Microphysics effects of anthropogenic aerosols on urban heavy precipitation over the Pearl River Delta, China
Introduction
There are now likely more land regions experiencing increasingly heavy precipitation events (IPCC, 2013) related to the increasing quantities of anthropogenic aerosols (Zhao and Wu, 2018) produced by human activities such as industry, vehicles, and biomass burning (Albriet et al., 2010; Penner et al., 1992; Wu et al., 2005). Anthropogenic aerosols can serve as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and/or ice nuclei that directly and indirectly affect the dynamics, thermodynamics, and microphysics of clouds and the precipitation process (Khain and Pokrovsky, 2004; Tao et al., 2012; Wan et al., 2013), which is termed “aerosol–cloud interaction.”
A consensus is lacking regarding the quantitative evaluation of the effects of aerosol–cloud interaction on precipitation (Khain et al., 2008). Khain et al. (2010) showed that clouds developing in conditions with continental-type aerosols tend to have stronger vertical velocity and attain higher levels. Consequently, the process of smaller particles falling over longer distances through dry air leads to enhanced evaporation and sublimation and thus to suppression of rainfall. Furthermore, suppressed autoconversion of rain and reduced warm rain were also reported to cause the suppression of rainfall in polluted conditions, but the ice-phase process was found insensitive to the CCN number concentration (Heikenfeld et al., 2019; Lim and Hong, 2012). Studies have reported that high aerosol loading tends to suppress precipitation in stratocumulus and small cumulus clouds, but that it is also responsible for the significant trend of increase in heavy precipitation events and rainstorms induced by deep convection clouds and convective systems owing to aerosol-induced invigoration (Jirak and Cotton, 2006; Yuan, 2011). Aerosol-induced cloud invigoration is the process whereby an increase of aerosols deepens convective clouds owing to coupling between the microphysics and the dynamics of cloud systems (Koren et al., 2010). It is widely accepted that invigoration of deep convective clouds is caused primarily by the thermodynamic effects of aerosols. Lee et al. (2014) reported that deposition latent heating contributed the most to the invigoration of clouds, while Miltenberger et al. (2018) showed that condensation latent heating increased with aerosol concentrations, which resulted in the increase of vertical velocities and enhancement of convective precipitation. Importantly, the latent heating rates might perform differently with increased CCN concentration in different microphysics schemes. For example, Lebo and Seinfeld (2011) showed that the latent heating rates in the bin microphysics scheme of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model increased significantly with CCN number concentration, while the bulk microphysics scheme showed little change. However, Fan et al. (2013) reported that the microphysical effects of aerosols cause dramatic increase in the cloud cover, cloud top height, and cloud thickness at the mature and dissipation stages, even without the thermodynamic invigoration of convection. Moreover, aerosols can also change the spatial distribution of precipitation through microphysics–dynamics feedback (Liu et al., 2018).
The Pearl River Delta (PRD), located in Guangdong Province in South China, has become the greatest urban agglomeration in the world. The generation of large quantities of anthropogenic aerosols in this region is associated with the rapid increase of urbanization and widespread infrastructure construction (Liu et al., 2012). Furthermore, this area experiences heavy rain events annually that are attributable to typhoons, frontal passages, and warm sector heavy rain (Wu et al., 2019). Induced by increasing concentrations of aerosols, enhanced westerly winds contribute to greater westerly moisture fluxes that can change the precipitation generated in the PRD region (Zhao and Wu, 2018). Observations and simulations suggest that elevated aerosol loading can suppress light and moderate precipitation but enhance heavy precipitation and lightning in the PRD region (Fu and Li, 2014; Wang et al., 2011). Statistically, precipitation enhancement occurs in 70% of the PRD region in polluted conditions (Guo et al., 2016). However, owing to the difficulty in distinguishing aerosol–cloud interaction from meteorological covariations and uncertainties in satellite retrievals (Nishant et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2005), previous studies have not been able to explore fully the mechanism of aerosol microphysical effects on clouds and precipitation using conventional observational data. Numerical model simulation is a useful tool that can help us understand the specific mechanisms of aerosol microphysical effects. Nevertheless, the effects of anthropogenic aerosols on the clouds and local mesoscale heavy rain processes in the PRD region are complex and remain uncertain in terms of the microphysics mechanisms. Thus, this paper discusses the microphysics mechanisms of aerosol effects on the clouds in a heavy rain process based on model simulation.
