Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landscape determinants of fish reproductive guilds

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Species dependent on freshwaters are declining globally. Understanding natural and anthropogenic environmental drivers affecting community structure and species occurrence is crucial for planning management and conservation actions.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine which landscape characteristics constrain reproductive guilds in wadeable streams and to explore the influence of reproductive strategy on fish occurrence. We expected reproductive guilds to differ in their associations with landscape determinants (i.e., the landscape characteristics found to constrain our reproductive guilds).

Methods

This study was conducted in the Delaware River Basin in North America. We compiled existing stream survey and geospatial data from multiple government agencies and scientific organizations for 552 sites. We used ordination and regression techniques to identify important landscape determinants and their associations with reproductive guilds.

Results

We identified 12 variables that explained 20.6% of the total variation in reproductive guild composition. Slope, land cover and disturbance variables drove the position of reproductive guilds in ordination space. All reproductive guilds differed in the set of landscape-scale determinants that were selected during modelling. Best subsets of variables selected in regression models indicate that reproductive guild occurrence is significantly explained by catchment characteristics. These characteristics include measures of slope, land use and land cover, disturbance, and climate.

Conclusions

Differences in determinants and relationships with reproductive guilds found in regression models, and gradients identified, indicate the importance of different landscape-scale determinants for specific reproductive guilds. Furthermore, our findings suggest a link between the environmental requirements of reproductive guilds and landscape-scale characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams SB, Frissell CA, Rieman BE (2000) Movements of nonnative Brook Trout in relation to stream channel slope. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:623–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar FC, Segurado P, Martins MJ, Bejarano MD, Nilsson C, Portela MM, Merritt DM (2018) The abundance and distribution of guilds of riparian woody plants change in response to land use and flow regulation. J Appl Ecol 55:2227–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen JD, Castillo MM (2007) Stream ecology structure and function of running waters, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balon EK (1975) Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. J Fish Res Board Can 32:821–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balon EK (1981) Additions and amendments to the classification and reproductive styles in fishes. Env Biol Fish 6:377–389

  • Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB (1999) Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, second edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water; Washington, DC

  • Daly C, Halbleib M, Smith JI, Gibson WP, Doggett MK, Taylor GH, Curtis J, Pasteris PA (2008) Physiographically-sensitive mapping of temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int J Climatol 28:2031–2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaware River Basin Commission (2013) State of the Delaware River Basin 2013. West Trenton, NJ. http://www.state.nj.us/drbc/library/documents/SOTB/2013brochure.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2017

  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z-I, Knowler DJ, Leveque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard A-H, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton AH, Burnett KM, Steel EA, Flitcroft RL, Pess GR, Feist BE, Torgersen CE, Miller DJ, Sanderson BL (2010) Hydrological connectivity for riverine fish: measurement challenges and research opportunities. Freshw Biol 55:2215–2237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL (1992) Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag S, Shokoufandeh A (2019) Development of a data model to facilitate rapid watershed delineation. Environ Monit Softw 122:103973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy AT, Sifneos JC, Hughes JM, Peck DV, Mitchell RM (2019) Lotic fish assemblage clusters across the conterminous United States and their associations with environmental variables. In: Hughes RM, Infante DM, Wang L, Chen K, Terra BF (eds) Advances in understanding landscape influences on freshwater habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 90, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 385–408

  • Hill MO (1979) DECORANA: a FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Section of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes RM, Wang L, Seelbach PW (eds) (2006) Landscape influences on stream habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 48, Bethesda, Maryland

  • Hughes RM, Infante DM, Wang L, Chen K, Terra BF (eds) (2019) Advances in understanding landscape influences on freshwater habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 90, Bethesda, Maryland

  • Infante DM, Wang L, Hughes RM, Chen K, Terra BF (2019) Advancements, challenges, and gaps in understanding landscape influences on freshwater ecosystems. In: Hughes RM, Infante DM, Wang L, Chen K, Terra BF (eds) Advances in understanding landscape influences on freshwater habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 90, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 463–495

