Skip to main content
Log in

Bounds on the semipaired domination number of graphs with minimum degree at least two

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let G be a graph with vertex set V and no isolated vertices. A subset \(S \subseteq V\) is a semipaired dominating set of G if every vertex in \(V {\setminus } S\) is adjacent to a vertex in S and S can be partitioned into two element subsets such that the vertices in each subset are at most distance two apart. The semipaired domination number \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr2}(G)\) is the minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of G. We show that if G is a connected graph of order n with minimum degree at least 2, then \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr2}(G) \le \frac{1}{2}(n+1)\). Further, we show that if \(n \not \equiv 3 \, (\mathrm{mod}\, 4)\), then \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr2}(G) \le \frac{1}{2}n\), and we show that for every value of \(n \equiv 3 \, (\mathrm{mod}\, 4)\), there exists a connected graph G of order n with minimum degree at least 2 satisfying \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr2}(G) = \frac{1}{2}(n+1)\). As a consequence of this result, we prove that every graph G of order n with minimum degree at least 3 satisfies \(\gamma _\mathrm{pr2}(G) \le \frac{1}{2}n\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Desormeaux WJ, Henning MA (2014) Paired domination in graphs: a survey and recent results. Util. Math. 94:101–166

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard W, Henning MA, McPillan CA (2014) Semitotal domination in graphs. Util. Math. 94:67–81

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998a) Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (eds) (1998b) Domination in Graphs: Advanced Topics. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Henning MA (2018a) Semipaired domination in graphs. J. Combin. Comput. Combin. Math. 104:93–109

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Henning MA (2018b) Perfect graphs involving semitotal and semipaired domination. J. Combin. Optim. 36(2):416–433

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Henning MA (2019) Graphs with large semipaired domination number. Discuss. Math. Graph Theory 39:659–671

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Henning MA (2020) Trees with unique minimum semitotal dominating sets. Graphs Combin. 36(3):689–702

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Slater PJ (1995) Paired-domination and the paired-domatic-number. Congr. Numer. 109:65–72

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Slater PJ (1998) Paired domination in graphs. Networks 32(3):199–206

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA (2007) Graphs with large paired-domination number. J. Combin. Optim. 13(1):61–78

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA (2017) Edge weighting functions on semitotal dominating sets. Graphs Combin. 33:403–417

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Kaemawichanurat P (2018) Semipaired domination in claw-free cubic graphs. Graphs Combin. 34:819–844

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Kaemawichanurat P (2019) Semipaired domination in maximal outerplanar graphs. J. Comb. Optim. 38(3):911–926

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Marcon AJ (2014) On matching and semitotal domination in graphs. Discrete Math. 324:13–18

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Marcon AJ (2016) Vertices contained in all or in no minimum semitotal dominating set of a tree. Discuss. Math. Graph Theory 36(1):71–93

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Marcon AJ (2016) Semitotal domination in claw-free cubic graphs. Ann. Combin. 20(4):799–813

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Marcon AJ (2018) Semitotal domination in graphs: partition and algorithmic results. Util. Math. 106:165–184

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Pandey A (2019) Algorithmic aspects of semitotal domination in graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 766:46–57

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Pandey A, Tripathi V (2019) Complexity and algorithms for semipaired domination in graphs. In: Combinatorial Algorithms. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11638, pp. 278–289. Springer, Cham (2019)

  • Henning MA, Yeo A (2013) Total Domination in Graphs (Springer Monographs in Mathematics) ISBN: 978-1-4614-6524-9 (Print) 978-1-4614-6525-6

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa W. Haynes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Research of both authors supported in part by the University of Johannesburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haynes, T.W., Henning, M.A. Bounds on the semipaired domination number of graphs with minimum degree at least two. J Comb Optim 41, 451–486 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00687-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00687-w

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation