Abstract
Purpose
The environmental assessment of urban mobility, defined as the movement of people in an urban area, exceeds the scope of transportation life cycle assessment (LCA) with spatial, territorial and even social considerations. The objective of this study is to develop an original interdisciplinary method based on LCA coupled with a land use and transport interaction (LUTI) model to better consider spatial and territorial dimensions in an environmental assessment of urban mobility.
Methods
Spatial and territorial issues emerge in all LCA stages for urban mobility, and this study illustrates them with an application on the Lyon urban area. To consider most individual daily trips, the geographical boundary is related to the area of influence of the city and the functional boundary includes all transportation modes, with motorized, public and non-motorized transports. The life cycle inventories (LCIs) combined EcoInvent 3.2 inventories with a specific LUTI model, named SIMBAD, local mobility surveys and an emissions and consumptions model (COPERT5). These refinements allow a spatial environmental impacts assessment of urban mobility, expressed per inhabitant per day, at different residential locations and open opportunities to develop precise assessment methods for local air pollutants with detailed description on both population and pollution concentrations.
Results and discussion
At territorial scale, this study highlights the major contribution to environmental impacts from private cars (around 90%) and the relevance to consider fuel, vehicle, and infrastructure life cycles in a mobility assessment. Spatial interpretations show important variability in function of residential locations and urban form characteristics related to different mobility behaviours, distance travelled and transport technologies used. Through the proposed assessment method for local air pollution impacts on human health, hotspots are revealed in the urban area, especially in the urban centre or along main road axes. In order to test our methodology and open discussions on mobility solutions, two contrasted scenarios are explored on compact city and vehicle electrification both presenting impact transfers between global indicators or with the air pollution exposure indicator.
Conclusions
Urban mobility and its related environmental burden are not only related to technological choices but are also related to spatial characteristics and territorial context. The combination of urban and spatial tools and data, such as LUTI model, with the LCA methodology improves the local representativeness of environmental assessment of mobility and enlarges the ranges of analysis and perspective. Nonetheless, improvements remain to be made in relation to ongoing developments on spatialized and territorial LCA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aissani L (2008) Intégration des paramètres spatio-temporels et des risques d’accident à l’Analyse du Cycle de Vie : Application à la filière hydrogène énergie et à la filière essence. Phdthesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne
Albertí J, Roca M, Brodhag C, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2019) Allocation and system boundary in life cycle assessments of cities. Habitat International 83:41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.11.003
André M, Joumard R, Vidon R et al (2006) Real-world European driving cycles, for measuring pollutant emissions from high- and low-powered cars. Atmos Environ 40:5944–5953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.057
André M, Pasquier A, Carteret M (2018) Experimental determination of the geographical variations in vehicle fleet composition and consequences for assessing low-emission zones. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 65:750–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.10.005
Azapagic A, Pettit C, Sinclair P (2007) A life cycle methodology for mapping the flows of pollutants in the urban environment. Clean Technol Environ Policy 9:199–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-007-0092-9
Baitz M, Albrecht S, Brauner E et al (2013) LCA’s theory and practice: like ebony and ivory living in perfect harmony? Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0476-x
Banister D (2008) The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp Policy 15:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
Bauer C, Hofer J, Althaus H-J et al (2015) The environmental performance of current and future passenger vehicles: Life cycle assessment based on a novel scenario analysis framework. Appl Energy 157:871–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.019
Belis CA, Karagulian F, Larsen BR, Hopke PK (2013) Critical review and meta-analysis of ambient particulate matter source apportionment using receptor models in Europe. Atmos Environ 69:94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.009
Boulay A-M, Bare J, Benini L et al (2018) The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:368–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8
Brown Weiss E (2011) The Evolution of International Environmental Law. Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Bulle C, Margni M, Patouillard L et al (2019) IMPACT World+: a globally regionalized life cycle impact assessment method. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24:1653–1674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01583-0
