Distance matrices of subsets of the Hamming cube

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indag.2021.01.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Graham and Winkler derived a formula for the determinant of the distance matrix of a full-dimensional set of n+1 points {x0,x1,,xn} in the Hamming cube Hn=({0,1}n,1). In this article we derive a formula for the determinant of the distance matrix D of an arbitrary set of m+1 points {x0,x1,,xm} in Hn. It follows from this more general formula that det(D)0 if and only if the vectors x0,x1,,xm are affinely independent. Specializing to the case m=n provides new insights into the original formula of Graham and Winkler. A significant difference that arises between the cases m<n and m=n is noted. We also show that if D is the distance matrix of an unweighted tree on n+1 vertices, then D11,1=2n where 1 is the column vector all of whose coordinates are 1. Finally, we derive a new proof of Murugan’s classification of the subsets of Hn that have strict 1-negative type.

Section snippets

Introduction: Distance and Gram matrices

The global geometry of a finite metric space (X,d)=({x0,x1,,xm},d) is completely encoded within its distance matrix D=(d(xi,xj))i,j=0m. A now much-studied problem concerns conditions on D which ensure that (X,d) embeds isometrically in a Euclidean space. We refer the reader to the surveys [2] and [10] for further details of the theory and applications of these so-called Euclidean distance matrices.

A class of finite metric spaces which rarely embeds in Euclidean space is the class of metric

Distance matrices of subsets of the Hamming cube

The hypercube {0,1}n has a natural additive group structure given by elementwise addition modulo 2. It is easy to check that the 1 metric is invariant under translation in this group. In particular, if X={x0,x1,,xm} is a given subset of Hn, then the map Φ(x)=xx0 is an isometric isomorphism from X to the set X={0,x1x0,,xmx0} (where 0 denotes the zero vector in {0,1}n). Note that if we set xi=xix0, 0im, then obviously G(x1x0,,xmx0)=G(x1x0,,xmx0) and consequently the m

Applications to supremal negative type

The results of Section 2 afford a new analysis of negative type properties of subsets of the Hamming cube Hn. In particular, we develop a new proof of Murugan’s [11] classification of the subsets of Hn that have strict 1-negative type. In order to proceed we need to recall some classical definitions and related theorems.

Definition 3.1

Let (X,d) be a metric space and suppose that p0. Then:

  • (a)

    (X,d) has p-negative type iff for each finite subset {x0,,xm} of X and each choice of scalars ξ0,,ξm such that ξ0++ξm=0

Affinely independent subsets of the Hamming cube

In the proof of Murugan’s result given in the previous section, it was shown that if {x0,x1,,xm} is an affinely independent subset of Hn, then D11,1>0 (where D=D1(1)=(d1(xi,xj))i,j=0m). However, there is actually more that can be said in this setting. As stated earlier, results of Hjorth et al. [8] and Murugan [11] imply that any unweighted metric tree T on n+1 vertices embeds isometrically into Hn as an affinely independent set. For such embedded trees we may compute the precise value of D

Acknowledgments

The work of the second and third authors was supported by the Research Training Program of the Department of Education and Training of the Australian Government .

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (5)

  • Roundness properties of Banach spaces

    2021, Journal of Functional Analysis
  • A PROBLEM ON DISTANCE MATRICES OF SUBSETS OF THE HAMMING CUBE

    2022, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Series B
View full text