & Myrick, J. G. (2015) How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses, Distance Education, 36:3, 295-311, DOI 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736
Ferguson, R., & Clow, D. (2015). Examining engagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs). In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 51-58. ACM. DOI 10.1145/2723576.2723606
Ferguson, R., Sharples, M., & Beale, R. (2015). MOOCs 2030: a future for massive open online learning. Retrieved at http://oro.open.ac.uk/43541/3/MOOCs%202030%20revised.pdf
Fernandez, J. V., & Webster, S. (2014). From OCW to MOOC: Deployment of OERs in a massive open online course. The experience of Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M). Open Praxis, 6(2), 145-158. DOI 10.5944/openpraxis.6.2.115
Friedman, T. (2013, January 27). Revolution hits the universities. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/opinion/sunday/friedman-revolutionhits-the-universities.html
FutureLearn (n.d). Social learning. Retrieved from https://partners.futurelearn.com/updates/social-learning/
Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. NYU press. DOI 0.18574/nyu/9780814732939.001.0001
Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 134–176. DOI 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954
Gast, A. (2013). Current trends in adult degree programs: How public universities respond to the needs of adult learners. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2013(140), 17-25. DOI 10.1002/ace.20070
Haavind, S., & Sistek-Chandler, C. (2015). The emergent role of the MOOC instructor: A qualitative study of trends toward improving future practice. International Journal on E-learning, 14(3), 331-350. DOI 10.1016/J.edurev.2014.05.001
Ho, A., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses, Fall 2012–Summer 2013 (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1). Retrieved from http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/96649/SSRN-id2381263.pdf;sequence=1
Haggard, S., Wang, B. H., & He, X. L. (2014). The MOOC Is Maturing [J]. Educational Research, 5(412), 92-112 DOI 10.12973/eurasia.2017.01056a
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1999). Using situated learning and multimedia to investigate higher-order thinking. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(1), 3-24. Retreived from http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/6962/1/using_situated_learning.pdf
Honeychurch, S., & Draper, S. (2013). A first briefing on MOOCs. Glasgow: The University of Glasgow. Retrieved from http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/93069/1/93069.pdf
Kelly, A. P. (2014). Disruptor, Distracter, or What? A Policymaker's Guide to Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Bellwether Education Partners. Retrieved at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED553715.pdf
Kim, B. (2001). Social constructivism. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 1(1), 16.
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & education, 104, 18-33. DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 19-38. DOI 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882
Kurzweil, M. (2018). Alternative Postsecondary Pathways: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and Why It Matters. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 50(3-4), 154-157. DOI 10.1080/00091383.2018.1509654
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Liu, M., Kang, J., & McKelroy, E. (2015). Examining learners’ perspective of taking a MOOC: reasons, excitement, and perception of usefulness. Educational Media International, 52(2), 129-146. DOI 10.1080/09523987.2015.1053289
Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2019). Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 28-41. DOI 10.14742/ajet.3749
Lowenthal, P., & Hodges, C. (2015). In search of quality: Using Quality Matters to analyze the quality of massive, open, online courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5). DOI 10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2348
Lowenthal, P., Snelson, C., & Perkins, R. (2018). Teaching Massive, Open, Online, Courses (MOOCs): Tales from the Front Line. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). DOI 10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3505
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77-83. DOI 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
McMahon, M. (1997). Social constructivism and the World Wide Web-A paradigm for learning. In ASCILITE conference. Perth, Australia, 327.
Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2). DOI 10.1007/s12186-010-9041-6
Najafi, H., Rolheiser, C., Harrison, L., & Håklev, S. (2015). University of Toronto instructors’ experiences with developing MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). DOI 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2073
Onah, D. F., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of massive open online courses: behavioural patterns. EDULEARN14 proceedings, 5825-5834. DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.2402.0009
Park, Y., Jung, I., & Reeves, T. C. (2015). Learning from MOOCs: A qualitative case study from the learners’ perspectives. Educational Media International, 52(2), 72-87. DOI 10.1080/09523987.2015.1053286
Palvia, S., Aeron, P., Gupta, P., Mahapatra, D., Parida, R., Rosner, R., & Sindhi, S. (2018). Online Education: Worldwide Status, Challenges, Trends, and Implications. DOI 10.1080/1097198X.2018.1542262
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning, In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, 451–502. San Diego, CA: Academic. DOI 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Reich, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2019). The MOOC pivot. Science, 363(6423), 130-131. DOI 10.1126/science.aav7958
Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., Bayne, S., & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 57-69. DOI 10.1080/02680930701754047
Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
Siemens, G. (2012). MOOCs are really a platform. eLearnspace.
Shearer, R. L. (2012). Theory to Practice in Instructional Design. In Moore, M. G. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of distance education. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research, 17, 273-85.
Suen, H. K. (2014). Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3). DOI 10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1680
Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The internet and higher education, 24, 1-12. DOI 0.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001
Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013–2015. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17, 198–221. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2448/3655 DOI 10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. DOI 10.12691/education-5-5-8
Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Czerniewicz, L. (2016). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education, 37(2), 208-223. DOI 10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400
Xing, W. (2019) Exploring the influences of MOOC design features on student performance and persistence, Distance Education, 40:1, 98-113, DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1553560
Yengin, I., Karahoca, A., & Karahoca, D. (2011). E-learning success model for instructors’ satisfactions in perspective of interaction and usability outcomes. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1396-1403. DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.021
Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE.
Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education (A white paper). London: JISC CETIS. Retrieved from http://www.smarthighered.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf DOI 10.13140/2.1.5072.8320
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., & Jakobs, H. (2014). A Review of the State-of-the-Art. Proceedings of CSEDU, 9-20.
Zelinski, M., Hicks, N. M., Wang, S., Douglas, K. A., Bermel, P., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Madhavan, K. (2017). Instructor outcomes of teaching a STEM MOOC. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1-7. IEEE. DOI 0.1109/FIE.2017.8190590
Zheng, S., Wisniewski, P., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2016). Ask the instructors: Motivations and challenges of teaching massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 206–221. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). DOI 10.1145/2818048.2820082
Zutshi, S., O'Hare, S., & Rodafinos, A. (2013). Experiences in MOOCs: The perspective of students. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 218-227.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