Cervero R, Kockelman K (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transport Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2:199–219
Chester M (2008) Life-cycle environmental inventory of passenger transportation in the United States. Institute of Transportation Studies
Chester M, Horvath A (2009) Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains. Environ Res Lett 4:024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008
Chester M, Horvath A, Madanat S (2010) Comparison of life-cycle energy and emissions footprints of passenger transportation in metropolitan regions. Atmos Environ 44:1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.012
Cortinovis J, Moreto F, Yahyaoui A et al (2006) Élaboration d’un cadastre d’émissions interrégional pour la plate-forme de modélisation de prévisions cartographiques ESMERALDA Elaboration of an interregional emissions inventory for the modelling platform of cartographic previsions ESMERALDA. 20
de Bortoli A, Feraille A, Leurent F (2017) Life Cycle Assessment to support decision-making in transportation planning : a case of French Bus Rapid Transit. Washington DC, USA
Del Duce A, Gauch M, Althaus H-J (2014) Electric passenger car transport and passenger car life cycle inventories in ecoinvent version 3. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0792-4
Del Pero F, Delogu M, Pierini M, Bonaffini D (2015) Life Cycle Assessment of a heavy metro train. Journal of Cleaner Production 87:787–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.023
Dupuy G (1999) Les territoires de l’automobile. Economica Anthropos
EEA (2018) National emissions reported to the UNFCCC and to the EU Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Mechanism
EEA (2014) Noise in Europe 2014
Eichlseder H, Hausberger S, Rexeis M et al (2009) Emission Factors from the Model PHEM for the HBEFA Version 3. Graz University of Technology
Ekvall T, Azapagic A, Finnveden G et al (2016) Attributional and consequential LCA in the ILCD handbook. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:293–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-1026-0
Enault C (2003) Vitesse, accessibilité et étalement urbain; analyse et application à l’aire urbaine dijonnaise. Université de Bourgogne
Eriksson M, Ahlgren S (2013) LCAs of petrol and diesel. S wedish University of Agricultural Science, SLU
European Commission/Joint Research Centre (2011) International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook: general guide for life cycle assessment: provisions and action steps. Publications Office, Luxembourg
Ewing R, Cervero R (2001) Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 87–114
Ewing R, Cervero R (2010) Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 76:265–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T et al (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manage 91:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018
François C (2019) Évaluation environnementale stratégique de la mobilité quotidienne des personnes d’une aire urbaine : couplage entre Modèle Transport-Urbanisme et Analyse de Cycle de Vie. PhD Thesis, Lyon
François C, Gondran N, Nicolas J-P, Parsons D (2017) Environmental assessment of urban mobility: combining life cycle assessment with land-use and transport interaction modelling—application to Lyon (France). Ecol Ind 72:597–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.014
García-Pérez S, Sierra-Pérez J, Boschmonart-Rives J (2018) Environmental assessment at the urban level combining LCA-GIS methodologies: a case study of energy retrofits in the Barcelona metropolitan area. Build Environ 134:191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.041
Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M et al (2009) ReCiPe 2008. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level 1:
Handy S (1996) Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transport Research Part D: Transport and Environment 1:151–165
Hellmuth T, Classen T, Kim R, Kephalopoulos S (2012) Methodological guidance for estimating the burden of disease from environmental noise. World Health Organization
Hellweg S, Mila i Canals L (2014) Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 344:1109–1113. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248361
Héran F, Ravalet EPJ (2008) La consommation d’espace-temps des divers modes de déplacement en milieu urbain. Application au cas de l’île de France, PREDIT
Hill J (2013) Life Cycle Analysis of Biofuels. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (Second Edition). Academic Press, Waltham, pp 627–630
Hischier R, Weidema B, Althaus H-J et al (2010) Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. EcoInvent
Hoffman AV, Felkner J (2002) The Historical Origins and Causes of Urban Decentralization in the United States. Joint Center for Housing Studies, Graduate School of Design [and] John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
Huijbregts MAJ, Schöpp W, Verkuijlen E et al (2000) Spatially explicit characterization of acidifying and eutrophying air pollution in life-cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 4:75–92. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819800300106393
Humbert S, Marshall JD, Shaked S et al (2011) Intake fraction for particulate matter: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45:4808–4816. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103563z
