Abstract
Recent understandings of ‘design’ and, in particular design education have become entrenched within schools and higher education as approaches to provide students with opportunities to develop creativity and imagination, and the skills needed for a globalized future. Drawing from Australian curriculum documents, this paper presents a content analysis that locates representations of design and establishes whether current representations support the building of twenty-first century capabilities. The development of curriculum is positioned within the paper as an ideological act that establishes normative discourses of design and compares them with ‘the other’. Our findings demonstrate that design is represented in multiple ways across the Australian Curriculum and that teachers are presented with a specific discourse of design in curriculum documents from different key learning areas. We argue that a dominant re-constructed representation of design within curriculum has the potential to standardize currently discipline specific understandings of design with implications for the enacted curriculum in the classroom and the key discipline design capabilities acquired by students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACARA. (2012). Australian Curriculum assessment and reporting authority. The Shape of the Australian Curriculum: Version 4.0. http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/The_Shape_of_the_Australian_Curriculum_v4.pdf
ACARA. (2013). Australian Curriculum assessment and reporting authority. Draft Australian Curriculum: Technologies. https://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/learning- areas-subjects/technologies.
ACOLA. (2016). Australian Council for Learned Academies. Skills and capabilities for Australian enterprise innovation (report 10). https://acola.org/skills-capabilities-enterprise-innovation-saf10/
Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2–3), 295–310.
Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Australian Curriculum. (2016a). Australian Curriculum: Languages – framework for aboriginal languages and Torres Strait Islander languages. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/languages/framework-for-aboriginal-languages-and-torres-strait-islander-languages/
Australian Curriculum. (2016b). Australian Curriculum: Technologies. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/technologies/
Australian Curriculum. (2016c). Australian Curriculum: The Arts. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/the-arts/
Atweh, B., & Goos, M. (2011). The Australian mathematics Curriculum: A move forward or back to the future? Australian Journal of Education, 55(3), 214–228.
Banks, F., & Williams, P. J. (2013). International perspectives on technology education. In G. Owen- Jackson (Ed.), Debates in design and technology education (pp. 31–48). New York: Routledge.
Bell, G. (2017, October 21). Fast, smart and connected: How to build our digital future [speech]. Boyer Lecture presented at ABC Studios, Ultimo NSW. https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/boyerlectures/series/2017-boyer- lectures/8869370.
Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2012.11519167.
Bleazby, J. (2015). Who some school subjects have a higher status than others: The epistemology of the traditional curriculum hierarchy. Oxford Review of Education, 41(5), 671–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1090966.
Bowen, G. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.
Carvalho, L., Dong, A., & Maton, K. (2009). Legitimating design: A sociology of knowledge account of the field. Design Studies, 30(5), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.11.005.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Connors, L., & McMorrow, J. (2015). Imperatives in schools funding: Equity, sustainability and achievement. Victoria: ACER Press https://research.acer.edu.au/aer/14/.
Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (1994). Design expertise amongst student designers. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 13(1), 39–56.
Department of Education, Skills and Employment. (2020). Why is STEM important? STEM skills are crucial for Australia’s changing future. https://www.dese.gov.au/australian-curriculum/national-stem-education-resources-toolkit/introductory-material/why-stem-important
Design Council. (2018). Designing a future economy: Developing design skills for productivity and innovation. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/resources/report/designing- future-economy-report.
Ditchburn, G. (2012). The Australian Curriculum: Finding the hidden narrative. Critical Studies in Education, 53(3), 347–360.
Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3), 4–17.
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006.
Dorst, K. (2015). Frame innovation: Create new thinking by design. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Education Council. (2015). National STEM school education strategy: A comprehensive plan for science, technology, engineering and mathematics education in Australia. http://www.educationcouncil.edu.au/EC-Reports-and-Publications.aspx
Ewing, R. (2020). The Australian Curriculum: The arts. A critical opportunity. Curriculum Perspectives, 40, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-019-00098-w.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction. London: Penguin Books.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193–217.
Fairclough, N. (2012). Critical discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse (pp. 9–20). New York: Routledge.
Fleer, M. (2018). The contexts, concepts and conditions for the development of the learning areas of technologies: Productive contradictions or a curriculum fossil? In A. Reid & D. Price (Eds.), The Australian Curriculum: Promises, problems and possibilities (pp. 65–77). Deakin West, ACT: ACSA.
Gardner, P. (2017). Worlds apart: A comparative analysis of discourses of English in the curricula of England and Australia. English in Education, 51(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12138.
Goldman, S., & Kabayadondo, Z. (2017). Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners and classrooms. In S. Goldman & Z, Kabayadondo (Eds.), Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners and classrooms (pp. 3–19). New York: Routledge.
Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.
Gonski, D., Arcus, T., Boston, K., Gould, V., Johnson, W., O’Brien, Perry, L., & Roberts, M. (2018). Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.dese.gov.au/uncategorised/resources/through-growth-achievement-report-review-achieve-educational-excellence-australian-schools
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2015). The ATC21S method. In P. Griffen & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and approach (pp. 3–33). Dordrecht: Springer.
Heskett, J. (2001). Past, present, and future in design for industry. Design Issues, 17(1), 18–26.
Honey, M., & Kanter, D. E. (2013). Introduction. In M. Honey & D. E. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 1–6). New York: Routledge.
Howard, J. H. (2016). Securing Australia’s future - capabilities for Australian enterprise innovation: The role of government industry and education and research institutions in developing innovation capabilities. Australian Council of Learned Academies [ACOLA] SAF 10. https://www.acola.org.au/PDF/SAF10/Howard.pdf.
Katz, B. M. (2015). Make it new: The history of Silicon Valley design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Keane, L., & Keane, M. (2016). STEAM by design. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 21(1), 61–82 https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/2085.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: A guide to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2019). Design ad design thinking in STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00020-z.
Lingard, B. (2018). The Australian curriculum: A critical interrogation of why, what and where to? Curriculum Perspectives, 38(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0033-7.
Love, T. (2002). Constructing a coherent cross-disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs: Some philosophical issues. Design Studies, 23(3), 345–361.
Lucas, B., & Smith, C. (2018). The capable country: Cultivating capabilities in Australian education. http://www.mitchellinstitute.org.au/reports/the-capable-country/
Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maxwell, J., Lowe, K., & Salter, P. (2018). The re-creation and resolution of the ‘problem’ of Indigenous education and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander cross-curriculum priority. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0254-7.
MCEETYA. (2008). Ministerial council on education, employment, training and youth affairs. National declaration on educational goals for young Australians. http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/National_Declaration_on_the_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf
Mosely, G., Harris, J., & Grushka, K. (2020). Design education in schools: An investigation of the Australian. Curriculum: Technologies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09572-3.
Norman, D. (2016). When you come to a fork in the road, take it: The future of design. She ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation, 2(4), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.07.003.
Peacock, D., Lingard, R., & Sellar, S. (2015). Texturing space-times in the Australian curriculum: Cross-curriculum priorities. Curriculum Inquiry, 45(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2015.1064305.
Powers, P. (2007). The philosophical foundations of Foucaultian discourse analysis. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 1(2), 18–34.
Razzouck, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.
Reid, A. (2018). The journey towards the first Australian Curriculum. In A. Reid & D. Price (Eds.), The Australian Curriculum: Promises, problems and possibilities (pp. 3–18). Deakin West, ACT: ACSA.
Rudd, K., & Gillard, J. (2008). Quality education: The case for an education revolution in our schools. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia Retrieved from http://apo.org.au/system/files/9133/apo-nid9133-41591.pdf.
Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-Design, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068.
Savage, G. C. (2016). Who’s steering the ship? National curriculum reform and the re-shaping of Australian federalism. Journal of Education Policy, 31(6), 833–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1202452.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2003). The politics of league tables. JSSE-Journal of social science education. https://doi.org/10.4119/jsse-301.
Taylor, P. C. (2016). Why is a STEAM curriculum perspective crucial to the 21st century? In ACER Research Conference 2016 (pp. 89–93). https://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference/RC2016/9august/6/
Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214.
Wright, N., & Wrigley, C. (2019). Broadening design-led education horizons: Conceptual insights and future research directions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9429-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mosely, G., Harris, J. & Grushka, K. Locating the place of ‘design’ across the Australian Curriculum: a detailed analysis of three learning areas. Aust. Educ. Res. 49, 193–209 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00426-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00426-4