Abstract
While numerous challenges associated with climate change exist, it remains difficult to fully comprehend its full implications on one’s life. Explanations for this range from psychological and cognitive barriers to social, political and economic impediments. This article provides the findings of a research project which investigated the lived experience of climate scientists and climate change experts to understand how they make sense of climate change. The research is based on qualitative interviews with 16 participants located in 12 different countries. The research finds that participants made sense of climate change through a diversity of ways, both professional and personal, including personal experience, emotions, exchanges with others and broader societal context. While for most, climate change started as an area of professional interest, it seems to have permeated their personal lives to a great extent. They see it as a disruption of the normal way of life and all concur about the gravity of the situation. The deeper implication of this study of the lived experiences of climate experts is that there is ground to be concerned.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
15 February 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03024-0
References
Abbott D, Wilson G (2014) Climate change: lived experience, policy and public action. Int Jnl Clim Chang Strat and Manag 6(1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2013-0040
Abbott D, Wilson G (2015) The lived experience of climate change, Springer International Publishing
Anderson K, Bows A (2011) Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: emission scenarios for a new world. Phil Trans R Soc A 369:20–44. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0290
Bendell J (2018) Deep adaptation: a map for navigating climate tragedy. IFLAS occasional paper 2. https://www.iflas.info. Accessed 3 Oct 2018
Benzein E, Norbgerg A, Saveman BI (2001) The meaning of the lived experience of hope in patients with cancer in palliative home care. Palliat Med 15:117–126. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921601675617254
Boulton E (2016) Climate change as a ‘hyperobject’: a critical review of Timothy Morton's reframing narrative. WIREs Clim Change 7:772–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.410
Bray D, Von Storch H (1996) Inside science, a preliminary investigation of the case of global warming. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Report 195
Bray D, Von Storch H (2014) A survey of the perceptions of climate scientists 2013. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27842.79043
Bray D, Von Storch H (2016) The Bray and von Storch 5th international survey of climate scientists 2015/2016. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11802.85443
Burnham M, Ma Z, Zhang B (2015) Making sense of climate change: hybrid epistemologies, socio-natural assemblages and smallholder knowledge. Area 48(1):18–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12150
Clayton S (2018) Mental health risk and resilience among climate scientists. Nat Clim Chang 8:260–271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0123-z
Coulter L (2018a) Future Climate Narratives: Combining Personal and Professional Knowledge to Adapt to Climate Change. In: Serrao-Neumann et al (eds.), Communicating Climate Change Information for Decision-Making, Springer Climate
Coulter L (2018b) Future climate narratives: knowledge informing climate change adaptation, Thesis (PhD Doctorate), Griffith University. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/380061. Accessed 29 Aug 2019
Dannenberg A, Zitzelsberger S (2019) Climate experts’ views on geoengineering depend on their beliefs about climate change impacts. Nat Clim Chang 9:769–775. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0564-z
Granderson AA (2014) Making sense of climate change risks and responses at the community level: a cultural-political lens. Clim Risk Manag 3:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2014.05.003
Grundmann R (2012) “Climategate” and the scientific ethos. Sci Technol Hum Values 38(1):67–93
Head B (2008) Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy 3(2):101–118
Head L, Harada T (2017) Keeping the heart a long way from the brain: the emotional labour of climate scientists. Emot Space Soc 24:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2017.07.005
Hoffman AJ (2015) How culture shapes the climate change debate. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Hulme M (2008) Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change. Trans Inst Br Geogr 33:5–11
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A. Field CB et al (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 1132 pp
IPCC (2018) Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. Masson-Delmotte V et al (eds.). World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Kahan D (2012) Why we are poles apart on climate change. Nature 488:255. https://doi.org/10.1038/488255a
Lakoff G (2010) Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environ Commun 4(1):70–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749
Lazarus RJ (2009) Super wicked problems and climate change: restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Rev 94(5):1153–1234
Lenton T et al (2019) Climate tipping points — too risky to bet against. Nature 575:592–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03595-0
Levin K, Cashore B, Bernstein S, Auld G (2012) Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sci 45(2):123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
Maitlis S, Vogus TJ, Lawrence TB (2013) Sensemaking and emotion in organizations. Organ Psychol Rev 3(3):222–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386613489062
Markowitz EM, Guckian ML (2018) Climate change communication: challenges, insights, and opportunities. In: Clayton S and manning C. Academic Press, Psychology and Climate Change, pp 35–63
McIntosh I, Wright S (2019) Exploring what the notion of ‘lived experience’ offers for social policy analysis. J Soc Policy 48(3):449–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279418000570
Milkoreit M (2015) Science and climate change diplomacy: cognitive limits and the need to reinvent science communication. Sci dip: new day or false Dawn? Sci Clim Change Dipl 6:109–131. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814440073_0006
Milkoreit M (2017) Mindmade politics: the cognitive roots of international climate governance. MIT Press, Cambridge
Moloney G et al (2014) Using social representations theory to make sense of climate change: what scientists and nonscientists in Australia think. Ecol Soc 19(3):19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06592-190319
Morton T (2013) Hyperobjects, philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Nash N, Whitmarsh L, Capstick S et al (2019) Local climate change cultures: climate-relevant discursive practices in three emerging economies. Clim Chang 163:3–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02477-8
Pahl S, Sheppard S, Boomsma C, Groves C (2014) Perceptions of time in relation to climate change. WIREs Clim Chang 5:375–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.272
Rapley CG et al. (2014) Time for Change? Climate Science Reconsidered. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/public-policy/policy-professionals/policy-commissions/ucl-policy-commission-communication-climate-science. Accessed 2 Dec 2019
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01405730
Schwandt TA, Burgon H (2006) Evaluation and the study of lived experience. In: Shaw I, Greene JC, Mark MM (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Evaluation. Sage, London
Steentjes K et al (2017) European perceptions of climate change: topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016. Cardiff University, Cardiff
Steffen W et al (2018) Trajectories of the earth system in the Anthropocene. PNAS 115(33):8252–8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115
Termeer C, Dewulf A, Breeman G (2013) Governance of wicked climate adaptation problems. In: Knieling J, Leal Filho W (eds) Climate change governance. Climate Change Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Vogt VP (2005) Dictionary of statistics & methodology, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983907.n1482
Von Storch et al. (2019) Attitudes of young scholars in Qingdao and Hamburg about climate change and climate policy - the role of culture for the explanation of differences. Adv Clim Chang Res https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2019.04.001
Whitmarsh L, Capstick S (2018) Perceptions of climate change. In: Clayton S, Manning C (eds) Psychology and Climate Change. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 13–33
Acknowledgments
I warmly thank the participants to this research, as well as Richard Hil, Mark Hughes and Barbara Rugendyke for their close review of the initial drafts. I am also grateful to the anonymous reviewers. Their advice have greatly contributed to improve the article but any mistakes remains my responsibility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Renouf, J.S. Making sense of climate change—the lived experience of experts. Climatic Change 164, 14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02986-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02986-5