Skip to main content
Log in

Resistance of Two-Rowed Barley Cultivars and Collection Accessions to False Loose Smut in Western Siberia

  • PLANT PROTECTION
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

False loose smut caused by the fungus Ustilago nigra Tapke causes significant damage to barley crops in Russia. The aim of this work was to estimate the false loose smut resistance in spring double-row barley varieties created by the Omsk Agrarian Research Center and samples from the Collection of the Vavilov All-Russia Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR) in Western Siberia. Cultivars were assessed in the field in 2016–2019 according to common methods. The artificial inoculation of seeds with U. nigra teliospores was carried out before sowing. The damage to cultivars significantly varied, which was due to contrasting weather conditions during periods critical for plant infection. Stable resistance to disease was observed for cultivars Omsky 91 and Sasha, while damage to other cultivars of Omsk breeding increased. The collection cultivars of Russian and Western European breeding showed high resistance to false loose smut under conditions favorable for infection, as well as in drought with high temperatures. Ukrainian and Latvian cultivars showed high resistance to infection under conditions of high humidity and low temperature. High resistance under contrasting conditions was observed for cultivars Vorsinsky 2, Yasny, Vakula, Zadel 3, Yastreb, Inklyuziv, and Vzirez. The best combination of resistance to the disease and yields were demonstrated by cultivars Vorsinsky 2, Zernogradsky 770, Vakula, Vzirets, and Inklyuziv. These cultivars are promising to be used as sources of false loose smut resistance for barley breeding in Western Siberia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Anis’kov, N.I. and Popolzukhin, P.V., Yarovoi yachmen' v Zapadnoi Sibiri (selektsiya, semenovodstvo, sorta): Monografiya (Spring Barley in Western Siberia (Selection, Seed Production, and Varieties): Monograph), Omsk: OOO Variant-Omsk, 2010.

  2. Stepanovskikh, A.S., Golovnevye bolezni yachmenya: Monografiya (Head Diseases of Barley: Monograph), Chelyabinsk, 1990.

  3. Tyuterev, S.L., Treatment of seeds of cereal crops, Zashch. Karantin Rast., 2005, no. 3, pp. 90–132.

  4. Usol’tsev, Yu.A., Reducing crop losses of spring barley from smut diseases, Vestn. Kurgan. GSKhA, 2018, no. 3, pp. 65–69.

  5. Menzies, J.G., Thomas, P.L., and Woods, S., Incidence and severity of loose smut and surface-borne smuts of barley on the Canadian prairies from 1972 to 2009, Can. J. Plant Pathol., 2014, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 300–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aidarova, N.S., Study of the species composition of smut diseases on barley crops in the Volga Coast farm in the Dukhovnitsky district of Saratov oblast, Vavilovskie chteniya. 2007. Mater. Mezhd. nauchn.-prakt. konf. (Vavilov Readings. 2007. Proc. Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf.), Saratov, 2007, pp. 5–6.

  7. Zaushintsena, A.V. and Svirkova, S.V., Technology of barley breeding for resistance to smut fungi, Sci. Evol., 2017, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paderina, E.V., Sources of barley with stable complex resistance to smut diseases, Istochniki Ustoich. S-kh. Kul’t. Bolezn. Zap. Sib.: Nauch.-Tekh. Byull., 1990, no. 6, pp. 17–21.

  9. Meshkova, L.V. and Pyatkova, O.V., Monitoring of populations of pathogens of oat smut diseases in Omsk oblast, Vestn. Altai. Gos. Agrar. Univ., 2015, no. 11, pp. 13–18.

  10. Plotnikova, L.Ya., Meshkova, L.V., Gul’tyaeva, E.I., Mitrofanova, O.P., and Lapochkina, I.F., The tendency of overcoming the genes of resistance to leaf rust, introgressed from Aegilops speltoides Tausch into soft wheat, in Western Siberia, Vavilovskii Zh. Sel. Gen., 2018, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 550–567.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krivchenko, V.I. and Khokhlova, A.P., Smut diseases in grain crops, in Ustoichivost’ geneticheskikh resursov zernovykh kul’tur k vrednym organizmam: Metodicheskoe posobie (Resistance of Genetic Resources of Grain Crops to Harmful Organisms: Methodological Manual), Moscow, 2008, pp. 32–85.

  12. Plotnikova, L.Ya., Meshkova, L.V., Sabaeva, O.B., and Nikolaev, P.N., Resistance to stone smut of varieties and collection samples of two-row barley in Western Siberia, Vestn. Omsk. Gos. Agrar. Univ., 2020, no. 1, pp. 50–60.

  13. Parlevliet, J.E., What is durable resistance, a general outline, in Durability of Disease Resistance, Jacobs, Th. and Parlevliet, J.E., Eds., Springer Netherlands, 1993, pp. 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sidhu, G. and Person, C., Genetic control of virulence in Ustilago hordei. III. Identification of genes for host resistance and demonstration of gene-for-gene relations, Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 1972, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zuo, W., Okmen, B., Depotter, J.R.L., Ebert, M.K., Redkar, A., Misas Villamil, J., and Doehlemann, G., Molecular interactions between smut fungi and their host plants, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 2019, vol. 57, pp. 411–430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Legkun, I.B., Breeding and evaluation of winter barley varieties for group resistance to smut diseases, Russ. J. Genet.: Appl. Res., 2016, vol. 6, pp. 264–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Ya. Plotnikova.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Translated by K. Lazarev

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meshkova, L.V., Plotnikova, L.Y. & Sabaeva, O.B. Resistance of Two-Rowed Barley Cultivars and Collection Accessions to False Loose Smut in Western Siberia. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 46, 572–576 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367420060117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367420060117

Keywords:

Navigation