Abstract
The spatial variation of ground motion is determined for high-frequency P- and S-waves in the New Madrid Seismic Zone at a site near Mooring, TN. An L-shaped array consisting of 19 seismometers and having arm lengths of 600 m located on Holocene fluvial sediments of the Mississippi River was used to examine wave coherency appropriate for many sites throughout the Mississippi embayment and other sediment sites associated with large rivers. Data from local and regional earthquakes within a distance range of 300 km show that coherency within the frequency band of 0.5 to 16 Hz degrades with inter-station distance across the array according to an empirical exponential model. Vertical component P-waves are coherent over nearly 2 horizontal wavelengths. However, the coherency for horizontal component S-waves degrades more rapidly than the vertical component P-waves. S-waves become significantly incoherent at distances of only 0.2 horizontal wavelength and become completely incoherent after 0.5 wavelength. The results of this study show clear and quick decay of wave coherence likely to occur in strong ground motions from nearby earthquakes. The observed incoherence can be a significant factor for the response of structures having foundation lengths of even 100 m.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson NA (1993) Spatial variation of multiple supports inputs, Proc of 1st US seminar on seismic evaluation and retrofit of steel bridges, A Caltrans and Univ. of California at Berkeley Seminar, San Francisco CA
Abrahamson NA, Bolt BA, Darragh RB, Penzien J, Tsai YB (1987) The SMART-I accelerograph array (1980-1987): a review. Earthquake Spectra 3:263–287
Barker JS, Campillo M, Sanchez-Sesma FJ, Jongmans D, Singh SK (1996) Analysis of wave propagation in the valley of Mexico from a dense array of seismometers. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1667–1680
Bockholt BM, Langston CA, DeShon HR, Horton S, Withers M (2014) Mysterious tremor-like signals seen on the Reelfoot Fault, Northern Tennessee. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104:2194–2205. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140030
Bodin P, Horton S (1999) Broadband microtremor observation of basin resonance in the Mississippi embayment, central U.S.: implications for seismic hazard assessment. Geophys Res Lett 26:903–906
Bodin P, Gomberg J, Singh SK, Santoyo M (1997) Dynamic deformations of shallow sediments in the Valley of Mexico, part I: three-dimensional strains and rotations recorded on a seismic array. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:528–539
Braun T, Schweitzer J (2008) Spatial noise-field characteristics of a three-component small aperture test array in Central Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(4):1876–1886. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070077
Ghiocel DM, Short S, Hardy G (2009) Seismic motion incoherency effects on SSI response of nuclear islands with significant mass eccentricities and different embedment levels. Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 20), Division K, Paper 1853
Harichandran RS (1991) Estimating the spatial variation of earthquake ground motion from dense array recordings, Struct. Safety 10:219–233
Harichandran RS, Vanmarcke EH (1986) Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time. J Eng Mech ASCE 112(2):154–174
Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Langston CA, Bodin P, Powell C, Withers M, Horton S, Mooney W (2005) Bulk sediment Qp and Qs in the Mississippi embayment, Central U.S. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:2162–2179. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050047
Langston CA, Bodin P, Powell C, Withers M, Horton S, Mooney W (2006) Explosion source strong ground motions in the Mississippi embayment. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:1038–1054
Mykkeltveit S, Astebøl K, Dornboos DJ, Husebye ES (1983) Seismic array configuration optimization. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:173–186
Nawab S, Dowla F, Lacoss R (1985) Direction determination of wideband signals, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1114–1122, October 1985
Nyamwandha CA, Powell CA, Langston CA (2015) A joint local and teleseismic tomography study of the Mississippi Embayment and New Madrid Seismic Zone. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121(5):3570–3585
Powell CA, Withers MM, DeShon HR, Dunn MM (2010) Intrusions and anomalous Vp/Vs ratios associated with the New Madrid Seismic Zone. J Geophys Res 115:B08311. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB007107
Pujol J, Johnston A, Chiu JM, Yang Y (1997) Refinement of thrust faulting models for the central New Madrid Seismic Zone. Eng Geol 46:281–298
Self RP (1993) Late Tertiary to early Quaternary sedimentation in the Gulf coastal plain and lower Mississippi valley. Southeast Geol 33:99–110
Sextos A, Kappos AJ, Mergos P (2004) Effect of soil-structure interaction and spatial variability of ground motion on irregular bridges: the case of the Krystallopigi bridge, 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, Issue no. 2298
Singh SK, Santoyo M, Bodin P, Gomberg J (1997) Dynamic deformations of shallow sediments in the Valley of Mexico, part II: single-station estimates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:540–550
Snaebjornsson JTh, Sigbjornsson R (2008) The spatial variability of ground motion and its effects on multi-supported structures, Proceedings of The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China
Soyluk K, Dumanoglu AA (2004) Spatial variability effects of ground motions on cable-stayed bridges. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(2004):241–250
Spudich, P. (1994). Recent seismological insights into the spatial variation of earthquake ground motions, in Proceedings of Seminar on New Developments in Earthquake Ground Motion Estimation and Implications for Engineering Design Practice, Applied Technology Council ATC 35–1, Redwood City, California
Stearns RG (1957) Cretaceous, Paleocene, and lower Eocene geologic history of the northern Mississippi embayment. Geol Soc Am Bull 68:1077–1100
Stearns RG, Marcher MV (1962) Late Cretaceous and subsequent structural development of the northern Mississippi embayment area. Geol Soc Am Bull 73:1387–1394
Toksoz MN, Dainty AM, Charette EE (1991) Coherency of ground motion at regional distances and scattering. Phys Earth Planet Inter 67(1–2):162–179
Zerva A, Zervas V (2002) Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: an overview. Appl Mech Rev 55(3):271–297
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Center for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis and its support is gratefully acknowledged. This work was also part of a Master’s thesis by the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huda, M.M., Langston, C.A. Coherence and variability of ground motion in New Madrid Seismic Zone using an array of 600 m. J Seismol 25, 433–448 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-020-09970-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-020-09970-z