Abstract
This work investigates the influence of electrokinetic-bioremediation (EK-BIO) on remediating soil polluted by persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and heavy metals (mainly Cu, Pb and Ni), originated from electronic waste recycling activity. The results demonstrate that most of POPs and metals were removed from the soil. More than 60% of metals and 90% of POPs in the soil were removed after a 30-day EK-BIO remediation assisted by citrate. A citrate sodium concentration of 0.02 g/L was deemed to be suitable because higher citrate did not significantly improve treatment performance whereas increasing dosage consumption. Citrate increased soil electrical current and electroosmotic flow. After remediation, metal residues mainly existed in stable and low-toxic states, which could effectively lower the potential hazard of toxic metals to the surrounding environment and organisms. EK-BIO treatment influenced soil microbial counts, dehydrogenase activity and community structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acar Y B, Alshawabkeh A N (1993). Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environmental Science & Technology, 27(13): 2638–2647
Cappuyns V, Swennen R, Niclaes M (2007). Application of the BCR sequential extraction scheme to dredged pond sediments contaminated by Pd-Zn mining: A combined geochemical and mineralogical approach. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 93(2): 78–90
Chen F, Li X, Ma J, Qu J, Yang Y, Zhang S (2019). Remediation of soil co-contaminated with decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) and copper by enhanced electrokinetics-persulfate process. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 369: 448–455
Dong Z, Huang W, Xing D, Zhang H (2013). Remediation of soil co-contaminated with petroleum and heavy metals by the integration of electrokinetics and biostimulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 260: 399–408
Gomes H I, Dias-Ferreira C, Ribeiro A B (2012). Electrokinetic remediation of organochlorines in soil: Enhancement techniques and integration with other remediation technologies. Chemosphere, 87 (10): 1077–1090
Han R, Dai H, Yang C, Wei S, Xu L, Yang W, Dou X (2018). Enhanced phytoremediation of cadmium and/orbenzo (a) pyrene contaminated soil by hyperaccumlator Solanum nigrum L. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 20(9): 862–868
Hassan I, Mohamedelhassan E, Yanful E K, Yuan Z C (2016). A review article: electrokinetic bioremediation current knowledge and new prospects. Advances in Microbiology, 06(01): 57–72
Kakosová E, Hrabák P, Černík M, Novotný V, Czinnerová M, Trögl J, Popelka J, Kuráň P, Zoubková L, Vrtoch L (2017). Effect of various chemical oxidation agents on soil microbial communities. Chemical Engineering Journal, 314: 257–265
Li F, Guo S, Wang S, Zhao M (2020). Changes ofmicrobial community and activity under different electric fields during electro-bioremediation of PAH-contaminated soil. Chemosphere, 254: 126880
Li H, Li X, Xiang L, Zhao H M, Li Y W, Cai Q Y, Zhu L, Mo C, Wong M H (2018). Phytoremediation of soil co-contaminated with Cd and BDE-209 using hyperaccumulator enhanced by AM fungi and surfactant. Science of the Total Environment, 613–614: 447–455
Li Y, Yin Y, Liu G, Tachiev G, Roelant D, Jiang G, Cai Y (2012). Estimation of the major source and sink of methylmercury in the Florida Everglades. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(11): 5885–5893
Lorenz P B (1969). Surface conductance and electrokinetic properties of kaolinite beds. Clays and Clay Minerals, 17(4): 223–231
Lu M, Zhang Z, Sun S, Wang Q, Zhong W (2009). Enhanced degradation of bioremediation residues in petroleum-contaminated soil using a two-liquid phase bioslurry reactor. Chemosphere, 77(2): 161–168
Lu M, Zhang Z, Wang J, Zhang M, Xu Y, Wu X (2014). Interaction of heavy metals and pyrene on their fates in soil and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Environmental Science & Technology, 48(2): 1158–1165
Ma J, Zhang Q, Chen F, Zhu Q, Wang Y, Liu G (2020). Remediation of resins-contaminated soil by the combination of electrokinetic and bioremediation processes. Environmental Pollution, 260: 114047
Mahanta M J, Bhattacharyya K G (2011). Total concentrations, fractionation and mobility of heavy metals in soils of urban area of Guwahati, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 173(1–4): 221–240
Naghipour D, Gharibi H, Taghavi K, Jaafari J (2016). Influence of EDTA and NTA on heavy metal extraction from sandy-loam contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(3): 3512–3518
Nowack B (2002). Environmental chemistry of aminopolycarboxylate chelating agents. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(19): 4009–4016
Pletcher D, Greff R, Peat R (2010). The electrical double layer. In: Instrumental Methods in Electrochemistry. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing lnc.
Pradas del Real A E, García-Gonzalo P, Lobo M C, Pérez-Sanz A (2014). Chromium speciation modifies root exudation in two genotypes of silene vulgaris. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 107: 1–6
Ramadan B S, Sari G L, Rosmalina R T, Effendi A J, Hadrah (2018). An overview of electrokinetic soil flushing and its effect on bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Journal of Environmental Management, 218: 309–321
Salzberg H W (1983). Gmelins Handbook of Inorganic Chemistry. Berlin: Spinger-Verlag
Sharma H D, Reddy K R (2004). Geoenvironmental Engineering. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Song Y, Ammami M, Benamar A, Mezazigh S, Wang H (2016). Effect of EDTA, EDDS, NTA and citric acid on electrokinetic remediation of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn contaminated dredged marine sediment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(11): 10577–10586
Suanon F, Sun Q, Dimon B, Mama D, Yu C P (2016). Heavy metal removal from sludge with organic chelators: comparative study of N, N-bis (carboxymethyl) glutamic acid and citric acid. Journal of Environmental Management, 166: 341–347
Tang W, Sun L, Shu L, Wang C (2020). Evaluating heavy metal contamination of riverine sediment cores in different land-use areas. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(6): 104
Uddin M K (2017). A review on the adsorption ofheavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade. Chemical Engineering Journal, 308: 438–462
Virkutyte J, Sillanpää M, Latostenmaa P (2002). Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview. Science of the Total Environment, 289 (1–3): 97–121
Wang S, Guo S, Li F, Yang X, Teng F, Wang J (2016). Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 23833
Weng C H, Yuan C (2001). Removal of Cr (III) from clay soils by electrokinetics. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 23(3): 281–285
Yao Z, Xing J, Gu H, Wang H, Wu J, Xu J, Brookes P C (2016). Development of microbial community structure in vegetable-growing soils from open-field to plastic-greenhouse cultivation based on the PLFA analysis. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16(8): 2041–2049
Zhang M, Guo S, Li F, Wu B (2017). Distribution of ion contents and microorganisms during the electro-bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated saline soil. Journal of Environmental Science & Health Part A, 52(12): 1141–1149
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51974313 and 41907405) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20180641).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Highlights
• A new EK-BIO technology was developed to decontaminate e-waste contaminated soil.
• Adding sodium citrate in electrolyte was a good choice for decontaminating the soil.
• The system has good performance with low cost.
Supporting Information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, F., Zhang, Q., Ma, J. et al. Effective remediation of organic-metal co-contaminated soil by enhanced electrokinetic-bioremediation process. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 15, 113 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1401-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1401-y