Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Mindful Movement Intervention on Academic and Cognitive Abilities Among Kindergarten Children

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence suggests that acting mindfully, that is, by stressing the purpose of the action and monitoring its current state, may benefit health, wellbeing, and academic achievements. We sought to investigate the underlying motor abilities affected by mindful-movement (MM) intervention, and which mediate its effect on academic achievement among kindergarteners. To this end, 160 children aged 3–6 years participated for 145 days, which included pre- and post-intervention tests of verbal and non-verbal intelligence, namely language, mathematics, and Raven matrices. The three conditions consisted of MM (integrating movement in academic learning), MS (movement-for-its-own-sake; promoting movement without promoting awareness), and control (regular academic environment activities). Results indicated that, compared to MS and controls, MM improved verbal and non-verbal intelligence. The effect on verbal intelligence was mediated through static balance performance, whereas the effect on non-verbal intelligence was mediated by dynamic balance performance. Possible mechanisms accounting for these mediation effects are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2011). The dynamic microstructure of speech production: Semantic interference built on the fly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., Schumann, F., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2015). Mindful movement and skilled attention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crum, A. J., & Langer, E. J. (2007). Mind-set matters: Exercise and the placebo effect. Psychological Science, 18(2), 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dault, M. C., Frank, J. S., & Allard, F. (2001). Influence of a visuo-spatial, verbal and central executive working memory task on postural control. Gait & Posture, 14(2), 110–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, A., & Möhring, W. (2016). A matter of balance: Motor control is related to children’s spatial and proportional reasoning skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafenbrack, A. C., Kinias, Z., & Barsade, S. G. (2014). Debiasing the mind through meditation: Mindfulness and the sunk-cost bias. Psychological Science, 25(2), 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzitaki, V., Zlsi, V., Kollias, I., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2002). Perceptual-motor contributions to static and dynamic balance control in children. Journal of motor behavior, 34(2), 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, C. G., Vangkilde, S., Frokjaer, V., & Hasselbalch, S. G. (2012). Mindfulness training affects attention – Or is it attentional effort? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, K. M., Platt, J., Kaufman, A. S., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2017). Association of fluid intelligence and psychiatric disorders in a population-representative sample of us adolescents. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(2), 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohen-Raz, R., & Hiriartborde, E. (1979). Some observations on tetra-ataxiametric patterns of static balance and their relation to mental and scholastic achievements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48(3), 871–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakes, K. D., & Hoyt, W. T. (2004). Promoting self-regulation through school-based martial arts training. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2000). The construct of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science, 341(6149), 976–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, M. M., Cameron, C. E., Duncan, R., Bowles, R. P., Acock, A. C., Miao, A., & Pratt, M. E. (2014). Predictors of early growth in academic achievement: The head-toes-knees-shoulders task. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkowitz, A., Davis, D., & Bashi, Y. (1979). Evaluation of educational achievements of elementary school in Israel. Jerusalem: Y.L. Magnas (Hebrew).

  • Nadkarni, N. K., Zabjek, K., Lee, B., McIlroy, W. E., & Black, S. E. (2010). Effect of working memory and spatial attention tasks on gait in healthy young and older adults. Motor Control, 14(2), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortar, G., & Ben Shachar, N. (1976). Reading comprehension test. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education. (Hebrew).

  • Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1990). Coloured progressive matrices (1990 Edition, with US Norms). Manual for the Raven′s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales.

  • Rosenstreich, E., & Ruderman, L. (2016). Not sensitive, yet less biased: A signal detection theory perspective on mindfulness, attention, and recognition memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 43, 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstreich, E., & Ruderman, L. (2017). A dual-process perspective on mindfulness, memory, and consciousness. Mindfulness, 8(2), 505–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstreich, E., Levi, U., & Laslo-Roth, R. (2018). A matter of (inner) balance: The association between facets of mindfulness, attention deficit, and postural stability. Mindfulness, 9, 1627–1636.

  • Russell, T. A., & Arcuri, S. M. (2015). A neurophysiological and neuropsychological consideration of mindful movement: Clinical and research implications. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoval, E. (2011). Using mindful movement in cooperative learning while learning about angles. Instructional Science, 39(4), 453–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoval, E., Sharir, T., & Shulruf, B. (2014). The challenge kindergarten model: Integrating body-movement and scaffolding to keep the child in the center and make systematic progress in learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(4), 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoval, E., Sharir, T., Arnon, M., & Tenenbaum, G. (2018). The effect of integrating movement into the learning environment of kindergarten children on their academic achievements. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(3), 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shachaf, M., Laslo-Roth, R., & Rosenstreich, E. (2019). Postural stability and academic achievements among fifth graders: An experimental field study. Annals of Cognitive Science, 3(1), 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. L., & Carlson, L. E. (2009). The art and science of mindfulness: Integrating mindfulness into psychology and the helping professions. American Psychological Association.

  • Slijper, H., & Latash, M. (2000). The effects of instability and additional hand support on anticipatory postural adjustments in leg, trunk, and arm muscles during standing. Experimental brain research, 135(1), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Fukuda, K., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2014). Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 71, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. A., Patla, A. E., Prince, F., Ishac, M., & Gielo-Perczak, K. (1998). Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. Journal of neurophysiology, 80(3), 1211–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yogev-Seligmann, G., Hausdorff, J. M., & Giladi, N. (2008). The role of executive function and attention in gait. Movement Disorders, 23(3), 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C. Q., Si, G., Duan, Y., Lyu, Y., Keatley, D. A., & Chan, D. K. (2016). The effects of mindfulness training on beginners' skill acquisition in dart throwing: A randomized controlled trial. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 279–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyal Rosenstreich.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

In order to confirm that motor performance data corresponded with static and dynamic balance, we submitted all motor performance data collected pre-intervention (standing on one foot, tandem stand, walking on bar, and jumping) to an exploratory factor analysis with Kaiser normalized Varimax rotation. All scores were Z-transformed prior to the analysis. Factor loadings and eigenvalues are presented in Table A.

Table A Rotated factor loadings and explained variances of the three extracted factors

Overall, the factor analysis showed a three-factor solution for the data, with a total explained variance of 71.80%. More important, Table 1 reveals that the solution was compatible with our apriori distinction between dynamic, static, and complex balance tasks. In particular, the first factor was loaded only with bar-walking tasks, hence may be conceptualized as a dynamic balance factor. The second factor was loaded only with standing tasks—either on one or both feet—hence may be conceptualized as a static balance factor. Finally, the third factor was loaded only with the jumping tasks, hence may be conceptualized as a complex balance factor. This solution therefore strengthens the validity of our data.

Table 1 Means, (SEs), and ANCOVA results for the differences between groups in post-intervention motor performance
Table 2 Means, (SEs), and ANCOVA results for the differences in post-intervention verbal academic performance as a function of group
Table 3 Means, (SEs), and ANCOVA results for the differences in post-intervention Raven’s matrices performance as a function of group

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosenstreich, E., Shoval, E. & Sharir, T. The Effects of Mindful Movement Intervention on Academic and Cognitive Abilities Among Kindergarten Children. Early Childhood Educ J 50, 249–258 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01150-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01150-5

Keywords

Navigation