A simple technique for measuring the activity size distribution of radon and thoron progeny aerosols

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106506Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Significant information on the activity size distribution of radon and thoron progeny in the environment can be measured.

  • The impactor can work anywhere without AC supply.

  • Solid-state nuclear track detectors are used as the impaction plate though they face a backup filter at the last stage.

  • The dose conversion factor for radon and thoron progeny can be specified based on the measured activity size distribution.

Abstract

In this study, a portable cascade impactor was developed to more efficiently determine the activity size distribution of attached radon and thoron progeny in a natural environment. The developed impactor consisted of four stages with a backup filter stage for collection of the aerosol samples. The aerosol cut points were set for 10, 2.5, 1, and 0.5 μm at a sampling rate of 4 L min−1. Five CR-39 chips were used as alpha detectors for each stage. To separate the alpha particles emitted from radon and thoron progeny, the CR-39 detectors were covered with aluminium-vaporized Mylar films. The thickness of each film was adjusted to allow alpha particles emitted from radon and thoron progeny to reach the surface of the CR-39 detectors. The particle cut-off characteristics of each stage were determined by mono-dispersive aerosols with particle sizes ranging from 0.1 to 1.23 μm from the collection efficiency curve. The test results showed that the respective cut-off size of stages 3 and 4 were close to the designed cut-points. Validation of the technique by comparison with two commercial devices confirmed that the developed technique could provide the necessary information to estimate the activity size distribution of attached radon and thoron progeny for dose assessment, especially, in a field survey where direct electric power is not available.

Introduction

Radon is an inert, naturally occurring radioactive gas, that is derived from the breakdown of uranium and thorium in the earth's crust, which provides a continuous source of radon. The two most common and naturally abundant isotopes of radon are 222Rn and 220Rn, which originate from the decay series of 238U and 232Th, respectively. The specific isotope 222Rn is usually referred to as radon and has a half-life of 3.8235 d, while 220Rn is commonly called thoron and has a shorter half-life (55.6 s). Radon can outflow from rocks and soils that make up the Earth's crust either by molecular diffusion or by convection and, as a consequence (Gundersen et al., 1991), 222Rn is present in the air of both outdoor and indoor environments (ICRU, 2012). Globally 222Rn is the most critical natural source of ionizing radiation, accounting for approximately 40% of the annual effective dose from all sources of radiation (Kranrod et al., 2020). In addition, 222Rn has also become recognized as one of the most important indoor air pollutants. The most significant source of natural radiation when taking into consideration the total annual dose in inhaled air is not caused by 222Rn and 220Rn gas but rather by their short-lived decay products (Kávási et al., 2009, 2011; Dung et al., 2014; Pornnumpa et al., 2015).

In epidemiological studies, 222Rn and its progeny are constantly present in indoor environments and their concentrations vary widely. They constitute the second known leading cause of lung cancer in the general population after cigarette smoking (ICRP, 2014; 2010; Tokonami, 2010; WHO, 2009). Additionally, 220Rn is present everywhere together with 222Rn, and the quantity of 220Rn can sometimes be much higher than 222Rn in certain positions in dwellings (De Jong et al., 2006). In comparing 222Rn and 220Rn, per unit radioactivity, 220Rn progenies convey a 13.6-fold larger potential alpha energy concentration (PAEC) than 222Rn progenies (De Jong et al., 2006). The alpha radiation from polonium isotopes (radon progenies: 218Po and214Po, and thoron progenies: 216Po and 212Po), which are heavy metals, and the short-lived decay products of 222Rn and 220Rn provide a much higher contribution to the radiologically significant dose, primarily because alpha particles deposit their energy within a range of 47–71 μm in soft tissue (Hofmann et al., 2020). As a consequence, the alpha energy is deposited in the relatively sensitive lung lining and also has a dense deposition pattern, which has a much greater biological impact (Yu, 1993). The biological effects are attributed to the sharp Bragg peak and high linear energy transfer (LET) of alpha particles. Thus, the interaction of alpha particles with cells can lead to direct DNA damage via double strand breaks.