Hunt JD, Kriger DS, Miller EJ (2005) Current operational urban land-use–transport modelling frameworks: a review. Transport Reviews 25:329–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164052000336470
ICCT (2017) European vehicle market statistics: Pocketbook 2016/2017. The International Council on Clean Transportation
IEA (2019) World Energy Balances 2019
Ivanova D, Vita G, Steen-Olsen K et al (2017) Mapping the carbon footprint of EU regions. Environ Res Lett 12:054013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6da9
Jolliet O, Saadé-Sbeith M, Shaked S et al (2016) Environmental life cycle assessment. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton
Jones J (2016) Spatial bias in LUTI models. Université catholique de Louvain
Karlsson CSJ, Miliutenko S, Björklund A et al (2017) Life cycle assessment in road infrastructure planning using spatial geological data. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 22:1302–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1241-3
Kaufmann V, Bergman MM, Joye D (2004) Motility: mobility as capital. Int J Urban Reg Res 28:745–756
Kenworthy JR (2003) Transport energy use and greenhouse gases in urban passenger transport systems: a study of 84 global cities
Knibbs LD, Cole-Hunter T, Morawska L (2011) A review of commuter exposure to ultrafine particles and its health effects. Atmos Environ 45:2611–2622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.065
Krewitt W, Trukenmüller A, Bachmann TM, Heck T (2001) Country-specific damage factors for air pollutants. Int J LCA 6:199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979375
Kumar P, Morawska L, Birmili W et al (2014) Ultrafine particles in cities. Environ Int 66:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.01.013
Laurent F (2015) Optimisation fonctionnelle et spatiale de scénarios de méthanisation centralisée selon une approche systémique territoriale couplée à l’analyse du cycle de vie. Université de Rennes 1
Le Féon S (2014) Evaluation environnementale des besoins de mobilité des grandes aires urbaines en France-Approche par Analyse de Cycle de Vie. Saint-Etienne, EMSE
Le Féon S, Gondran N, Laforest V, Le Boulch D (2012) Global warming impact assessment of urban mobility using motivation trip perspective - a case study of Saint-Etienne, France. International Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering Research Vol 3(3):pp.86–101
Liu KF-R, Hung M-J, Yeh P-C, Kuo J-Y (2014) GIS-Based Regionalization of LCA. GEP 02:1–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2014.22001
Loiseau E, Aissani L, Le Féon S et al (2018) Territorial Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): What exactly is it about? A proposal towards using a common terminology and a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production 176:474–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.169
Loiseau E, Roux P, Junqua G et al (2013) Adapting the LCA framework to environmental assessment in land planning. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1533–1548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0588-y
Luz R, Hausberger S (2010) User Guide for the Model PHEM. Handbuch, Graz
Ma H, Balthasar F, Tait N et al (2012) A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles. Energy Policy 44:160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.034
Marshall S, Banister D (eds) (2007) Land use and transport: European research towards integrated policies. Elsevier, Amsterdam London
Menten F, Chèze B, Patouillard L, Bouvart F (2013) A review of LCA greenhouse gas emissions results for advanced biofuels: the use of meta-regression analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 26:108–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.021
Milakis D, Cervero R, Van Wee B (2015) Stay local or go regional? Urban form effects on vehicle use at different spatial scales: A theoretical concept and its application to the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of Transport and Land Use 8. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.557
Minx J, Baiocchi G, Wiedmann T et al (2013) Carbon footprints of cities and other human settlements in the UK. Environ Res Lett 8:035039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035039
Mirabella N, Allacker K, Sala S (2018) Current trends and limitations of life cycle assessment applied to the urban scale: critical analysis and review of selected literature. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1467-3
Moine A (2006) Le territoire comme un système complexe : un concept opératoire pour l’aménagement et la géographie. LEspace geographique Tome 35:115–132
Moreno EL, Murguía RO (2015) The City Prosperity Initiative: 2015 Global City Report. UN-Habitat
Mutel CL, Hellweg S (2009) Regionalized life cycle assessment: computational methodology and application to inventory databases. Environ Sci Technol 43:5797–5803. https://doi.org/10.1021/es803002j
Naess P (2012) Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context. Journal of Transport and Land Use 5:21–45. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v5i2.314
Newman PWG, Kenworthy JR (1999) Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press, Washington D, C., USA
Nichols BG, Kockelman KM (2014) Life-cycle energy implications of different residential settings: recognizing buildings, travel, and public infrastructure. Energy Policy 68:232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.062
Nicolas J-P, Bonnel P, Cabrera J et al (2009) SImuler les MoBilités pour une Agglomération Durable. Laboratoire d’Économie des Transports
Nitschelm L, Aubin J, Corson MS et al (2016) Spatial differentiation in Life Cycle Assessment LCA applied to an agricultural territory: current practices and method development. Journal of Cleaner Production 112:2472–2484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.138
Ntziachristos L, Samaras Z, Kouridis C, et al (2014) COPERT Guidebook 2014 : Exhaust emissions from road transport. Guidebook
Ntziachristos L, Samaras Z, Kouridis C, et al (2016) EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2016 - Passenger cars, light commercial trucks, heavy-duty vehicles including buses and motor cycles. 153
O’Keeffe S, Majer S, Bezama A, Thrän D (2016) When considering no man is an island—assessing bioenergy systems in a regional and LCA context: a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:885–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1057-1
Ostrom E (2009) A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. World Bank
Patouillard L, Collet P, Tirado-Seco P, et al (2016) Prioritize regional data collection based on uncertainty analysis to enhance the quality of LCA results. LCA XVI undefined-undefined
Pérez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L et al (2008) Land use functions — a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability. In: Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 375–404
Potting J, Hauschild M (1997) Part II: spatial differentiation in life-cycle assessment via the site-dependent characterisation of environmental impact from emissions. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978417
Potting J, Schöpp W, Blok K, Hauschild M (1998) Site-dependent life-cycle impact assessment of acidification. J Ind Ecol 2:63–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.2.63
Querini F, Benetto E (2015) Combining agent-based modeling and life cycle assessment for the evaluation of mobility policies. Environ Sci Technol 49:1744–1751. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5060868
Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Cons 141:2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
Saner D, Beretta C, Jäggi B et al (2016) FoodPrints of households. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:654–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0924-5
Santos JM, Flintsch G, Ferreira A (2017) Environmental and economic assessment of pavement construction and management practices for enhancing pavement sustainability. Resources Conservation and Recycling 15–31
Saujot M, de Lapparent M, Arnaud E, Prados E (2015) To make LUTI models operational tools for planning. Transport and Mobility Laboratory - Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Schafer A, Victor DG (2000) The future mobility of the world population. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 34:171–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00071-8
Schwanen T, Dijst M, Dieleman F (2004) Policies for urban form and their impact on travel: the Netherlands experience. Urban Studies 41:579–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000178690
Servant L (1996) L’Automobile dans la ville: l’envers d’un indéniable succès / The automobile in the city: the flip side of a genuine success story. Cahier de l’IAURIF 7–21
Shaheen SA, Chan ND, Gaynor T (2016) Casual carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area: understanding user characteristics, behaviors, and motivations. Transp Policy 51:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.003
Smit R (2006) An examination of congestion in road traffic emission models and their application to urban road networks. 22
Stead D, Marshall S (2001) The relationships between urban form and travel patterns. An international review and evaluation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 1:113–141
Tagliaferri C, Evangelisti S, Acconcia F et al (2016) Life cycle assessment of future electric and hybrid vehicles: a cradle-to-grave systems engineering approach. Chem Eng Res Des 112:298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.07.003
UNCED (1992) Agenda 21
Wegener M, Fürst F (2004) Land-use transport interaction: state of the art. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1434678
Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B et al (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8
Wiel M (1999) Mobilité, système d’interactions sociales et dynamiques territoriales. Espace, populations, sociétés 17:187–194. https://doi.org/10.3406/espos.1999.1884
Wilson A (2010) The general urban model: retrospect and prospect. Papers in Regional Science 89:27–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00282.x
Zahavi Y, Ryan JM (1980) Stability of travel components over time. Transp Res Rec 750:19–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Wulf-Peter Schmidt
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
François, C., Gondran, N. & Nicolas, JP. Spatial and territorial developments for life cycle assessment applied to urban mobility—case study on Lyon area in France. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26, 543–560 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01861-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01861-2