Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of Perceived Identity Threat and Realistic Threat on the Negative Attitudes and Usage Intentions Toward Hotel Service Robots: The Moderating Effect of the Robot’s Anthropomorphism

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of social robots in service scenarios (e.g. in hotels) is expected to increase. Research has indicated that realistic threat and identity threat contribute to prejudice, discrimination, and conflict. Therefore, designing smart robots that can understand user needs and provide prompt service is critical. This study aimed to explore the relationships among perceived threat, negative attitudes toward robots, and usage intention, and to discuss how anthropomorphism moderates the relationship between negative attitudes and usage intention toward robots. We hypothesized that realistic threat and identity threat positively influence negative attitudes toward social robots; such negative attitudes have negative effects on usage intention; and anthropomorphism positively moderates said effect. A between-subjects factorial research design was employed; participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions of robot anthropomorphic appearance. The stimuli were two pictures of service robots—one with a humanoid appearance and one without. After viewing one of the stimuli, participants filled in a questionnaire that assessed the realistic threat, identity threat, negative attitudes, and usage intention. When participants perceived the robot’s appearance to be highly anthropomorphic, their negative attitudes toward it had a stronger negative effect on their usage intention than when they considered the appearance less anthropomorphic. Both identity threat and realistic threat significantly increased negative attitudes toward the robots; thus, the public’s willingness to use these robots would be negatively affected. This study recommends that robotics companies consider how to decrease people’s perceived realistic and identity threats as well as adjust robots’ anthropomorphic appearance to people’s tastes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AjzenI I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Org Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benzell SG, Kotlikoff LJ, Lagarda G, Sachs JD (2015) Robots are us: some economics of human replacement. Working paper, National Bureau for Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.bu.edu/econ/files/2015/05/Robots_Are_Us_3-29-20151.pdf

  3. Blavier A, Nyssen AS (2014) The effect of 2D and 3D visual modes on surgical task performance: role of expertise and adaptation processes. Cogn Technol Work 16:509–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0281-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowen J, Morosan C (2018) Beware hospitality industry: the robots are coming. Worldw Hosp Tour Themes 10:726–733. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-07-2018-0045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carter S, Yeo ACM (2016) Mobile apps usage by Malaysian business undergraduates and postgraduates: implications for consumer behaviour theory and marketing practice. Intern Res 26:733–757. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-10-2014-0273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi J, Kim M (2009) The usage and evaluation of anthropomorphic form in robot design. In: Undisciplined! Design research society conference 2008, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, 16–19 July 2008

  7. Chou S-J (2018) The effects of anthropomorphism and autonomy of hotel service robots on consumer usage intention. Tatung University, Taipei

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conner M, Sparks P, Povey R, James R, Shepherd R, Armitage CJ (2002) Moderator effects of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude-behaviour relationships. Eur J Soc Psychol 32:705–718. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dautenhahn K (2007) Methodology & themes of human-robot interaction: a growing research field. Int J Adv Robot Syst. https://doi.org/10.5772/5702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duffy BR (2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Rob Autom Syst 42:177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114:864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erebak S, Turgut T (2019) Caregivers’ attitudes toward potential robot coworkers in elder care. Cognit Technol Work 21:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0512-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Evers V, Winterboer A, Pavlin G, Groen F (2010) The evaluation of empathy, autonomy and touch to inform the design of an environmental monitoring robot. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 285–294

  14. Ezer N, Fisk AD, Rogers WA (2009) Attitudinal and intentional acceptance of domestic robots by younger and older adults. In: International conference on universal access in human-computer interaction. Springer. Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 39–48

  15. Ferrari F, Paladino MP, Jetten J (2016) Blurring human–machine distinctions: anthropomorphic appearance in social robots as a threat to human distinctiveness. Int J Soc Robot 8:287–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0338-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1972) Attitudes and opinions. Annu Rev Psychol 23:487–544. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.23.020172.002415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Flandorfer P (2012) Population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: the importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. Int J Popul Res 2012:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/829835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J Mark Res 18:382. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerlich L, Parsons BN, White AS, Prior S, Warner P (2007) Gesture recognition for control of rehabilitation robots. Cognit Technol Work 9:189–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0062-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gockley R, Forlizzi J, Simmons R (2006) Interactions with a moody robot. In: HRI 2006: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM conference on human-robot interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, USA, pp 186–193

  21. Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings—IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication. pp 55–60

  22. de Greef T, Leveringhaus A (2015) Design for responsibility: safeguarding moral perception via a partnership architecture. Cognit Technol Work 17:319–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0329-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis: Global edition. Pearson Education Limited, UK

  24. Henri T, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychol Intergr Relat 2:7–24

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hu Y, Li Z, Li G, Yuan P, Yang C, Song R (2017) Development of sensory-motor fusion-based manipulation and grasping control for a robotic hand-eye system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 47:1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2016.2560530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu Y, Wu X, Geng P, Li Z (2019) Evolution strategies learning with variable impedance control for grasping under uncertainty. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 66:7788–7799. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2884240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ivaldi S, Lefort S, Peters J, Chetouani M, Provasi J, Zibetti E (2017) Towards engagement models that consider individual factors in HRI: on the relation of extroversion and negative attitude towards robots to gaze and speech during a human-robot assembly task experiments with the iCub humanoid. Int J Soc Robot 9:63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0357-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ivanov S, Webster C, Garenko A (2018) Young Russian adults’ attitudes towards the potential use of robots in hotels. Technol Soc 55:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jetten J, Spears R, Manstead ASR (1996) Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. J Pers Soc Psychol 71:1222–1233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kamide H, Kawabe K, Shigemi S, Arai T (2013) Development of a psychological scale for general impressions of humanoid. In: Advanced robotics. pp 3–17

