Abstract
The possibility that sexual selection promotes adaptive evolution in variable environments remains controversial. In particular, where the scale of environmental variation results in parents and their offspring experiencing different environmental conditions, such variation is expected to break down associations between adult sexual traits and adaptive offspring traits. However, when adaptive offspring plasticity in nonsexual traits acts as an indirect benefit of mate choice, then mate choice for males that produce more plastic offspring could promote adaptation to variable environments. This hypothesis assumes that male sexual signals predict offspring plasticity, which has rarely been tested. To test this assumption, we used spadefoot toads (Spea multiplicata) to investigate whether variation in male sexual signals predicts the expression of tadpole tail-fin plasticity in response to predation cues. Such plasticity has been shown to be adaptive in numerous amphibian taxa. We found that condition-dependent male call characteristics predicted offspring plasticity. Generally, both phenotypic plasticity and female mate choice are ubiquitous in nature; therefore, adaptive associations between male sexual signals and offspring plasticity such as the one reported here might be common.
Significance statement
Sexual signals can indicate individuals’ capacity to sire high-quality offspring, which provides a mechanism by which sexual selection can contribute to adaptive evolution. Whether this occurs in variable environments is unclear, however, because variable environments can expose parents and their offspring to different selection pressures. To address this uncertainty, we investigated the possibility that sexual signals can signal the capacity to sire offspring that express adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to prevailing selective pressures. Using spadefoot toads, we found that condition-dependent male sexual signals predict the expression of tadpole tail-fin plasticity in response to predation cues. Because this form of plasticity has been demonstrated to be adaptive in several amphibian taxa, our results suggest that associations between sexual signals and adaptive offspring plasticity can allow sexual selection to promote adaptive evolution in variable environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data from this study are available via DRYAD (DOI: 10.5061/dryad.t4b8gtj0w).
References
Achorn AM, Rosenthal GG (2020) It’s not about him: mismeasuring ‘good genes’ in sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 35:206–219
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Bragg AN (1965) Gnomes of the night: the spadefoot toads. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
Bussiere LF, Hunt J, Stolting KN, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2008) Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress. Genetica 134:69–78
Canty A, Ripley BD (2020) boot: Bootstrap R (S-plus) Functions. R package version 1.3-25, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/boot/index.html
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org
Cornwallis CK, Uller T (2009) Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol Evol 25:145–152
Cotton S, Small J, Pomiankowski A (2006) Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Curr Biol 16:R755–R765
Dodd CK (2013) Frogs of the United States and Canada, vol. 1. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Gerhardt HC (1991) Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim Behav 42:615–635
Gerhardt HC (1994) Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim Behav 47:959–969
Hedges LV, Olkin I (2014) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic press
Kelly PW, Pfennig DW, de la Serna Buzón S, Pfennig KS (2019) Male sexual signal predicts phenotypic plasticity in offspring: implications for the evolution of plasticity and local adaptation. Phil Trans R Soc B 374:20180179
Kokko H, Heubel K (2008) Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox. Genetica 134:55–62
Kraft PG, Wilson RS, Franklin CE (2005) Predator-mediated phenotypic plasticity in tadpoles of the striped marsh frog, Limnodynastes peronii. Austral Ecol 30:558–563
Kraft P, Franklin C, Blows M (2006) Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in tadpoles: extension or innovation? J Evol Biol 19:450–458
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest package: tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. J Stat Softw 82:1–26
LaFiandra EM, Babbitt KJ (2004) Predator induced phenotypic plasticity in the pinewoods tree frog, Hyla femoralis: necessary cues and the cost of development. Oecologia 138:350–359
Lee N, Ward JL, Vélez A, Micheyl C, Bee MA (2017) Frogs exploit statistical regularities in noisy acoustic scenes to solve cocktail-party-like problems. Curr Biol 27:743–750
Lorch PD, Proulx S, Rowe L, Day T (2003) Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol Ecol Res 5:867–881
Martin RA, Pfennig DW (2009) Disruptive selection in natural populations: the roles of ecological specialization and resource competition. Am Nat 174:268–281
Martin RA, Pfennig DW (2010) Field and experimental evidence that competition and ecological opportunity promote resource polymorphism. Biol J Linn Soc 100:73–88
Martin RA, Pfennig DW (2012) Widespread disruptive selection in the wild is associated with intense resource competition. BMC Evol Biol 12:136
McCollum SA, Van Buskirk J (1996) Costs and benefits of a predator-induced polyphenism in the gray treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis. Evolution 50:583–593
McIntyre PB, Baldwin S, Flecker AS (2004) Effects of behavioral and morphological plasticity on risk of predation in a Neotropical tadpole. Oecologia 141:130–138
Michimae H, Hangui J-I (2008) A trade-off between prey-and predator-induced polyphenisms in larvae of the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:699–704
Miller CW, Svensson EI (2014) Sexual selection in complex cnvironments. Annu Rev Entomol 59:427–445
Peig J, Green AJ (2009) New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos 118:1883–1891
Pfennig DW (1990) The adaptive significance of an environmentally-cued developmental switch in an anuran tadpole. Oecologia 85:101–107
Pfennig DW (1992a) Polyphenism in spadefoot toads as a locally adjusted evolutionarily stable strategy. Evolution 46:1408–1420
Pfennig DW (1992b) Proximate and functional causes of polyphenism in an anuran tadpole. Funct Ecol 6:167–174
Pfennig DW, Pfennig KS (2012) Evolution's wedge: competition and the origins of diversity. University of California Press, Berkeley
Pfennig DW, Reeve HK, Sherman PW (1993) Kin recognition and cannibalism in spadefoot toad tadpoles. Anim Behav 46:87–94
Pfennig DW, Rice AM, Martin RA (2006) Ecological opportunity and phenotypic plasticity interact to promote character displacement and species coexistence. Ecology 87:769–779
Pfennig KS (2000) Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings. Behav Ecol 11:220–227
Pfennig KS (2007) Facultative mate choice drives adaptive hybridization. Science 318:965–967
Pfennig KS (2008) Population differences in condition-dependent sexual selection may promote divergence in non-sexual traits. Evol Ecol Res 10:763–773
Pomeroy LV (1981) Developmental polymorphism in the tadpoles of the spadefoot toad Scaphiopus multiplicatus. PhD thesis University of California, Riverside, USA
Proulx SR (1999) Matings systems and the evolution of niche breadth. Am Nat 154:89–98
Proulx SR (2001) Female choice via indicator traits easily evolves in the face of recombination and migration. Evolution 55:2401–2411
Proulx SR (2002) Niche shifts and expansion due to sexual selection. Evol Ecol Res 4:351–369
Qvarnström A (2001) Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 16:5–7
Relyea RA (2002) Competitor-induced plasticity in tadpoles: consequences, cues, and connections to predator-induced plasticity. Ecol Monogr 72:523–540
Relyea RA (2004) Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85:172–179
Schoeppner NM, Relyea RA (2005) Damage, digestion, and defence: the roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defences. Ecol Lett 8:505–512
Servedio MR, Boughman JW (2017) The role of sexual selection in local adaptation and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 48:85–109
Skulason S, Smith TB (1995) Resource polymorphisms in vertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 10:366–370
Smith DC, Van Buskirk J (1995) Phenotypic design, plasticity, and ecological performance in two tadpole species. Am Nat 145:211–233
Tomkins JL, Radwan J, Kotiaho JS, Tregenza T (2004) Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol Evol 19:323–328
Touchon JC, Robertson JM (2018) You cannot have it all: Heritability and constraints of predator-induced developmental plasticity in a Neotropical treefrog. Evolution 72:2758–2772
Touchon JC, Warkentin KM (2008) Fish and dragonfly nymph predators induce opposite shifts in color and morphology of tadpoles. Oikos 117:634–640
Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA (1999) Plasticity and selection explain variation in tadpole phenotype between ponds with different predator composition. Oikos 85:31–39
Van Buskirk J, Schmidt BR (2000) Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in larval newts: trade-offs, selection, and variation in nature. Ecology 81:3009–3028
Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA, Werner EE (1997) Natural selection for environmentally induced phenotypes in tadpoles. Evolution 51:1983–1992
van Doorn GS, Edelaar P, Weissing FJ (2009) On the origin of species by natural and sexual selection. Science 326:1704–1707
Veen T, Otto SP (2015) Liking the good guys: amplifying local adaptation via the evolution of condition-dependent mate choice. J Evol Biol 28:1804–1815
Ward JL, Love EK, Vélez A, Buerkle NP, O'Bryan LR, Bee MA (2013) Multitasking males and multiplicative females: dynamic signalling and receiver preferences in Cope's grey treefrog. Anim Behav 86:231–243
Wells KD (2010) The ecology and behavior of amphibians. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Whitman DW, Agrawal AA (2009) What is phenotypic plasticity and why is it important? In: Whitman DW, Ananthakrishnan TN (eds) Phenotypic plasticity of insects. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 1–63
Zahavi A, Zahavi A (1999) The handicap principle: a missing piece of Darwin's puzzle. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to J. Sundermann for help with tadpole care, G. Calabrese, C. Chen, and E. Harmon for help with field recordings and collections, and A. Monson for performing tadpole measurements. We are additionally grateful to M. Jennions, R. Fox, A. Baugh, and three anonymous referees for helpful comments on the manuscript.
Funding
Funding was provided by an American Museum of Natural History Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund Grant and the National Science Foundation (DEB 1753865 and IOS 1555520).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DWP, PWK, and KSP conceived of the study. PWK performed field recordings and collections, the experiment, and the analyses. PWK drafted the manuscript with help from DWP and KSP. All authors revised and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
All procedures were approved by UNC’s IACUC (IACUC ID 20-016.0 and 20-036.0). Field collections were performed in accordance with permits granted by the Game and Fish Departments of Arizona and New Mexico. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the use of animals were followed.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Our manuscript is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and all authors have seen and approved the manuscript for submission. All persons entitled to authorship have been so named.
Additional information
Communicated by A. Taylor Baugh
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelly, P.W., Pfennig, D.W. & Pfennig, K.S. A condition-dependent male sexual signal predicts adaptive predator-induced plasticity in offspring. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75, 28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-02968-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-02968-8