Skip to main content
Log in

Overview of Computer Measures of the Referential Process

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Referential Process (RP) has three functions or processes, called Arousal, Symbolizing, and Reflecting/Reorganizing. Taken together, these provide a framework within which to address the question: how do people connect nonverbal experience and verbal forms. The purpose of this paper is to describe the Discourse Attributes Analysis Program (DAAP), which uses certain dictionaries or word lists to produce measures that model the referential process functions. These dictionaries are also described. The referential process may occur in any type of discourse context and the DAAP computer system may be applied to any type of verbal data. The focus in this paper is on transcripts of psychotherapy sessions. DAAP provides numeric and graphic data at several levels of discourse including word-by-word data concerning dictionary matches; average data for each turn of speech; average data for each speaker for each session; numeric data and graphic images for each session; and overall session data for each treatment. Graphic images of the ebb and flow of these computer generated functions of the referential process over the course of a therapy session are presented and interpreted. There are also discussions of new relational measures, as well as the referential process data base, which currently contains numerical data for 22 treatments, and presentations of several applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term tokens refers to the number of individual words, counting multiplicity; the term types refers to the number of distinct individual words, not counting multiplicity.

  2. The procedure for the development of the REF dictionary are described in www.thereferentialprocess.org.

  3. These are average data taken from the RP data base (see below).

  4. See www.thereferentialprocess.org.

  5. DAAP changes all vocalizations such as eh, hm and um into the one item mm.

  6. Operating manuals detailing DAAP operation and output measures are in preparation; see www.thereferentialprocess.org.

  7. The special DAAP segmentation and data aggregation features for transcripts of interviews are described in the DAAP operating manuals.

  8. See www.thereferentialprocess.org.

  9. The equality between the means of the smooth and unsmoothed dictionary functions holds for the extension to larger segments well as for the individual turns.

  10. The covariation is closely related to the (Pearson) correlation coefficient, but due to the smoothing procedure, the elements are not statistically independent, so it does not have the same statistical meaning as the correlation coefficient.

  11. This 25 session treatment was conducted and videotaped by Dr. Charles Jaffe of the Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute, with written permission from the patient for purposes of research and teaching.

  12. Kingsley also considered several other variables, such as covariations and positive and negative affect, with mixed results; these will not be considered here.

References

  • Bonfanti, A. A, Campanelli, L., Ciliberti, A., Golia, G., & Papini, S. P. (June, 2008). Speech disfluency in spoken language: The Italian computerized dictionary (I-DF) and its application on a single case. Paper presented to the 39th International Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy research (Spain, 2008).

  • Bucci, W. (2021a). Overview of the referential process: The operation of language within and between people. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50 (in press).

  • Bucci, W. (2021b). Development and validation of measures of Referential Activity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50 (in press).

  • Bucci, W., & Crisafulli, G. (2021). Linguistic measures of the therapeutic process in Carl Rogers’s Case of Miss Vib. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50 (in press).

  • Bucci, W., & Maskit, B. (2006). A weighted dictionary for referential activity. In J. G. Shanahan, Y. Qu, & J. Wiebe (Eds.), Computing attitude and affect in text: Theory and applications (Vol. 20). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4102-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucci, W., & Maskit, B. (2007). Beneath the surface of the therapeutic interaction: The psychoanalytic method in modern dress. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55(4), 1355–1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306510705500412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bucci, W., Maskit, B., & Murphy, S. (2016). Connecting emotions and words: The referential process. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, 15(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-015-9417-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucci, W., Maskit, M., & Hoffman, L. (2012). Objective measures of subjective experience; The use of therapist notes in process-outcome research. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 40(2), 303–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didion, J. (1998) Last words. The New Yorker, November 9 (pp. 74–80).

  • Graham, E. (2009). Telling silences in analytic sessions: Clinical meanings of pauses and affective valence in the referential process. Doctoral Dissertation, Adelphi University.

  • Hoffman, L., Algus, J., Braun, W., Bucci, W., & Maskit, B. (2013). Treatment notes: Objective measures of language style point to clinical insights. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 61(3), 535–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065113489026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley, G. (2009). The clinical validation of measures of the Referential Process. Ph.D. dissertation, Adelphi University, The Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, United States, New York. Retrieved September 3, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses at Adelphi University. (Publication No. AAT 3377938).

  • Mariani, R. (2009). Per uno studio del Processo Referenziale in Psicoterapia Il Dizionario delle Parole Riflessive (IREF) un indicatore linguistico in relazione all’ IWRAD nello studio delle narrative. Tesi di Dottorato. Roma: Università La Sapienza.

  • Mariani, R., Maskit, B., Bucci, W., & De Coro, A. (2013). Linguistic measures of the referential process in psychodynamic treatment: The English and Italian versions. Psychotherapy Research: Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 23(4), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.794399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskit, B. (2014): DAAPMath. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.928469.

  • Mergenthaler, E. (1996). Emotion-Abstraction Patterns in verbatim protocols: A new way of describing psychotherapeutic processes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1306–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mergenthaler, E., & Bucci, W. (1999). Linking verbal and non-verbal representations: Computer analysis of referential activity. British Journal of Medical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711299160040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negri, A., & Ongis, M. (2021). Stimulus features of the object relations technique affecting the linguistic qualities of individuals’ narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50 (in press)

  • Negri, A., Esposito, G., Mariani, R., Savarese, M., Belotti, L., Squitieri, B., & Bucci, W. (2018). The Italian weighted reflection and reorganizing list(I-WRRL); A new linguistic measure detecting the third phase of the referential process. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 215–216.

  • Niederhoffer, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2002). Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 337. https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinker, T. W. (2018). lexicon: Lexicon Data. Buffalo, New York. Retrieved from http://github.com/trinker/lexicon.

  • Roussos, A., & O’Connell, M. (2005). Construcción de un diccionarioponderado en español para medir la ActividadReferencial. Revista del Instituto de Investgaciones de la Facultad de Psicología/UBA, 10(2), 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slonim, T. (2014). Verbal Behavior in Individuals with Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Depressive Disorders (Doctoral Dissertation, The City University of New York). Retrieved February 2, 2015 from https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_psyc_diss/index.4.html.

  • Tokgoz, T. (2014). Nonverbal vocal communication of emotions in interviews with child and adolescent psychoanalysts. Doctoral Dissertation, The New School. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED575105.

  • Zhou, Y., Maskit, B., Bucci, W., Fishman, A., & Murphy, S. (2021). Development of WRRL: A new computer measure of the Reflecting/Reorganizing function. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50 (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Maskit.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The work presented here represents collaborative work of the Pacella Research Group of the New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute. The author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of Wilma Bucci and Sean Murphy throughout this project and the work of Xinyao Zhang in preparing the figures that appear in this paper.

Appendix

Appendix

The DAAP smoothing operator is basically a mathematical process. This appendix contains a broad description of that process in non-mathematical terms; a precise mathematical description can be found in the forthcoming DAAP Technical Manual (www.thereferentialprocess.org). The process has two steps: A fold-ever procedure and a moving weighted averaging procedure. The basic idea of the moving weighted average is that we replace the dictionary value at each word with a weighted average of the dictionary values at nearby words, where the weighting is greatest at the word itself, called the central word, and decreases steadily with distance from this central word until it reaches zero 100 words away. The weighting function we use here is an exponential function related to the normal curve; the graph of this function is shown in Fig. 

Fig. 5
figure 5

The weighting function

5. The weighting function W is positive exactly for the indices, − 100 < i < 100; W(i) is increasing from i = − 100 to i = 0, has a unique maximum at i = 0, and decreases from i = 0 to 100.

There is a difficulty with this operation in that for a central word near the beginning of a turn, we do not have 100 previous words for computing this moving weighted average; likewise, for a central word near the end of a turn, we do not have 100 following words. This difficulty is overcome by using a fold-over procedure in which we extend the definition of the dictionary function to values at indices before the beginning and after the end of a turn. Label the dictionary values at the N words of a turn in order as U(1), …, U(N). Now extend this function U to have values at the indices N + 1, N + 2, etc. by folding over; that is, by setting U(N + 1) = U(N), U(N + 2) = U(N − 1), …, U(2N) = U(0). If 2N < 100, more values of U are needed beyond 2N; these additional values are obtained by folding over again; U(2N + 1) = U(2N) = U(0), U(2N + 2) = U(2N − 1) = U(2), etc. Likewise the definition of the function U can be extended to 0 and negative indices by folding over in the opposite direction; that is, U0) = U(1), U(− 1) = U(2), U(− 2) = U(3), etc.

Having extended the definition of the function U as far as necessary, the moving weighted average at each of the N words of the turn can be defined by the sum:

S(n) = Σ U(t + m) W(m), where the sum is taken over all m in the range − 100 < m < 100.

This smoothing operator has two mathematical features that are of some interest. One is that the mean of the smoothed dictionary values for a turn of speech is equal to the mean of the original dictionary values. The other is that if the original dictionary values are all equal to some constant, the smoothed dictionary values are all equal to this same constant.

We are usually concerned primarily with turns of more than 25 words. For shorter turns, S(n) is close to being constantly equal to the mean of the unsmoothed dictionary values. In general, for longer turns, the graph of the smooth dictionary function shows variations that indicate the changes in the speakers’ style of speech. The particular weighting function, W was chosen so that the value of the smooth dictionary function at a word depends strongly on the unsmoothed dictionary values of nearby words. For example, the dictionary value of the word itself together with the dictionary values of the 25 closest words in both directions account for over 70% of the value of the smooth dictionary function. This also holds for words close to the beginning or end of a turn. For example, if there are fewer than 25 preceding words and more than 25 following words, then the dictionary values of all the preceding words, together with the dictionary values of the 25 following words account for over 70% of the value of the smooth dictionary function.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maskit, B. Overview of Computer Measures of the Referential Process. J Psycholinguist Res 50, 29–49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09761-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09761-8

Keywords

Navigation