Sell-side equity analysts and equity sales: A study of interaction
Introduction
‘Because they (analysts) can become too cerebral in their thinking; that they’re the brains, and forget that brains are useless without distribution.’ (Sales 4).
Despite not being directly involved in investing or trading, sell-side analysts occupy the ‘centre court’ in the field of investment advice to institutional investors (Abhayawansa et al., 2018, p. 951). Given this prominent position, understanding analysts’ practices provides insights into how equity capital markets function (Chen, Danbolt and Holland, 2018). Predicated on the assertion that exploring the economic activities of analysts requires a thorough appreciation of social networks and relationships, there is an increasing body of sell-side analyst literature that engages with social theory to investigate analysts’ social context (for example, Abhayawansa, Aleksanyan, Imam, Millo and Spence, 2019a; Chen et al., 2018; Imam and Spence, 2016; Tan, 2014; Fogarty and Roberts, 2005). Despite the strong contribution from this body of work, prior studies have not undertaken detailed research on equity sales1 and their interactions with analysts. We argue that this is a significant omission which we address in our study.
The paucity of coverage of equity sales in sell-side research is particularly surprising given that most analysts work in the ‘sales, trading and research’ divisions of investment banks. Whereas we might argue that traders have a distinct market-facing function in buying and selling shares, the sales role entails ‘developing investment ideas from research’ (Stowell, 2018, p. 122) and so is directly proximate to the work of analysts. The apparent prominence of equity sales, coupled with the relative neglect of their role in the literature, suggests a clear and significant gap in our understanding of the analyst field and is central to the motivation for this investigation.
Additionally, this study responds directly to the call from Abhayawansa et al. (2019a, p. 25) for research studies that yield new insights into the networks of social relations in the sell-side field, ‘looking notably at the ways in which these actors interact with company management, brokers, and sales teams in investment banks.’ Consequently, our study sheds light on the equity sales role, how salespeople interact with analysts and, ultimately, the way in which such interactions shape the practices of the sell-side as reflected in our research question:
How do analyst interactions with equity sales teams influence their information gathering, processing and client servicing activities?
Section snippets
Overview
Sell-side analysts represent a cluster of economic actors typically employed in investment banks and brokerage houses (Cascino et al., 2014), covering companies in a specific industry (Boni and Womack, 2006). The literature supports the view that analysts hold influential positions, providing investment research services to a diverse range of market participants (Bradley, Gokkaya and Liu, 2017; Brown, Call and Clement, 2015). Such services encompass, amongst other things, information filtering,
Literature
The analyst literature, introduced in section 2 above, affirms the importance of the sell-side. However, there is also substantial evidence that raises doubts regarding the quality of analyst work. Scholars have found analyst outputs are overly optimistic and that asset managers routinely ignore their advice, driven in part by the multitude of conflicts of interest they face (for example, Chen et al., 2018; Green, Markov and Subasi, 2014; Cliff 2007). Such is the level of concern about the
Theoretical framework
In this section, we elaborate on the nature of the work of analysts, drawing upon the ideas of Stones (see 2015, 2005) on strong structuration theory. We view the work of analysts as being shaped within a web of position-practices relations (Stones, 2005, p. 81). Embedded inside a social web, analysts gain an understanding of their role in relation to others and the impact of context on their work. At the same time, they influence others as they are actively mapping out and navigating through
Research methods
The research methodology was constructed to give voice to the analysts and other actors in the field. The research is interpretive with a hermeneutic interest in understanding the lived experiences of the participants included in the study. Such a research philosophy led to the choice of an interview-based field study. In addition to the interviews, the research also included reviewing a variety of documents such as relevant press articles, media and consultant reports, research reports, job
Findings and discussion
The findings are structured as follows: 1) Position mapping of analysts and key agents in context; 2) Position-practices of analysts and equity sales; 3) Power relations and 4) Issues of trust between analysts and sales.
Conclusions
Our contention, supported by the evidence gathered for this research, is that the interactions between equity sales and analysts represents an underexplored and important field condition which influences, constrains and enables analyst work. We extend the knowledge of analyst context in the literature, explored by, for example, Imam and Spence (2016), Abhayawansa et al. (2019a) and Aleksanyan et al. (2018) by introducing original, detailed empirics about equity sales and how they play a
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not for profit sectors.
Declaration of competing interest
None.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to participants at the 2018 strong structuration theory workshop in Dublin. We are also indebted to participants at the 2018 British Accounting and Finance Association annual conference in London and the 2018 Management Accounting Research Group (MARG) conference at Aston University for their comments and suggestions. Finally, we thank two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful feedback on earlier versions of the paper.
References (73)
- et al.
Buy-side trades and sell-side recommendations: Interactions and information content
Journal of Financial Markets
(2012) - et al.
Information about bank intangibles, analyst information intermediation, and the role of knowledge and social forces in the ‘market for information’
Accounting Forum
(2018) - et al.
Overseas equity analysis by UK analysts and fund managers
The British Accounting Review
(2008) - et al.
Structuration: A position–practice perspective and an illustrative study
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
(2014) - et al.
Back to the future: New potential for structuration theory in management accounting research
Management Accounting Research
(2009) Reflection on the application of and potential for structuration theory in accounting research
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
(2014)- et al.
Financial analysts’ reports: An extended institutional theory evaluation
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(2005) - et al.
Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: Strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory
Social Science & Medicine
(2010) - et al.
Access to management and the informativeness of analyst research
Journal of Financial Economics
(2014) Testing the limits of structuration theory in accounting research
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
(2014)
The construction of calculative expertise: The integration of corporate governance into investment analyses by sell-side financial analysts
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Reading between the lines: An empirical examination of qualitative attributes of financial analysts’ reports
Journal of Accounting and Public Policy
The capital budgeting process and the energy trilemma: A strategic conduct analysis
The British Accounting Review
Conceptualisation of intellectual capital in analysts’ narratives: A performative view
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
Earning the ‘write to speak’: Sell-side analysts and their struggle to be heard
Contemporary Accounting Research
A practice theoretical analysis of the irrelevance of integrated reporting to mainstream sell-side analysts
Accounting and Finance
‘Agents-in-focus’ and ‘Agents-in-context’: The strong structuration analysis of central government accounting practices and reforms in Nepal
Accounting Forum
Inside the black-box of analysts’ bounded rationality: A study of contexts that matter
Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach
Two faces of power
American Political Science Review
The market for information--evidence from finance directors, analysts and fund managers
Accounting and Business Research
Mutual forbearance and competition among security analysts
Management Science
Analysts, industries, and price momentum
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Before an analyst becomes an analyst: Does industry experience matter?
The Journal of Finance
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Qualitative Research in Psychology
Inside the ’black box’ of sell-side financial analysts
Journal of Accounting Research
Analyst recommendations, mutual fund herding, and overreaction in stock prices
Management Science
Who uses financial reports and for what purpose? Evidence from capital providers
Accounting in Europe
Do affiliated analysts mean what they say?
Financial Management
Structuration theory: Reflections on its further potential for management accounting research
Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management
Strong structuration theory in accounting research. Accounting
Auditing & Accountability Journal
Structuration theory: Anthony Giddens and the constitution of social life
Accountants’ proactivity in intra-organisational networks: A strong structuration perspective, accounting
Auditing & Accountability Journal
The concept of power
Behavioural Science
Earnings predictability and bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts
The Accounting Review
What can (not) a flat and local structuration ontology do for management accounting research? A comment on Coad, Jack and kholeif
Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management
Cited by (3)
The Field of Investment Advice: The Social Forces That Govern Equity Analysts
2023, Accounting ReviewThrowing in the towel: What happens when analysts' recommendations go wrong?
2023, Contemporary Accounting ResearchHave your cake and eat it? Combining structure and agency in management research
2021, European Management Review