Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Natural period and vertical distribution of base shear in confined masonry buildings using ambient vibration test

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In semi-urban setting where availability of land can afford construction of low-rise buildings, confined masonry may compete with other alternatives of seismic resilient system provided well-articulated design standards and construction guidelines are available. Most seismic standards do not make explicit recommendations on the natural period and vertical distribution of base shear for the design of confined masonry buildings. In such a case, one of the two alternatives, such as (1) reinforced concrete (RC) frame building with masonry infill walls and (2) RC frame building with structural walls, is tacitly extrapolated. This paper is first aimed to explore the possible recommendations from the ambient vibration testing of a class of confined masonry building stock. Nine (G + 3) confined masonry hostel buildings are considered for Ambient Vibration Testing (AVT). Recorded signatures are processed and modal characteristics (primarily restricted to the first triplet of fundamental modes) are extracted. Each building is modelled numerically and fine-tuned followed by a comparison of natural frequencies and mode shapes in numerical model and experimental results. The fine-tuned numerical models are analysed against a set of recorded ground motions. Possible design recommendations for natural period and distribution of base shear along the height are the key contributions. Empirical equation for natural periods is derived from the seismic code recommendation on that of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings but removing the bias contributed from the height shorter than one storey while using the experimental results. Distribution of the base shear along the height follows a parabolic profile with an exponent close to 0.4. Results of AVT indicate the inherent damping ratio on an average of about 5% which, however, may not be directly used for seismic excitation. The building stock used for AVT in this paper does not include considerable variations in height and different varieties of confined masonry constructions. Therefore, recommendations of this paper should be verified against a larger size of dispersed building stock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Adapted from Nema and Basu (2019)

Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data may be available from the corresponding author through making reasonable request.

Code availability

Standard licenced software is used. Custom code is developed in MATLAB environment and not available for sharing.

References

  • ASCE/SEI 7-16 (2017) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, Standard ASCE/SEI7-16. American Society of Civil Engineers

  • Astroza M, Moroni O, Brzev S, Tanner J (2012) Seismic performance of engineered masonry buildings in the 2010 Maule earthquake. Earthq Spectra 28(S1):S385–S406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au S-K, Zhang F-L (2012) Ambient modal identification of a primary–secondary structure by Fast Bayesian FFT method. Mech Syst Signal Process 28:280–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu D (2019) Back-of-the-Envelope analysis of plan-asymmetric confined masonry buildings for force-based seismic design. J Build Eng 21:455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu D, Whittaker AS, Constantinou MC (2017) On the design of a dense array to extract rotational components of earthquake ground motion. Bull Earthq Eng 15(3):827–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir A, Basu D (2018) Revisiting probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of gujarat: an assessment of indian design spectra. Nat Hazards 91(3):1127–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendat JS, Piersol AG (2011) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, vol 729. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Brincker R, Andersen P, Jacobsen N-J (2007) Automated frequency domain decomposition for operational modal analysis. In: Proceedings of The 25th international modal analysis conference (IMAC), Orlando, Florida. vol 415

  • Brincker R, Ventura C (2015) Introduction to operational modal analysis. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2000) Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. In: Proceedings of the 18th international modal analysis conference (IMAC), San Antonio, Texas

  • Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2001) Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition. Smart Mater Struct 10(3):441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownjohn JMW, Magalhaes F, Caetano E, Cunha A (2010) Ambient vibration re-testing and operational modal analysis of the Humber Bridge. Eng Struct 32(8):2003–2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakra-Varthy P (2019) Confined masonry buildings: evaluation of modal properties using ambient vibration testing. MTech Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

  • Conte JP, He X, Moaveni B, Masri SF, Caffrey JP, Wahbeh M, Tasbihgoo F, Whang DH, Elgamal A (2008) Dynamic testing of Alfred Zampa memorial bridge. J Struct Eng ASCE 134(6):1006–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Sortis A, Antonacci E, Vestroni F (2005) Dynamic identification of a masonry building using forced vibration tests. Eng Struct 27(2):155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurocode-8 (2009) Design of structures for earthquake resistance: part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. In: European Committee for Standardization, B-1050, Brussels

  • Felber AJ (1994) Development of a hybrid bridge evaluation system. PhD thesis. University of British Columbia

  • Foraboschi P (2019) Masonry does not limit itself to only one structural material: Interlocked masonry versus cohesive masonry. J Build Eng 100831

  • Foraboschi P (2016) The central role played by structural design in enabling the construction of buildings that advanced and revolutionized architecture. Constr Build Mater 114:956–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Chopra AK (1997) Vibration properties of buildings determined from recorded earthquake motions. Report No. UCB/EERC-97/14, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California

