Skip to main content
Download PDF

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: therapeutic opportunities and challenges for spinal cord injury

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 12, Article number: 102 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often leads to serious motor and sensory dysfunction of the limbs below the injured segment. SCI not only results in physical and psychological harm to patients but can also cause a huge economic burden on their families and society. As there is no effective treatment method, the prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation of patients with SCI have become urgent problems to be solved. In recent years, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have attracted more attention in the treatment of SCI. Although MSC therapy can reduce injured volume and promote axonal regeneration, its application is limited by tumorigenicity, a low survival rate, and immune rejection. Accumulating literature shows that exosomes have great potential in the treatment of SCI. In this review, we summarize the existing MSC-derived exosome studies on SCI and discuss the advantages and challenges of treating SCI based on exosomes derived from MSCs.

Introduction

SCI is a serious neurological disease because patients often suffer from poor quality of life. In addition to motor and sensory impairment, patients also have bladder dysfunction an respiratory distress and may die [1]. According to the definition of the International Spinal Cord Society, SCI is divided into traumatic spinal cord injury and non-traumatic spinal cord injury [2]. The economic impact of SCI on patients is enormous [3].

Current treatments for SCI include surgical decompression [4,5,6], hemodynamic therapy [7,8,9], corticosteroids [10, 11], and invasive spinal cord pressure monitoring [12,13,14]. However, these methods do not completely restore the function of the injured spinal cord, and it is urgent to find a new method for treating SCI.

The role of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in SCI has been extensively studied, but many studies have shown that MSCs have many drawbacks, and their therapeutic effects are more likely to be related to paracrine action. Exosomes are important mediators of cell-cell communication and participate in many pathological processes. The therapeutic potential of exosomes in SCI has attracted more and more attention in recent years.

This review mainly introduces the potential mechanisms of exosomes derived from MSCs in SCI. Given the unique role of exosome miRNAs derived from MSCs, we will introduce them separately. We will also discuss the prospects and challenges of MSC-derived exosomes, as MSC-exosomes may become a promising treatment method for SCI in the future.

The pathology of SCI

The pathological process of SCI includes two consecutive processes of primary and secondary injury [15, 16]. Primary injury is defined as the immediate mechanical injury to the spinal cord, which is an irreversible process [17, 18]. Mechanical injury leads to rupture of the axonal membranes and the release of inhibitory decomposition products from the myelin sheath, such as neurite outgrowth inhibitor protein A, myelin-associated glycoprotein, oligodendrocyte myelin glycoprotein, and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, which are all powerful axonal regeneration inhibitors [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Physical force is the main cause of the primary injury, and this force includes forms of compression, contusion, tear, or tension [26, 27]. The secondary injury is delayed and progressive. Inflammatory cells release inflammatory cytokines due to the destruction of the blood spinal cord barrier (BSCB) [28, 29]. Secondary injury includes electrolyte abnormalities and the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and excitatory amino acids, which, in turn, lead to ischemia, edema, and cell necrosis, and apoptosis at the injured site [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Secondary injury is generally more complicated than the primary injury.

Exosomes and MSC-derived exosomes

Exosomes, one of the main subclasses of extracellular vesicles that can be released into the extracellular environment, are secreted by almost all types of cells and exist widely in body fluids [40, 41]. Exosomes have clear biophysical and biochemical parameters, so they are suitable for routine laboratory tests [40, 42, 43]. The diameter of exosomes is generally 30–150 nm, and their density is 113–119 g mL−1 [44].

The biogenesis of exosomes can be divided into different stages (Fig. 1), including the formation of early endosomes through invagination of the plasma membrane, the formation of late endosomes through cargo selection, and the formation of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) from late endosomes. MVBs contain intraluminal vesicles (ILVs). The fusion between MVBs and the plasma membrane results in the release of the MVB contents called exosomes [45,46,47]. The endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) is an important system during exosomal biogenesis [48, 49]. However, the formation of exosomes is not entirely dependent on the ESCRT complex [50].

Fig. 1
figure 1

a The structure of exosomes derived from MSCs. MSC-derived exosomes express tetraspanins (CD81, CD63, and CD9), heat shock proteins (HSP60, HSP70, and HSP90), ALG-2 interacting protein X (Alix), TSG101, and adhesion molecules (CD29, CD44, and CD73). Exosomes derived from MSCs carry a complex cargo, including nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, and enzymes. b Biogenesis of MSC-derived exosomes. The biogenesis of exosomes includes the formation of early endosomes through invagination of the plasma membrane, the formation of late endosomes through selection of cargo, and the formation MVB from late endosomes. MVBs contain ILV. The fusion between MVBs and the plasma membrane results in the release of exosomes. The three ways for exosomes to enter recipient cells are receptor-mediated entry, direct membrane fusion, and endocytosis

Full size image

MSCs secrete more exosomes than other cells [51]. MSC-derived exosomes not only express tetraspanins as common exosomal surface markers (CD81, CD63, and CD9) but also express heat shock proteins (HSP60, HSP70, and HSP90), ALG-2 interacting protein X (Alix), tumor susceptibility gene 101 (Tsg101), and adhesion molecules (CD29, CD44, and CD73) [41, 52] (Fig. 1). MSC-derived exosomes, like general exosomes, carry a complex cargo, including, proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids [53, 54] (Fig. 1). In addition to cytoplasmic proteins, there are a considerable number of membrane proteins [44, 55, 56], and proteins found in lipid rafts (Flotillin-1 and Flotillin-2) [57, 58]. Exosomes are also rich in nucleic acids, which play an essential role in changing the fate of recipient cells. Among them, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been researched the most [59, 60]. miRNAs encapsulated in MSC-exosomes mainly exist in the form of their precursors [61]. Emerging evidence shows that the efficacy of MSC treatment results mainly from paracrine effects, rather than transdifferentiation and implantation of MSCs. Therefore, MSC-derived exosomes containing various paracrine mediators can be used as a cell-free therapeutic strategy [62]. And we launch the idea that MSC-exosomes have great potential to promote functional recovery and their contents may serve as biomarkers in SCI.

Treating SCI with exosomes derived from MSCs

Exosomes derived from MSCs are easier to obtain and store and are subject to little ethical restriction compared with MSCs [63]. The volume of exosomes is significantly smaller than that of MSCs, so they will not be captured by lung and liver tissues, and they can penetrate the BSCB [64]. Therefore, attention has recently focused on the use of exosomes to treat SCI (Table 1). We have summarized the existing studies on MSC-derived exosomes to treat SCI. The specific mechanisms are as follows (Fig. 2).

Table 1 Studies on the treatment of SCI with exosomes derived from MSCs
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

The therapeutic effects of exosomes derived from different MSCs in the treatment of SCI. MSCs can be obtained from bone marrow, the umbilical cord, the amniotic membrane, and adipose tissue. Exosomes derived from MSCs have anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects, as well as inhibit A1 astrocytes, promote axonal regeneration and macrophage polarization, and protect the BSCB from spinal cord injury

Full size image

Anti-inflammatory effects of exosomes derived from MSCs

The relative levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and anti-inflammatory factors are related to the functional recovery of patients with SCI [83, 84]. Thus, the composition of the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory environments is highly correlated with the prognosis after SCI, and inhibiting the formation of the pro-inflammatory environment is a major strategy for treating SCI. Romanelli et al. [66] reported that exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSC-exosomes) directly interact with activated microglia in vitro and inhibit the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines during secondary injury. Intravenous injection of hUCMSC-exosomes into an SCI rat model inhibits the expression of IL-1β and IL-6, but also inhibits the formation of scars, thereby contributing to the recovery of motor function. Neuroinflammation is characterized by the activation of resident immune cells initiated by various external stimuli, and this activation is mediated by an important protein complex-inflammasome called the nucleotide-binding domain-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome that plays a key role in the secondary injury of SCI [85]. The NLRP3 inflammasome is located in the cytoplasm and is assembled by NLRP3, an apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain, and caspase-1. It is involved in the regulation of the natural immune response [86, 87]. Some recent studies have shown that the activity of the NLRP3 inflammasome increases in traumatic brain injury and SCI models [85, 88, 89]. The NLRP3 inflammasome may be triggered and upregulated after SCI [88, 90, 91]. Inhibiting activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome promotes functional recovery after SCI in rats [88, 90,91,92,93]. Huang et al. [65] discovered that exosomes derived from epidural fat mesenchymal stem cells (EFMSCs) promote the recovery of neural function and reduce injured volume. The molecular mechanism is that systemic administration of EFMSC-exosomes into an SCI model significantly inhibits the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes and reduces the expression of inflammatory cytokines. In addition, EFMSC-exosomes reduce the pro-apoptotic protein (Bcl-2-associated X protein, Bax) after SCI, while upregulating the expression of anti-apoptotic protein (B cell lymphoma-2, Bcl-2). Sun et al. [76] obtained similar results. They found that exosomes derived from hUCMSCs reduce the levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, interferon-γ, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor while increasing the levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4 and IL-10.

Promotion of macrophage polarization

The therapeutic effect of MSC-exosomes has also been found to be related to the promotion of macrophage polarization. Macrophages are heterogeneous cells with extensive functional plasticity that have been divided into M1 and M2 types [94, 95]. M1 macrophages produce pro-inflammatory cytokines, ROS, and nitric oxide to promote tissue inflammation and injury. In contrast, M2 macrophages usually produce anti-inflammatory factors that reduce the ability of the injured site to produce pro-inflammatory molecules, thereby resulting in tissue remodeling. Macrophages can switch from one phenotype to another, which is induced by inflammatory factors after injury or infection [96, 97]. M1 macrophages have harmful effects in the injured spinal cord, while M2 macrophages promote axonal regeneration even in the presence of dominant inhibitory substrates [98, 99]. Most macrophages in the injured spinal cord are M1 macrophages, and only a few transient M2 macrophages exist [99]. The dominance of M1 macrophages and the decreased number of M2 macrophages after SCI aggravates the injury [98, 99]. Understanding these macrophage phenotypes and the characteristics of the chemical microenvironment after SCI will help to clarify how macrophages participate in the pathogenesis of SCI and to find new treatment strategies. Few reports are available about exosomes secreted by MSCs that promote the polarization of macrophages to treat SCI. One study reported that exosomes derived from hUCMSCs trigger the polarization of macrophages from the M1 phenotype to the M2 phenotype [76]. Lankford et al. [100] also demonstrated that intravenously injected MSC-derived exosomes quickly reach the injured spinal cord, rather than the uninjured spinal cord, and bind specifically to M2 macrophages, demonstrating that M2 macrophages can alleviate SCI.

Reduction in A1 astrocytes

Astrocytes are very important in the process of SCI, as they can hinder or promote recovery of the CNS [101,102,103,104]. In 2017, Liddelow et al. [105] discovered that two types of reactive astrocytes, called A1 and A2 astrocytes, are induced by neuroinflammation and ischemia, respectively. A2 astrocytes play a protective role by upregulating the expression of certain neurotrophic factors, while A1 astrocytes are rapidly formed after SCI, and have neurotoxic effects on myelin, synapses, and neurons. Therefore, inhibiting A1 astrocytes is a potential treatment for SCI. A study published in 2019 confirmed that bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC)-derived exosomes effectively promote functional recovery after SCI. One of the potential mechanisms may be to inhibit the activation of A1 neurotoxic reactive astrocytes [69]. These results suggest that applying exosome-derived MSCs may be a promising strategy for treating SCI.

A1 astrocyte marker (complement C3) will upregulate in a nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB)-dependent manner [106]. Some studies have shown that NF-κB signaling is widely activated by a variety of pro-inflammatory agents, such as cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1) and ROS [107, 108]. In addition, the secondary inflammation of SCI is regulated by the NF-κB pathway [109], and inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway promotes functional recovery after SCI [110]. Wang et al. [111] reported that BMSC-derived exosome treatment effectively reduces SCI-induced A1 astrocytes by inhibiting nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65.

Protecting the BSCB

The BSCB is responsible for maintaining the normal function of the nervous system and its unique characteristics and functions are regulated by neurovascular unit cells [112]. The BSCB is formed by the basement membrane, pericytes, capillary endothelial cells, and astrocyte foot processes [113]. Pericytes, as a part of the neurovascular unit, are very important for maintaining the integrity and barrier properties of blood vessels. Jo et al. [114] showed that the ability of pericytes to maintain the stability of microvessels mainly occurs via three possible mechanisms: promoting the expression of endothelial tight junction proteins, regulating vesicle transport and body flow across cells, and moderating the tightness connection arrangement. In neurological diseases, such as stroke and ALS, there is increasing evidence indicating that abnormal migration of pericytes aggravates these diseases [115, 116]. In clinical practice and animal models, the destruction of the BSCB is usually the inevitable result of SCI [112]. After SCI, the blood vessels at the injured site are immediately destroyed, and the BSCB far away from the injured area is permanently destroyed [117]. Therefore, maintaining the integrity of the BSCB after SCI is a potential treatment. Previous studies have shown that intravenous injection of BMSCs promotes the functional recovery of SCI in rats and accelerates the restoration of BSCB integrity [68, 118]. Further research reported that the therapeutic effect of exosomes derived from BMSCs occurs via the NF-κB p65 pathway to inhibit the migration of pericytes, thereby maintaining integrity of the BSCB after SCI, leading to a reduction of neuronal cell apoptosis, axonal regeneration, and motor function [68]. Yuan et al. [119] directly used pericyte-derived exosomes to treat SCI and found that they reduce cell apoptosis, improve microcirculation in the spinal cord after injury, and prevent BSCB injury and edema.

Exosomal miRNAs derived from MSCs in SCI

MicroRNA (miRNA) is an endogenous non-coding RNA with a length of 20–24 nucleotides. After mature miRNAs are treated with dicer enzymes, they usually interact with target messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and bind to the 3′ end, leading to translational inhibition and degradation of these target mRNAs [120, 121]. Recently, some miRNAs have been identified as potential new targets for treating SCI, including miRNA-486, miRNA-21, and miRNA-126 [122,123,124]. Accumulating evidence reveals that exosomes with a bilayer membrane structure can be used as valuable carriers for targeting miRNAs at the SCI site. In addition, exosomes can penetrate the blood-brain barrier or BSCB to enhance the therapeutic effect of miRNAs [125]. MSCs secrete exosomes containing high levels of specific miRNAs by transfecting specific miRNA plasmids in advance [126]. Extensive studies have indicated that exosomes from MSCs carrying miRNAs have efficient repair effects on SCI. Exosomal miRNAs currently studied in SCI mainly include miRNA-21, miRNA-133b, and miRNA-126 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Exosomal miRNAs derived from MSCs in the treatment of SCI

Full size image

MiRNA-21 of exosomes derived from MSCs in SCI

MiRNA-21 expression increases in various injured tissues and organs, suggesting that miRNA-21 is closely related to tissue injury [127,128,129,130]. Liu et al. [131] reported that miRNA-21 is unregulated in a rat model and reduces neuronal apoptosis by promoting activation of the PTEN-Akt signaling pathway and regulating the expression of the apoptosis-related proteins Bax, Bcl-2, caspase-9, and caspase-3 [132]. MiRNA-21 is one of the most common miRNAs secreted by exosomes derived from MSCs, and it is also the most studied exosomal miRNA for SCI therapeutic effects. Zhou et al. [72] determined that exosomes derived from miRNA-21-modified BMSCs significantly promote functional recovery and reduce lesion volume and apoptosis, which was mainly achieved by downregulating the expression of the pro-apoptotic gene FasL. The results of miRNA target analysis tools show that miRNA-21 contains a binding site complementary to the 3′ untranslated region of the FasL gene, indicating that the FasL gene is the direct target gene of miRNA-21. Xu et al. [74] reported that miRNA-21 of MSC-exosomes regulates apoptosis and differentiation of neurons in patients with SCI by downregulating the expression of PTEN, and that PTEN is a target gene of miRNA-21. Further research reported that miRNA-21 of exosomes derived from MSCs not only targets PTEN but also targets the tumor suppressor gene programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4). The miRNA-21/PTEN/PDCD4 signaling pathway improves cell viability and inhibits cell apoptosis [75]. Ji et al. [73] showed that the weakened protective effect of exosomes derived from MSCs on SCI in obese rats was due to insulin resistance in the rats. Insulin resistance of MSCs reduces the level of miRNA-21 secreted by exosomes, which further strengthens the view that miRNA-21 is a potential molecule for treating SCI.