Aerosol–cloud interaction has been studied extensively using global climate and regional meteorological models, in which the CCN number concentrations and distribution patterns, as a proxy for aerosols, are modified to explore the dynamics, thermodynamics, and microphysics responses of clouds (Cheng et al., 2010; Xiao et al., 2016). However, accurate simulation of the complex feedback mechanisms between aerosols and the atmosphere requires a fully coupled model such as the WRF model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem), which is considered a representative online model (Grell et al., 2005) that has been used in some numerical studies (Yang et al., 2016). As chemistry and meteorology are fully coupled in WRF-Chem, the primary pollutant aerosols can produce secondary aerosols through photolysis, chemical reaction, advection and convection, and wet and dry deposition (Chapman et al., 2009; Fast et al., 2006). The CCN number concentration does not increase linearly with the input aerosol concentrations in WRF-Chem (Jiang et al., 2016). Therefore, WRF-Chem provides a more authentic representation with which to explore the impacts of pollutant aerosols on cloud microphysics and precipitation.
The objective of this study was to simulate precisely the mesoscale convective precipitation process of an event that occurred in the PRD region on 21 February 2019, and to explore the effects of anthropogenic aerosols on the cloud microphysics during the precipitation event using anthropogenic emission inventories from before urbanization and for the present day.
Section snippets
Model configurations
WRF-Chem is a fully compressible, Eulerian nonhydrostatic, 3-dimensional (3D) mesoscale model with a hydrostatic option that is able to simulate and predict weather, direct and indirect aerosol forcing, and the release and transport of chemical constituents (Grell et al., 2005; Skamarock et al., 2008). This study used WRF-Chem and its 3D component (3D-VAR) version 4.0 to simulate the local mesoscale urban-related rainfall in the PRD megacity area. The two simulations were initialized at 12:00
Simulation results
At 06:00 on 21 February 2019, a cold front was aligned SW–NE across Guangdong Province in the PRD region with 5 m·s−1 northeastern and southeastern prevailing surface winds (figure not shown). The surface cold front moved from northwest toward southeast and brought heavy precipitation to the PRD region. The distributions of cloud top blackbody brightness temperature derived from FY-2H satellite imagery together with hourly accumulated precipitation derived from observations (hereafter, referred
Conclusions
Microphysics effects of anthropogenic aerosols on a mesoscale urban heavy precipitation event that occurred on 21 February 2019 over the PRD region were investigated at a convection-permitting scale using WRF-Chem. The study adopted the approach that anthropogenic emissions in a clean year (1960) and a polluted year (2010) could be applied in E1960 and E2010 simulations to produce realistic environmental background fields of aerosols before urbanization and at the present day, respectively. The
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1507402], National Natural Science Foundation of China [41875168 and 41705117], Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies (Grant 2020B1212060025), and Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration [KDW1902]. The authors thank the National Meteorological Information Center for providing the precipitation data (http://data.cma.cn/), Peking
References (64)
Modal Aerosol Dynamics model for Europe: Development and first applications
Atmos. Environ.
(1998)- et al.
Modelling aerosol number distributions from a vehicle exhaust with an aerosol CFD model
Atmos. Environ.
(2010) Sensitivity analysis of the microphysics scheme in WRF-Chem contributions to AQMEII phase 2
Atmos. Environ.
(2015)- et al.
Impacts of land use changes and synoptic forcing on the seasonal climate over the Pearl River Delta of China
Atmos. Environ.
(2012) - et al.
Simulation of the effects of increasing cloud condensation nuclei on mixed-phase clouds and precipitation of a front system
Atmos. Res.
(2010) Influence of pollutants on activity of aerosol cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) during pollution and post-rain periods in Guangzhou, southern China
Sci. Total Environ.
(2018)Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model
Atmos. Environ.
(2005)- et al.
Natural volatile organic compound emission rate estimates for U.S. woodland landscapes
Atmos. Environ.
(1994) - et al.
Observation and modeling analyses of the macro- and microphysical characteristics of a heavy rain storm in Beijing
Atmos. Res.
(2015) - et al.
Influence of drop size distribution function on simulated ground precipitation for different cloud droplet number concentrations
Atmos. Res.
(2015)
A modeling study of the aerosol effects on ice microphysics in convective cloud and precipitation development under different thermodynamic conditions
Atmos. Res.
Aerosol hygroscopicity and its impact on atmospheric visibility and radiative forcing in Guangzhou during the 2006 PRIDE-PRD campaign
Atmos. Environ.
Impact of city belt in Yangtze River Delta in China on a precipitation process in summer: a case study
Atmos. Res.
Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models
J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.
A new double-moment microphysics parameterization for application in cloud and climate models. Part II: single-column modeling of arctic clouds
J. Atmos. Sci.
Identification of atmospheric boundary layer height over a tropical station using high-resolution radiosonde refractivity profiles: Comparison with GPS radio occupation measurements
J. Geophys. Res.
Spatial and temporal variation of historical anthropogenic NMVOCs emission inventories in China
Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Coupling aerosol-cloud-radiative processes in the WRF-Chem model: investigating the radiative impact of elevated point sources
Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity
Mon. Weather Rev.
Microphysical effects determine macrophysical response for aerosol impacts on deep convective clouds
Proc. Natl. Acad. U. S. A.
Evolution of Ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology-chemistry-aerosol model
J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.
Trends in the Different Grades of Precipitation over South China during 1960-2010 and the possible link with Anthropogenic Aerosols
Adv. Atmos. Sci.
Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: Model evaluations and sensitivity analyses
J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.
Delaying precipitation and lightning by air pollution over the Pearl River Delta. Part I: Observational analyses
J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.
Aerosol effects on deep convection: the propagation of aerosol perturbations through convective cloud microphysics
Atmos. Chem. Phys.
A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes
Monthly Weather Review - MON WEATHER REV
Investigation of the effects of anthropogenic pollution on typhoon precipitation and microphysical processes using WRF-Chem
J. Atmos.
Effect of Air Pollution on Precipitation along the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains
J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol.
Simulation of effects of atmospheric aerosols on deep turbulent convective clouds using a spectral microphysics mixed-phase cumulus cloud model. Part II: sensitivity study
J. Atmos. Sci.
Aerosol impact on the dynamics and microphysics of convective clouds
Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.
Factors determining the impact of aerosols on surface precipitation from clouds: an attempt at classification
J. Atmos.
Cited by (12)
Evaluation of meteorological microphysical schemas based on the WRF model for simulation of rainfall in the northeastern region of Iran
2023, Journal of Hydrology: Regional StudiesInvestigation of aerosol effects on a deep convection case in Southeast China with budget analysis of hydrometeor mass and latent heat
2022, Atmospheric ResearchCitation Excerpt :It should be noted that bin microphysics schemes were adopted by Fan et al. (2018) and Dagan et al. (2015), which could account for the dependence of supersaturation and condensation rate on droplet number concentration. Interestingly, in some other CRM studies using bulk microphysics schemes, although saturation adjustment was utilized and droplet number concentration was decoupled with condensation rate, aerosol-induced enhancement of condensation could still occur and contribute to the convective invigoration (Miltenberger et al., 2018; Chua and Ming, 2020; Cao et al., 2021), the underlying mechanisms remain less clear. Furthermore, some CRM studies also supported the dominant role of enhanced cold rain production in the increase of surface rain (Cheng et al., 2010; Sarangi et al., 2017), thus it is yet too early to conclude whether warm or cold phase microphysical processes play the leading role in the convective invigoration.
On the relationship between convective precipitation and aerosol pollution in North China Plain during autumn and winter
2022, Atmospheric ResearchCitation Excerpt :The aerosol-cloud interactions are one of the most important and uncertain forces that drive climate change (Rosenfeld et al., 2014). The aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions of deep convection systems have been widely studied, and have demonstrated that aerosols can enhance the deep convective precipitation by promoting the released latent heat from condensation and freezing of water droplets, which is seen as the “invigoration effect of aerosol” (Cao et al., 2021; Koren et al., 2012; Koren et al., 2005; Li et al., 2011; Sun and Zhao, 2020; Tao et al., 2012). In contrast, many studies have also found an inhibitory effect of aerosols on the deep convective precipitation through the “aerosol radiative effect”.
Simulating the impact of biomass burning aerosols on an intensive precipitation event in urban areas of the Pearl River Delta
2022, Atmospheric ResearchCitation Excerpt :Over the Guangdong province, the domestic BBAs was contributed mainly by less-developed rural area (He et al., 2011). Over the PRD region, the PM10 emission was mostly contributed by anthropogenic source (Fig. 3b; Cao et al., 2021). Vertically, the PM10 located largely under 850 hPa (Fig. 3d).
Comparison of the impacts due to biomass burning, anthropogenic, and biogenic aerosol emissions on the mature phase of an urban heavy precipitation event over the Pearl River Delta
2022, Atmospheric ResearchCitation Excerpt :Three sources contributed differently to the secondary organic aerosol (Kelly et al., 2018), which is further related with the aerosol impact on regional climate. However, with abundant studies over the impact on regional climate due to one specific aerosol source (Brioude et al., 2009; Scott et al., 2014; Cao et al., 2021; and etc.), there have been relatively less studies comparing and discussing the source-dependent differences in aerosol impact. There were studies discussing the effect and properties of aerosols using satellite data and found that they were strongly dependent on aerosol types (Dubovik et al., 2002; Jiang et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018).