  • Jellyman PG, Harding JS (2012) The role of dams in altering freshwater fish communities in New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 46:475–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BL, Richardson WB, Naimo TJ (1995) Past, present, and future concepts in large river ecology. Bioscience 45:134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearny M (2006) Habitat, environment, and niche: what are we modelling? Oikos 115(1):186–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornan M, Kropil R (2014) What are ecological guilds? Dilemma of guild concepts. Russ J Ecol 45(5):445–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll SA, Horwitz RJ, Keller DH, Sweeney BW, Jackson JK, Perez LB (2019) Large-scale protection and restoration programs aimed at protecting stream ecosystem integrity: the role of science-based goal setting, monitoring, and data management. Freshw Sci 38:23–39. https://doi.org/10.1086/701756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liermann CR, Nilsson C, Robertson J, Ng RY (2012) Implications of dam obstruction for global freshwater fish diversity. Bioscience 62:539–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan M (2010) Biostatistical design and analysis using R: a practical guide. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo DR, Hughes RM, Ligeiro R, Ferreira WR, Castro M, Junqueira NT, Silva DRO, Firmiano KR, Kaufmann PR, Pompeu PS, Callisto M (2014) The relative influence of multiple spatial scale environmental predictors on fish and macroinvertebrate assemblage richness in Cerrado ecoregion streams, Brazil. Landsc Ecol 29:1001–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmqvist B, Rundle S (2002) Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environ Conserv 29(2):134–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin B, Tsang YP, Tingley RW III, Clilverd H, Infante DW (2019) Characterizing natural barriers to nonnative stream fauna in Hawai’i. In: Hughes RM, Infante DM, Wang L, Chen K, Terra BK (eds) Advances in understanding landscape influences on freshwater habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 90, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 83–104

  • McCormick FH, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR, Peck DV, Stoddard JL, Herlihy AT (2001) Development of an index of biotic integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highlands region. Trans Am Fish Soc 130:857–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManamay RA, Peoples BK, Orth DJ, Dolloff CA, Matthews DC (2015) Isolating causal pathways between flow and fish in the regulated river hierarchy. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 72:1731–1748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melcher A, Schmutz S, Haidvogl G, Moder K (2007) Spatially based methods to assess the ecological status of European fish assemblage types. Fish Manag Ecol 14:453–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik JM, Griffith GE (2014) Ecoregions of the conterminous united states: evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework. Environ Manag 54:1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkin JS, Troia MJ, Shaw DCR, Gerken JE, Gido KB (2014) Multiple watershed alterations influence fish community structure in Great Plains prairie streams. Ecol Freshw Fish 25:141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkin JS, Wellemeyer JC, Fore JD (2019) Multiscale fish assemblage distribution models to guide riverscape conservation planning. In: Hughes RM, Infante DM, Wang L, Chen K, Terra BF (eds) Advances in understanding landscape influences on freshwater habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 90, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 409–440

  • Pompeu PS, Leal CG, Carvalho DR, Junqueira NT, Castro MA, Hughes RM (2019) Effects of catchment land use on stream fish assemblage structure in the Brazilian savanna. In: Hughes RM, Infante DM, Wang W, Chen K, Terra BF (eds) Advances in understanding landscape influences on freshwater habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 90, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 303–320

  • Quinn GP, Keough M (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Resh VH, Brown AV, Covich AP, Gurtz ME, Li HW, Minshall W, Reice SR, Sheldon AL, Wallace JB, Wissmar RC (1988) The role of disturbance in stream ecology. J N Am Benthol Soc 7:433–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Sály P, Takács P, Kiss I, Bíró P, Erös T (2011) The relative influence of spatial context and catchment- and site-scale environmental factors on stream fish assemblages in a human-modified landscape. Ecol Freshw Fish 20:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon TP (1999) Assessment of Balon’s reproductive guilds with application to midwestern North American freshwater fishes. In: Simon TP (ed) Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 97–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer JR, Criswell RW, Fischer DP (2016) The fishes of Pennsylvania. Cichlid Press, Lauenau, p 556

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (1988) Tactics, strategies, templets. Oikos 52:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2012) Canoco reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination (version 5.0). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, p 496

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornbrugh DJ, Infante DM (2019) Landscape effects on stream fishes: broad-scale responses to anthropogenic land use across temperate mesic regions of the United States. In: Hughes RM, Infante DM, Wang L, Chen K, Terra BF (eds) Advances in understanding landscape influences on freshwater habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 90, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 351–383

  • Townsend CR, Crowl TA (1991) Fragmented population structure in a native New Zealand fish: an effect of introduced brown trout? Oikos 61:347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Hildrew AG (1994) Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river system. Freshw Biol 31:265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh C, Mac Nally R (2013) hier.part: hierarchical Partitioning. R package version 1.0–4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hier.part

  • Ward JV, Stanford JA (1983) The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems. Dyn Lotic Ecosyst 10:29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Young RG, Quarterman AJ, Eyles RF, Smith RA, Bowden WB (2005) Water quality and thermal regime of the Motueka River: influences of land cover, geology and position in the catchment. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 39(4):803–882

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you Jim Kurtenbach of the US Environmental Protection Agency, Mari-Beth DeLucia of The Nature Conservancy, Jason Cruz, Lance Butler, Joe Perillo, and Raymond Pierdomenico of the Philadelphia Water Department, Douglas Fischer of the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, and Brian Duffy and Alexander J. Smith of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for providing data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Keller.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keller, D.H., Barren, G.J. & Horwitz, R.J. Landscape determinants of fish reproductive guilds. Landscape Ecol 36, 845–862 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01183-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01183-6

Keywords

Navigation