MiRNA-133b of exosomes derived from MSCs in SCI

MiRNA-133b plays an important role in neuronal differentiation, growth, and apoptosis [133,134,135]. Some studies have shown that overexpression of miRNA-133b promotes functional recovery after stroke in rats [136, 137]. In addition, studies on zebrafish and rodents have indicated that miRNA-133b is expressed in midbrain dopaminergic neurons where it regulates the production of tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine transporters in patients with Parkinson’s disease [138]. In a study on the relationship between miRNA-133b and functional recovery after SCI in adult zebrafish, Yu et al. [139] showed that decreased expression of miRNA-133b is not conducive to the recovery of motor function and reduces neuronal axonal regeneration after using morpholino antisense oligonucleotides, which inhibit the expression of miRNA-133b.

Some molecules mediate the protective effect of miRNA-33b on SCI, such as signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), RhoA, and cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB). STAT3 is distributed in astrocytes and neurons and is responsible for neuronal proliferation and differentiation as well as axonal regeneration [140, 141]. Activated STAT3 mediates inflammation caused by SCI [142]. RhoA is a member of the Rho family that is upregulated after SCI in rats and acts on Rho-associated kinase [143], which is its direct downstream effector. RhoA is related to the death of neurons [144]. The transcription factor CREB also plays an important role in axonal regeneration [145]. Activation of CREB is sufficient to overcome myelin inhibitors and promote axonal regeneration in vivo [146]. Qi et al. [147] demonstrated that miRNA-133b in exosomes significantly increases the STAT3 phosphorylation level, which is involved in axonal regeneration in the injured spinal cord of SCI rats. There is evidence that RhoA is a direct target of miRNA-133b [134]. In addition, miRNA-133b in exosomes released by MSCs promotes axonal growth [148]. Li et al. [77] further demonstrated this result and showed that systemic injection of miRNA-133b exosomes protects neurons and promotes the recovery of motor function after SCI, and this effect was at least partially due to activation of ERK1/2, STAT3, and CREB and inhibition of RhoA expression. Ren et al. [149] showed that exosomes containing miRNA-133b significantly promote the expression of neurofilament, growth-associated protein 43 (GAP-43), glial fibrillary acidic protein, and myelin basic protein by affecting signaling pathways related to axonal regeneration and promoting recovery of neuronal function in SCI animals.

MiRNA-126 of exosomes derived from MSCs in SCI

MiRNA-126 has recently been found to promote functional recovery after SCI. In 2015, Hu et al. [124] reported that the expression of miRNA-126 decreases after SCI, while increasing the level of miRNA-126 reduces inflammation and promotes angiogenesis and functional recovery. This process may be related to the downregulation of sprouty-related EVH1 domain-containing protein 1, phosphoinositol-3 kinase regulatory subunit 2, and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 target gene expression. Some scholars have turned their attention to using exosomes derived from miRNA-126-modified MSCs to treat SCI. Huang et al. [80] demonstrated that exosomes containing miRNA-126 promotes angiogenesis and neurogenesis after SCI, as well as attenuates cell apoptosis, thereby promoting functional recovery of an SCI rat model. Yuan et al. [81] indicated that systemic administration of exosomes derived from miRNA-126-modified MSCs promotes functional recovery and axonal regeneration. Similar to miRNA-21, it is likely that miRNA-126 activates ERK1/2, STAT3, and CREB while inhibiting the expression of RhoA.

Other miRNAs of exosomes derived from MSCs in SCI

In 2019, Yu et al. [71] injected exosomes secreted from miRNA-29b-modified BMSCs into a rat model. They showed that these exosomes accelerate motor functional recovery and reduce pathological damage of spinal cord tissue in rats with SCI, as well as promote neuronal regeneration. This mechanism may also be related to regulating the expression of neural regeneration-related proteins, such as NF200, GAP-43, and GFAP. In addition, Zhao et al. [150] found that exosomes derived from BMSCs have neuroprotective effects in the ischemic spinal cord. This effect may be due to pre-transfection of BMSCs to secrete exosomes with high expression of miRNA-25, thus indicating that miRNA-25 enhances neuroprotection. Another exosomal miRNA that has neuroprotective effects is miRNA-544. Li et al. [151] transfected rat BMSCs with miRNA-544 mimic to obtain exosomes that highly expressed miRNA-544 and these exosomes were intravenously injected into a SCI rat model. The results showed that miRNA-544 accelerates the recovery of neuronal function after SCI. In addition, overexpression of miRNA-544 in BMSC-exosomes alleviated the histological defects and neuronal loss caused by SCI. Liu et al. [152] determined that exosomal miRNA-216a-5p transforms microglia from the M1 pro-inflammatory phenotype to the M2 anti-inflammatory phenotype by inhibiting TLR4/NF-κB and activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, thereby increasing treatment potential.

Challenges and prospects

The main obstacles to the repair of an injured spinal cord include the weakened ability of axonal growth, insufficient repair of endogenous cells, and the presence of inhibitory molecules at the injured site [153,154,155,156]. Overcoming these obstacles would lead to an ideal method for treating SCI. MSC transplantation seems to be an attractive option. However, the direct transplantation of MSCs has potential risks. For example, one study reported that BMSCs that have not been genetically modified could have chromosomal abnormalities even during early passages, leading to the formation of malignant tumors [157]. Moreover, MSCs cannot differentiate into neurons. Immunochemistry, molecular marker, and cell morphology studies indicate that although MSCs have neuron-like characteristics after transplantation, it is difficult to regard them as real neurons [158, 159]. The expression of neuronal antigens may simply be due to the immature nature of the MSCs [160]. During in vitro culture, MSCs gradually lose their potential to proliferate and differentiate [161, 162]. According to current evidence, the curative effect of MSCs seems to be related to their paracrine activity but has little to do with the mechanism of cell replacement [163]. Moreover, the disadvantages of MSCs, such as tumorigenesis, low survival rate, and immune rejection, make it difficult to continue the treatment of SCI using MSCs [164].

Similar to MSCs, MSC-exosomes have the same characteristics of homing to the injured tissue, and have the advantage of nanometer size, allowing them to pass through the BSCB and play an important role in the repair of the nervous system. More importantly, based on their relatively small molecular structure, natural molecular transport characteristics, and good biocompatibility, exosomes have shown great application potential as drug carriers in recent years. Traditional drugs often have a number of defects, such as poor water solubility, quick removal by the body, poor biocompatibility, unsatisfactory distribution in vivo, and low permeability to cells, which limit their efficacy and clinical application. However, exosomes combine the advantages of cell and nanotechnology in drug delivery. For example, exosomes improve the stability of drugs; exosomes have a natural targeting ability based on donor cells when delivering drugs, and exosomes are nano-molecules with cell surface substances, so they have strong biological barrier permeability and can selectively penetrate a tissue injury. Therefore, we speculate that exosomes will be a promising drug-delivery system to treat SCI. Another advantage of exosomes derived from MSCs is that they are not tumorigenic. No study has reported on the tumorigenesis potential of MSC-exosomes [165]. Although there is a lack of a direct comparison of the characteristics of exosomes derived from different MSCs in SCI models, we believe that umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs) may be one of the best sources because they are easier to obtain than BMSCs, and do not involve ethical issues.

Although exosomes have great potential to treat SCI, there are still a number of challenges that need to be addressed before exosome therapy for SCI can be used in clinical trials. First, the source of the exosomes must be determined, and the content and function of exosomes obtained under different culture conditions (such as hypoxia and growth factors) are also not consistent [166]. In addition, MSC-exosome separation methods must be standardized. There is no consensus on the method to separate exosomes, and different methods of separating exosomes have advantages and disadvantages. In fact, there are significant differences in protein and RNA contents among different separating methods [167]. The most commonly used method is ultracentrifugation, but the purity of exosomes obtained by this method is low, and the exosomes can be contaminated by other EVs with similar diameters [168], so it is necessary to explore a more efficient method. Another problem that needs to be solved is the storage, preservation, and transportation of exosomes. Although exosomes are more stable and suitable for long-term preservation than MSCs, a study published in 2018 showed that it is possible to purify exosomes by lyophilization [169]. This would help produce ready-to-use batches of exosomes, which could be easily transported; however, further research is needed to demonstrate whether lyophilization will change the characteristics of exosomes. Before exosomes can be used in clinical trials it will also be necessary to verify the half-life of freshly isolated and cryopreserved exosomes after injection. The contents of exosomes also need to be further studied to understand which components can be used to treat SCI and which may be harmful. Further research is needed to probe the relationship between injection frequency, dosage, and the therapeutic effect of MSC-exosomes to maintain the long-term effect, and whether single or multiple administrations will have a negative effect, which is very important for the correct use of exosomes to treat SCI. Research on the treatment of SCI with exosomes derived from MSCs is in the exploratory stage; the number of studies is small and most of them are based on rodents, particularly Sprague-Dawley rats. However, there are anatomical differences between human and rodent spinal cords. The SCI area of the rodent model is small, while the SCI area of humans is often larger, which leads to more tissue loss. Additionally, the human nervous system is more complex and more advanced than that of rodents. The process of human SCI is characterized by an immune response, a vascular response, an inflammatory reaction, and glial scar formation, which is also significantly different from SCI in rodents. Thus, the scope of research needs to be expanded further using larger animals (such as dogs) for research. In addition, although exosomes have a demonstrated therapeutic effect on SCI, the specific therapeutic mechanism and target are not exactly clear, and most studies have focused on the role of miRNAs; there is less research on the role of other components of exosomes, so further research is needed to clarify the therapeutic effects of exosomes. Furthermore, although MSC-exosomes are superior to MSCs in the treatment of SCI, the production technology for MSC-exosomes needs to be improved before it can be used in clinical practice. Studies have shown that MSCs secrete only a small number of exosomes (1–4 μg of exosome protein can be extracted from 106 cells/day) [170]. Therefore, long-term cell culture and a large number of MSCs are needed to produce sufficient numbers of exosomes for clinical applications. However, the expression of growth factors decreases significantly in late-passage MSCs, which would reduce the therapeutic effect of growth factors and its mRNAs secreted by exosomes [171]. As mentioned earlier, the obstacles to SCI recovery include the weakened ability of axonal growth and insufficient endogenous cell repair but, unfortunately, current research on MSC-derived exosomes does not aid recovery through these mechanisms. In addition, there is a lack of research for horizontal comparison of exosomes from different MSCs in SCI, and the differences in the therapeutic efficacy of exosomes from different MSCs remain unclear.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the treatment of SCI is a great challenge, and there is no effective strategy to restore lost function. The pathological process of SCI is very complex and is the result of multiple factors, which hinders the development of treatments leading to a full recovery. Therefore, understanding the pathological mechanism is conducive to better treatments for SCI. Because of the poor plasticity and weak regenerating ability of the CNS, the recovery of neural function is greatly limited. As an intercellular communication medium, exosomes are superior for treating SCI, particularly exosomes derived from MSCs. Exosomes derived from MSCs can pass through the BSCB and can be used as good drug carriers, which has great therapeutic potential in SCI. We must optimize MSC-derived exosomes to improve their therapeutic effect in SCI. More research is required to clarify the specific role of exosomes in SCI. If these problems can be solved, it will provide a comprehensive theoretical basis for the clinical transformation of MSC-derived exosomes in the treatment of SCI, and bring hope for clinical treatment of SCI.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

Alix:

ALG-2 interacting protein X

Bax:

Bcl-2-associated X protein

BBB:

Blood-brain barrier

Bcl-2:

B cell lymphoma-2

BMSCs:

bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

BSCB:

Blood spinal cord barrier

CM:

Conditioned medium

CNS:

Central nervous system

CREB:

cAMP-response element-binding protein

EFMSCs:

Epidural fat mesenchymal stem cells

ESCRT:

Endosomal sorting complex required for transport

GAP-43:

Growth-associated protein 43

GFAP:

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

hUCMSCs:

Human umbilical cord mesenchymal

IV:

Intravenous injection

hMSCs:

Human mesenchymal stem cells

HSP:

Heat shock proteins

IFN-γ:

Interferon-γ

ILVs:

Intraluminal vesicles

miRNAs:

MicroRNAs

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

MVs:

Microvesicles

MVBs:

Multivesicular bodies

NF:

Neurofilament

NF-κB:

Nuclear factor kappa B

NLRP3:

Nucleotide-binding domain-like receptor protein 3

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

PDCD4:

Programmed cell death 4

PTEN:

Phosphate and tension homology deleted on chromsome ten

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SCI:

Spinal cord injury

STAT3:

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

TLR4:

Toll-like receptor 4

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

Tsg101:

Tumor susceptibility gene 101

UCMSCs:

Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells

References

  1. Giger RJ, Hollis ER 2nd, Tuszynski MH. Guidance molecules in axon regeneration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(7):a001867.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. New PW, Sundararajan V. Incidence of non-traumatic spinal cord injury in Victoria, Australia: a population-based study and literature review. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(6):406–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. None. Spinal cord injury (SCI) facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med. 2016;39(1):123–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wutte C, Klein B, Becker J, Mach O, Panzer S, Strowitzki M, Maier D, Grassner L. Earlier decompression (< 8 hours) results in better neurological and functional outcome after traumatic thoracolumbar spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36(12):2020–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, DWC, Harrop JS, Aarabi B, Shaffrey C, Dvorak M, Fisher C, et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang M, Yin X, Liu S, Hui H, Yan L, He B, Hao D. Letter: ultra-early (<12 hours) surgery correlates with higher rate of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Conversion after cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(2):E399–e400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryken TC, Hurlbert RJ, Hadley MN, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Gelb DE, Rozzelle CJ, Theodore N, Walters BC. The acute cardiopulmonary management of patients with cervical spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(Suppl 2):84–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hawryluk G, Whetstone W, Saigal R, Ferguson A, Talbott J, Bresnahan J, Dhall S, Pan J, Beattie M, Manley G. Mean arterial blood pressure correlates with neurological recovery after human spinal cord injury: analysis of high frequency physiologic data. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(24):1958–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Streijger F, So K, Manouchehri N, Gheorghe A, Okon EB, Chan RM, Ng B, Shortt K, Sekhon MS, Griesdale DE, et al. A direct comparison between norepinephrine and phenylephrine for augmenting spinal cord perfusion in a porcine model of spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(12):1345–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, Holford TR, Young W, Baskin DS, Eisenberg HM, Flamm E, Leo-Summers L, Maroon J, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(20):1405–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Hellenbrand KG, Collins WF, Leo LS, Freeman DF, Wagner FC, Flamm ES, Eisenberg HM, Goodman JH, et al. Methylprednisolone and neurological function 1 year after spinal cord injury. Results of the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. J Neurosurg. 1985;63(5):704–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones CF, Newell RS, Lee JH, Cripton PA, Kwon BK. The pressure distribution of cerebrospinal fluid responds to residual compression and decompression in an animal model of acute spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(23):E1422–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Squair JW, Bélanger LM, Tsang A, Ritchie L, Mac-Thiong JM, Parent S, Christie S, Bailey C, Dhall S, Street J, et al. Spinal cord perfusion pressure predicts neurologic recovery in acute spinal cord injury. Neurology. 2017;89(16):1660–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwon BK, Curt A, Belanger LM, Bernardo A, Chan D, Markez JA, Gorelik S, Slobogean GP, Umedaly H, Giffin M, et al. Intrathecal pressure monitoring and cerebrospinal fluid drainage in acute spinal cord injury: a prospective randomized trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10(3):181–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tator CH. Update on the pathophysiology and pathology of acute spinal cord injury. Brain Pathol. 1995;5(4):407–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McDonald JW, Sadowsky C. Spinal-cord injury. Lancet. 2002;359(9304):417–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carlson GD, Gorden C. Current developments in spinal cord injury research. Spine J. 2002;2(2):116–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar H, Ropper AE, Lee SH, Han I. Propitious therapeutic modulators to prevent blood-spinal cord barrier disruption in spinal cord injury. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(5):3578–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moreno-Flores MT, Avila J. The quest to repair the damaged spinal cord. Recent Pat CNS Drug Discov. 2006;1(1):55–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fournier AE, GrandPre T, Strittmatter SM. Identification of a receptor mediating Nogo-66 inhibition of axonal regeneration. Nature. 2001;409(6818):341–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. GrandPré T, Nakamura F, Vartanian T, Strittmatter SM. Identification of the Nogo inhibitor of axon regeneration as a Reticulon protein. Nature. 2000;403(6768):439–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwab ME. Nogo and axon regeneration. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14(1):118–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Domeniconi M, Cao Z, Spencer T, Sivasankaran R, Wang K, Nikulina E, Kimura N, Cai H, Deng K, Gao Y, et al. Myelin-associated glycoprotein interacts with the Nogo66 receptor to inhibit neurite outgrowth. Neuron. 2002;35(2):283–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li M, Shibata A, Li C, Braun PE, McKerracher L, Roder J, Kater SB, David S. Myelin-associated glycoprotein inhibits neurite/axon growth and causes growth cone collapse. J Neurosci Res. 1996;46(4):404–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beller JA, Snow DM. Proteoglycans: road signs for neurite outgrowth. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9(4):343–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Morales II, Toscano-Tejeida D, Ibarra A. Non pharmacological strategies to promote spinal cord regeneration: a view on some individual or combined approaches. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(6):720–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tyler JY, Xu XM, Cheng JX. Nanomedicine for treating spinal cord injury. Nanoscale. 2013;5(19):8821–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakamura M, Houghtling RA, MacArthur L, Bayer BM, Bregman BS. Differences in cytokine gene expression profile between acute and secondary injury in adult rat spinal cord. Exp Neurol. 2003;184(1):313–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ulndreaj A, Chio JC, Ahuja CS, Fehlings MG. Modulating the immune response in spinal cord injury. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16(10):1127–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fehlings MG, Nakashima H, Nagoshi N, Chow DSL, Grossman RG, Kopjar B. Rationale, design and critical end points for the Riluzole in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (RISCIS): a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled parallel multi-center trial. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(1):8–15.

  31. Marina G, Vladislav V, Harrell C, Crissy F, Nemanja J, Nebojsa A, Miodrag S. Stem cells therapy for spinal cord injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(4):1039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Garcia E, Aguilar-Cevallos J, Silva-Garcia R, Ibarra A. Cytokine and growth factor activation in vivo and in vitro after spinal cord injury. Mediat Inflamm. 2016;2016:9476020.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schanne FA, Kane AB, Young EE, Farber JL. Calcium dependence of toxic cell death: a final common pathway. Science. 1979;206(4419):700–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Beattie MS, Farooqui AA, Bresnahan JC. Review of current evidence for apoptosis after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17(10):915–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Crowe MJ, Bresnahan JC, Shuman SL, Masters JN, Beattie MS. Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys. Nat Med. 1997;3(1):73–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dong H, Fazzaro A, Xiang C, Korsmeyer SJ, Jacquin MF, McDonald JW. Enhanced oligodendrocyte survival after spinal cord injury in Bax-deficient mice and mice with delayed Wallerian degeneration. J Neurosci. 2003;23(25):8682–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Li S, Stys PK. Mechanisms of ionotropic glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity in isolated spinal cord white matter. J Neurosci. 2000;20(3):1190–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang Y, Wang H, Tao Y, Zhang S, Wang J, Feng X. Necroptosis inhibitor necrostatin-1 promotes cell protection and physiological function in traumatic spinal cord injury. Neuroscience. 2014;266:91–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu M, Wu W, Li H, Li S, Huang LT, Yang YQ, Sun Q, Wang CX, Yu Z, Hang CH. Necroptosis, a novel type of programmed cell death, contributes to early neural cells damage after spinal cord injury in adult mice. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(6):745–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Zeringer E, Barta T, Li M, Vlassov AV. Strategies for isolation of exosomes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2015;2015(4):319–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Colombo M, Raposo G, Théry C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:255–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sokolova V, Ludwig AK, Hornung S, Rotan O, Horn PA, Epple M, Giebel B. Characterisation of exosomes derived from human cells by nanoparticle tracking analysis and scanning electron microscopy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2011;87(1):146–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu Y, Song B, Wei Y, Chen F, Chi Y, Fan H, Liu N, Li Z, Han Z, Ma F. Exosomes from mesenchymal stromal cells enhance imatinib-induced apoptosis in human leukemia cells via activation of caspase signaling pathway. Cytotherapy. 2018;20(2):181–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Théry C, Amigorena S, Raposo G, Clayton A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2006;Chapter 3:Unit 3.22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Théry C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(8):569–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Batista BS, Eng WS, Pilobello KT, Hendricks-Muñoz KD, Mahal LK. Identification of a conserved glycan signature for microvesicles. J Proteome Res. 2011;10(10):4624–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Heijnen HF, Schiel AE, Fijnheer R, Geuze HJ, Sixma JJ. Activated platelets release two types of membrane vesicles: microvesicles by surface shedding and exosomes derived from exocytosis of multivesicular bodies and alpha-granules. Blood. 1999;94(11):3791–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, Antoniou A, Arab T, Archer F, Atkin-Smith GK, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7(1):1535750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Jeppesen DK, Fenix AM, Franklin JL, Higginbotham JN, Zhang Q, Zimmerman LJ, Liebler DC, Ping J, Liu Q, Evans R, et al. Reassessment of exosome composition. Cell. 2019;177(2):428–45 e418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Trajkovic K, Hsu C, Chiantia S, Rajendran L, Wenzel D, Wieland F, Schwille P, Brügger B, Simons M. Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular endosomes. Science. 2008;319(5867):1244–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yu B, Zhang X, Li X. Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(3):4142–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Schorey JS, Bhatnagar S. Exosome function: from tumor immunology to pathogen biology. Traffic. 2008;9(6):871–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Villarroya-Beltri C, Baixauli F, Gutiérrez-Vázquez C, Sánchez-Madrid F, Mittelbrunn M. Sorting it out: regulation of exosome loading. Semin Cancer Biol. 2014;28:3–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Vlassov AV, Magdaleno S, Setterquist R, Conrad R. Exosomes: current knowledge of their composition, biological functions, and diagnostic and therapeutic potentials. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1820(7):940–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Escola JM, Kleijmeer MJ, Stoorvogel W, Griffith JM, Yoshie O, Geuze HJ. Selective enrichment of tetraspan proteins on the internal vesicles of multivesicular endosomes and on exosomes secreted by human B-lymphocytes. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(32):20121–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pols MS, Klumperman J. Trafficking and function of the tetraspanin CD63. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315(9):1584–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Strauss K, Goebel C, Runz H, Möbius W, Weiss S, Feussner I, Simons M, Schneider A. Exosome secretion ameliorates lysosomal storage of cholesterol in Niemann-Pick type C disease. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(34):26279–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Grapp M, Wrede A, Schweizer M, Hüwel S, Galla HJ, Snaidero N, Simons M, Bückers J, Low PS, Urlaub H, et al. Choroid plexus transcytosis and exosome shuttling deliver folate into brain parenchyma. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Berindan-Neagoe I, Calin GA. Molecular pathways: microRNAs, cancer cells, and microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(24):6247–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Zaharie F, Muresan MS, Petrushev B, Berce C, Gafencu GA, Selicean S, Jurj A, Cojocneanu-Petric R, Lisencu CI, Pop LA, et al. Exosome-carried microRNA-375 inhibits cell progression and dissemination via Bcl-2 blocking in colon cancer. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2015;24(4):435–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Chen TS, Lai RC, Lee MM, Choo AB, Lee CN, Lim SK. Mesenchymal stem cell secretes microparticles enriched in pre-microRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(1):215–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen B, Li Q, Zhao B, Wang Y. Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles as a novel potential therapeutic tool for tissue repair. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(9):1753–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Gimona M, Pachler K, Laner-Plamberger S, Schallmoser K, Rohde E. Manufacturing of human extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics for clinical use. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(6):1190.

  64. Wang X, Botchway BOA, Zhang Y, Yuan J, Liu X. Combinational treatment of bioscaffolds and extracellular vesicles in spinal cord injury. Front Mol Neurosci. 2019;12:81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Huang JH, Fu CH, Xu Y, Yin XM, Cao Y, Lin FY. Extracellular vesicles derived from epidural fat-Mesenchymal stem cells attenuate NLRP3 Inflammasome activation and improve functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Neurochem Res. 2020;45(4):760–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Romanelli P, Bieler L, Scharler C, Pachler K, Kreutzer C, Zaunmair P, Jakubecova D, Mrowetz H, Benedetti B, Rivera FJ, et al. Extracellular vesicles can deliver anti-inflammatory and anti-scarring activities of mesenchymal stromal cells after spinal cord injury. Front Neurol. 2019;10:1225.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Huang JH, Yin XM, Xu Y, Xu CC, Lin X, Ye FB, Cao Y, Lin FY. Systemic administration of exosomes released from mesenchymal stromal cells attenuates apoptosis, inflammation, and promotes angiogenesis after spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(24):3388–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang R, Wen L, Wu K, Li Y, Yao Y, Duan R, Jia Y. Bone Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles promote recovery following spinal cord injury via improvement of the integrity of the blood-spinal cord barrier. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Liu W, Wang Y, Gong F, Rong Y, Luo Y, Tang P, Zhou Z, Zhou Z, Xu T, Jiang T, et al. Exosomes derived from bone Mesenchymal stem cells repair traumatic spinal cord injury by suppressing the activation of A1 neurotoxic reactive astrocytes. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36(3):469–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wang L, Pei S, Han L, Guo B, Li Y, Duan R, Yao Y, Xue B, Chen X, Jia Y. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes reduce A1 astrocytes via downregulation of phosphorylated NFkappaB P65 subunit in spinal cord injury. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;50(4):1535–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Yu T, Zhao C, Hou S, Zhou W, Wang B, Chen Y. Exosomes secreted from miRNA-29b-modified mesenchymal stem cells repaired spinal cord injury in rats. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2019;52(12):e8735.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhou X, Chu X, Yuan H, Qiu J, Zhao C, Xin D, Li T, Ma W, Wang H, Wang Z, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell derived EVs mediate neuroprotection after spinal cord injury in rats via the microRNA-21-5p/FasL gene axis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;115:108818.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ji W, Jiang W, Li M, Li J, Li Z. miR-21 deficiency contributes to the impaired protective effects of obese rat mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes against spinal cord injury. Biochimie. 2019;167:171–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Xu G, Ao R, Zhi Z, Jia J, Yu B. miR-21 and miR-19b delivered by hMSC-derived EVs regulate the apoptosis and differentiation of neurons in patients with spinal cord injury. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(7):10205–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Kang J, Li Z, Zhi Z, Wang S, Xu G. MiR-21 derived from the exosomes of MSCs regulates the death and differentiation of neurons in patients with spinal cord injury. Gene Ther. 2019;26(12):491–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Sun G, Li G, Li D, Huang W, Zhang R, Zhang H, Duan Y. Wang B: hucMSC derived exosomes promote functional recovery in spinal cord injury mice via attenuating inflammation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018;89:194–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Li D, Zhang P, Yao X, Li H, Shen H, Li X, Wu J, Lu X. Exosomes derived from miR-133b-modified mesenchymal stem cells promote recovery after spinal cord injury. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:845.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Li C, Jiao G, Wu W, Wang H, Ren S, Zhang L, Zhou H, Liu H, Chen Y. Exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit neuronal apoptosis and promote motor function recovery via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Cell Transplant. 2019;28(11):1373–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhao C, Zhou X, Qiu J, Xin D, Li T, Chu X, Yuan H, Wang H, Wang Z, Wang D. Exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit complement activation in rats with spinal cord injury. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:3693–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Huang JH, Xu Y, Yin XM, Lin FY. Exosomes derived from miR-126-modified MSCs promote angiogenesis and neurogenesis and attenuate apoptosis after spinal cord injury in rats. Neuroscience. 2020;424:133–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Yuan B, Pan S, Dong YQ, Zhang WW, He XD. Effect of exosomes derived from mir-126-modified mesenchymal stem cells on the repair process of spinal cord injury in rats. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(8):4058.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Gu J, Jin ZS, Wang CM, Yan XF, Mao YQ, Chen S. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes improves spinal cord function after injury in rats by activating autophagy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020;14:1621–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Biglari B, Swing T, Child C, Büchler A, Westhauser F, Bruckner T, Ferbert T, Jürgen Gerner H, Moghaddam A. A pilot study on temporal changes in IL-1β and TNF-α serum levels after spinal cord injury: the serum level of TNF-α in acute SCI patients as a possible marker for neurological remission. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(7):510–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Kwon BK, Streijger F, Fallah N, Noonan VK, Bélanger LM, Ritchie L, Paquette SJ, Ailon T, Boyd MC, Street J, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers to stratify injury severity and predict outcome in human traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(3):567–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Zhou K, Shi L, Wang Y, Chen S, Zhang J. Recent advances of the NLRP3 Inflammasome in central nervous system disorders. J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:9238290.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Davis BK, Wen H, Ting JP. The inflammasome NLRs in immunity, inflammation, and associated diseases. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011;29:707–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Martinon F, Mayor A, Tschopp J. The inflammasomes: guardians of the body. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:229–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Jiang W, Li M, He F, Zhou S, Zhu L. Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome to attenuate spinal cord injury in mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Liu HD, Li W, Chen ZR, Hu YC, Zhang DD, Shen W, Zhou ML, Zhu L, Hang CH. Expression of the NLRP3 inflammasome in cerebral cortex after traumatic brain injury in a rat model. Neurochem Res. 2013;38(10):2072–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Jiang W, Huang Y, He F, Liu J, Li M, Sun T, Ren W, Hou J, Zhu L. Dopamine D1 receptor agonist A-68930 inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation, controls inflammation, and alleviates histopathology in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(6):E330–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Zendedel A, Mönnink F, Hassanzadeh G, Zaminy A, Ansar MM, Habib P, Slowik A, Kipp M, Beyer C. Estrogen attenuates local inflammasome expression and activation after spinal cord injury. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(2):1364–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Xu G, Shi D, Zhi Z, Ao R, Yu B. Melatonin ameliorates spinal cord injury by suppressing the activation of inflammasomes in rats. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(4):5183–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Jiang W, Huang Y, Han N, He F, Li M, Bian Z, Liu J, Sun T, Zhu L. Quercetin suppresses NLRP3 inflammasome activation and attenuates histopathology in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2016;54(8):592–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(1):23–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Locati M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004;25(12):677–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(12):958–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Wolfs IM, Donners MM, de Winther MP. Differentiation factors and cytokines in the atherosclerotic plaque micro-environment as a trigger for macrophage polarisation. Thromb Haemost. 2011;106(5):763–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. David S, Kroner A. Repertoire of microglial and macrophage responses after spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(7):388–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Kigerl KA, Gensel JC, Ankeny DP, Alexander JK, Donnelly DJ, Popovich PG. Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2009;29(43):13435–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Lankford KL, Arroyo EJ, Nazimek K, Bryniarski K, Askenase PW, Kocsis JD. Intravenously delivered mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes target M2-type macrophages in the injured spinal cord. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Sofroniew MV, Vinters HV. Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119(1):7–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Anderson MA, Burda JE, Ren Y, Ao Y, O'Shea TM, Kawaguchi R, Coppola G, Khakh BS, Deming TJ, Sofroniew MV. Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature. 2016;532(7598):195–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Sofroniew MV. Astrogliosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;7(2):a020420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Martinez FO, Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, Bennett ML, Münch AE, Chung WS, Peterson TC, et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature. 2017;541(7638):481–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Lian H, Yang L, Cole A, Sun L, Chiang AC, Fowler SW, Shim DJ, Rodriguez-Rivera J, Taglialatela G, Jankowsky JL, et al. NFκB-activated astroglial release of complement C3 compromises neuronal morphology and function associated with Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 2015;85(1):101–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Kaltschmidt B, Kaltschmidt C. NF-kappaB in the nervous system. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1(3):a001271.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Gilmore TD, Herscovitch M. Inhibitors of NF-kappaB signaling: 785 and counting. Oncogene. 2006;25(51):6887–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Conti A, Cardali S, Genovese T, Di Paola R, La Rosa G. Role of inflammation in the secondary injury following experimental spinal cord trauma. J Neurosurg Sci. 2003;47(2):89–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Brambilla R, Bracchi-Ricard V, Hu WH, Frydel B, Bramwell A, Karmally S, Green EJ, Bethea JR. Inhibition of astroglial nuclear factor kappaB reduces inflammation and improves functional recovery after spinal cord injury. J Exp Med. 2005;202(1):145–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Wang L, Pei S, Han L, Guo B, Li Y, Duan R, Yao Y, Xue B, Chen X, Jia Y. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes reduce A1 astrocytes via downregulation of phosphorylated NFκB P65 subunit in spinal cord injury. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;50(4):1535–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Bartanusz V, Jezova D, Alajajian B, Digicaylioglu M. The blood-spinal cord barrier: morphology and clinical implications. Ann Neurol. 2011;70(2):194–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Reinhold AK, Rittner HL. Barrier function in the peripheral and central nervous system-a review. Pflugers Arch. 2017;469(1):123–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Jo DH, Kim JH, Heo JI, Kim JH, Cho CH. Interaction between pericytes and endothelial cells leads to formation of tight junction in hyaloid vessels. Mol Cells. 2013;36(5):465–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Winkler EA, Sengillo JD, Sullivan JS, Henkel JS, Appel SH, Zlokovic BV. Blood-spinal cord barrier breakdown and pericyte reductions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125(1):111–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Cheng J, Korte N, Nortley R, Sethi H, Tang Y, Attwell D. Targeting pericytes for therapeutic approaches to neurological disorders. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136(4):507–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Figley SA, Khosravi R, Legasto JM, Tseng YF, Fehlings MG. Characterization of vascular disruption and blood-spinal cord barrier permeability following traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(6):541–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Matsushita T, Lankford KL, Arroyo EJ, Sasaki M, Neyazi M, Radtke C, Kocsis JD. Diffuse and persistent blood-spinal cord barrier disruption after contusive spinal cord injury rapidly recovers following intravenous infusion of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Neurol. 2015;267:152–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Yuan X, Wu Q, Wang P, Jing Y, Yao H, Tang Y, Li Z, Zhang H, Xiu R. Exosomes derived from pericytes improve microcirculation and protect blood-spinal cord barrier after spinal cord injury in mice. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Akçakaya P, Ekelund S, Kolosenko I, Caramuta S, Ozata DM, Xie H, Lindforss U, Olivecrona H, Lui WO. miR-185 and miR-133b deregulation is associated with overall survival and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 2011;39(2):311–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Jee MK, Jung JS, Choi JI, Jang JA, Kang KS, Im YB, Kang SK. MicroRNA 486 is a potentially novel target for the treatment of spinal cord injury. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 4):1237–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Hu JZ, Huang JH, Zeng L, Wang G, Cao M, Lu HB. Anti-apoptotic effect of microRNA-21 after contusion spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30(15):1349–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Hu J, Zeng L, Huang J, Wang G, Lu H. miR-126 promotes angiogenesis and attenuates inflammation after contusion spinal cord injury in rats. Brain Res. 2015;1608:191–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Ding SQ, Chen J, Wang SN, Duan FX, Chen YQ, Shi YJ, Hu JG, Lü HZ. Identification of serum exosomal microRNAs in acute spinal cord injured rats. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2019;244(14):1149–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Chen L, Lu FB, Chen DZ, Wu JL, Hu ED, Xu LM, Zheng MH, Li H, Huang Y, Jin XY, et al. BMSCs-derived miR-223-containing exosomes contribute to liver protection in experimental autoimmune hepatitis. Mol Immunol. 2018;93:38–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Buller B, Liu X, Wang X, Zhang RL, Zhang L, Hozeska-Solgot A, Chopp M, Zhang ZG. MicroRNA-21 protects neurons from ischemic death. FEBS J. 2010;277(20):4299–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Lei P, Li Y, Chen X, Yang S, Zhang J. Microarray based analysis of microRNA expression in rat cerebral cortex after traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 2009;1284:191–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Redell JB, Liu Y, Dash PK. Traumatic brain injury alters expression of hippocampal microRNAs: potential regulators of multiple pathophysiological processes. J Neurosci Res. 2009;87(6):1435–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 2009;19(1):92–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Liu NK, Wang XF, Lu QB, Xu XM. Altered microRNA expression following traumatic spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2009;219(2):424–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Han Z, Chen F, Ge X, Tan J, Lei P, Zhang J. miR-21 alleviated apoptosis of cortical neurons through promoting PTEN-Akt signaling pathway in vitro after experimental traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 2014;1582:12–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Heyer MP, Pani AK, Smeyne RJ, Kenny PJ, Feng G. Normal midbrain dopaminergic neuron development and function in miR-133b mutant mice. J Neurosci. 2012;32(32):10887–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Lu XC, Zheng JY, Tang LJ, Huang BS, Li K, Tao Y, Yu W, Zhu RL, Li S, Li LX. MiR-133b promotes neurite outgrowth by targeting RhoA expression. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;35(1):246–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Xia C, Cai Y, Lin Y, Guan R, Xiao G, Yang J. MiR-133b-5p regulates the expression of the heat shock protein 70 during rat neuronal cell apoptosis induced by the gp120 V3 loop peptide. J Med Virol. 2016;88(3):437–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Xin H, Katakowski M, Wang F, Qian JY, Liu XS, Ali MM, Buller B, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. MicroRNA cluster miR-17-92 cluster in exosomes enhance neuroplasticity and functional recovery after stroke in rats. Stroke. 2017;48(3):747–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Xin H, Li Y, Liu Z, Wang X, Shang X, Cui Y, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. MiR-133b promotes neural plasticity and functional recovery after treatment of stroke with multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells in rats via transfer of exosome-enriched extracellular particles. Stem Cells. 2013;31(12):2737–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Kim J, Inoue K, Ishii J, Vanti WB, Voronov SV, Murchison E, Hannon G, Abeliovich A. A MicroRNA feedback circuit in midbrain dopamine neurons. Science. 2007;317(5842):1220–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Yu YM, Gibbs KM, Davila J, Campbell N, Sung S, Todorova TI, Otsuka S, Sabaawy HE, Hart RP, Schachner M. MicroRNA miR-133b is essential for functional recovery after spinal cord injury in adult zebrafish. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33(9):1587–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Madaro L, Passafaro M, Sala D, Etxaniz U, Lugarini F, Proietti D, Alfonsi MV, Nicoletti C, Gatto S, De Bardi M, et al. Denervation-activated STAT3-IL-6 signalling in fibro-adipogenic progenitors promotes myofibres atrophy and fibrosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(8):917–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Renault-Mihara F, Mukaino M, Shinozaki M, Kumamaru H, Kawase S, Baudoux M, Ishibashi T, Kawabata S, Nishiyama Y, Sugai K, et al. Regulation of RhoA by STAT3 coordinates glial scar formation. J Cell Biol. 2017;216(8):2533–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Zong S, Zeng G, Fang Y, Peng J, Tao Y, Li K, Zhao J. The role of IL-17 promotes spinal cord neuroinflammation via activation of the transcription factor STAT3 after spinal cord injury in the rat. Mediat Inflamm. 2014;2014:786947.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Schwab JM, Conrad S, Monnier PP, Julien S, Mueller BK, Schluesener HJ. Spinal cord injury-induced lesional expression of the repulsive guidance molecule (RGM). Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21(6):1569–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Wu X, Walker CL, Lu Q, Wu W, Eddelman DB, Parish JM, Xu XM. RhoA/rho kinase mediates neuronal death through regulating cPLA (2) activation. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(9):6885–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Filbin MT. Myelin-associated inhibitors of axonal regeneration in the adult mammalian CNS. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(9):703–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Gao Y, Deng K, Hou J, Bryson JB, Barco A, Nikulina E, Spencer T, Mellado W, Kandel ER, Filbin MT. Activated CREB is sufficient to overcome inhibitors in myelin and promote spinal axon regeneration in vivo. Neuron. 2004;44(4):609–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Qiu J, Cafferty WB, McMahon SB, Thompson SW. Conditioning injury-induced spinal axon regeneration requires signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation. J Neurosci. 2005;25(7):1645–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Xin H, Li Y, Buller B, Katakowski M, Zhang Y, Wang X, Shang X, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. Exosome-mediated transfer of miR-133b from multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells to neural cells contributes to neurite outgrowth. Stem Cells. 2012;30(7):1556–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Ren ZW, Zhou JG, Xiong ZK, Zhu FZ, Guo XD. Effect of exosomes derived from MiR-133b-modified ADSCs on the recovery of neurological function after SCI. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(1):52–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Zhao L, Jiang X, Shi J, Gao S, Zhu Y, Gu T, Shi E. Exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing microRNA-25 protect spinal cords against transient ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(2):508–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Li C, Li X, Zhao B, Wang C. Exosomes derived from miR-544-modified mesenchymal stem cells promote recovery after spinal cord injury. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2020;126(4):369–75.

  152. Liu W, Rong Y, Wang J, Zhou Z, Ge X, Ji C, Jiang D, Gong F, Li L, Chen J, et al. Exosome-shuttled miR-216a-5p from hypoxic preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells repair traumatic spinal cord injury by shifting microglial M1/M2 polarization. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17(1):47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Wu D, Klaw MC, Connors T, Kholodilov N, Burke RE, Tom VJ. Expressing constitutively active Rheb in adult neurons after a complete spinal cord injury enhances axonal regeneration beyond a chondroitinase-treated glial scar. J Neurosci. 2015;35(31):11068–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Blesch A, Tuszynski MH. Spinal cord injury: plasticity, regeneration and the challenge of translational drug development. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32(1):41–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. He Z, Jin Y. Intrinsic control of axon regeneration. Neuron. 2016;90(3):437–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Jure I, Pietranera L, De Nicola AF, Labombarda F. Spinal cord injury impairs neurogenesis and induces glial reactivity in the hippocampus. Neurochem Res. 2017;42(8):2178–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Jeong JO, Han JW, Kim JM, Cho HJ, Park C, Lee N, Kim DW, Yoon YS. Malignant tumor formation after transplantation of short-term cultured bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in experimental myocardial infarction and diabetic neuropathy. Circ Res. 2011;108(11):1340–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Vismara I, Papa S, Rossi F, Forloni G, Veglianese P. Current options for cell therapy in spinal cord injury. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23(9):831–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Corcione A, Benvenuto F, Ferretti E, Giunti D, Cappiello V, Cazzanti F, Risso M, Gualandi F, Mancardi GL, Pistoia V, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate B-cell functions. Blood. 2006;107(1):367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Deng J, Petersen BE, Steindler DA, Jorgensen ML, Laywell ED. Mesenchymal stem cells spontaneously express neural proteins in culture and are neurogenic after transplantation. Stem Cells. 2006;24(4):1054–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Churchman SM, Boxall SA, McGonagle D, Jones EA. Predicting the remaining lifespan and cultivation-related loss of osteogenic capacity of bone marrow multipotential stromal cells applicable across a broad donor age range. Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:6129596.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. Stolzing A, Jones E, McGonagle D, Scutt A. Age-related changes in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: consequences for cell therapies. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129(3):163–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Park WS, Ahn SY, Sung SI, Ahn JY, Chang YS. Strategies to enhance paracrine potency of transplanted mesenchymal stem cells in intractable neonatal disorders. Pediatr Res. 2018;83(1–2):214–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Balsam LB, Wagers AJ, Christensen JL, Kofidis T, Weissman IL, Robbins RC. Haematopoietic stem cells adopt mature haematopoietic fates in ischaemic myocardium. Nature. 2004;428(6983):668–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Bruno S, Chiabotto G, Camussi G. Extracellular vesicles: a therapeutic option for liver fibrosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(12):4255.

  166. Lopatina T, Bruno S, Tetta C, Kalinina N, Porta M, Camussi G. Platelet-derived growth factor regulates the secretion of extracellular vesicles by adipose mesenchymal stem cells and enhances their angiogenic potential. Cell Commun Signal. 2014;12:26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. Zhang J, Li S, Li L, Li M, Guo C, Yao J, Mi S. Exosome and exosomal microRNA: trafficking, sorting, and function. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015;13(1):17–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. Li P, Kaslan M, Lee SH, Yao J, Gao Z. Progress in exosome isolation techniques. Theranostics. 2017;7(3):789–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Bari E, Perteghella S, Di Silvestre D, Sorlini M, Catenacci L, Sorrenti M, Marrubini G, Rossi R, Tripodo G, Mauri P, et al. Pilot production of mesenchymal stem/stromal freeze-dried secretome for cell-free regenerative nanomedicine: a validated GMP-compliant process. Cells. 2018;7(11):190.

  170. Katsuda T, Tsuchiya R, Kosaka N, Yoshioka Y, Takagaki K, Oki K, Takeshita F, Sakai Y, Kuroda M, Ochiya T. Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells secrete functional neprilysin-bound exosomes. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. Mastri M, Lin H, Lee T. Enhancing the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell therapy. World J Stem Cells. 2014;6(2):82–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Chinese Medicine Administration Research Project of Gansu province (GZK-2019-46) and Cuiying Technology Innovation Project of Lanzhou University Second and Cuiying Scientific Training Program for Undergraduates of Lanzhou University Second Hospital (CYXZ2020-03). Hospital (CY2019-MS10).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wen-zhao Liu, Zhan-jun Ma, and Jie-ru Li are contributed equally to this study and share first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China

    Wen-zhao Liu, Zhan-jun Ma & Xue-wen Kang

  2. Department of Orthopedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, No.82 Cuiyingmen Street, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China

    Wen-zhao Liu, Zhan-jun Ma & Xue-wen Kang

  3. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China

    Jie-ru Li

  4. The International Cooperation Base of Gansu Province for the Pain Research in Spinal Disorders, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China

    Xue-wen Kang

Authors
  1. Wen-zhao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhan-jun Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jie-ru Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xue-wen Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Zhan-jun Ma, and Xue-wen Kang designed the study. Wen-zhao Liu and Jie-ru Li collected the literature. Wen-zhao Liu wrote the manuscript. Xue-wen Kang revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors gave final approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xue-wen Kang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Wz., Ma, Zj., Li, Jr. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: therapeutic opportunities and challenges for spinal cord injury. Stem Cell Res Ther 12, 102 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02153-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02153-8

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512