Abstract
Despite the massification of higher education, social inequality in higher education outcomes still persists. It is known that secondary schools’ socioeconomic composition is at least partly responsible for this social inequality. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which socioeconomic composition affects higher education enrollment are still poorly understood. Based on the attribution theory, this study expects students’ feelings of academic self-efficacy and sense of futility to act as underlying mechanisms. Additionally, given that individual self-efficacy beliefs and individual sense of futility are shared among students within schools — that is, schools have different self-efficacy and futility cultures — we investigate whether these cultures are consequential for higher education enrollment and program choice. Results of binomial logistic multilevel analyses on the data of the International Study of City Youth (www.iscy.org) in Ghent, consisting of 1214 Flemish students across 29 schools, indicated that students in low socioeconomic composition schools are less likely to enroll in higher education because these schools are characterized by high futility cultures. In contrast, high self-efficacy and self-efficacy cultures are positively associated with the choice for academic bachelor programs, but they did not explain socioeconomic composition effects. We conclude that educational policies should aim at increasing a sense of control over academic outcomes in order to improve social equality in higher education outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agirdag, O., Van Houtte, M., & Van Avermaet, P. (2011). Why does the ethnic and socio-economic composition of schools influence math achievement? The role of sense of futility and futility culture. European Sociological Review, 28(3), 366–378.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206.
Boardman, J. D., & Robert, S. A. (2000). Neighborhood socioeconomic status and perceptions of self-efficacy. Sociological Perspectives, 43(1), 117–136.
Boone, S., & Van Houtte, M. (2013). In search of the mechanisms conducive to class differentials in educational choice: A mixed method research. The Sociological Review, 61(3), 549–572.
Boone, S., & Van Houtte, M. (2016). More ambitious educational choices in urban areas: A matter of local labor market characteristics? Urban Education, 51(8), 940–963.
Brookover, W. B., Schweitzer, J. H., Schneider, J. M., Beady, C. H., Flood, P. K., & Wisenbaker, J. M. (1978). Elementary school social climate and school achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 301–318.
Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 525.
De Clercq, M., Galand, B., & Frenay, M. (2017). Transition from high school to university: A person-centered approach to academic achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(1), 39–59.
Demanet, J., & Van Houtte, M. (2011). Social-ethnic school composition and school misconduct: Does sense of futility clarify the picture? Sociological Spectrum, 31(2), 224–256.
Demanet, J., & Van Houtte, M. (2019). Socioeconomic status, economic deprivation, and school misconduct: an inquiry into the role of academic self-efficacy in four European cities. Social Psychology of Education, 22(1), 1–22.
Demanet, J., Van den Broeck, L., & Van Houtte, M. (2018). Social inequality in attitudes and behavior: The implications of the flemish tracking system for equity. In L.D Hill, & F. J Levine (Eds.), Global perspectives on education research (pp. 159–181). New York: Routledge.
Demanet, J., Van den Broeck, L., & Van Houtte, M. (2019). Socioeconomic school composition and school misconduct: Disentangling structural and cultural explanations in Ghent. In J. Demanet, & M. Van Houtte (Eds.), Resisting education: A cross-national study on systems and school effects (pp. 135–153). Switzerland:Springer.
Engberg, M. E., & Wolniak, G. C. (2010). Examining the effects of high school contexts on postsecondary enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 51(2), 132–153.
Engberg, M. E., & Wolniak, G. C. (2014). An examination of the moderating effects of the high school socioeconomic context on college enrollment. The High School Journal, 97(4), 240–263.
Farkas, G. (2011). Middle and high school skills, behaviors, attitudes, and curriculum enrollment, and their consequences. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither Opportunity?: Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances (pp. 71–90). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 115–121.
Ganzeboom, H. B. G. (2010). Occupational Status Measures for the New International Standard Classification of Occupations ISCO-08; with a Discussion of the New Classification. Retrieved from http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/isol/isol2010c2-ganzeboom.pdf
Goldthorpe, J., & Jackson, M. (2008). Education-based meritocracy: The barriers to its realization. In A. Lareau & D. Conley (Eds.), Social class: How does it work (pp. 93–117). New York, United States of America: Russel Sage Foundation.
Hill, D. H. (2008). School strategies and the “college-linking” process: Reconsidering the effects of high schools on college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 81(1), 53–76.
Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 286–316.
Huisman, M. (2000). Imputation of missing item responses: Some simple techniques. Quality and Quantity, 34(4), 331–351.
