Abstract
The time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE) is solved to evaluate energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of H-atom confined by one of the radial potentials, which is modified by a ring-shaped potential and further encaged in a spherical boundary. We have considered the following four radial potentials i.e., Debye, Exponential Cosine Screened Coulomb (ECSC), Hulthén(\(\alpha \)), and Hulthén(2\(\alpha \)). Static \(2^{l}\)-pole polarizability of H-atom in different modified ring confinement potential is evaluated for a range of screening parameter (\(\alpha \)). Repulsive ring-shaped potential affects multipole polarizabilities and reduces the critical screening parameter in different modified ring confinement potentials. The confinement parameters \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) considerably affect the amplitude of multipole polarizabilities. Size of the spherical boundary (\(r_{0}\)) crucially affects multipole polarizabilities and overweighs the effect of \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \). The results prove that as the screening parameter increases the polarizabilities corresponding to various radial potentials become almost equal, i.e., the response due to the different radial potentials becomes indistinguishable after a particular value of the screening parameter.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.]
References
A. Arda, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6340409
J. Mitroy, M.S. Safronova, C.W. Clark, J. Phys. B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Phys. 43, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/43/20/202001
J. Tiihonen, I. Kylänpää, T.T. Rantala, J. Chem. Phys. 147, 204101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4999840
A. Michels, J. De Boer, A. Bijl, Physica 4, 981 (1937)
A. Dalgarno, Adv. Phys. 11, 281 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1080/00018736200101302
P.W. Langhoff, R.P. Hurst, Phys. Rev. 139, 1415 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.139.A1415
A.C. Tanner, A.J. Thakkar, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 24, 345 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.560240403
B. Saha, P.K. Mukherjee, G.H.F. Diercksen, Astron. Astrophys. 396, 337 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20021350
K.D. Sen, B. Mayer, P.C. Schmidt, J. Garza, R. Vargas, A. Vela, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 90, 491 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.946
C. Laughlin, J. Phys. B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Phys. 37, 4085 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/37/20/004
Y.Y. Qi, J.G. Wang, R.K. Janev, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032502 (2009)
M. Das, Phys. Plasmas 19, 092707 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4754716
H.F. Lai, Y.C. Lin, C.Y. Lin, Y.K. Ho, Chinese J. Phys. 51, 73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.6122/CJP.51.73
M.K. Bahar, A. Soylu, A. Poszwa, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 44, 2297 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2016.2604421
L. Zhu, Y.Y. He, L.G. Jiao, Y.C. Wang, Y.K. Ho, Phys. Plasmas 27, 072101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0007973
C.Y. Chen, S.H. Dong, Phys. Lett. A 335, 374 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2004.12.062
S.M. Ikhdair, R. Sever, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 46, 2384 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-007-9356-8
Y.F. Cheng, T.Q. Dai, Phys. Scripta 75, 274 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/75/3/008
D. Agboola, Commun. Theor. Phys. 55, 972 (2011)
J.B. Rosser, Comput. Math. Appl. 1, 351 (1975)
T.E. Simos, P.S. Williams, Comput. Chem. 23, 513 (1999)
S.L. Talwar, S. Lumb, K.D. Sen, V. Prasad, Phys. Scripta 95, 035404 (2020)
S. Lumb, S. Lumb, V. Prasad, European Physical Journal Plus 130, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2015-15149-6
K.D. Sen, J. Katriel, H.E. Montgomery, Ann. Phys. 397, 192 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2018.08.001
K.D. Sen, D. Mandal, J. Molecular Model. 24, 299 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-018-3840-3
R.L. Hall, J. Phys. A: Math. General 25, 4459 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/25/16/021
J.G. Kirkwood, Physik, Z 57, 33 (1932)
R.A. Buckingham, Proc. Royal Soc. London A 94, 160 (1937)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Chanchal Yadav made the computer code for the problem, generated the data and carried out critical analysis of the manuscript. Sonia Lumb did interpretation of the data, drafted the manuscript and approved for the submitted version. Vinod Prasad formulated the problem and contributed in the interpretation of the data and approved for version of the manuscript to be submitted.
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yadav, C., Lumb, S. & Prasad, V. Static multipole polarizabilites of H-atom in modified ring-shaped potentials. Eur. Phys. J. D 75, 21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-020-00026-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-020-00026-y