Abstract
Separating species in terms of dispersal capacity can be useful to understand how local and regional factors affect the distribution of organisms in metacommunities. In this study, we sought to unravel how the characteristics of local habitats and spatial distances structure fish communities in Amazonian streams. We hypothesized that fishes classified with high dispersal capacity are mainly structured by mass effects and respond to environmental and spatial variables in the same proportion, while fishes classified with low dispersal capacity are mainly structured by species sorting, responding mainly to local environmental variables. We collected fish from 36 well-preserved streams in the Capim river basin in northern Brazil during the dry season. In general, the community composition was structured by characteristics of the local habitat. Spatial variables influenced each group at different intensities, agreeing with the models of species sorting and mass effects and corroborating our hypotheses. Thus, our findings suggest that the dispersal mode affects how metacommunities are structured. The differences in the patterns observed between the groups compared can help in the management and conservation of species, such as those with greater environmental requirements and more susceptible to habitat changes. We emphasize the need to maintain habitat integrity and connectivity in headwater streams to conserve species in their habitats.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alahuhta J, Lindholm M, Bove CP et al (2018) Global patterns in the metacommunity structuring of lake macrophytes: regional variations and driving factors. Oecologia 188(4):1167–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4294-0
Algarte VM, Rodrigues L, Landeiro VL et al (2014) Variance partitioning of deconstructed periphyton communities: does the use of biological traits matter? Hydrobiologia 722:279–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1711-6
Benone NL, Ligeiro R, Juen L, Montag LFA (2018) Role of environmental and spatial processes structuring fish assemblages in streams of the eastern Amazon. Mar Freshw Res 69(2):243–252. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17103
Bie T, Meester L, Brendonck L et al (2012) Body size and dispersal mode as key traits determining metacommunity structure of aquatic organisms. Ecol Lett 15:740–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01794.x
Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D (2008) Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89(9):2623–2632. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0986.1
Bojsen BH, Barriga R (2002) Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams. Freshw Biol 47(11):2246–2260. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00956.x
Borcard D, Legendre P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Modell 153(1–2):51–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00501-4
Brejão GL, Gerhard P, Zuanon J (2013) Functional trophic composition of the ichthyofauna of forest streams in eastern Brazilian Amazon. Neotrop Ichthyol 11(2):361–373. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252013005000006
Brown B, Swan C (2010) Dendritic network structure constrains metacommunity properties in riverine ecosystems. J Anim Ecol 79:571–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2656.2010.01668.X
Calvão LB, Nogueira DS, de Assis Montag LF et al (2016) Are Odonata communities impacted by conventional or reduced impact logging? For Ecol Manag 382:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.013
Cantanhêde LG, Luiza-Andrade A, Leão H et al (2020) How does conversion from forest to pasture affect the taxonomic and functional structure of the fish assemblages in Amazonian streams? Ecol Freshw Fish. https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12589
Carvalho RA, Tejerina-Garro FL (2015) Environmental and spatial processes: what controls the functional structure of fish assemblages in tropical rivers and headwater streams? Ecol Freshw Fish 24:317–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12152
Castillo-Escrivà A, Aguilar-Alberola JA, Mesquita-Joanes F (2017) Spatial and environmental effects on a rock-pool metacommunity depend on landscape setting and dispersal mode. Freshw Biol 62:1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12920
Cetra M, Petrere Júnior M, Barrella W (2017) Relative influences of environmental and spatial factors on stream fish assemblages in Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Fish Manag Ecol 24(2):139–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12207
Chen K, Hughes RM, Brito JG et al (2017) A multi-assemblage, multi-metric biological condition index for eastern Amazonia streams. Ecol Ind 78:48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.003
Cottenie K (2005) Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol Lett 8:1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00820.x
Couto TBA, Aquino PDPU (2011) Structure and integrity of fish assemblages in streams associated to conservation units in Central Brazil. Neotrop Ichthyol 9(2):445–454. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252011000200023
Datry T, Moya N, Zubieta J, Oberdorff T (2016) Determinants of local and regional communities in intermittent and perennial headwaters of the Bolivian Amazon. Freshw Biol 61:1335–1349. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12706
Dray S, Blanchet FG, Legendre P (2013) packfor: forward selection with permutation (Canoco p. 46), version 0.0-8/r109.
Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR (2006) Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol Modell 196(3–4):483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015
Ferreira MC, Begot TO, da Silveira PB et al (2018) Effects of oil palm plantations on habitat structure and fish assemblages in Amazon streams. Environ Biol Fishes 101(4):547–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-018-0716-4
Göthe E, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Wiberg-Larsen P et al (2017) Environmental and spatial controls of taxonomic versus trait composition of stream biota. Freshw Biol 62:397–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12875
Grönroos M, Heino J, Siqueira T et al (2013) Metacommunity structuring in stream networks: roles of dispersal mode, distance type, and regional environmental context. Ecol Evol 3(13):4473–4487. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.834
Heino J (2013) The importance of metacommunity ecology for environmental assessment research in the freshwater realm. Biol Rev 88(1):166–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00244.x
Heino J, Melo AS, Siqueira T et al (2015) Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects. Freshw Biol 60:845–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12533
Heino J, Soininen J, Alahuhta J et al (2017) Metacommunity ecology meets biogeography: effects of geographical region, spatial dynamics and environmental filtering on community structure in aquatic organisms. Oecologia 183:121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3750-y
Herrera-R GA, Oberdorff T, Anderson EP et al (2020) The combined effects of climate change and river fragmentation on the distribution of Andean Amazon fishes. Glob Change Biol 26(10):5509–5523. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15285
Landeiro VL, Magnusson WE, Melo AS et al (2011) Spatial eigenfunction analyses in stream networks: do watercourse and overland distances produce different results? Freshw Biol 56:1184–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02563.x
Langeani F, Casatti L, Gameiro HS et al (2005) Riffle and pool fish communities in a large stream of southeastern Brazil. Neotrop Ichthyol 3(2):305–311. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-62252005000200009
Legendre P, Borcard D, Blanchet F, Dray S (2013) PCNM: MEM spatial eigenfunction and principal coordinate analyses. In: R Packag. version 2.1-2
Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129(2):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100716
Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N et al (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x
Leitão RP, Zuanon J, Mouillot D et al (2018) Disentangling the pathways of land use impacts on the functional structure of fish assemblages in Amazon streams. Ecography 41:219–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02845
Logue JB, Mouquet N, Peter H, Hillebrand H (2011) Empirical approaches to metacommunities: a review and comparison with theory. Trends Ecol Evol 26(9):482–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.009
López-Delgado EO, Winemiller KO, Villa-Navarro FA (2019) Do metacommunity theories explain spatial variation in fish assemblage structure in a pristine tropical river? Freshw Biol 64(2):367–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13229
Mendonça FP, Magnusson WE, Zuanon J (2005) Relationships between habitat characteristics and fish assemblages in small streams of Central Amazonia. Copeia 4:751–764. https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2005)005[0751:rbhcaf]2.0.co;2
Mol JHA (2012) The freshwater fishes of Suriname. Fauna Suriname. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-6187
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R et al (2013) Package vegan. Commun Ecol Package 2(9):1–295
Olden JD, Poff NL, Bestgen KR (2008) Trait synergisms and the rarity, extirpation, and extinction risk of desert fishes. Ecology 89(3):847–856. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1864.1
Padial AA, Ceschin F, Declerck SAJ et al (2014) Dispersal ability determines the role of environmental, spatial and temporal drivers of metacommunity structure. PLoS ONE 9(10):e111227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111227
Pandit SN, Kolasa J, Cottenie K (2009) Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists: an empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework. Ecology 90(8):2253–2262. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0851.1
Peck DV, Herlihy AT, Hill BH, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR, Klemm DJ, Lazorchak JM, Mccormick FH, Peterson SA, Ringold PL, Magee TK, Cappaer MR (2006) Environmental monitoring and assessment program-surface waters western pilot study: field operation manual for wadeable streams. EPA/620/R-06/003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC
Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA (2007) Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87(10):2614–2625. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:VPOSDM]2.0.CO;2
Pérez-Mayorga MA, Casatti L, Teresa FB, Brejão GL (2017) Shared or distinct responses between intermediate and satellite stream fish species in an altered Amazonian River? Environ Biol Fishes 100(12):1527–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-017-0663-5
Prudente BS, Pompeu PS, Juen L, Montag LFA (2017) Effects of reduced-impact logging on physical habitat and fish assemblages in streams of Eastern Amazonia. Freshw Biol 62(2):303–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12868
R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Roa-Fuentes CA, Casatti L (2017) Influence of environmental features at multiple scales and spatial structure on stream fish communities in a tropical agricultural region. J Freshw Ecol 32(1):281–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2017.1287129
Rodrigues-Filho CAS, Gurgel-Lourenço RC, Bezerra LAV et al (2018a) How are local fish communities structured in Brazilian semiarid headwater streams? Hydrobiologia 819(1):93–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3650-8
Rodrigues-Filho CAS, Leitão RP, Zuanon J et al (2018b) Historical stability promoted higher functional specialization and originality in Neotropical stream fish assemblages. J Biogeogr 45(6):1345–1354. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13205
Strahler AN (1953) Revisions of Horton’s quantitative factors in erosional terrain. Trans Am Geophys Union 34:345
Terra BF, Hughes RM, Araújo FG (2016) Fish assemblages in Atlantic Forest streams: the relative influence of local and catchment environments on taxonomic and functional species. Ecol Freshw Fish 25(4):527–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12231
Thompson R, Townsend C (2006) A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates. J Anim Ecol 75:476–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01068.x
Tolonen KT, Cai Y, Vilmi A et al (2018) Environmental filtering and spatial effects on metacommunity organisation differ among littoral macroinvertebrate groups deconstructed by biological traits. Aquat Ecol 52:119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-018-9649-4
Van Der Gucht K, Cottenie K, Muylaert K et al (2007) The power of species sorting: Local factors drive bacterial community composition over a wide range of spatial scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(51):20404–20409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707200104
Van Der Sleen P, Albert JS (2018) Field guide to the fishes of the Amazon, Orinoco, and Guianas, vol 115. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Veloso HP, Rangel Filho ALR, Lima JCA (1991) Classificação da Vegetação Brasileira Adaptada a um Sistema Universal
Veríssimo A, Barreto P, Mattos M et al (1992) Logging impacts and prospects for sustainable forest management in an old Amazonian frontier: the case of Paragominas. For Ecol Manag 55(1–4):169–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90099-U
Vilmi A, Tolonen KT, Karjalainen SM, Heino J (2017) Metacommunity structuring in a highly-connected aquatic system: effects of dispersal, abiotic environment and grazing pressure on microalgal guilds. Hydrobiologia 790:125–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-3024-z
Watrin OS, Rocha AMA (1992) Levantamento de vegetação natural e uso da terra no Município de Paragominas (PA) utilizando imagens TM/Landsat. Belém: EMBRAPA-CPATU. Boletim de Pesquisa
Wilson DS (1992) Complex interactions in metacommunities, with implications for biodiversity and higher levels of selection. Ecology 73:1984–2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941449
Zbinden ZD, Matthews WJ (2017) Beta diversity of stream fish assemblages: partitioning variation between spatial and environmental factors. Freshw Biol 62(8):1460–1471. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12960
Zuanon J, Medonça FP, Espírito Santo H, Dias MS, Galuch AV, Akama A (2015) Guia de peixes da Reserva Adolpho Ducke. Editora INPA, Manaus
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the companies CIKEL Ltda. 33 Forest Capital, and Tropical Forest Institute (IFT) for their financial and logistic support. We thank the foundations Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES)—(GSP—process 1707307; LFAM—process 88881.119097/2016-01), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—Brazil (CNPq)—(LFAM—process 302406/2019-0), and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações—Brazil (MCTIC/CNPq)—(NLB—300706/2019-7, 88887.475625/2020-00) for research grants. We also thank researchers Bruno S. Prudente and Gilberto N. Salvador for their help in fish collection and classification.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GSP wrote the manuscript and performed the experiments and analyses. NLB participated in the fieldwork and species identification and provided textual improvements. RLBS provided corrections and improvements to the manuscript. LFAM originally formulated the idea and provided textual corrections. All authors contributed to the manuscript and gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Handling Editor: Sébastien Villeger
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palheta, G.S., Benone, N.L., Santos, R.L.B. et al. Unraveling the role of environmental factors and dispersal capacity in a metacommunity of Amazonian stream fishes. Aquat Ecol 55, 227–236 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09824-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09824-3