The activity size distribution of radon progeny has been determined by tagging the natural aerosol particles with radon or thoron progeny. The observed data from many literatures have revealed that the size distribution consisted of ultrafine clusters with median diameters below 4 nm (unattached activity) and the progenies were associated with ambient aerosol particles in sizes ranging between 100 and 400 nm (attached activity). In aerosol-rich air, most of the radon and thoron progeny radionuclides attach on the surface of aerosol particles and form a radioactive aerosol. Therefore, the behavior of the airborne radionuclides is determined by the behavior of the aerosol particles in the atmosphere. Moreover, these radioactive aerosols (attached and unattached progenies) are inhaled into the human body during breathing, and accumulate in the lower respiratory tract, which consists of the trachea, bronchial tree, and lungs. The particle size determines the respiratory organ where the radioactive aerosols are deposited (Brenner, 1994; ICRP, 1994). Therefore, the lung dose assessment caused by radon and thoron progeny strongly depends on the aerosol size distribution (the activity median aerodynamic diameter, AMAD, and the standard deviation, σg), manner of breathing, and breathing rate (Mohamed et al., 2014; Porstendörfer, 1997; Tokonami, 2000). The unattached and ultrafine particles with sizes below 100 nm and with a high diffusion coefficient are considered to yield about 50% of the total radiation dose (Paquet et al., 2017).

In order to accurately assess the dose due to radon and thoron, one of the important physical parameters is the AMAD derived from the activity-weighted size distribution (AWSD), as well as the radon and thoron concentrations. In general, atmospheric aerosol particles follow a trimodal distribution (NRC, 1979): (1) the nucleation mode (from 3 to 70 nm, average 15 nm), (2) the accumulation mode (from 70–2000 nm, average 300 nm), and (3) the coarse mode (from 2000–36,000 nm, average > 10,000 nm). 210Pb are preferentially attached to accumulation-mode aerosols (Sykora and Froehlich, 2009). Many radionuclides differently attach to various sizes of aerosols. For short-lived radon and thoron progenies, the size distribution was obtained as 12–19% in the nucleation mode, 81–88% in the accumulation mode, and none in the coarse mode. The AMADs of the accumulation mode was mixed between 332 nm (218Po) and 347 nm (214Po) for the radon progeny and between 382 nm (212Po) and 421 nm (212Pb) for the thoron progeny (Gründel and Porstendörfer, 2004).

The methods for measuring this physical parameter are different for radon and thoron progeny. Moreover, there are two types of device that has been widely used to measure the AWSD. These are screen diffusion batteries (Cheng and Yeh, 1980; Hopke et al., 1992) and low-pressure cascade impactors (Sorimashi et al., 2008a; Yamasaki and Suzuki, 1992). Cascade impactors, with various numbers of stages (Wołoszczuk and Skubacz, 2018; Mohamed and El-Hussein, 2005) and online impactors (Gründel and Porstendörfer, 2004), have been used to measure the size distribution of aerosol-attached radon and thoron decay products.

In order to easily determine the activity size distribution (ASD) of attached activity, a simple technique was developed using a standard four-stage portable impactor sampler and applying allyl diglycol carbonate (commercially known as CR-39) as the alpha detection system for radon and thoron progeny. This paper describes the performance of the developed portable impactor and its verification for use for assessment of the dose by measuring the ASD of both radon and thoron progeny in the environment.

Section snippets

Structure of the four-impact impactor sampler

In this study, a four-stage portable impactor was designed to be used as the air sampler. The design was based upon the impactors being able to handle the size distribution of aerosols, which was represented by a log-normal size distribution mode. The impactor was a round four-jet type with four size-fractionating stages and a backup filter holder. Each stage consisted of an identical stage wall, four round jets of nozzle but with different nozzle diameters and thicknesses of the nozzle throat.

The cut-off sizes of the four-stage impactor

The size of the aerosol generated was between 0.3 and 1 μm, resulting in a cut-off size for the portable impactor of 1 and 0.5 μm at the 3rd and 4th stage, respectively, as well as the collection efficiency as presented in Table 2. The particle cut-off size data for each stage (Table 2) was plotted as a function of the particle diameter in Fig. 5 for both the GFF and Al-Mylar film impaction substrates (shown in the same graph for direct comparison). The experimental data were fitted using a

Conclusion

In this study, a four-stage portable impactor was developed that was expected to be able to handle the size distribution of aerosol-attached radon and thorn progeny in the natural environment and the high aerosol concentrations, such as underground mines. Results from a performance test and verification were found to be consistent with two commercial devices and it is simple to employ. Therefore, the technique developed in this study can be an alternative dosimeter to use and provide

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the funding support providing from the National Research Council of Thailand through Chulalongkorn University (Grant Number 1321110009), and the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number 16H02667 and 16K15358), the Environmental Radioactivity Research Network Center (Grant Number: I-20-16, I-20-19 and I-20-20), and Hirosaki University Female Researcher Recruitment and Development Support business. We are grateful to the Research Clinic Unit, Office of Research Affairs, Chulalongkorn

References (61)

  • D.J. Brenner

    Protection against radon-222 at home and at work. ICRP publication 65

    Int. J. Radiat. Biol.

