Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An Experimental Review of the Physicochemical Properties of Copper Electrowinning Electrolytes

  • Review
  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physicochemical properties of copper electrolytes are a strong fundamental consideration in electrodeposition processes during electro-purification and recovery of copper. Their influence extends to mass transfer as well as energy consumption during the electrodeposition process. In this study, the influence of electrolyte composition on electrolyte physicochemical properties was investigated to review the existing literature data. This review of data is considered necessary as more and more electrowinning models are being developed for process prediction and optimisation and a need of such data is required for accurate prediction of physicochemical properties. The major components of importance to the formation of smooth high-quality and high-purity copper cathodes at optimum current efficiency are considered the species in solution. These include Cu ions, Fe ions (major impurity), H2SO4, and a smoothing agent additive. A 5-factor, 2- and 3-level experimental design was employed to determine the effect of copper (35 and 45 g/l), sulphuric acid (160 and 180 g/l), iron (1, 3, and 6 g/l), polyacrylamide additive (2, 5, and 10 mg/l), and temperature (45 and 55 °C) on electrolyte density, conductivity, and the diffusion coefficient in synthetic copper electrowinning electrolytes. The major species in a copper electrowinning electrolyte are found to be the most relevant for prediction of physicochemical properties. These results indicate that relatively simple empirical models are sufficient for modelling of the electrolyte domain in electrowinning, without the need for the generation of vast amounts of complex experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data can be made available on request

References

  1. Moats M, Khouraibchia Y (2009) Effective diffusivity of ferric ions and current efficiency in stagnant synthetic copper electrowinning solutions. Min Metall Explor 26(4):179–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03402537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moats MS, Hiskey JB, Collins DW (2000) The effect of copper, acid, and temperature on the diffusion coefficient of cupric ions in simulated electrorefining electrolytes. Hydrometallurgy 56(3):255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(00)00070-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Panda B, Das SC (2001) Electrowinning of copper from sulfate electrolyte in presence of sulfurous acid. Hydrometallurgy 59(1):55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(00)00140-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Price DC, Davenport WG (1980) Densities, electrical conductivities and viscosities of CuSO4/H2SO4 solutions in the range of modern electrorefining and electrowinning electrolytes. Metall Trans B 11(1):159–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02657185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Price DC, Davenport WG (1981) Physico-chemical properties of copper electrorefining and electrowinning electrolytes. Metall Trans B 12(4):639–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02654131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Subbaiah T, Das SC (1989) Physico-chemical properties of copper electrolytes. Metall Mater Trans B 20(3):375–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Subbaiah T, Das SC (1994) Effect of some common impurities on mass transfer coefficient and deposit quality during copper electrowinning. Hydrometallurgy 36(3):271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-386X(94)90026-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baur JE (2007) Diffusion coefficients. In: Handbook of Electrochemistry. Elsevier, pp 829–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451958-0.50036-7

  9. Werner JM, Zeng W, Free ML, Zhang Z, Cho J (2018) Modeling and validation of local electrowinning electrode current density using two phase flow and Nernst-Planck equations. J Electrochem Soc 165:E190–E207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Araneda-Hernández E, Vergara-Gutierrez F, Pagliero-Neira A (2014) Effect of additives on diffusion coefficient for cupric ions and kinematics viscosity in CuSO4-H2SO4 solution at 60°C. Dyna 81(188):209–215. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v81n188.41815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gladysz O, Los P, Krzyzak E (2007) Influence of concentrations of copper, levelling agents and temperature on the diffusion coefficient of cupric ions in industrial electro-refining electrolytes. J Appl Electrochem 37(10):1093–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-007-9363-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vereecken J, Winand R (1976) Influence of polyacrylamides on the quality of copper deposits from acidic copper sulfate solutions. Surf Technol 4(3):227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-4583(76)90035-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saban MD, Scott JD, Cassidy RM (1992) Collagen proteins in electrorefining: rate constants for glue hydrolysis and effects of molar mass on glue activity. Metall Trans B 23(2):125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown GM, Hope GA (1995) SERS study of the adsorption of gelatin at a copper electrode in sulfuric acid solution. J Electroanal Chem 397:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(95)04159-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coetzee C (2018) Characterizing the role of polyacrylamide additives in copper electrowinning (Masters dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University)

  16. Robinson TG, Sole KC, Sandoval S, Siegmund A, Davenport WG, Moats M (2013) “Copper Electrowinning: 2013World Tankhouse Operating Data,” Proceeding of Copper 2013 Conference Vol. V Electrowinning/Electrorefining, Santiago, Chile: IIMCh, pp. 3-14

  17. Quickenden TI, Jiang X (1984) The diffusion coefficient of copper sulphate in aqueous solution. Electrochim Acta 29(6):693–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(84)80002-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quickenden TI, Xu Q (1996) Toward a reliable value for the diffusion coefficient of cupric ion in aqueous solution. J Electrochem Soc 143(4):1248–1253. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1836624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Montgomery DC, Peck EA and Vining GG (2012) Introduction to linear regression analysis (Vol. 821). John Wiley & Sons

  20. Fogel’son RL, Likhachev ER (2009) Temperature dependence of liquid volume. Tech Phys 54(7):1082–1084. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784209070299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalliomaki T, Aji AT, Rintala L, Aromaa J, Lundstrom M (2017) Models for viscosity and density of copper electrorefining electrolytes. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 53(2):1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.5277/ppmp170227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bousfield WR, Lowry TM (1903) Influence of temperature on the conductivity of electrolytic solutions. Proc R Soc Lond 71:42–54. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1902.0059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barron JJ, Ashton C (2005) The effect of temperature on conductivity measurement. TSP. 7(3):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kalliomäki T, Aromaa J, Lundström M (2016) Modeling the effect of composition and temperature on the conductivity of synthetic copper electrorefining electrolyte. Minerals 6(3):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/min6030059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalliomäki T, Wilson BP, Aromaa J, Lundström M (2019) Diffusion coefficient of cupric ion in a copper electrorefining electrolyte containing nickel and arsenic. Miner Eng 134:381–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.02.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding support of the Wilhelm Frank Trust in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Process Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa

    Chalwe Chibwe & Margreth Tadie

Authors
  1. Chalwe Chibwe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margreth Tadie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mr. Chalwe Chibwe conducted research, analysed data, wrote the manuscript. Dr. Margreth Tadie: conceptualised, supervised, analysed data, and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margreth Tadie.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chibwe, C., Tadie, M. An Experimental Review of the Physicochemical Properties of Copper Electrowinning Electrolytes. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 38, 1225–1237 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00401-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00401-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation