Skip to main content
Log in

Disturbance of the Stratosphere over Tomsk during Winter 2017/2018 Using Lidar and Aura MLS/OMI Observations

  • REMOTE SENSING OF ATMOSPHERE, HYDROSPHERE, AND UNDERLYING SURFACE
  • Published:
Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lidar observations at Siberian Lidar Station (SLS) of the Institute of Atmospheric Optics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, in Tomsk (56.5° N; 85.0° E) showed the presence of stratospheric aerosol layers, descent of air masses, and deficit of ozone over the city during winter 2017–2018. Aura OMI/MLS data indicated that the total ozone (TO) content and NO2 content in the stratosphere over northern Eurasia, as well as the temperature in the stratosphere, were significantly lower than normal in December 2017–January 2018. Analysis of back trajectories and integrated (over profile) TO showed that the dynamic disturbance of the Arctic stratosphere in December 2017 led to the extrusion of cold air masses with excessive reactive chlorine content (in view of NO2 deficit) beyond the Arctic circle and their intrusion into the stratosphere of Tomsk. Seemingly, they were exposed to solar radiation in the stratosphere over Tomsk and, staying spatially isolated, became chemically disturbed. This state is similar to the state of the springtime Arctic stratosphere, where ozone is intensely destroyed until the final warming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. Solomon, “Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history,” Rev. Geophys. 37 (3), 275–316 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Von Clarmann, “Chlorine in the stratosphere,” Atmosfera 26 (3), 415–458 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O. E. Bazhenov, “Increased humidity in the stratosphere as a possible factor of ozone destruction in the Arctic during the spring 2011 using Aura MLS observations,” Int. J. Remote Sens. 40 (9), 3448–3460 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Jiang, Y. L. Yung, and R. W. Zurek, “Decadal evolution of the Antarctic ozone hole,” J. Geophys. Res. D 101 (4), 8985–8999 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. V. Sanders, S. Solomon, J. P. Smith, L. Perliski, H. L. Miller, G. H. Mount, J. G. Keys, and A. L. Schmeltekoph, “Visible and near-ultraviolet spectroscopy at McMurdo station, Antarctica: 9. Observations of OClO from April to October 1991,” J. Geophys. Res. D 98 (4), 7219–7228 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Solomon, R. W. Sanders, and H. L. Miller, Jr., “Visible and near-ultraviolet spectroscopy at McMurdo station, Antarctica 7. OClO diurnal photochemistry and implications for ozone destruction,” J. Geophys. Res. D 95 (9), 13,807 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. C. S. Singleton, C. E. Randall, M. P. Chipperfield, S. Davies, W. Feng, R. M. Bevilacqua, K. W. Hoppel, M. D. Fromm, G. L. Manney, and V. L. Harvey, “2002-2003 Arctic ozone loss deduced from POAM III satellite observations and the SLIMCAT chemical transport model,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 597–609 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. L. Manney, Z. D. Lawrence, M. L. Santee, W. G. Read, N. J. Livesey, A. Lambert, L. Froidevaux, H. C. Pumphrey, and M. J. Schwartz, “A minor sudden stratospheric warming with a major impact: Transport and polar processing in the 2014/2015 Arctic winter,” Geophys. Rev. Lett. 42, 7808–7816 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. O. E. Bazhenov, “Quasi-biennial oscillation of the total ozone and ozone concentrations at separate altitude levels over Arctic and Tomsk according to TOMS, OMI, and MLS observations,” Int. J. Remote Sens. 36 (12), 3033–3040 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. J. Charlton and L. M. Polvani, “A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings. Part I. Climatology and modeling benchmarks,” J. Climate 20 (3), 449–471 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Rao, R. Ren, H. Chen, Y. Yu, and Y. Zhou, “The stratospheric sudden warming event in February 2018 and its prediction by a climate system model,” J. Geophys. Res. 23 (123) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028908

  12. T. Flury, K. Hocke, A. Haefele, N. Kampfer, and R. Lehmann, “Ozone depletion, water vapor increase, and PSC Generation at midlatitudes by the 2008 major stratospheric warming,” J. Geophys. Res. D 114 (18302) (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011940

  13. G. L. Manney, Z. D. Lawrence, M. L. Santee, N. J. Livesey, A. Lambert, and M. C. Pitts, “Polar processing in a split vortex: Arctic ozone loss in early winter 2012/2013,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 5381–5403 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. L. Manney and Z. D. Lawrence, “The major stratospheric final warming in 2016: Dispersal of vortex air and termination of Arctic chemical ozone loss,” Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 15371–15396 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. V. D. Burlakov, S. I. Dolgii, and A. V. Nevzorov, “Modification of the measuring complex at the Siberian Lidar Station,” Atmos. Ocean. Opt. 17 (10), 756–762 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to O. E. Bazhenov, A. A. Nevzorov or A. V. Nevzorov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by O. Ponomareva

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bazhenov, O.E., Nevzorov, A.A., Nevzorov, A.V. et al. Disturbance of the Stratosphere over Tomsk during Winter 2017/2018 Using Lidar and Aura MLS/OMI Observations. Atmos Ocean Opt 33, 622–628 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856020060068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856020060068

Keywords:

Navigation