3.Al-Based Metal-Organic Framework MFM-300 and MIL-160 for SO2 Capture: A Molecular Simulation Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2021.112963Get rights and content

Abstract

SO2 emission from fossil fuels combustion in the environment has led to various environmental and health hazards drawing the significant attention of the world to control. SO2 capture through metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as adsorbent is a promising environmental technology to eliminate the emission of SO2. Many factors have been identified that influence the activity of SO2 separations for flue gases by MOFs, but the precise mechanisms of selectivity underlying the interactions between host and guest molecules are still unclear. Moreover, the role of H2O in flue gases needs to be considered since it is an essential factor in practical engineering applications. In this work, the MOFs of MIL-160 and MFM-300 are selected to capture SO2 from flue gases with various components, which have been experimentally demonstrated to have great feature in flue gas desulfurization. Force-field-based grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations combined with density functional theory (DFT) are employed to predict the strength of host/guest interactions and the adsorption isotherms for all guests in flue gas in MIL-160 and MFM-300. The results show that MIL-160 has an outstanding SO2/CO2 selectivity up to 220 (298 K, 1bar), compared to MFM-300 with 53. CO2 and SO2 binding furanyl groups in MIL-160 are stronger than binding hydroxyl groups in MFM-300. We also found that the increasing weakens the performance of SO2 capture due to the predominant H2O adsorption in the separation process.

Introduction

The large quantities emission of CO2 in flue gas from the combustion of fossil fuels has drawn worldwide attention because it is a significant source of global warming [1,2]. Amine-based processes for CO2 post-combustion capture applications are considered as the most developed and adequate method for CO2 utilization [2]. However, small amounts of SO2 in flue gas can react with organo-amines used for CO2 capture causing permanent loss of activity [3]. Accordingly, the development of new materials and processes for efficient, reversible, and economical capture of SO2 is highly desired. Effective capture of SO2 from flue gas requires strong physical or chemical absorption because of the relatively low partial pressure (e.g. 1000 ppm SO2) in flue gas. Adsorption of SO2 by porous materials such as zeolites [4], metal oxides [5], porous carbon [6] and porous organic polymers (POPs) [7] based on supramolecular host-guest interactions is a promising approach. However, these materials generally suffer from irreversible structural degradation when exposure to SO2, leading to poor adsorption capacity and reusability.

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as a new class of crystalline porous materials composed of self-assembled metallic species and organic linkers to form three-dimensional network structures. Due to their high surface area, tunable pore size, and tailorable surface property, MOFs have potential applications in separation, catalysis, and gas storage. Besides, MOFs can be synthesized with various combinations of organic linkers and metal centers, which provides a platform to design materials for specific applications [8]. A series of MOFs, such as DMOF-1 [9], MOF-74 [10], SIFSIX family [11] and KAUST family [12], have been reported as promising adsorbents in capture of SO2 from gas mixtures, such as natural gas and flue gas. Among these MOFs, Al-based MFM-300 [13] and MIL-160 [14] were experimentally demonstrated to have great potential in flue gas desulfurization for their outstanding performances in SO2 selectivity and high chemical and hydrothermal stability. Moreover, Al is more accessible and cheaper compared to other metals, and robust synthesis routes were developed [15,16]. These two MOFs are built from inorganic aluminum chains linked via bipheny l-3,3′,5,5′-tetracarboxylic acid (H4BPTC) and 2,5-furan dicarboxylate, respectively, and contain the chains of corner-sharing (via μ2-OH group) [AlO4(OH)2] octahedra being connected through ligand to form a three-dimensional framework possessing one-dimensional pores (Fig. 1). SO2 adsorption and separation in these two MOFs have been studied through experimental techniques and density functional theory (DFT) calculation [13,17], in which the gas separation properties of MOFs were derived from the above breakthrough experiments or single gas adsorption isotherms. In this context, we emphasize to numerically reveal the mechanisms of SO2 adsorption and separation performance in gas mixtures of MIL-160 and MFM-300.

Furthermore, the effects of H2O in flue gases on SO2 separation by these materials are still unclear, which are significant factors in practical engineering applications. Typically, adsorption behavior is likely to be further complicated by the presence of H2O, which is known to co-adsorb alongside CO2 and SO2 under conditions of wet flue gas purification and reduce the adsorption capacity. The studies [1,18,19] showed that H2O molecule impaired the adsorption capacity of MOFs with coordinatively unsaturated metal sites. It was also reported that H2O has a minimal impact on CO2 adsorption properties on MOFs, such as ZIF-68/69 [20], UIO-66 [21] and SGU-29 [22].

We here aim to understand the adsorption mechanisms of pure CO2 and SO2 as well as SO2/CO2 mixtures in MIL-160 and MFM-300. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations coupled with DFT calculation are used to predict adsorption isotherm and heat of adsorption. In addition, the SO2/CO2 selectivity is calculated based on ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST), and the influence of H2O in wet flue gas is probed to evaluate the actual performance of these two MOFs for post-combustion SO2 capture.

Section snippets

Structure optimization

Before the simulation, the crystal structures of MIL-160 and MFM-300, initially taken from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) [23], were geometrically optimized using DFT in the QUICKSTEP/CP2K package [24]. The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange correlation functional [25] was adopted to perform calculations with the DFT-D3 functional [26] to account for dispersion forces. Double-ζ valence polarized Gaussian basis sets were employed for all atoms. For C, H, and O, basis sets

Adsorption of single-component gas

Firstly, the experimental data for MIL-160 at 293 K estimated from ref [17] were used to assess the accuracy of the predicted isotherms for CO2 and SO2. The simulated and experimental adsorption isotherms for pure CO2 and SO2 gases in MIL-160 at 298 K and pressures up to 1 bar are displayed in Fig. 3. The CO2 and SO2 uptakes basing on the generic force field are also compared in Fig. 3, which shows that the predicted adsorption uptakes of CO2 by these force fields both agree with experimental

Conclusions

We here reported the SO2 adsorption and separation of flue gas in two Al-based MOFs (MIL-160 and MFM-300) by means of molecular simulation. The GCMC and IAST results confirmed that both of two MOFs have high affinity for SO2 in the flue gas. It was found that MFM-300 adsorb SO2 and CO2 molecules mainly through μ2-OH groups. Unlikely, the oxygen atom of furan ring in MIL-160 shows strong effect on SO2, while its μ2-OH groups seem to be inaccessible. Therefore, MIL-160 shows higher selectivity

Authors statement

Jia-xiang Liu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing - original draft preparation. Jie Li: Software, Data curation. Wen-quan Tao: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Zhuo Li: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing, Supervision.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52076152), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (20ZR1461000), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (04002150007).

References (50)

  • G. Singh et al.

    Carbon

    (2019)
  • A. Modak et al.

    Microporous and Mesoporous Materials

    (2019)
  • D. Wu et al.

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (2017)
  • D. Barpaga et al.

    Microporous and Mesoporous Materials

    (2016)
  • X. Ma et al.

    Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

    (2018)
  • X.-C. An et al.

    Chemical Engineering Journal

    (2020)
  • T. Grant Glover et al.

    Chemical Engineering Science

    (2011)
  • J. VandeVondele et al.

    Computer Physics Communications

    (2005)
  • G. Kamath et al.

    Fluid Phase Equilibria

    (2006)
  • C.M. Simon et al.

    Computer Physics Communications

    (2016)
  • M.I. Hossain et al.

    Chemical Engineering Science

    (2019)
  • X. Peng et al.

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

    (2017)
  • X. Han et al.

    Nature Reviews Chemistry

    (2019)
  • J. Hungerford et al.

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

    (2018)
  • X. Cui et al.

    Advanced Materials

    (2017)
  • M.R. Tchalala et al.

    Nature Communications

    (2019)
  • S. Yang et al.

    Nature Chemistry

    (2012)
  • A. Cadiau et al.

    Advanced Materials

    (2015)
  • N. Tannert et al.

    Dalton Transactions

    (2019)
  • I. Thomas-Hillman et al.

    Green Chemistry

    (2019)
  • P. Brandt et al.

    ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

    (2019)
  • B.L. Suh et al.

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

    (2017)
  • K. Tan et al.

    Chemistry of Materials

    (2015)
  • B. Liu et al.

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

    (2010)
  • E. Soubeyrand-Lenoir et al.

    Journal of the American Chemical Society

    (2012)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Experimental study on adsorption removal of SO<inf>2</inf> in flue gas by defective UiO-66

      2023, Chemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are porous coordination polymers formed by the self-assembly of metal ions or metal ion clusters, and organic or inorganic ligands [4,6,7]. Due to their abundant active sites and periodic porous structures, MOFs exhibit a good adsorption performance for SO2 [8–11]. Zhonghui Zhang et al. [12] introduced ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) into Zr-based MOF (MOF-808) to prepare EDTA-MOF-808.

    • Understanding of water desalination in two-dimensional porous membrane via molecular dynamics

      2022, Journal of Molecular Liquids
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, it is expected that membrane of two COFs could exhibit very high rejection rates in water desalination. As reported in our previous study [32] for metal–organic frameworks, geometry and cell optimization for all structures were performed using periodic density functional theory calculations in CP2K package [33]. We have used Mixed Gaussian and plane waves (GPW) approach, where a triple-ζ TZVP-MOLOPT functions was considered.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text