Abstract
Bioinformatics analysis was focused on unique acetylesterases annotated in the CAZy database within the CE16 family and simultaneously belonging to the SGNH hydrolase superfamily. The CE16 acetylesterases were compared to structurally related SGNH hydrolases: (i) selected members of the CE2, CE3, CE6, CE12 and CE17 family of the CAZy database and (ii) structural representatives of the Lipase_GDSL and Lipase_GDSL_2 families according to the Pfam database. Sequence alignment based on four conserved sequence regions (CSRs) containing active-site residues was used to calculate sequence logos specific for each CE family and to construct a phylogenetic tree. In many members of the CE16 family, aspartic acid from the Ser–His–Asp catalytic triad has been replaced by asparagine, and based on structure–sequence comparison, an alternative catalytic dyad mechanism was predicted for these enzymes. In addition to four conserved regions, CSR-I, CSR-II, CSR-III and CSR-V, containing catalytic and oxyanion-hole residues, CSR-IV was found in the CE16 family as the only CAZy family. Tertiary structures of the characterized CE16 members prepared by homology modeling showed that the α/β/α sandwich fold as well as the topology of their active sites are preserved. The phylogenetic tree and sequence alignment indicate the existence of a subfamily in the CE16 family fully consistent with the known biochemical data. In addition, nonstandard CE16 members that differ from others were analyzed and their active-site residues were predicted. A better understanding of the structure–function relationship of acetylesterases can help in the targeted design of these enzymes for biotechnology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AE:
-
Acetylesterase
- AnAE:
-
CE16 acetylesterase from Aspergillus niger (GenBank accession No.: CAK45102.1)
- AxE:
-
Acetylxylan esterase
- CAZy:
-
Carbohydrate-active enzymes database
- CBM:
-
Carbohydrate-binding module
- CE:
-
Carbohydrate esterase
- CDD:
-
Conserved domain database
- GH:
-
Glycoside hydrolase
- PaAE:
-
CE16 acetylesterase from Podospora anserina (GenBank accession No.: CDP30204.1)
- PDB:
-
Protein Data Bank
- Pfam:
-
Protein family database
- TrAE:
-
CE16 acetylesterase from Trichoderma reesei (GenBank accession No.: ABI34466.1)
- TtAE:
-
CE16 acetylesterase from Thermothelomyces thermophilus (GenBank accession No.: AGW01024.1)
- Xylp:
-
Xylopyranosyl
- 3″-Ac3MeGlcA3Xyl3:
-
4-O-methyl-α-D-glucopyranuronosyl-(1 → 2)-(3-O-acetyl)-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-D-xylose
- 4″-Ac3MeGlcA3Xyl3:
-
4-O-methyl-α-D-glucopyranuronosyl-(1 → 2)-(4-O-acetyl)-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-β-D-xylopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-D-xylose
References
Akoh CC, Lee GC, Liaw YC et al (2004) GDSL family of serine esterases/lipases. Prog Lipid Res 43:534–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2004.09.002
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W et al (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA et al (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K et al (2018) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D41–D47. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1094
Biely P, Mastihubova M, Tenkanen M et al (2011) Action of xylan deacetylating enzymes on monoacetyl derivatives of 4-nitrophenyl glycosides of β-D-xylopyranose and α-l-arabinofuranose. J Biotechnol 151:137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.10.074
Biely P, Cziszarova M, Agger JW et al (2014a) Trichoderma reesei CE16 acetyl esterase and its role in enzymatic degradation of acetylated hemicellulose. Biochim Biophys Acta 1840:516–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.10.008
Biely P, Cziszarova M, Wong KKY, Fernyhough A (2014b) Enzymatic acylation of flavonoid glycosides by a carbohydrate esterase of family 16. Biotechnol Lett 36:2249–2255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-014-1599-x
Bitto E, Bingman CA, McCoy JG et al (2005) The structure at 1.6 Å resolution of the protein product of the At4g34215 gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr D61:1655–1661. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444905034074
Buchan DWA, Jones DT (2019) The PSIPRED protein analysis workbench: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W402–W407. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz297
Burley SK, Berman HM, Bhikadiya C et al (2019) RCSB Protein Data Bank: biological macromolecular structures enabling research and education in fundamental biology, biomedicine, biotechnology and energy. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D464–D474. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1004
Craik CS, Roczniak S, Largman C, Rutter WJ (1987) The catalytic role of the active site aspartic acid in serine proteases. Science 237:909–913. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3303334
Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE (2004) WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14:1188–1190. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.849004.1
Doolittle RF (1989) Redundancies in protein sequences. In: Fasman GD (ed) Prediction of protein structure and the principles of protein conformation. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 599–623
El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A et al (2019) The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D427–D432. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky995
Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr D66:486–501. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910007493
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution (N Y) 39:783–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
Gille S, Pauly M (2012) O-acetylation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Front Plant Sci 3:12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00012
Gorelik A, Illes K, Nagar B (2018) Crystal structure of the mammalian lipopolysaccharide detoxifier. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E896–E905. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719834115
Hemmer W, McGlone M, Tsigelny I, Taylor SS (1997) Role of the glycine triad in the ATP-binding site of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem 272:16946–16954. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.27.16946
Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY et al (2014) InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031
Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM et al (2015) The Phyre2 web portal for protein modelling, prediction, and analysis. Nat Protoc 10:845–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015-053
Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res 32:W526–W531. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh468
Koutaniemi S, van Gool MP, Juvonen M et al (2013) Distinct roles of carbohydrate esterase family CE16 acetyl esterases and polymer-acting acetyl xylan esterases in xylan deacetylation. J Biotechnol 168:684–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.10.009
Kremnicky L, Biely P (2005) Unique mode of acetylation of oligosaccharides in aqueous two-phase system by Trichoderma reesei acetyl esterase. J Mol Catal B Enzym 37:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2005.09.011
Krissinel E, Henrick K (2004) Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr D60:2256–2268. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444904026460
Langkilde A, Kristensen SM, Lo Leggio L et al (2008) Short strong hydrogen bonds in proteins: a case study of rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr D64:851–863. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444908017083
Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP et al (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404
Larsson A (2014) AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics 30:3276–3278. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu531
Lescic Asler I, Ivic N, Kovacic F et al (2010) Probing enzyme promiscuity of SGNH hydrolases. ChemBioChem 11:2158–2167. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201000398
Lescic Asler I, Stefanic Z, Marsavelski A et al (2017) The catalytic dyad in the SGNH hydrolase superfamily: in-depth insight into structural parameters tuning the catalytic process of extracellular lipase from Streptomyces rimosus. ACS Chem Biol 12:1928–1936. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.6b01140
Letunic I, Bork P (2016) Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W242–W245. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw290
Li X-L, Skory CD, Cotta MA et al (2008) Novel family of carbohydrate esterases, based on identification of the Hypocrea jecorina acetyl esterase gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:7482–7489. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00807-08
Lo Y-C, Lin S-C, Shaw J-F, Liaw Y-C (2003) Crystal structure of Escherichia coli thioesterase I/protease I/lysophospholipase L1: consensus sequence blocks constitute the catalytic center of SGNH-hydrolases through a conserved hydrogen bond network. J Mol Biol 330:539–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00637-5
Lombard V, Bernard T, Rancurel C et al (2010) A hierarchical classification of polysaccharide lyases for glycogenomics. Biochem J 432:437–444. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20101185
Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E et al (2014) The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D490–D495. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1178
Lopez-Cortes N, Reyes-Duarte D, Beloqui A et al (2007) Catalytic role of conserved HQGE motif in the CE6 carbohydrate esterase family. FEBS Lett 581:4657–4662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.08.060
Madeira F, Park YM, Lee J et al (2019) The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res 47:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz268
Mai-Gisondi G, Maaheimo H, Chong SL et al (2017) Functional comparison of versatile carbohydrate esterases from families CE1, CE6 and CE16 on acetyl-4-O-methylglucuronoxylan and acetyl-galactoglucomannan. Biochim Biophys Acta 1861:2398–2405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.06.002
Marchler-Bauer A, Bo Y, Han L et al (2017) CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D200–D203. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1129
Mazlan SN, Ali MS, Rahman RN et al (2018) Crystallization and structure elucidation of GDSL esterase of Photobacterium sp. J15. Int J Biol Macromol 119:1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.022
McNicholas S, Potterton E, Wilson KS, Noble MEM (2011) Presenting your structures: the CCP4mg molecular-graphics software. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr D67:386–394. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444911007281
Michalak L, La Rosa SL, Leivers S et al (2020) A pair of esterases from a commensal gut bacterium remove acetylations from all positions on complex β-mannans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:7122–7130. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915376117
Mitchell AL, Attwood TK, Babbitt PC et al (2019) InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D351–D360. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1100
Mølgaard A, Kauppinen S, Larsen S (2000) Rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase elucidates the structure and function of a new family of hydrolases. Structure 8:373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00118-0
Montanier C, Money VA, Pires VMR et al (2009) The active site of a carbohydrate esterase displays divergent catalytic and noncatalytic binding functions. PLoS Biol 7:0687–0697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000071
Murayama K, Kano K, Matsumoto Y, Sugimori D (2013) Crystal structure of phospholipase A1 from Streptomyces albidoflavus NA297. J Struct Biol 182:192–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2013.02.003
Neumüller KG, De Souza AC, Van Rijn JHJ et al (2015) Positional preferences of acetyl esterases from different CE families towards acetylated 4-O-methyl glucuronic acid-substituted xylo-oligosaccharides. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-014-0187-6
O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR et al (2016) Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D733–D745. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1189
Pawar PM-A, Koutaniemi S, Tenkanen M, Mellerowicz EJ (2013) Acetylation of woody lignocellulose: significance and regulation. Front Plant Sci 4:118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00118
Pham VD, To TA, Gagne-Thivierge C et al (2020) Structural insights into the putative bacterial acetylcholinesterase ChoE and its substrate inhibition mechanism. J Biol Chem 295:8708–8724. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.011809
Pickens LB, Sawaya MR, Rasool H et al (2011) Structural and biochemical characterization of the salicylyl-acyltranferase SsfX3 from a tetracycline biosynthetic pathway. J Biol Chem 286:41539–41551. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.299859
Polgar L (2005) The catalytic triad of serine peptidases. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:2161–2172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-005-5160-x
Polgar L, Bender ML (1969) The nature of general base-general acid catalysis in serine proteases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 64:1335–1342. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.64.4.1335
Poutanen K, Sundberg M (1988) An acetyl esterase of Trichoderma reesei and its role in the hydrolysis of acetyl xylans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 28:419–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00268207
Poutanen K, Sundberg M, Korte H, Puls J (1990) Deacetylation of xylans by acetyl esterases of Trichoderma reesei. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:506–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172542
Puchart V, Biely P (2015) Redistribution of acetyl groups on the non-reducing end xylopyranosyl residues and their removal by xylan deacetylases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:3865–3873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6160-2
Puchart V, Berrin JG, Haon M, Biely P (2015) A unique CE16 acetyl esterase from Podospora anserina active on polymeric xylan. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:10515–10526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6934-1
Puchart V, Agger JW, Berrin JG et al (2016) Comparison of fungal carbohydrate esterases of family CE16 on artificial and natural substrates. J Biotechnol 233:228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.07.003
Saitou N, Nei M (1998) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
Schrödinger L (2011) The PyMOL Molecular graphics system, version 1.4
Sheffield PJ, McMullen TWP, Li J et al (2001) Preparation and crystal structure of the recombinant α1/α2 catalytic heterodimer of bovine brain platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase Ib. Protein Eng 14:513–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/14.7.513
Sievers F, Higgins DG (2018) Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences. Protein Sci 27:135–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3290
Solovicova A, Christensen T, Hostinova E et al (1999) Structure–function relationships in glucoamylases encoded by variant Saccharomycopsis fibuligera genes. Eur J Biochem 264:756–764. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00634.x
Sprang S, Standing T, Fletterick R et al (1987) The three-dimensional structure of Asn102 mutant of trypsin: role of Asp102 in serine protease catalysis. Science 237:905–909. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3112942
Studer G, Rempfer C, Waterhouse AM et al (2020) QMEANDisCo—distance constraints applied on model quality estimation. Bioinformatics 36:1765–1771. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz828
Sugimori D, Kano K, Matsumoto Y (2012) Purification, characterization, molecular cloning and extracellular production of a phospholipase A1 from Streptomyces albidoflavus NA297. FEBS Open Bio 2:318–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fob.2012.09.006
Tenkanen M (1998) Action of Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus oryzae esterases in the deacetylation of hemicelluloses. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 27:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-8744.1998.tb01370.x
The UniProt Consortium (2017) UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D158–D169. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1099
Till M, Goldstone DC, Attwood GT et al (2013) Structure and function of an acetyl xylan esterase (Est2A) from the rumen bacterium Butyrivibrio proteoclasticus. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 81:911–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.24254
Tiwari MK, Singh RK, Singh R et al (2012) Role of conserved glycine in zinc-dependent medium chain dehydrogenase/reductase superfamily. J Biol Chem 287:19429–19439. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.335752
Upton C, Buckley JT (1995) A new family of lipolytic enzymes? Trends Biochem Sci 20:178–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(00)89002-7
van den Berg B (2010) Crystal structure of a full-length autotransporter. J Mol Biol 396:627–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.12.061
Wan Y, Liu C, Ma Q (2019) Structural analysis of a Vibrio phospholipase reveals an unusual Ser–His–chloride catalytic triad. J Biol Chem 294:11391–11401. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.008280
Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S et al (2018) SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W296–W303. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky427
Wei Y, Schottel JL, Derewenda U et al (1995) A novel variant of the catalytic triad in the Streptomyces scabies esterase. Nat Struct Biol 2:218–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb0395-218
Williams AH, Veyrier FJ, Bonis M et al (2014) Visualization of a substrate-induced productive conformation of the catalytic triad of the Neisseria meningitidis peptidoglycan O-acetylesterase reveals mechanistic conservation in SGNH esterase family members. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr D70:2631–2639. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1399004714016770
Yan BX, Sun YQ (1997) Glycine residues provide flexibility for enzyme active sites. J Biol Chem 272:3190–3194. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.6.3190
Yoshida S, Mackie RI, Cann IKO (2010) Biochemical and domain analyses of FSUAxe6B, a modular acetyl xylan esterase, identify a unique carbohydrate binding module in Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. J Bacteriol 192:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00935-09
Acknowledgements
LU thanks to Štefan Janeček for his help with designing the study and to Luboš Vajner for VBA Excel programming. This work was financially supported by the projects Nos. 2/0190/14 and 2/0146/17 from the Slovak Academy of Sciences Grant Agency VEGA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Ethical statements
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Urbániková, Ľ. CE16 acetylesterases: in silico analysis, catalytic machinery prediction and comparison with related SGNH hydrolases. 3 Biotech 11, 84 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02575-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02575-w