The differential of probabilistic entailment

To Ettore Casari, in memoriam
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2021.102945Get rights and content

Abstract

Suppose elements a1,,ak of a boolean algebra A are assigned probabilities π1,πk. Boole asked to determine the possible probabilities of some other element aA, given the assignment aiπi,(i=1,,k). De Finetti's solution of Boole's problem yields a closed interval Ia[0,1] such that the set of possible probabilities of a coincides with Ia. Ia is nonempty iff the assignment is consistent in de Finetti's sense. Now suppose the probability of ak undergoes a small perturbation πkπk+dπk. We study the resulting modification of Ia. For instance, we prove that the one-sided derivatives length(Ia)/πk± always have a rational, (generally non-integer) value. In the particular case when each probability πi is rational and A is presented as a Lindenbaum algebra, all these derivatives are Turing computable. Their existence domain is decidable by the Tarski-Seidenberg algorithm for polynomial equations and inequalities in real closed fields. Our results build on de Finetti's consistency notion and his solution of Boole's problem, and extend Hailperin's polyhedral methods for combining bounds on probabilities.

Section snippets

Introduction and statement of the main results

Let a1,,ak be elements of a boolean algebra A, π1,,πk[0,1], and a1π1,,akπk a [0,1]-valued map. Interpreting each πi as a probability, Boole asked to determine the probability of some other event aA given the assignment aiπi,i=1,,k. De Finetti's solution of Boole's problem, Theorem 2.7, yields a closed interval Ia[0,1] such that the set of probabilities of a compatible with the assignment aiπi coincides with Ia. The interval Ia is nonempty iff the assignment is consistent in the sense

Preliminaries: Boole's extension problem and de Finetti's solution

Boole [2, Chapter XVI, 4, p. 246] writes:

the object of the theory of probabilities might be thus defined. Given the probabilities of any events, of whatever kind, to find the probability of some other event connected with them.

Let us call this Boole's extension problem. This section is devoted to giving a short proof of de Finetti's solution of the problem. His result and the preliminary material for the proof will find repeated use below.

So let us first assume “events” a1,,al1 are assigned

Minimal paths in the state space SA induced by a consistent book

Let A be a finite boolean algebra together with elements a1,,ak,a and a consistent book β:a1π1,,ak1πk1. Theorem 2.7 yields the de Finetti interval Iak=[πmin,πmax] of consistent probabilities for ak given β. We may write where a¯k:SA[0,1] is as defined in (3). For fixed β, our aim in this section is to study the dependence of Ia on the probability xIak.

Suppose A has u atoms. Given affinely independent points ϵ1,,ϵuRu1 a convenient geometric representation of the state space SA is

The dynamics of Boole's extension problem

In this section we consider the totality of consistent books on a fixed but otherwise arbitrary k-tuple X=(a1,,ak) of elements of a finite boolean algebra A. Our aim is to investigate the computability of the differential version of Boole's extension problem. We letΠX={(x1,,xk)[0,1]k| the book a1x1,,akxk is consistent}. In Proposition 4.2 we will provide a concrete realization of the set ΠX[0,1]k. To this purpose we prepare the following easy lemma, whose proof we have not been able to

Examples

Example 5.1

The faces of a tetrahedral biased dice are denoted o1,,o4 and are identified with the atoms of the free two-generator boolean algebra F2. The outcomes o1o2,o2o3 have equal probability 1/3.

Problem: How does the probability of rolling o4 depend on the probability of rolling o3o1?

Fig. 1 gives a geometric representation of the problem and its solution. The boolean algebra F2 is presented as the powerset of the set Ω={ϵ1,,ϵ4}, the latter being in one-one correspondence with both hom(F2) and at(

Related work and final remarks

In [10, §§ 1-5] Hailperin considered the possible probabilities of a boolean formula ϕ given a [0,1]-valued map Aiai defined on the free generating set {A1,,An} of the free n-generator boolean algebra Fn. In Hailperin's terminology, “A1,,An are arbitrary events of which nothing is known except that their respective probabilities are a1,,an.” An effective procedure is described, based on Linear Programming, by which, given any formula ϕ=ϕ(A1,,An) one can obtain the best possible upper and

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the two Referees for their competent and careful reading of this paper and their valuable comments and suggestions for improvement.

References (26)

  • G. Georgakopoulos et al.

    Probabilistic satisfiability

    J. Complex.

    (1988)
  • P. Hansen et al.

    Boole's conditions of possible experience and reasoning under uncertainty

    Discrete Appl. Math.

    (1995)
  • N.J. Nilsson

    Probabilistic logic

    Artif. Intell.

    (1986)
  • S. Basu et al.

    Algorithms in Real Algebraic Geometry

    (2003)
  • G. Boole

    An Investigation of the Laws of Thought

    (1854)
  • B. de Finetti

    Sul significato soggettivo della probabilità

    Fundam. Math.

    (1931)
  • B. de Finetti

    La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives

    Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré

    (1937)
    (1980)
  • B. de Finetti

    Opere Scelte (Selected Works), Vol. 1

    (2006)
  • B. de Finetti

    Theory of Probability. A Critical Introductory Treatment

    (2017)
  • H. Edelsbrunner

    Geometric algorithms

  • K.R. Goodearl

    Partially Ordered Abelian Groups with Interpolation

    (1986)
  • T. Hailperin

    Best possible inequalities for the probability of a logical function of events

    Am. Math. Mon.

    (1965)
  • T. Hailperin

    Boole's Logic and Probability: A Critical Exposition from the Standpoint of Contemporary Algebra, Logic and Probability Theory

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text