  • Goulet J-A, Michel C, Smith IFC (2013) Hybrid probabilities and error-domain structural identification using ambient vibration monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 37(1–2):199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heylen W, Lammens S, Sas P (1995) Modal analysis theory and testing, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

  • Humar JL (2012) Dynamics of structures. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IS 1893-Part 1 (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures Part-1: General Provisions and Buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi

  • IS 456 (2000) Plain and Reinforced Concrete—Code of Practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi

  • Jacobsen N-J (2006) Separating structural modes and harmonic components in operational modal analysis. In: Proceedings IMAC XXIV conference

  • Liu Y-C, Loh C-H, Ni Y-Q (2013) Stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis: application to super high-rise tower under abnormal loading condition. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 42(4):477–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes F, Caetano E, Cunha A, Flamand O, Grillaud G (2012) Am-bient and free vibration tests of the Millau Viaduct: evaluation of alternative processing strategies. Eng Struct 45:372–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meli R, Brzev S, Astroza M, Boen T, Crisafulli F, Dai J, Farsi M, Hart T, Mebarki A, Moghadam AS et al. (2011) Seismic design guide for low-rise confined masonry buildings, Oakland, California 94612-1934, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute

  • NBCC (2015) National building code of Canada. In: National Research Council and others, Ottawa, Canada

  • Nema H, Basu D (2019) Natural properties of confined masonry buildings–experimental case studies and possible inferences. Int J Masonry Res Innov 4(3):197–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NZS 1170-5 (2004) Structural Design Actions, Part 5: Earthquake Actions—New Zealand

  • Parloo E, Guillaume P, Cauberghe B (2003) Maximum likelihood identification of non-stationary operational data. J Sound Vib 268(5):971–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parloo E (2003) Application of frequency-domain system identification techniques in the field of operational modal analysis. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters B, De Roeck G (1999) Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 13(6):855–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters B, De Roeck G (2001) Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: a review. J Dyn Syst Meas Contr 123(4):659–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G (2014) Operational modal analysis of civil engineering structures: An introduction and a guide for applications. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reynders E, Magalhaes F, De Roeck G, Cunha A (2009) Merging strategies for multi-setup operational modal analysis: application to the Luiz I steel arch bridge. In: Proceedings of IMAC. vol 27

  • Rodda GK, Basu DB (2020) A novel framework for conditional simulation of fully nonstationary spatially varying ground motion field. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trifunac MD (1972) Comparisons between ambient and forced vibration experiments. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1(2):133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turek M, Thibert K, Ventura C, Kuan S (2006) Ambient vibration testing of three unreinforced brick masonry buildings in Vancouver, Canada. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), Saint Louis, MI, USA

  • UBC (1997) Uniform building code. In: International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA

  • Valente M, Milani G (2019) Damage assessment and collapse investigation of three historical masonry palaces under seismic actions. Eng Fail Anal 98:10–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente M, Milani G (2018) Damage assessment and partial failure mechanisms activation of historical masonry churches under seismic actions: three case studies in Mantua. Eng Fail Anal 92:495–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma R, Basu D (2017) On correlating the modulus of elasticity of stack- bonded flyash brick masonry using impact hammer and compression tests. Eur J Civ Environ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.1410232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vestroni F, Beolchini GC, Antonacci E, Modena C (1996) Identification of dynamic characteristics of masonry buildings from forced vibration tests. In: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on earthquake engineering

  • Xie Y, Liu P, Cai G-P (2016) Modal parameter identification of flexible spacecraft using the covariance-driven stochastic subspace identification (SSI-COV) method. Acta Mech Sin 32(4):710–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Brincker R (2005) An overview of operational modal analysis: major development and issues. In: 1st international operational modal analysis conference. Aalborg Universitet, pp 179–190

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, under the Grant No. 22/762/17/ EMR-II. Financial support is gratefully acknowledged. Authors also acknowledge Mr. Abhi Mittal for his assistance while testing some of the buildings and Mr. Falak Vats during preparation of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, under the Grant No. 22/762/17/ EMR-II and the financial support is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India

    Pranav Chakra-Varthy & Dhiman Basu

Authors
  1. Pranav Chakra-Varthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dhiman Basu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DB proposed the idea, interpret the results, prepared the final draft, acquire the funding, interpreted results, and manage the overall research. PC performed the experiments, processed the data, analysed with custom code, and licenced software, generated results, and prepared the first draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhiman Basu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that the manuscript is free from any Conflicts of interest and Competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakra-Varthy, P., Basu, D. Natural period and vertical distribution of base shear in confined masonry buildings using ambient vibration test. Bull Earthquake Eng 19, 1851–1899 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01046-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01046-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation