Skip to main content
Log in

“Why would Benjamin Franklin want to know if lightning was electricity?” elementary teachers and students making sense of the nature of science during interactive read-alouds

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examines the pedagogical use of reading aloud of science trade books as an effective tool for teaching nature of science (NOS) to elementary students. To this end, we explore elementary teachers’ and students’ dialogic negotiation of NOS during interactive science read-alouds, as well as potential interactions between their sense-making patterns, NOS views, and trade-book representations of NOS. It was found that, when a book had explicit NOS aspects in it, a teacher with more informed NOS views was able to facilitate a more extended, open-ended, and inclusive discussion about NOS. Conversely, when the trade book had very explicit connections, a teacher with naïve NOS views was able to only superficially address these NOS aspects without going beyond or elaborating on the information available in the book. Furthermore, the latter discussion was characteristically close-ended, exclusive of students, and limited in sense-making. These findings underscore the need for further investigation of how particular NOS aspects are narrativized in science trade-books, and how elementary teachers can effectively guide students while facilitating explicit negotiation of particular types of trade book representations of NOS during interactive science read-alouds. It is argued that improving elementary science instruction requires a more sophisticated, theory-based understanding of how NOS instruction is mediated by stories and storytelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816932.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Rutherford’s enlarged: A content-embedded activity to teach about nature of science. Physics Education, 37(1), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1088/00319120/37/1/309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramzon, N., Saccoman, S., & Hoeling, B. (2017). Improving the attitude of pre-service elementary school teachers towards teaching physics. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(3), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20170603.11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Abd El Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1025–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). How should I know what scientists do—I’m just a kid: Fourth-grade students’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a Reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<295::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Buzzelli, C. A., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010a). On the nature of teaching nature of science: Preservice early childhood teachers’ instruction in preschool and elementary settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Weiland, I. S., Pongsanon, K., & Nargund, V. (2010b). Evidence-based strategies for teaching nature of science to young children. Journal of Kırşehir Education, 11(4), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2009). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M. C. (1999). Ordinary creativity. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 153–171). Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bircher, L. S. (2009). Reading aloud: A springboard to inquiry. The Science Teacher, 76(5), 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassell, D. (2006). Inspiring young scientists with great books. The Reading Teacher, 60(4), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.60.4.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bricker, P. L. (2005). Children’s books and the nature of science: A multisite naturalistic case study of three elementary teachers in the rural southeast. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (AAT 3197597).

  • Brunner, J. (2016). Enriching science trade books with explicit-reflective nature of science instruction: Impacting elementary teachers’ practice and improving students’ learning [dissertation]. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois. 214 p. Accessed from: Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship, Last updated 2016 Nov 10.

  • Buxton, C. A., & Austin, P. (2003). Better books, better teaching. Science and Children, 41(2), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science. Science and Technology Education Library (Vol. 25). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science & Education, 15, 463–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-4846-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Ambrose, D. (1999). Adaptation and creativity. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 9–22). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D., Flood, J., Lapp, D., & Frey, N. (2004). Interactive read alouds: Is there a common set of implementation practices? The Reading Teacher, 58(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63, 482–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. J. (2006). Representations of science within children’s trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 214–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As times goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(5), 537–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/0169096014300031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kletzien, S. B., & Dreher, M. J. (2004). Informational text in K-3 classrooms: Helping Children read and write (pp. 45–54). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (p. 354). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9081-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, D., Klassen, S., McMillan, B., Clough, M., & Olson, J. (2007). Building a foundation for the use of historical narratives. Science & Education, 16(3–5), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9024-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. S. (2017). Changing preservice science teachers’ views of nature of science: Why some conceptions may be more easily altered than others. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9503-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. J. (1984). Case studies. In R. F. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 237–241). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A. (2012). Creativity and its nature. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 837–840). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_809.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690117727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, A. W. (2011). Science communication in teacher personal pronouns. International Journal of Science Education, 33(13), 1805–1833. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.510541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, A. W., Akerson, V. L., Colak, H., Pongsanon, K., & Genel, A. (2012). The implicit communication of nature of science and epistemology during inquiry discussion. Science Education, 96(4), 652–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purser, R., & Montuori, A. (2000). In search of creativity: Beyond individualism and collectivism. Paper presented at the Western Academy of Management Conference, Kona, Hawaii.

  • Sandlos, J. (1998). The storied curriculum: Oral narratives, ethics, and environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969809601857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Olafson, L., & VanderVeldt, M. (2012). Epistemological development and learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1165–1168). Basel: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_355.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schussler, E. E. (2008). From flowers to fruits: How children’s books represent plant reproduction. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1677–1696. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701570248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trundle, K. C., & Saçkes, M. (2015). Research in early childhood science education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, M. L. N. (2014). The concept of the absent curriculum: The case of the Muslim contribution and the English National Curriculum for history. Journal of Curriculum Studies., 46(4), 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.869838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarnowski, M., & Turkel, S. (2013). How nonfiction reveals the nature of science. Children’s Literature in Education, 44, 295–310. https://doi.org/10.5840/thought196944232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

List of trade books analyzed

  • Stille, D. (2006). Electricity Simply Discussion. Compass Point Books.

  • Stille, D. (2001). Electricity. Compass Point Books.

  • Hiscock, B. (1999). The Big Rock. Aladdin.

  • Pfefferand, W. and Reisch, J. (2003). The Shortest Day. Dutton Books for Young Readers.

  • Greenburg, K.E. (1998). Storm Chaser. Blackbirch Press.

  • Cherry, L. (1992). A River Ran Wild. Harcourt Childrens Books.

  • Jenkins, R. and Page, S. (2008). How Many Ways Can You Catch a Fly? HMH Books for Young Readers.

  • Levine, S. and Johnstone, L. (2006). Mighty Machines. Sterling.

  • Graham, I. (2005). Water. Heinemann Raintree.

  • Seuss, D. (1976). Bartholomew. Random House.

  • Cole, J. (1997). Magic School Bus. Scholastic.

  • Brown, D. (2010). A Wizard From the Start. HMH Books for Young Readers.

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seema Rivera.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lead Editor: S. Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rivera, S., Oliveira, A. “Why would Benjamin Franklin want to know if lightning was electricity?” elementary teachers and students making sense of the nature of science during interactive read-alouds. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 16, 47–69 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09988-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09988-2

Keywords

Navigation