Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Taguchi-Based Six Sigma Method on Variation Reduction in a Green Construction Material Production Process

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Having sufficient knowledge about the role of statistics in engineering helps the managers to control the system appropriately, minimize the costs and increase the productivity. Studies indicate that different quality improvement techniques implemented in recent years did not work properly in some cases due to the unwise application of statistics. Taguchi-based Six Sigma method is a newly introduced method that has borrowed strengths of Taguchi and Six Sigma to provide a more applicable tool for industries, construction works and service centers. It is the optimal setting combined of two-quality improvement techniques, which can be significantly effective in reducing the variation and defects of a manufacturing or producing process. This study aimed to test and evaluate the effectiveness of this new quality improvement model in optimizing the production process of a green construction material. Results of implementing indicated a significant progress about 50% in process performance that verify the effectiveness of Taguchi-based Six Sigma method on variation reduction and quality improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agus A, Krishnan SK, Kadir SLSA (2000) The structural impact of total quality management on financial performance relative to competitors through customer satisfaction: a study of Malaysian manufacturing companies. Total Qual Manag 11(4–6):808–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Akingbehin K (2005). Taguchi-based metrics for software quality. In computer and information science, 2005. Fourth annual ACIS international conference on (pp. 713–716). IEEE

  • Almuwbber O, Haldenwang R, Mbasha W, Masalova I (2018) The influence of variation in cement characteristics on workability and strength of SCC with fly ash and slag additions. Constr Build Mater 160:258–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoni A, Purwantoro AA, Suyanto WS, Hardjito D (2020) Fresh and hardened properties of high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer matrix with high dosage of borax. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civil Eng 44(1):535–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony J (2011) A SWOT analysis on six sigma: some perspectives from leading academics and practitioners. Int J Product Perform Manag 61(6):691–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony J, Balbontin A, Taner T (2000) Key ingredients for the effective implementation of statistical process control. Work Study 49(6):242–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson M, Gremyr I (2008) Principles of robust design methodology. Qual Reliab Eng Int 24:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Atarodi A, Karami H, Ardeshir A, Hosseini K, Lampert D (2020) Experimental investigation of scour reduction around spur dikes by collar using taguchi method. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00373-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendell A, Disney J, McCollin C (1999) The future role of statistics in quality engineering and management. Stat 48(3):299–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman B, Klefsjö B (2010) Quality from customer needs to customer satisfaction. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulcutt R (2001) Why is six sigma so successful? J Appl Stat 28(3–4):301–306

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HJ, Chang SN, Tang CW (2017) Application of the Taguchi method for optimizing the process parameters of producing lightweight aggregates by incorporating tile grinding sludge with reservoir sediments. Materials 10(11):1294

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Chang T, Lin Y, Cheng H, Chang T (2013) Application of DMAIC process to enhance health effect sin caring institution. Qual Quant 47:2065–2080

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JC, Brahma ARB (2014) Taguchi-based six sigma defect reduction of green sand casting process: an industrial case study. J Enterp Transform 4:172–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JC, Li Y, Cox RA (2009) Taguchi-based Six Sigma approach to optimize plasma cutting process: an industrial case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:760–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou S, Chen JC (2017) Taguchi-based six sigma approach to optimize surface roughness for milling processes. Int J Indus Manuf Eng 11(10):1653–1658

    Google Scholar 

  • Das PP, Gupta P, Ghadai RK, Ramachandran M, Kalita K (2017) Optimization of turning process parameters by Taguchi-based six sigma. Mech Mech Eng 21(3):649–656

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mast J, Does RJ (2006) Industrial statistics: a discipline with opportunities and challenges. Stat Neerl 60(3):270–282

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Mast J, Lokkerbol J (2012) An analysis of the six sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving. Int J Prod Econ 139(2):604–614

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mast J, Schippers WAJ, Does RJMM, Van Den Heuvel ER (2000) Steps and strategies in process improvement. Qual Reliab Eng Int 16:301–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Eşme U (2009) Application of Taguchi method for the optimization of resistance spot welding process. Arab J Sci Eng 34(2B):519–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Fursule NV, Bansod SV, Fursule SN (2012) Understanding the benefits and limitations of six sigma methodology. Int J Sci Res Publ 2(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerger A, Firuzan AR (2020) Taguchi based Case study in the automotive industry: nonconformity decreasing with use of Six Sigma methodology. J Appl Stat. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2020.1837086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong G, Chen JC, Guo G (2017) Enhancing tensile strength of injection molded fiber reinforced composites using the Taguchi-based six sigma approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9–12):3385–3393

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw J, McAuley LM, Bero LA, Grilli R, Oxman AD, Ramsay C, Zwarenstein M (2003) Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes. BMJ Qual Saf 12(4):298–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi S, Zahraee SM, Rohani JM (2018) Application of Six Sigma DMAIC methodology in plain yogurt production process. Int J Lean Six Sigma. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-11-2016-0069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton L (2008) Treasure chest of six sigma growth methods, tools, and best practices. Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinckley CM, Barkan P (1996) Selecting the best defect reduction methodology. Qual Reliab Eng Int 12:411–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl RW, Snee R (2010) Statistical thinking and methods in quality improvement: a look to the future. Qual Eng 22(3):119–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard JL (2003) The federal commitment to green building: experiences and expectations. Federal Executive, Office Of The Federal Environmental Executive, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Tsai P, Lai S, Wang W, Lin W (2011) A systematic approach for improving the process quality with Six Sigma projects: a case study of radio frequency equipment. Proceedings of the 41st international conference on computers & industrial engineering.

  • Ikeagwuani CC, Nwonu DC, Ugwu CK, Agu CC (2020) Process parameters optimization for eco-friendly high strength sandcrete block using Taguchi method. Heliyon 6(6):e04276

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbabi MS, Carrigan C, McKenna S (2012) Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. Int J Sustain Built Environ 1:194–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Jou Y, Wu Y (2013) Six sigma approach applied to LCD photolithography process improvement. Proceedings of the institute of industrial engineers asian conference 2013

  • Juvas K, Kappi A, Salo K, Nordenswan E (2001) The effects of cement variations on concrete workability. Nord Concr Res Publ 26:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibert CJ (2016) Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Klefsjö B, Wiklund H, Edgeman RL (2001) Six sigma seen as a methodology for total quality management. Meas Bus Excell 5(1):31–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Klefsjö B, Bergquist B, Edgeman RL (2006) Six Sigma and Total Quality Management: different day, same soup? Int J Six Sigma Compet Adv 2(2):162–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Kumar S, Mehrotra SP (2007) Towards sustainable solutions for fly ash through mechanical activation. Resour Conserv Recycl 52(2):157–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar UD, Nowicki D, Ramirez-Marquez JE, Verma D (2008) On the optimal selection of process alternatives in a Six Sigma implementation. Int J Product Econ 111:456–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Papadopoulos CT, Zhang L (2016) Continuous improvement in manufacturing and service systems. Int J Prod Res 54(21):6281–6284

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavinejad SHG, Sara YGS (2019) Experimental study effect of silica fume and hybrid fiber on mechanical properties lightweight concrete. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civil Eng 43(2):263–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa Y, Shakri S, Hafez MA, Adnan MA (2013) Strengthening sand column using PFA-cement mixture. Electron J Geotech Eng 18:4969–4987

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik TR (2008) Sustainability of concrete construction. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 13(2):98–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz I (2013) Disposal and utilization of fly ash to protect the environment. Int J Innov 2:5259–5266

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham DM, Sinopoli DJ, Dinglas VD, Berenholtz SM, Korupolu R, Watson SR, Pronovost PJ (2009) Improving data quality control in quality improvement projects. Int J Qual Health Care 21(2):145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyebisi SO, Ede AN, Olutoge FA (2020) Optimization of design parameters of slag-corncob ash-based geopolymer concrete by the central composite design of the response surface methodology. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00470-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross PJ (1988) Taguchi method for quality engineering. McGraw-Hill Publishers, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant J (2013) SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-Hill Education, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Priyadarshana T, Dissanayake R (2012) Variation in cement properties and its effect on quality of concrete. Int Inst Infrastruct Resil Reconstruct 2019:113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramezanianpour A (2014) Cement replacement materials: properties, durability, sustainability. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao RS, Kumar CG, Prakasham RS, Hobbs PJ (2008) The Taguchi methodology as a statistical tool for biotechnological applications: a critical appraisal. Biotechnol J Healthcare Nutr Technol 3(4):510–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Telford T (2001) Properties and use of coal fly ash: a valuable industrial by-product. Lindon K. A. Sear, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas MDA (2007) Optimizing the use of fly ash in concrete, vol 5420. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai T (2011) Improving the fine-pitch stencil printing capability using the Taguchi method and Taguchi fuzzy-based model. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 27:808–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahraee SM, Hatami M, Bavafa AA, Ghafourian K, Rohani JM (2014a) Application of statistical Taguchi method to optimize main elements in the residential buildings in Malaysia based energy consumption. Appl Mech Mater 606:265–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahraee SM, Rezaei G, Shahpanah A, Chegeni A, Rohani JM (2014b) Performance improvement of concrete pouring process based resource utilization using taguchi method and computer simulation. Jurnal Teknologi 69(1):17–24

  • Zahraee SM, Chegeni A, Rohani JM (2015) Characterization of manufacturing system computer simulation using taguchi method. Jurnal Teknologi 72(4):77–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Zang C, Friswell MI, Mottershead JE (2005) A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics. Comput Struct 83(4):315–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Waszink AB, Wijngaard J (2000) An instrument for measuring TQM implementation for Chinese manufacturing companies. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 17(7):730–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman JP, Weiss J (2005) Six Sigma’s seven deadly sins. Quality 44(1):62

    Google Scholar 

  • Zu X, Fredendall LD, Douglas TJ (2008) The evolving theory of quality management: the role of Six Sigma. J Operations Manage 26(5):630–650

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Ketabforoush.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ketabforoush, M., Abdul Aziz, N. The Effect of Taguchi-Based Six Sigma Method on Variation Reduction in a Green Construction Material Production Process. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 45, 879–889 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00583-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00583-1

Keywords

Navigation