Skip to main content
Log in

Oxygen transfer rate behavior in three phase electroflotation column

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of bubble size, solids particle (impurities) and the respective physical mechanisms on gas–liquid columns have received little attention. Therefore, the objective of this work is to study the effect of solid concentration and the ratio of the bubble diameter to the solid diameter on the mass transfer characteristics. Experiments were conducted in a three phase electroflotation column for the systems gas/water/olive stone. Volumetric mass transfer coefficient, kLa, was measured under different solid concentrations values (1–3 g/l) and ratio of the bubble diameter to the solid diameter values. It was found that the kLa rises when the ratio of the bubble diameter to the solid diameter increase. The presence of solid particle has a negative effect on mass transfer coefficients (kLa,kL and a). The liquid side mass transfer coefficient has the same behavior as the volumetric mass transfer coefficient. The capacity of oxygenation CO was also studied. Models relating the mass transfer coefficients kLa, kL and CO were elaborated in each case using linear regression method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a:

Specific interfacial area (m2 m−3).

C:

Oxygen concentration (Kg m−3).

C*:

The saturated oxygen concentration in liquid phase (Kg m−3).

C0 :

The initial dissolved oxygen concentration (Kg m−3).

Cs:

Solid concentration (Kg m−3).

dB :

Bubble diameter (m).

dS :

Solid diameter (m).

kL :

The liquid side mass transfer coefficient (m s−1).

kLa:

The volumetric mass transfer coefficient (s−1).

CO:

Oxygenation capacity (O2/m3.h).

References

  1. Kherbeche A, Mei M, Thoraval MJ, Hebrard G, Dietrich N (2019) Hydrodynamics and gas-liquid mass transfer around a confined sliding bubble. Chem Eng J 386:121461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kováts P, Thévenin D, Zähringer K (2019) Influence of viscosity and surface tension on bubble dynamics and mass transfer in a model bubble column. Int J Multiphase Flow 123:103174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Issaoui R, Ksentini I, Kotti M, Ben Mansour L (2017) Effect of current density and oil concentration on hydrodynamic aspects in electroflotation column during oil/water emulsion treatment. J Water Chem Technol 39:166–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mejri M, Ben Mansour L (2019) Bubble size distribution and mass transfer on a three-phase electroflotation column. Heat Mass Transf 55:2235–2245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abufalgha AA, Clarke KG, Pott RWM (2020) Characterisation of bubble diameter and gas hold-up in simulated hydrocarbon-based bioprocesses in a bubble column reactor. Biochem Eng J 158:107577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Besagni G, Inzoli F, De Guido G, Pellegrini LA (2017) The dual effect of viscosity on bubble column hydrodynamics. Chem Eng Sci 158:509–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mejri M, Kseintini I, Kotti M, Ben Mansour L (2018) Studying the hydrodynamics in a three-phase electroflotation column. Dessalin Water Treat 132:150–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Da Cruz SG, Dutra AJB, Monte MBM (2015) The influence of some parameters on bubble average diameter in an electroflotation cell by laser diffraction method. J Environ Chem Eng 4:33681–33687

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jia X, Hu W, Yuan X, Yu K (2015) Effect of surfactant type on interfacial area and liquid mass transfer for CO2 absorption in a bubble column. Chin J Chem Eng 23:476–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McClure DD, Lee AC, Kavanagh JM, Fletcher DF, Barton GW (2015) Impact of surfactant addition on oxygen mass transfer in a bubble column. Chem Eng Technol 38:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bajón FY, Cartmell E, Soares A et al (2015) Gas to liquid mass transfer in rheologically complex fluids. Chem Eng J 273:656–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thobie C, Gadoin E, Blel W, Pruvost J, Gentric C (2017) Global characterization of hydrodynamics and gasliquid mass transfer in a thin-gap bubble column intended for microalgae cultivation. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 122:76–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lakhdissi EM, Fallahi A, Guy C, Chaouki J (2020) Effect of solid particles on the volumetric gas liquid mass transfer coefficient in slurry bubble column reactors. Chem Eng Sci 227:115912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Z, Guo K, Liu H, Liu C, Geng Y, Lu Z, Jiao B, Chen D (2020) Effects of bubble size on the gas–liquid mass transfer of bubble swarms with Sauter mean diameters of 0.38–4.88 mm in a co-current upflow bubble column. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 95:2853–2867

  15. Sedahmed G, Nosier SA, Abdel-Aziz MH, El-Naggar MH (2020) Solid liquid mass transfer in a bubble column reactor with tube bank internals. Exp Heat Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1080/08916152.2020.1776420

  16. Lewis WK, Whitman WG (1924) Principles of gas absorption. Ind Eng Chem 16:1215–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kotti M, Dammak N, Ksentini I, Ben Mansour L (2009) Effects of impurities on oxygen transfer rate in the electroflotation process. Indian J Chem Technol 16:513–518

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hassanzadeh A, Hassas BV, Kouachi S, Brabcova Z, Celik MS (2016) Effect of bubble size and velocity on collision efficiency in chalcopyrite flotation. Colloid Surface A 498:258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruthiya KC, Kuster BF, Schouten JC (2003) Gas-liquid mass transfer enhancement in a surface aeration stirred slurry reactors. Can J Chem Eng 81:632–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Manjrekar ON, Sun Y, He L, Tang YJ, Dudukovic MP (2017) Hydrodynamics and mass transfer coefficients in a bubble column photobioreactor. Chem Eng Sci 168:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wongwailikhit K, Warunyuwong P, Chawaloesphonsiya N, Dietrich N, Hébrard G, Painmanakul P (2018) Gas Sparger orifice sizes and solid particle characteristics in a bubble column– relative effect on hydrodynamics and mass transfer. Chem Eng Technol 41:461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaobai L, Jungeng F, Shuang X, Rundong L, Jingde L (2017) The influence of Ph on gas-liquid mass transfer in non-Newtonian fluids. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q 23:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lakhdissi EM, Soleimani I, Guy C, Chaouki J (2020) Simultaneous effect of particle size and solid concentration on the hydrodynamics of slurry bubble column reactors. AICHE J 6:16813

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ozkan O, Calimli A, Berber R, Oguz H (2000) Effect of inert solid particles at low concentrations on gas–liquid mass transfer in mechanically agitated reactors. Chem Eng Sci 55:2737–2740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoon R, Luttrell GH (1989) The effect of bubble size on fine particle flotation. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 5:101–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maroua Mejri.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mejri, M., Mansour, L.B. Oxygen transfer rate behavior in three phase electroflotation column. Heat Mass Transfer 57, 1205–1210 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-021-03016-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-021-03016-x

Navigation