Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Person-centered analysis of self-regulated learner profiles in MOOCs: a cultural perspective

  • Cultural and Regional Perspectives
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) requires learners to self-regulate their learning process or receive effective self-regulated learning (SRL) interventions to accomplish personal goals. Much attention has thus been paid to how SRL influences learner performance in MOOCs, but research has overlooked a person-centered analysis of how online learners perform SRL in this setting. Without understanding this individual difference, educators are unlikely to provide effective SRL interventions tailored to each type of self-regulated learner. In addition, it remains uncertain how culture shapes the differences in SRL traces, especially given that most of the existing understandings of SRL are rooted in Western cultures. To fill the gaps, this research applied learning analytics to explore learner profiles in terms of how they performed SRL in MOOCs. Using K-means clustering analysis, this research revealed four different self-regulated learner profiles: all-around SRL learners, disillusioned SRL learners, control-oriented SRL learners, and control-dominated SRL learners. In addition, all-around SRL learners outperformed the other three clusters in course grades. This research also identified cultural differences between those clusters. Practical implications on how to design effective SRL interventions are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hostip.info—http://www.hostip.info/use.html.

References

  • Arslan, F., Bagchi, K., & Ryu, S. (2015, June). A Preliminary Evaluation of the determinants of certification success in MOOCs: A multi-level study. Paper presented at the Twenty-First Americas Conference on Information Systems. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2015/ISEdu/GeneralPresentations/33/

  • Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakharia, A., Corrin, L., de Barba, P., Kennedy, G., Gašević, D., Mulder, R., et al. (2016, April). A conceptual framework linking learning design with learning analytics. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 329–338). ACM.

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomé, A. R., & Steffens, K. (2015). Are MOOCs promising learning environments? Comunicar, 22, 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, J. B., & Ellis, A. K. (2013). The effects of metacognitive reflective assessment on fifth and sixth graders’ mathematics achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 113(5), 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Culture and academic achievement: Ethnic and cross-national differences. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 9, 119–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchinelli, A., Veas, E., Pardo, A., Pammer-Schindler, V., Fessl, A., Barreiros, C., & Lindstädt, S. (2018, March). Finding traces of self-regulated learning in activity streams. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 191–200). ACM.

  • Corrin, L., de Barba, P. G., & Bakharia, A. (2017, March). Using learning analytics to explore help-seeking learner profiles in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference (pp. 424–428). ACM.

  • Delfino, M., Dettori, G., & Persico, D. (2010). An online course fostering self-regulation of trainee teachers. Psicothema, 22(2), 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Mitri, D., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Börner, D., Ternier, S., & Specht, M. (2017, March). Learning pulse: A machine learning approach for predicting performance in self-regulated learning using multimodal data. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference (pp. 188–197). ACM.

  • Fang, Z., Grant, L. W., Xu, X., Stronge, J. H., & Ward, T. J. (2013). An international comparison investigating the relationship between national culture and student achievement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(3), 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 134–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genolini, C., & Falissard, B. (2010). KmL: k-means for longitudinal data. Computational Statistics, 25(2), 317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Q., Liu, Z., Li, X., & Qiao, X. (2018). Indulgence and long term orientation influence prosocial behavior at national level. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: McGrawHill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, G. J. (n.d.). Dimensions of national cultures. Retrieved from, http://www.geerthofstede.nl/dimensions-of-national-cultures.

  • Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizilcec, R. F., & Schneider, E. (2015). Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 22(2), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK, 2013, 170–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009). Three metacognitive approaches to training pre-service teachers in different learning phases of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(5), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610903444550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski, W. J., & Lai, Y. T. (1988). A criterion for determining the number of groups in a data set using sum-of-squares clustering. Biometrics, 44, 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, B., & Hoff, E. (2006). Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 377–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29(1), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kizilcec, R. F., Morales, N., & Munoz-Gama, J. (2018). Mining theory-based patterns from Big data: Identifying self-regulated learning strategies in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCardle, L., Webster, E. A., Haffey, A., & Hadwin, A. F. (2017). Examining students’ self-set goals for self-regulated learning: Goal properties and patterns. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2153–2169.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, D. M., & King, R. B. (2018). Culture and self-regulation in educational contexts. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 485–502). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2016). How health professionals regulate their learning in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, R., Tarrant, C., Bonas, S., Yates, J., & Sandars, J. (2015). The struggling student: A thematic analysis from the self-regulated learning perspective. Medical Education, 49(4), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popov, V., Biemans, H. J. A., Kuznetsov, A. N., & Mulder, M. (2014). Use of an interculturally enriched collaboration script in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(3), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.945474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdie, N., & Hattie, J. (1996). Cultural differences in the use of strategies for self-regulated learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 845–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., Ogrin, S., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review of self-report instruments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9229-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothes, A., Lemos, M. S., & Gonçalves, T. (2017). Motivational profiles of adult learners. Adult Education Quarterly, 67(1), 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarle, W. S. (1983). Cubic clustering criterion. SAS Technical Report A-108. SAS Institution Inc., Cary, NC.

  • Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidne (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y., Frederiksen, C. H., & Muis, K. R. (2013). A cross-cultural study of self-regulated learning in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 23, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (2014). Remarks on MOOCS and mini-MOOCS. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(3), 385–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 30, 679–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2016). Massive Open Online Courses and educational equality in China: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 9(1), 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H., & Wang, N. (2017). Have massive open online courses disrupted higher education around the globe? Exploring the cultural perspective. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H., Wang, S., Qian, Y., & Peck, K. (2016). Students’ perceptions of online instructors’ roles in a Massive Open Online Course. In S. D’Agustino (Ed.), Creating teacher immediacy in online learning environments (pp. 277–294). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H., Xing, W., & Pei, B. (2018). Exploring the temporal dimension of forum participation in MOOCs. Distance Education, 39(3), 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, H., Xing, W., & Pei, B. (2019). Time really matters: Understanding the temporal dimension of online learning using educational data mining. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(5), 1326–1347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommsdorff, G. (2012). Development of “agentic” regulation in cultural context: The role of self and world views. Child Development Perspective, 6, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00224.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T. H. (2011). Developing web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-Learning environment. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1801–1812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, M., Trommsdorff, G., & Muñoz, L. (2016). Children’s self-regulation and school achievement in cultural contexts: The role of maternal restrictive control. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S. J., & Huang, W.-H.D. (2011). Comparison of Web 2.0 technology acceptance level based on cultural differences. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Studies, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA

    Hengtao Tang

Authors
  1. Hengtao Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hengtao Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Definitions of each dimension in Hofstede’s six cultural dimensions (see more at https://hi.hofstede-insights.com/national-culture)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, H. Person-centered analysis of self-regulated learner profiles in MOOCs: a cultural perspective. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 1247–1269 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09939-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09939-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation