Abstract
This paper conceptualizes children’s mathematical thinking from a materialist perspective on language and mathematics. This perspective considers human and non-human bodies as ontologically equivalent; that is, as both being agentive, vibrant, and animated, thus resisting static representations. This conceptualization is an alternative to the interactionist and language-based models that have dominated research in language and mathematics. This conceptual approach informs the paper’s non-hierarchical analysis of a bilingual classroom studying the concept of equivalent fractions. The non-hierarchical nature of this analysis permits a dynamic shift of focus from learners to materials to mathematical concepts. This non-traditional analysis informs the paper’s final discussion regarding the nature of children’s mathematical thinking. The discussion highlights how working outside language-based interactionist models provides an alternative view of children and artefacts as equal partners working within and as part of the vibrant boundaries between matter and meaning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from students’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286.
Argüelles, J. (1987). The Mayan factor: Path beyond technology. Santa Fe, NM: Bear & Company.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268.
Barnhardt, R., & Kawagley, A. O. (2008). Indigenous Knowledge systems and Alaskan Native ways of knowing. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(1), 8–23.
Barwell, R. (2020). Learning mathematics in a second language: Language positive and language neutral classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(2), 150–178.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: University Press.
Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Prediger, S. (2006). Diversity of theories in mathematics education—How can we deal with it? ZDM, 38(1), 52–57.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bohr, N. (1958). Atomic physics and human knowledge. New York, NY: Wiley.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. New York, NY: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. London, UK: Routledge.
Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light Publishers.
de Freitas, E. (2016). Material encounters and media events: What kind of mathematics can a body do? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91, 185–202.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglement in the classroom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. London, UK: Continuum.
DeLanda, M. (2008). Deleuze, materialism and politics. In I. Buchanan & N. Thoburn (Eds.), Deleuze and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Dominguez, H. (2014). Reconocer: Recognizing resources with English learners in mathematics. In T. G. Bartell & A. Flores (Eds.), TODOS Research Monograph 3: Embracing resources of children, families, communities, and cultures in mathematics learning (pp. 65–79). San Bernardino, CA: TODOS, Mathematics for All.
Dominguez, H. (2019). Theorizing reciprocal noticing with non-dominant students in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 75–89.
Dominguez, H., Crespo, S., del Valle, T., Adams, M., Coupe, M., González, G., et al. (2020). Learning to transform, transforming to learn: Children’s creative thinking with fractions. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 10(2), 76–101.
Elbers, E., & de Hann, M. (2005). The construction of word meaning in a multicultural classroom. Mediational tools in peer collaboration during mathematics lessons. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(1), 45–59.
Esmond, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punishment. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Gutiérrez, R. (2017). Living mathematx: Towards a vision for the future. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32, 1–34.
Hoban, G. F. (2002). Teacher learning for educational change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London and New York: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London, UK: Routledge.
Jung, J., & Schütte, M. (2018). An interactionist perspective on mathematics learning: Conditions of learning opportunities in mixed-ability groups within linguistic negotiation process. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50, 1089–1099.
Kamii, C., & Clark, F. B. (1995). Equivalent fractions: Their difficulty and educational implications. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 365–378.
Lather, P. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. New York, NY: SUNNY Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.
Martínez Parédez, D. (1964). Hunab Ku: Síntesis del pensamiento filosófico Maya. México, Editorial Orión: Distrito Federal.
Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mikulan, P., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Thinking mathematics pedagogy stratigraphically in the Anthropocene. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 32, 1–13.
Mikulan, P., & Sinclair, N. (2019). Stratigraphy as a method for studying the different modes of existence arising in the mathematical classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 239–249.
Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 189–212.
Nemirovsky, R., Rasmussen, C., Sweeney, G., & Wawro, M. (2012). When the classroom floor becomes the complex plane: Addition and multiplication as ways of bodily navigation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 287–323.
Palmer, A. (2011). “How many sums can I do”? Performative strategies and diffractive thinking as methodological tools for rethinking mathematical subjectivity. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1(1), 3–18.
Perry, M. (2013). Devising theatre and consenting bodies in the classroom. In D. Masny (Ed.), Cartographies of becoming in education: A Deleuze-Guattari perspective (pp. 93–108). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Phillips, J. (2006). Agencement/assemblage. Theory, Culture and Society, 23, 108–109.
Planas, N., Morgan, C., & Schütte, M. (2018). Mathematics education and language: Lessons and directions from two decades of research. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education. Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 196–210). New York, NY: Routledge.
Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(3), 111–126.
Reinholz, D. L., & Shah, N. (2018). Equity analytics: A methodological approach for identifying participation patterns in mathematics classroom discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(20), 140–177.
Roth, W. M. (2016). Growing-making mathematics: A dynamic perspective on people, materials, and movement in classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93, 87–103.
Rotman, B. (2000). Mathematics as sign: Writing, imagining, counting. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2000). Between languages and discourses: Language practices in primary multilingual mathematics classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 243–269.
Setati, M., & Planas, N. (2012). Mathematics education across two language contexts. In O. Skovsmose & B. Greer (Eds.), Opening the cage: Critique and politics of mathematics education (pp. 167–186). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Sinclair, N., de Freitas, E., & Ferrara, F. (2013). Virtual encounters: The murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness. ZDM—The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 45, 239–252.
Sofaer, J. R. (2006). The body as material culture: A theoretical osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ulmer, J. B. (2017). Posthumanism as research methodology: Inquiry in the Anthropocene. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(9), 832–848.
Valsiner, J. (1984). Construction of the zone of proximal development in adult-child joint action: The socialization of meals. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 23, 65–76.
Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children’s action: A theory of human development. New York, NY: Wiley.
Whitehead, A. (1978). Process and reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dominguez, H. Fraction detectives: bilingual students investigate the hidden identities of equivalent fractions. ZDM Mathematics Education 53, 393–404 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01218-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01218-x