  31. Kiesler S, Hinds P (2004) Introduction to this special issue on human-robot interaction. Hum-Comput Interact 19:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2004.9667337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Koschate M, Potter R, Bremner P, Levine M (2016) Overcoming the uncanny valley: displays of emotions reduce the uncanniness of humanlike robots. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction

  33. Kuhnert B, Ragni M, Lindner F (2017) The gap between human’s attitude towards robots in general and human’s expectation of an ideal everyday life robot. In: RO-MAN 2017—26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication

  34. Lau S-H, Woods PC (2008) An investigation of user perceptions and attitudes towards learning objects. Br J Educ Technol 39:685–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00770.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. LeVine R, Campbell D (1972) Ethnocentrism: theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lolli JC (2013) Interpersonal communication skills and the young hospitality leader: are they prepared? Int J Hosp Manag 32:295–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mac Dorman KF, Chattopadhyay D (2016) Reducing consistency in human realism increases the uncanny valley effect; increasing category uncertainty does not. Cognition 146:190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McNaughton N, Gray JA (2000) Anxiolytic action on the behavioural inhibition system implies multiple types of arousal contribute to anxiety. J Affect Disord 61:161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00344-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Millot P (2015) Situation awareness: is the glass half empty or half full? Cognit Technol Work 17:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0322-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mori M, Mac Dorman KF, Kageki N (2012) The uncanny valley. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 19:98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Murphy J, Hofacker C, Gretze lU (2017) Dawning of the age of robots in hospitality and tourism: challenges for teaching and research. Eur J Tour Res 15:104–111

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nomura T, Kanda AT, Suzuki T (2006) Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human-robot interaction. AI Soc 20:138–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-005-0012-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Park E, Del Pobil AP (2013) Users’ attitudes toward service robots in South Korea. Ind Rob 40:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/01439911311294273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Riek BM, Mania EW, Gaertner SL (2006) Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: a meta-analytic review. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 10:336–353. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Roubroeks MAJ, Ham JRC, Midden CJH (2010) The dominant robot: threatening robots cause psychological reactance, especially when they have incongruent goals. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 174–184

  46. Sarstedt M, Henseler J, Ringle CM (2011) Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: alternative methods and empirical results. Adv Int Mark 22:195–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Saygin A, Chaminade T, Ishiguro H, Driver J, Frith C (2012) The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 7:413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stafford RQ, Macdonald BA, Jayawardena C, Wegner DM, Broadbent E, Stafford RQ, Broadbent E, Macdonald BA, Jayawardena C, Wegner DM (2014) Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. Int J Soc Robot 6:17–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0186-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Stephan WG, Ybarra O, Bachman G (1999) Prejudice toward immigrants. J Appl Soc Psychol 29:2221–2237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00107.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Straub I, Nishio S, Ishiguro H (2010) Incorporated identity in interaction with a teleoperated android robot: a case study. In: Proceedings—IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication. pp 119–124

  51. Su H, Hu Y, Karimi HR, Knoll A, Ferrigno G, DeMomi E (2020) Improved recurrent neural network-based manipulator control with remote center of motion constraints: experimental results. Neural Netw 131:291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sundar SS, Waddell TF, Jung EH (2016) The Hollywood robot syndrome: media effects on older adults’ attitudes toward robots and adoption intentions. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. IEEE Comput Soc, pp 343–350

  53. Sverre Syrdal D, Dautenhahn K, Lee Koay K, Walters ML (2009) The negative attitudes towards robots scale and reactions to robot behaviour in a live human-robot interaction study. SSAISB

  54. Tajfel H, Turner JC (2019) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Political Psychology

  55. Waugh R Stephen Hawking warns of the danger of ’intelligent’robots. Metro

  56. Witte K (1992) Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model. Commun Monogr 59:329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. WuI L, Chen JL (2005) An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: an empirical study. Int J Hum Comput Stud 62:784–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Yogeeswaran K, Złotowski J, Livingstone M, Bartneck C, Sumioka H, Ishiguro H (2016) The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research. J Hum-Robot Interact 5:29–47. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Yogeeswaran

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Złotowski J, Yogeeswaran K, Bartneck C (2017) Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources. Int J Hum Comput Stud 100:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tatung University, Taipei City, Taiwan

    Hsien-Long Huang, Li-Keng Cheng, Pi-Chuan Sun & Szu-Jung Chou

Authors
  1. Hsien-Long Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Li-Keng Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pi-Chuan Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Szu-Jung Chou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Keng Cheng.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, HL., Cheng, LK., Sun, PC. et al. The Effects of Perceived Identity Threat and Realistic Threat on the Negative Attitudes and Usage Intentions Toward Hotel Service Robots: The Moderating Effect of the Robot’s Anthropomorphism. Int J of Soc Robotics 13, 1599–1611 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00752-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00752-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation