Skip to main content
Log in

Composition and compound proportions affect the response to complex chemical signals in a spiny lizard

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most animal signals across sensory modalities are multicomponent traits that can be broken down into discrete elements. If different elements are perceived as unique, independent units (elemental perception), instead of as integrated percepts (configural perception), single changes in the presence/absence or the abundance of specific elements of a multicomponent signal may be enough to impact communication. Here, we found that male Yarrow’s spiny lizards (Sceloporus jarrovii) can discriminate single compounds of a multicomponent chemical signal (femoral gland secretions), different concentrations of a signaling compound, and a single compound from a mixture of compounds. In addition, one chemical compound elicited a response similar to that evoked by the complete natural scent. We conclude that perception of chemical signals in S. jarrovii lizards is elemental but also configural. The elemental perception of signaling compounds seems to occur with high sensitivity and narrow resolution, so that minor changes in single key elements may affect chemical communication. Given the multicomponent nature of most animal signals, hypotheses regarding signal function and evolution would be enhanced if researchers could determine whether these results apply to signals in other sensory modalities and identify the key elements of complex signals, from a receiver’s perspective.

Significance statement

Most signals in animal communication are quite complex. For example, odors are mixtures of multiple volatile chemical compounds, and the way in which receivers perceive and process these mixtures to extract relevant information influences the structure and evolution of chemical signals. In a series of behavioral trials, we investigated how male Sceloporus jarrovii lizards may perceive conspecific odors by testing their response to individual and combined mixtures of two compounds present in femoral gland secretions at two different concentrations. We demonstrate that lizards can discriminate structurally similar compounds and that the response to a compound changes when said compound is part of a larger mixture. Compound concentration affected the perception of individual compounds but not complex mixtures. Deciphering what elements and/or configurations are perceived in an odor mixture is the only way to understand the role of mixture composition and its impact on communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the manuscript and supplementary material.

References

  • Abell AJ (1997) Estimating paternity with spatial behaviour and DNA fingerprinting in the striped plateau lizard, Sceloporus virgatus (Phrynosomatidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apfelbach R, Parsons M, Soini HA, Novotny MV (2015) Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species? Front Neurosci 9:263

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Apps PJ (2013) Are mammal olfactory signals hiding right under our noses? Naturwissenschaften 100:487–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Apps PJ, Weldon PJ, Kramer M (2015) Chemical signals in terrestrial vertebrates: search for design features. Nat Prod Rep 32:1131–1153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baeckens S, Van Damme R, Cooper WE (2017) How phylogeny and foraging ecology drive the level of chemosensory exploration in lizards and snakes. J Evol Biol 30:627–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baugh AT, Akre KL, Ryan MJ (2008) Categorical perception of a natural, multivariate signal: mating call recognition in túngara frogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:8985–8988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund B, Berglund U, Lindvall T (1976) Psychological processing of odor mixtures. Psychol Rev 83:432–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bondoc KGV, Lembke C, Vyverman W, Pohnert G (2016) Searching for a mate: pheromone-directed movement of the benthic diatom Seminavis robusta. Microb Ecol 72:287–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bro-Jørgensen J (2010) Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. Trends Ecol Evol 25:292–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campos SM, Strauss C, Martins EP (2017) In space and time: territorial animals are attracted to conspecific chemical cues. Ethology 123:136–144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Campos SM, Pruett JA, Soini HA, Zúñiga-Vega JJ, Goldberg JK, Vital-García C, Hews DK, Novotny MV, Martins EP (2020) Volatile fatty acid and aldehyde abundances evolve with behavior and habitat temperature in Sceloporus lizards. Behav Ecol 31:978–991

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev 78:575–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (2008) Bird song: biological themes and variations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caves EM, Green PA, Zipple MN, Peters S, Johnsen S, Nowicki S (2018) Categorical perception of colour signals in a songbird. Nature 560:365–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman SW (2009) Taxonomic and sensory biases in the mate-choice literature: there are far too few studies of chemical and multimodal communication. Acta Ethol 12:45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WE Jr (1998) Evaluation of swab and related tests as a bioassay for assessing responses by squamate reptiles to chemical stimuli. J Chem Ecol 24:841–866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WE Jr, Burghardt GM (1990) A comparative analysis of scoring methods for chemical discrimination of prey by squamate reptiles. J Chem Ecol 16:45–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coureaud G, Langlois D, Sicard G, Schaal B (2004) Newborn rabbit responsiveness to the mammary pheromone is concentration-dependent. Chem Senses 29:341–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coureaud G, Hamdani Y, Schaal B, Thomas-Danguin T (2009) Elemental and configural processing of odour mixtures in the newborn rabbit. J Exp Biol 212:2525–2531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coureaud G, Gibaud D, Le Berre E, Schaal B, Thomas-Danguin T (2011) Proportion of odorants impacts the configural versus elemental perception of a binary blending mixture in newborn rabbits. Chem Senses 36:693–700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz D, Eizaguirre M (2015) Response to conspecific and heterospecific semiochemicals by Sesamia nonagrioides (L.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) gravid females. Bull Entomol Res 105:347–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duvall D (1979) Western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis) chemical signals. I. Conspecific discriminations and release of a species-typical visual display. J Exp Zool 210:321–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:S125–S153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furtado NAJC, Pupo MT, Carvalho I, Campo VL, Duarte MCT, Bastos JK (2005) Diketopiperazines produced by an Aspergillus fumigatus Brazilian strain. J Braz Chem Soc 16:1448–1453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grether GF, Kolluru GR, Nersissian K (2004) Individual colour patches as multicomponent signals. Biol Rev 79:583–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halekoh U, Højsgaard S, Yan J (2006) The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw 15:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfwerk W, Varkevisser J, Simon R, Mendoza E, Scharff C, Riebel K (2019) Toward testing for multimodal perception of mating signals. Front Ecol Evol 7:124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebets EA, Uetz GW (2000) Leg ornamentation and the efficacy of courtship display in four species of wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:280–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann MA, Campos SM, Martins EP, Romero-Diaz C (2020) Eye-bulging behavior in lizards of the genus Sceloporus: a role in chemical communication? Copeia 108:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hews DK, Martins EP (2013) Visual and chemical signals of social communication: providing the link to habitat and environment. In: Lutterschmidt W (ed) Reptiles in research: investigations of ecology, physiology and behavior from desert to sea. Nova Publishers, Hauppauge, pp 111–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Hews DK, Date P, Hara E, Castellano M (2011) Field presentation of male secretions alters social display in Sceloporus virgatus but not S. undulatus lizards. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1403–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holveck MJ, Riebel K (2007) Preferred songs predict preferred males: consistency and repeatability of zebra finch females across three test contexts. Anim Behav 74:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman L, Gollop N, Mumcuoglu KY, Breuer E, Bhusare SR, Shai Y, Galun R (2007) Antibacterial substances of low molecular weight isolated from the blowfly, Lucilia sericata. Med Vet Entomol 21:127–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacot A, Romero-Diaz C, Tschirren B, Richner H, Fitze PS (2010) Dissecting carotenoid from structural components of carotenoid-based coloration: a field experiment with great tits (Parus major). Am Nat 176:55–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jemiolo B, Novotny M (1994) Inhibition of sexual maturation in juvenile female and male mice by a chemosignal of female origin. Physiol Behav 55:519–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RE (2005) Communication by mosaic signals: individual recognition and underlying neural mechanisms. In: Mason RT, LeMaster MP, Müller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 10. Springer, Boston, pp 269–282

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso EC, Martins EP (2008) Effects of two courtship display components on female reproductive behaviour and physiology in the sagebrush lizard. Anim Behav 75:639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei H, Vickers N (2008) Central processing of natural odor mixtures in insects. J Chem Ecol 34:915–927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeMaster MP, Mason RT (2003) Pheromonally mediated sexual isolation among denning populations of red-sided garter snakes, Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. J Chem Ecol 29:1027–1043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Livermore A, Hutson M, Ngo V, Hadjisimos R, Derby CD (1997) Elemental and configural learning and the perception of odorant mixtures by the spiny lobster Panulirus argus. Physiol Behav 62:169–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • López P, Martín J (2012) Chemosensory exploration of male scent by female rock lizards result from multiple chemical signals of males. Chem Senses 37:47–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • López P, Amo L, Martín J (2006) Reliable signaling by chemical cues of male traits and health state in male lizards, Lacerta monticola. J Chem Ecol 32:473–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martín J, López P (2014) Pheromones and chemical communication in lizards. In: Rheubert JL, Siegel DS, Trauth SE (eds) The reproductive biology and phylogeny of lizards and tuatara. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 43–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín J, Moreira PL, López P (2007) Status-signalling chemical badges in male Iberian rock lizards. Funct Ecol 21:568–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín J, Ortega J, López P (2015) Interpopulational variations in sexual chemical signals of Iberian wall lizards may allow maximizing signal efficiency under different climatic conditions. PLoS ONE 10:e0131492

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martins EP (1993) A comparative study of the evolution of Sceloporus push-up displays. Am Nat 142:994–1018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martins EP, Ord TJ, Davenport SW (2005) Combining motions into complex displays: playbacks with a robotic lizard. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins EP, Ord TJ, Slaven J, Wright JL, Housworth EA (2006) Individual, sexual, seasonal, and temporal variation in the amount of sagebrush lizard scent marks. J Chem Ecol 32:881–893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason RT, Parker MR (2010) Social behavior and pheromonal communication in reptiles. J Comp Physiol A 196:729–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Micheletta J, Engelhardt A, Matthews L, Agil M, Waller BM (2013) Multicomponent and multimodal lipsmacking in crested macaques (Macaca nigra). Am J Primatol 75:763–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny MV, Jemiolo B, Harvey S, Wiesler D, Marchlewska-Koj A (1986) Adrenal-mediated endogenous metabolites inhibit puberty in female mice. Science 231:722–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ord TJ, Martins EP (2006) Tracing the origins of signal diversity in anole lizards: phylogenetic approaches to inferring the evolution of complex behaviour. Anim Behav 71:1411–1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ossip-Drahos AG, Oyola Morales JR, Vital-García C, Zúñiga-Vega JJ, Hews DK, Martins EP (2016) Shaping communicative colour signals over evolutionary time. R Soc Open Sci 3:160728

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ossip-Klein AG, Fuentes-González JA, Hews DK, Martins EP (2013) Information content is more important than sensory system or physical distance in guiding the long-term evolutionary relationships between signaling modalities in Sceloporus lizards. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1513–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Development Core Team R (2018) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package Version 3:1–137. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme

  • Price AC, Weadick CJ, Shim J, Rodd FH (2008) Pigments, patterns, and fish behavior. Zebrafish 5:297–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pruett JA, Zuniga-Vega JJ, Campos SM, Soini HA, Novotny MV, Vital-Garcia C, Martins EP, Hews DK (2016) Evolutionary interactions between visual and chemical signals: chemosignals compensate for the loss of a visual signal in male Sceloporus lizards. J Chem Ecol 42:1164–1174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn VS, Hews DK (2010) The evolutionary decoupling of behavioral and color cues in a multicomponent signal in two Sceloporus lizards. Ethology 116:509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand AS, Ryan MJ (1981) The adaptive significance of a complex vocal repertoire in a neotropical frog. Z Tierpsychol 57:209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard J, Sinclair M, Srinivasan MV, Claudianos C (2010) Honeybees learn odour mixtures via a selection of key odorants. PLoS ONE 5:e9110

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Renou M (2014) Pheromones and general odor perception in insects. In: Mucignat-Caretta C (ed) Neurobiology of chemical communication. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 23–56

  • Rhee KH (2004) Cyclic dipeptides exhibit synergistic, broad spectrum antimicrobial effects and have anti-mutagenic properties. Int J Antimicrob Agents 24:423–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riebel K (2009) Song and female mate choice in zebra finches: a review. Adv Study Behav 40:197–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riffell JA, Lei H, Christensen TA, Hildebrand JG (2009) Characterization and coding of behaviorally significant odor mixtures. Curr Biol 19:335–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Diaz C, Richner H, Granado-Lorencio F, Tschirren B, Fitze PS (2013) Independent sources of condition dependency and multiple pathways determine a composite trait: lessons from carotenoid-based plumage colouration. J Evol Biol 26:635–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Diaz C, Rivera JA, Ossip-Drahos AG, Zúñiga-Vega JJ, Vital-García C, Hews DK, Martins EP (2019) Losing the trait without losing the signal: evolutionary shifts in communicative colour signalling. J Evol Biol 32:320–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Diaz C, Campos SM, Herrmann MA, Lewis KN, Williams DR, Soini HA, Novotny MV, Hews DK, Martins EP (2020) Structural identification, synthesis and biological activity of two volatile cyclic dipeptides in a terrestrial vertebrate. Sci Rep 10:4303

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe C (1999) Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Anim Behav 58:921–931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruby DE (1981) Phenotypic correlates of male reproductive success in the lizard, Sceloporus jarrovi. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior: recent research and new theory. Chiron Press, New York, pp 96–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ (1991) Sexual selection and communication in frogs. Trends Ecol Evol 6:351–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ, Rand AS (2003) Mate recognition in túngara frogs: a review of some studies of brain, behavior, and evolution. Acta Zool Sin 49:713–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal B, Coureaud G, Langlois D, Giniès C, Sémon E, Perrier G (2003) Chemical and behavioural characterization of the rabbit mammary pheromone. Nature 424:68–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider NY, Datiche F, Wilson DA, Gigot V, Thomas-Danguin T, Ferreira G, Coureaud G (2016) Brain processing of a configural vs elemental odor mixture in the newborn rabbit. Brain Struct Funct 221:2527–2539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CL, Evans CS (2013) A new heuristic for capturing the complexity of multimodal signals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1389–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RC, Klein B, Stein J, Ryan M (2008) Faux frogs: multimodal signalling and the value of robotics in the study of animal behaviour. Anim Behav 76:1089–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas-Danguin T, Sinding C, Romagny S, El Mountassir F, Atanasova B, Le Berre E, Le Bon A-M, Coureaud G (2014) The perception of odor objects in everyday life: a review on the processing of odor mixtures. Front Psychol 5:504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JT, Bissell AN, Martins EP (2008) Inhibitory interactions between multimodal behavioural responses may influence the evolution of complex signals. Anim Behav 76:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumlinson JH, Brennan MM, Doolittle RE, Mitchell ER, Brabham A, Mazomenos BE, Baumhover AH, Jackson DM (1989) Identification of a pheromone blend attractive to Manduca sexta (L.) males in a wind tunnel. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 10:255–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, Clark DL, Roberts JA (2016) Multimodal communication in wolf spiders (Lycosidae) — an emerging model for study. Adv Study Behav 48:117–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon PJ, Flachsbarth B, Schulz S (2008) Natural products from the integument of nonavian reptiles. Nat Prod Rep 25:738–756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt TD (2014) Introduction to chemical signaling in vertebrates and invertebrates. In: Mucignat-Caretta C (ed) Neurobiology of chemical communication. Taylor & Francis Group LLC, Boca Raton, pp 1–22

  • Yew JY, Chung H (2015) Insect pheromones: an overview of function, form, and discovery. Prog Lipid Res 59:88–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yorzinski JL, Patricelli GL, Babcock JS, Pearson JM, Platt ML (2013) Through their eyes: selective attention in peahens during courtship. J Exp Biol 216:3035–3046

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, 1st edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Cindy Xu and Kenro Kusumi for sharing laboratory equipment, to Julio Rivera, Jesualdo Fuentes-G, Ciara Sypherd and Anna Hu for the help in the field, and to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. The Department of Animal Care & Technologies at ASU and the Southwestern Research Station provided logistical support.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers IOS-1050274 to EPM and IOS-1052247 to DKH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Romero-Diaz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Lizard capture was approved by the Arizona Game and Fish Department (LIC #SP597303) and the US Forest Service. All procedures and animal care were conducted according to protocols approved by Arizona State University Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol No. 17-1597R to EPM) and adhered to ASAB/ABS Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Research. Lizards were monitored daily for welfare and were allowed to live in the laboratory after the behavior experiments.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Madsen

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(PDF 372 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romero-Diaz, C., Campos, S.M., Herrmann, M.A. et al. Composition and compound proportions affect the response to complex chemical signals in a spiny lizard. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75, 42 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-02987-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-02987-5

Keywords

Navigation