Experimental study on calcination and fragmentation characteristics of limestone in fluidized bed
Introduction
Fluidized bed combustion technology is an economic and effective clean combustion technology [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]. Due to the low cost and availability, limestone is usually used as a desulfurization sorbent in the fluidized bed (FB) and circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boilers to reduce SO2 emissions from coal-fired flue gas [[6], [7], [8], [9]].
The desulfurization reaction of limestone can be carried out in two different ways, which depends on the degree of calcination [[10], [11], [12]]. The calcination of limestone is determined by the partial pressure of CO2 in the reactor. Indirect desulfurization occurs when the concentration of CO2 is low or the temperature is high [[13], [14], [15]]:
If the CO2 concentration is very high or the reaction temperature is lower than the calcination temperature of limestone, the calcination reaction will not occur. Limestone will not be calcined, and sulfation will occur between CaCO3 and SO2, which is called direct desulfurization [16,17]:
Calcination temperature and partial pressure of CO2 in fluidization medium have a very important influence on the fragmentation of limestone. When the partial pressure of CO2 is greater than the equilibrium pressure of limestone decomposition, the calcination reaction will be inhibited and the crushing degree of limestone is small; when the partial pressure of CO2 is less than the equilibrium pressure of limestone decomposition, the generation of CO2 from calcination reaction causes the internal pressure to increase and then the crushing degree will increase.
It can be seen that the capture of SO2 by calcium-containing materials depends on these parameters: temperature, particle size, and its properties (age, porosity, and composition), total pressure and partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and the concentration of SO2 [18].
When the limestone particles stay in the bed, they are impacted by internal stress, chemical reaction, and collision from other particles and the inner wall of the reactor. All of these phenomena may cause fragmentation and attrition, which causes the size to change. Due to the thermal stress and internal overpressure caused by CO2 emission, primary fragmentation will occur [19]. The development of chemical reactions involved in desulfurization (calcination, sulfation) interferes with the fragmentation process, making the phenomena more complex [20].
Hu et al. [21] found that limestone did not suffer an important thermal shock and show a high fragmentation level after calcination under high-temperature conditions. The results of Scala et al. [22] showed that attrition and fragmentation patterns under oxy-firing conditions were much different from those occurring under air-firing combustion conditions. Previous studies have investigated the effects of limestone type and size, fluidizing gas velocity, and temperature on fragmentation [23]. However, they focused more on the chemical reactivity of limestone in the SO2 atmosphere, rarely involving the effect of SO2 on limestone fragmentation behavior. Meanwhile, the effect of sulfation on limestone fragmentation is a problem of practical significance. In most studies, the calcination and sulfidation reactions in the desulfurization process are treated separately, but in the actual fluidized bed, the calcination and sulfidation reactions are carried out simultaneously. There are obvious differences in particle composition, reaction rate and final conversion rate of limestone under calcination and sulfidation conditions, which will also affect the fragmentation. Due to the non decoupling characteristics of sulfidation and calcination, it is necessary to explore the interaction between sulfidation and calcination, so as to provide a reference for the calculation of limestone desulfurization efficiency in fluidized bed boiler. Also, the influence of particle size evolution, temperature, and reaction rate on fragmentation is still a controversial topic [24]. Because the behavior of limestone is very different between air combustion and oxygen-enriched combustion, it is also necessary to explore the characteristics under oxygen-enriched conditions.
CaCO3 exists in nature as calcite and aragonite. Calcite and aragonite are polymorphs of CaCO3. The main difference between calcite and aragonite is that the crystal system of calcite is triangular, while the crystal system of aragonite is orthogonal. In addition, calcite is more stable than aragonite. In this paper, the calcination and fragmentation of the above two kinds of limestone in a fluidized bed reactor were systematically studied. The effects of temperature, reaction rate, SO2 and CO2 atmosphere, and firing exhaust gas atmosphere were studied. Besides, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis has been used to observe the surface morphology of the original and reaction samples. The experimental results and analysis will provide more information for understanding the size evolution of limestone particles during the desulfurization process in the fluidized bed.
Section snippets
Experimental apparatuses and parameters
The experiment was carried out in a lab-scale fluidized bed reactor as shown in Fig. 1. The reactor (54 mm ID, 800 mm height) is made of quartz glass and heated by the silica carbon tube located outside the reactor. The heating system is divided into two sections. The lower section is mainly used to control the temperature of the hot air, while the higher section can maintain the bed temperature. The bed temperature is controlled by PID (Proportional, integral and derivative control) that
Size evolution in the calcination and fragmentation process
The limestone sample was calcined in the furnace at 850 °C. The calcination reaction produced fresh lime and CO2 during the process, therefore, the particles would suffer from size evolution. As listed in Table 3, the Sauter diameter of particles decreased about 5–20% than original samples and larger limestone with 600–800 μm has more notable size evolution than finer ones. It can be seen from Table 3 and Fig. 3 that the particle size of the fragmentation product is much finer than that of the
Conclusions
The particle size distribution of sorbent is seriously affected by limestone calcination and fragmentation. In this paper, the effects of temperature, reaction rate, SO2 and CO2 atmosphere, firing exhaust atmosphere on the calcination and fragmentation of limestone in fluidized bed were studied by using calcite and aragonite with different particle sizes. The main conclusions are as follows:
Compared with limestone 1, limestone 2 is easier to detect particle size reduction and has higher
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the National Key Research Plan (2019YFE0102100) and C9 University science and technology project (201903D421009).
References (29)
Fluidized bed combustion: achievements and problems
- et al.
Heat transfer characteristics in a large-scale bubbling fluidized bed with immersed horizontal tube bundles
Energy
(2018) - et al.
SO3 formation and the effect of fly ash in a bubbling fluidised bed under oxy-fuel combustion conditions
Fuel Process. Technol.
(2017) - et al.
Effect of attrition on SO2 capture by limestone under pressurized fluidized bed combustion conditions-comparison between a mathematical model of SO2 capture by single limestone particle under attrition condition and SO2 capture in a large-scale PFBC
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(2001) - et al.
Research on sulfur recovery from the byproducts of magnesia wet flue gas desulfurization
Appl. Therm. Eng.
(2014) - et al.
Mechanisms of direct and in-direct sulfation of limestone
Fuel
(2015) - et al.
Calcium sulfation characteristics at high oxygen concentration in a 1MWth pilot scale oxy-fuel circulating fluidized bed
Fuel Process. Technol.
(2018) - et al.
Sulfation and reactivation characteristics of nine limestones
Fuel
(2000) - et al.
A review of attrition and attrition test methods
Powder Technol.
(1987) - et al.
Fragmentation of calcium-based sorbents under high heating rate, short residence time conditions
Fuel
(1995)
Limestone fragmentation and attrition during fluidized bed oxyfiring
Fuel
The influence of temperature on limestone sulfation and attrition under fluidized bed combustion conditions
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
Review of the direct sulfation reaction of limestone
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
Attrition during steam gasification of lignite char in a fluidized bed reactor
Fuel Process. Technol.
Cited by (8)
Partially calcined CaCO<inf>3</inf> for remediating multi-heavy metals-contaminated groundwater
2023, Chemical Engineering JournalTransformation of CFB boilers pollutant treatment strategies under China's stricter requirements and the background of carbon neutrality (FBC24)
2023, FuelCitation Excerpt :CFB boiler technology is facing great challenges. Due to low-cost consumption and strong availability, limestone is usually used as desulfurizer in CFB boiler [16–17]. Its optimal temperature zone is 800–900 °C, which is within the combustion temperature zone of CFB boiler (750–950 °C), so CFB has a good effect on reducing SO2 [18].
Comminution of carbon particles in a fluidized bed reactor: A review
2023, Minerals EngineeringCalcination and desulfurization characteristics of calcium carbonate in pressurized oxy-combustion
2022, EnergyCitation Excerpt :As expected, the calcination rate of CaCO3 increases as the temperature rises, which is because the higher the temperature, the better the chemical reaction rate [29]. In addition, because the calcination reaction is endothermic, an increase in temperature may promote the calcination reaction [30]. There are three reported rate controlling steps during the calcination: heat transfer to the CaCO3 surface, mass transfer of CO2 from the particle surface through the product layer, and the chemical reaction.
Effect of Circulating Fluidized Bed Fly Ash on Performance of Foam Concrete
2023, Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society