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919.
Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. R. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 586–602.
Kohn, M. L. (1989). Social structure and personality: A quintessentially sociological approach to social psychology. Social Forces, 68(1), 26–33.
Mare, R. D. (1981). Change and stability in educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 46(1), 72–87.
Massey, D. S., Charles, C. Z., Lundy, G., & Fischer, M. J. (2011). The source of the river: The social origins of freshmen at America’s selective colleges and universities (Vol. 61). Princeton: University Press.
McDonough, P. (1997). Choosing colleges. How social class and schools structure opportunity. New York: State University of New York Press.
Miller, S. K., & Crano, W. D. (1980). Raising Low-Income/Minority Achievement by Reducing Student Sense of Academic Futility: The Underlying Theoretical Commonalities of Suggested Strategies. Conference paper, presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
OECD. (2014). Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/Belgium-EAG2014-Country-Note.pdf.
Opdenakker, M. C., & Van Damme, J. (2001). Relationship between school composition and characteristics of school process and their effect on mathematics achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 407–432.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.
Palardy, G. J. (2015). High school socioeconomic composition and college choice: Multilevel mediation via organizational habitus, school practices, peer and staff attitudes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(3), 329–353.
Palardy, G. J., & Rumberger, R. W. (2019). The effects of 21st century skills on behavioral disengagement in Sacramento high schools. In J. Demanet & M. Van Houtte (Eds.), Resisting Education: A Cross-National Study on Systems and School Effects (pp. 53–80). Switzerland: Springer.
Ready, D. D., & Wright, D. L. (2011). Accuracy and inaccuracy in teachers’ perceptions of young children’s cognitive abilities: The role of child background and classroom context. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 335–360.
Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Arneson, J. J., Cooper, S. R., & Waters, S. D. (2009). Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance? Psychological Bulletin, 23(9), 1000–1007.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). Netherlands: Elsevier.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.
Van den Broeck, L., Demanet, J., & Van Houtte, M. (2018). Unmet goals of tracking: Within-track heterogeneity of students’ expectations about the future. Sociological Perspectives, 61(5), 728–747.
Van Houtte, M. (2004). Why boys achieve less at school than girls: The difference between boys’ and girls’ academic culture. Educational Studies, 30(2), 159–173.
Van Houtte, M. (2005). Climate or culture? A plea for conceptual clarity in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(1), 71–89.
Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. (2010a). The culture of futility and its impact on study culture in technical/vocational schools in Belgium. Oxford Review of Education, 36(1), 23–43.
Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. (2010b). School ethnic composition and aspirations of immigrant students in Belgium. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 209–237.
Van Houtte, M., Demanet, J., & Stevens, P. A. (2012). Self-esteem of academic and vocational students: Does within-school tracking sharpen the difference? Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 73–89.
Weiner, B. (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 203–215.
Wiederkehr, V., Darnon, C., Chazal, S., Guimond, S., & Martinot, D. (2015). From social class to self-efficacy: Internalization of low social status pupils’ school performance. Social Psychology of Education, 18(4), 769–784.
Wilson, A. B. (1959). Residential segregation of social classes and aspirations of high school boys. American Sociological Review, 24(6), 836–845.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Special Research Fund, Ghent University, Belgium under Grant number 01N03518. In this article, data of the International Study of City Youth (ISCY) was used, which is an international collaborative project designed and implemented by various research partners from across the world. The cities participating in the study are Barcelona (Spain), Bergen (Norway), Bordeaux (France), Ghent (Belgium), Melbourne (Australia), Montréal (Canada), Reykjavik (Iceland), San Diego (US), Santa Barbara (US), Sacramento (US), Santiago (Chile), Tijuana (Mexico), Turku (Finland), and Wroclaw (Poland). The project is led by the Centre for International Research on Education Systems (CIRES) at Victoria University, Australia. We would like to thank all researchers that contributed to this international project. The International Study of City Youth has received funding from various sources. We owe a special thanks to the Australian Research Council, the Victorian Department of Education and Training, and CIRES at Victoria University, Australia. Moreover, for data used in this article we have received further funding the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), the Special Research Fund of Ghent University, Belgium, and the Department of Sociology at Ghent University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vandelannote, I., Demanet, J. Unravelling socioeconomic school composition effects on higher education enrollment: the role of students’ individual and shared feelings of futility and self-efficacy. Soc Psychol Educ 24, 169–193 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09608-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09608-z