    (1994)
  • Y.S. Cheng et al.

    Theory of a screen-type diffusion battery

    J. Aerosol Sci.

    (1980)
  • T.W. Cheon et al.

    Enhancement of collection efficiency of an inertial impactor using an additional punched impaction plate

    Aerosol. Air Qual. Res.

    (2017)
  • Darby, S., Hill, D., Auvinen, A., Barros-Dios, J.M., Baysson, H., Bochicchio, F., Deo, H., Falk, R., Forastiere, F.,...
  • P. De Jong et al.

    National survey on the natural radioactivity and 222Rn exhalation rate of building materials in The Netherlands

    Health Phys.

    (2006)
  • W. Doub et al.

    Addressing the need for controls on particle bounce and re-entrainment in the cascade impactor and for the mitigation of electrostatic charge for aerodynamic particle size assessment of orally inhaled products: an assessment by the international consortium on regulation and science (IPAC-RS)

    AAPS PharmSciTech

    (2020)
  • B.D. Dung et al.

    Estimation of radon and thoron caused dose at exraction and processing sites of mineral sand mining area in Vietnam (HA TINH province)

    J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.

    (2014)
  • A. Fernández Tena et al.

    Deposition of inhaled particles in the lungs

    Arch. Bronconeumol.

    (2012)
  • M. Gründel et al.

    Differences between the activity size distributions of the different natural radionuclide aerosols in outdoor air

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2004)
  • L.C. Gundersen et al.

    Field studies of radon in rocks, soils and water

    US Geol. Surv. Bull.

    (1991)
  • W. Hofmann et al.

    Application of a Monte Carlo lung dosimetry code to the inhalation of thoron progeny

    Radiat. Protect. Dosim.

    (2014)
  • W. Hofmann et al.

    Internal microdosimetry of alpha-emitting radionuclides

    Radiat. Environ. Biophys.

    (2020)
  • P.K. Hopke et al.

    Measurement of activity-weighted size distributions of radon decay products in a normally occupied home

  • M. Hosoda et al.

    Characteristic of thoron (220Rn) in environment

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2017)
  • A. Ibald-Mulli et al.

    Epidemiological evidence on health effects of ultrafine particles

  • H. Ichitsubo et al.

    Development of a radon aerosol chamber at NIRS - general design and aerosol performance

    J. Aerosol Sci.

    (2004)
  • ICRP

    ICRP publication 126: radiological protection against radon exposure

    Ann. ICRP

    (2014)
  • ICRP

    ICRP publication 115: lung cancer risk from radon and progeny and statement on radon

    Ann. ICRP

    (2010)
  • ICRP

    ICRP Publication 66: human respiratory tract model for radiological protection

    Ann. ICRP

    (1994)
  • ICRU

    Measurement and reporting of radon exposures

    J. ICRU

    (2010)
  • T. Ishikawa et al.

    Calculation of dose conversion factors for thoron decay products

    J. Radiol. Prot.

    (2007)
  • Y. Ishimori et al.

    Radon intercomparison experiment at PTB in Germany

    Jpn. J. Health Phys.

    (2004)
  • M. Janik et al.

    International intercomparisons of integrating radon/thoron detectors with the NIRS radon/thoron chambers

    Radiat. Protect. Dosim.

    (2010)
  • M. Janik et al.

    The most recent international intercomparisons of radon and thoron monitors with the NIRS radon and thoron chambers

    Radiat. Protect. Dosim.

    (2015)
  • M. Janik

    Intercomparisons exercises of radon and thoron monitors provided by four laboratories: a review

    Jpn. J. Health Phys.

    (2017)
  • N. Kávási et al.

    Difficulties in the dose estimate of workers originated from radon and radon progeny in a manganese mine

    Radiat. Meas.

    (2009)
  • N. Kávási et al.

    Dose estimation and radon action level problems due to nanosize radon progeny aerosols in underground manganese ore mine

    J. Environ. Radioact.

    (2011)
  • G.M. Kendall et al.

    Effective and organ doses from thoron decay products at different ages

    J. Radiol. Prot.

    (2007)
  • C. Kranrod et al.

    A simple technique for determining the equilibrium equivalent Thoron concentration using a CR-39 detector: application in mineral treatment industry

    Radioprotection

    (2009)
  • C. Kranrod et al.

    Mitigation of the effective dose of radon decay products through the use of an air cleaner in a dwelling in Okinawa, Japan

    Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (2009)
  • View full text